Connect with us

Published

on

Twitter has been accused of secretly “blacklisting” prominent right-wing figures in the US in order to ensure they reached a smaller audience.

High-profile right-wing individuals – such as talk show host Dan Bongino, conservative activist Charlie Kirk and anti-lockdown campaigner Dr Jay Bhattacharya – were apparently demoted by Twitter staff before it was taken over by Elon Musk.

The “blacklists”, which limited the visibility of accounts or prevented them from being featured in Twitter’s list of trending topics, have been revealed as part of the so-called Twitter Files.

The Twitter Files, which appear to come directly from Musk, feature detailed internal documents from the previous regime at Twitter, including internal messages and screenshots of administrator tools.

They have been shared with a group of right-wing journalists who share Musk’s views on free speech.

The controversial billionaire has described himself as a “free speech absolutist” fighting against a “woke mind-virus”.

Read more:
Ex-Twitter employees sue over lay-offs
Musk’s ‘chainsaw’ strategy ‘does not bode well’

Elon Musk
Image:
Elon Musk bought Twitter in October

How were right-wing figures ‘blacklisted’?

The documents suggest Stanford’s Dr Bhattacharya, one of a group of academics who argued COVID-19 should be allowed to spread in order to develop herd immunity, was secretly placed on a “trends blacklist”, which prevented his tweets from trending.

Right-wing talk show host Bongino was put on a “search blacklist,” meaning his tweets would not appear in search results.

According to the report, which was published on Twitter, this practice was known internally at the company as “visibility filtering”.

“Think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see to different levels. It’s a very powerful tool,” one senior Twitter employee told Bari Weiss, one of a group of journalists given wide-ranging access to Twitter’s internal documentation.

Another Twitter engineer said: “We control visibility quite a bit. And we control the amplification of your content quite a bit. And normal people do not know how much we do.”

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Twitter had always denied secretly demoting certain accounts, a practice sometimes known as shadow banning.

In 2018, the site’s head of legal policy and trust and head of product wrote a blog saying “we do not shadow ban”.

“And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology,” they added.

However, the company openly acknowledged reducing the visibility of tweets in search and trending topics.

It also ranked tweets, a practice which included demoting “tweets from bad-faith actors who intend to manipulate or divide the conversation”, a habit the blog implied was more common among right-wing figures.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Do tech giants really own the future?

How do other platforms operate?

The practice of “blacklisting” and “whitelisting” certain users is commonplace in social media and other internet businesses such as Google or YouTube, where they are used to make sure sites surface the most relevant content.

Indeed, Musk suggested that, under his control, Twitter would use a similar technique, promoting useful tweets and demoting “negative/hate” ones.

Yet, questions have been raised about the arbitrary way these demotions and promotions are carried out.

Just this week, the board which investigates Meta found celebrities, politicians and commercial partners were being given extra leeway to break the rules on Instagram and Facebook, a practice it described as causing “real harm”.

“I hope (perhaps naively) that Musk has now set a precedent for greater transparency for future Twitter moderation and even moderation elsewhere on other platforms and news media,” said Charlie Beckett, professor of media and communications at the London School of Economics.

FILE PHOTO: Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey addresses students during a town hall at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) in New Delhi, India, November 12, 2018
Image:
Ex-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey

‘Make everything public now’

However, although the Twitter Files purport to shed a light on this murky practice, they have been criticised for offering a partial, politically-motivated view of the real picture inside the company, designed to paint a favourable picture of Musk.

“If the goal is transparency to build trust, why not just release everything without filter and let people judge for themselves? Including all discussions around current and future actions? Make everything public now,” former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey complained to Musk on Twitter.

Musk has promised that further revelations will be coming soon.

“Most important data was hidden (from you too) and some may have been deleted,” he replied to Mr Dorsey, “but everything we find will be released”.

Continue Reading

Business

Retail sales show zero growth despite ‘fresh two-year high’ for consumer confidence

Published

on

By

Retail sales show zero growth despite 'fresh two-year high' for consumer confidence

There was a worse than expected performance for retail sales last month, defying predictions of a consumer-led pick up from recession for the UK economy.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported sales volumes were flat in March, following an upwardly revised figure of 0.1% for the previous month.

It said sales at non-food stores helped offset declines at supermarkets.

Sales of fuel rose by 3.2%.

Money latest: Do solar panels work in the UK’s wet and cloudy climate?

ONS senior statistician Heather Bovill said of the overall picture: “Retail sales registered no growth in March.

“Hardware stores, furniture shops, petrol stations and clothing stores all reported a rise in sales.

More on Uk Economy

“However, these gains were offset by falling food sales and in department stores where retailers say higher prices hit trading.

