Connect with us

Published

on

Trump expected in court on Tuesday

Former President Donald Trump will be formally arrested and arraigned next Tuesday in his hush money case, court officials say

NEW YORK – After being indicted by a Manhattan grand jury, former President Donald Trump is expected to be arraigned in court on Tuesday, a law enforcement source has told Fox News.

Judge Juan Merchan is the trial judge presiding over the case, which stems from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's investigation into alleged hush money payments Trump made to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016. Trump is scheduled to be arraigned at 2:15 p.m. in Merchan's courtroom on the 15th floor at 100 Centre Street in New York City.

In addition to Trump's personal attorney Joe Tacopina, a second source has confirmed that Trump has made arrangements with the district attorney's legal team to surrender without handcuffs. Detectives with the DA's office will handle the arrest. Former prosecutor Peter Frankel on Trump indictment: ‘You can indict a ham sandwich’

NYC criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Peter Frankel joined Good Day New York to discuss the news of former President Donald Trump’s indictment by a Manhattan grand jury.

Law enforcement agencies including the U.S. Secret Service, New York Police Department, FBI, New York State court officers and the DA's office will meet Friday afternoon to finalize details about the logistics and security of Trump's arrest.

President-elect Donald Trump looks on during a rally at the DeltaPlex Arena, December 9, 2016 in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Credit: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

The Secret Service will determine how Trump is brought in, the source familiar said. 

Sources previously told Fox News that Bragg had requested that Trump surrender to his office Friday after the grand jury voted to indict him Thursday evening, but the Secret Service delayed his surrender. 

RELATED: Why was Trump indicted? What to expect in New York hush money case

The indictment of a current or former president of the United States is unprecedented in American history. The criminal charges against Trump come after a years-long investigation into a $130,000 payment to Daniels and another $150,000 payment to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, allegedly to keep them quiet about alleged sexual liaisons they had with Trump during his first campaign for the presidency. Trump has denied the affairs and any wrongdoing. Trump indictment: What can we expect with security?

The NYPD is ramping up security in the aftermath of the indictment of former President Donald Trump. Barricades went up and police presence increased around the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

Those payments had been investigated by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York and by the Federal Election Commission.

Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York opted out of charging Trump related to the Daniels payment in 2019, even as his then-attorney Michael Cohen implicated him as part of his plea deal on campaign finance violations. The Federal Election Commission also tossed its investigation into the matter in 2021.

"This evening we contacted Mr. Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan D.A.’s Office for arraignment on a Supreme Court indictment, which remains under seal," a spokesperson for the Manhattan District Attorney's Office said in a statement Thursday. "Guidance will be provided when the arraignment date is selected."

RELATED: Can Donald Trump still run for president despite indictment?

Trump reacted by slamming Bragg for his "obsession" with trying to "get Trump," while warning the move to charge a former president of the United States will "backfire." Trump attorney on Manhattan indictment: Political prosecution hes ready to fight

Donald Trump’s New York attorney Joe Tacopina on Good Day New York reacted to the news of the indictment, which was the first against a former U.S. president, and discussed when Trump may surrender.

"This is Political Persecution and Election Interference at the highest level in history," Trump said in a statement. "From the time I came down the golden escalator at Trump Tower, and even before I was sworn in as your President