“Looking at the longer-term picture, across the latest three months retail sales increased after a poor Christmas.”

While the performance will not damage the expected exit from recession during the first quarter of the year, it suggests that consumers are still carefully managing their spending.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Economy has turned a corner’

While the cost of living crisis – exacerbated by the Bank of England’s interest rate rises to push inflation down – has severely damaged budgets, wage growth has been rising at a faster pace than prices since last summer.

Separate ONS data this week has shown the annual rate of inflation at 3.2% – with wages growing at a rate of 6% when the effects of bonuses are stripped out.

Economists widely believe consumer spending power will win through as the year progresses, despite borrowing costs remaining at elevated levels.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Inflation slows to 3.2%


A measure of consumer confidence released on Friday showed confidence had increased for a sixth consecutive quarter to its highest level since the summer of 2021.

Deloitte’s measure showed an increase of 6.5 percentage points on this time last year.

Its survey cited an improvement in personal finances as inflation eased.

Read more from Sky News:
Sunak to demand end to ‘sick note culture’
Post Office had ‘bunker mentality’ towards press

The company’s consumer insight lead Celine Fenech said of its findings: “It is encouraging to see that consumers are feeling more confident in their personal finances – particularly younger consumers.

“Many consumers are paying less for essentials such as utility bills… however, spending on non-essential goods and services dropped this quarter, meaning that improving confidence is not yet translating to a significant boost to spending, and cautious optimism is required.”

She added: “Consumer confidence at its highest level in two-and-a-half years combined with the weather hopefully improving, should signal a brighter outlook for the consumer sector.”

Continue Reading

Business

Rishi Sunak to demand end to ‘sick note culture’ and shift focus to ‘what people can do’

Published

on

By

Rishi Sunak to demand end to 'sick note culture' and shift focus to 'what people can do'

Rishi Sunak is to call for an end to the “sick note culture” in a major speech on welfare reform – as he warns against “over-medicalising the everyday challenges and worries of life”.

The prime minister wants to shift the focus to “what people can do with the right support in place, rather than what they can’t do”.

Mr Sunak also wants sick notes to be issued by “specialist work and health professionals” rather the GPs in order to reduce workloads.

Politics latest: ‘Big questions’ for Sunak over claims against suspended Tory MP

The plans, which the government is now set to consult on, come as part of the government’s aims to cut spending on benefits in a bid to reduce spending and increase employment.

Mr Sunak is set to say: “We should see it as a sign of progress that people can talk openly about mental health conditions in a way that only a few years ago would’ve been unthinkable, and I will never dismiss or downplay the illnesses people have.

“But just as it would be wrong to dismiss this growing trend, so it would be wrong merely to sit back and accept it because it’s too hard; or too controversial; or for fear of causing offence.

More on Benefits

“Doing so, would let down many of the people our welfare system was designed to help.”

He will say there is a “growing body of evidence that good work can actually improve mental and physical health”.

“We need to be more ambitious about helping people back to work and more honest about the risk of over-medicalising the everyday challenges and worries of life,” Mr Sunak will add.

The prime minister will say, “we don’t just need to change the sick note, we need to change the sick note culture so the default becomes what work you can do – not what you can’t”.

“Building on the pilots we’ve already started we’re going to design a new system where people have easy and rapid access to specialised work and health support to help them back to work from the very first Fit Note conversation,” he will add.

“We’re also going to test shifting the responsibility for assessment from GPs and giving it to specialist work and health professionals who have the dedicated time to provide an objective assessment of someone’s ability to work and the tailored support they need to do so.”

It comes after Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, was criticised a month ago for suggesting in an interview that there was “a real risk” that “the normal ups and downs of human life” were being labelled as medical conditions which then held people back from working.

And upon launching the government’s “back to work plan”, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt warned that “anyone choosing to coast on the hard work of taxpayers will lose their benefits”.

Read more:
Hunt accused of ‘demonising’ disabled people with reforms
Sunak says he will ‘reward’ tightening benefits by cutting taxes

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘If you can work, you should work’

Since 2020, the number of people out of work due to long-term sickness has jumped drastically to a record high of 2.8 million people as of February this year, according to the latest estimates from the Office for National Statistics.

A large proportion of those report suffering from depression, bad nerves or anxiety.

The government said NHS data shows almost 11 million fit notes were issued last year – with 94% stating someone was “not fit for work”.

“A large proportion of these are repeat fit notes which are issued without any advice, resulting in a missed opportunity to help people get the appropriate support they may need to remain in work,” Downing Street said.

Fit notes are usually required by employers when someone takes more than seven days off work due to illness.

👉 Listen above then tap here to follow the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Disability equality charity Scope has said it would question whether Mr Sunak’s announcements are being “driven by bringing costs down rather than how we support disabled people”.

James Taylor, director of strategy at the charity, said: “We’ve had decades of disabled people being let down by failing health and work assessments; and a broken welfare system designed to be far more stick than carrot.

“Much of the current record levels of inactivity are because our public services are crumbling, the quality of jobs is poor and the rate of poverty amongst disabled households is growing.”

Read more from Sky News:
‘Modest’ £63 rise in statutory sick pay is overdue
Young people more likely to be off work sick

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Alison McGovern, Labour’s acting shadow work and pensions secretary, said: “A healthy nation is critical to a healthy economy, but the Tories have completely failed on both.

“We’ve had 14 Tory years, five Tory prime ministers, seven Tory chancellors, and the result is a record number of people locked out of work because they are sick – at terrible cost to them, to business and to the taxpayer paying billions more in spiralling benefits bills.

“Today’s announcement proves that this failed government has run out of ideas, announcing the same minor alternation to fit notes that we’ve heard them try before. Meanwhile, Rishi Sunak’s £46bn unfunded tax plan to abolish national insurance risks crashing the economy once again.”

Continue Reading

Business

Post Office had ‘bunker mentality’ towards press, lawyer tells inquiry

Published

on

By

Post Office had 'bunker mentality' towards press, lawyer tells inquiry

A sub-postmaster victim of faulty IT software Horizon was described as a “bluffer” when he alerted senior Post Office officials about bugs in the system.

One of the Post Office’s heads of legal Rodric Williams dismissed the complainant and told the Post Office Horizon Inquiry on Thursday there was “bunker mentality” among staff in relation to the media’s coverage of the IT system.

The inquiry has been hearing evidence to examine who in government and the Post Office knew what and when about the accounting computer programme that falsely generated financial losses at Post Office branches across the UK and led to the conviction of hundreds of sub-postmasters who ran branches for theft and false accounting.

As a result of Horizon’s errors, many other sub-postmasters lost homes, moved out of their communities, and became unwell having wracked up significant debts and had their reputations ruined.

Read more
Review ordered into another Post Office IT system
Horizon victim demands jail for those who denied her justice

But in 2015 – while prosecutions were taking place with Horizon data and four years before the Post Office would apologise for the miscarriage of justice – the warnings of former sub-postmaster Tim McCormack were dismissed.

“Generally, my view is that this guy is a bluffer, who keeps expecting us to march to his tune,” Mr Williams – who is now tasked with dealing with Horizon complaints – said in an email to colleagues.

More from Business

“I don’t think we should do that, but instead respond with a straight bat.”

The lawyer had been asked by former chief executive Paula Vennells to look into, what Mr McCormack said, was “clear and unquestionable evidence of an intermittent bug in Horizon that can and does cause thousands of pounds in losses to sub-postmasters”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Post Office Scandal: Davey ‘Sorry’

‘Bunker mentality’

Mr Williams agreed that there was an element of siege mentality at the Post Office against media questioning.

“I don’t know if I can speak for senior management but I do think certainly where I was sitting it did feel a bit bunker mentality, yes,” he told the inquiry.

When asked by barrister for the inquiry, Jason Beer: “It’s that siege mentality again, Mr Williams, isn’t it? Challenges to the Post Office are hostile and must be fended off rather than considered on their merits.”

Mr Williams responded, “I think that’s maybe overstating but there’s probably something in that, I think, that’s fair”.

‘Take it or leave it’

In response to a 2014 media request about Horizon satisfaction levels among sub-postmasters, Mr Williams effectively said they could use the system or leave.

“We don’t need to do research on Horizon – it’s the system we provide to our agents and require them to use. If agents don’t like it, they can choose not to provide services for us,” he said at the time.

“The vast majority of our agents and other users work with it just fine, and we’re not required to bespoke our point of sale accounting system to the whims of each individual agent.”

He was asked if it was his view, in 2014, that sub-postmasters could either use Horizon or leave he replied “yes”.

Mr Williams began at the organisation in 2012 as a litigation lawyer and still works there as the head of the remediation unit set up to address sub-postmaster complaints about Horizon.

His evidence continues on Friday.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Ms Vennells has said: “I continue to support and focus on co-operating with the inquiry and expect to be giving evidence in the coming months.

“I am truly sorry for the devastation caused to the sub-postmasters and their families, whose lives were torn apart by being wrongly accused and wrongly prosecuted as a result of the Horizon system.

“I now intend to continue to focus on assisting the inquiry and will not make any further public comment until it has concluded.”

Continue Reading

Trending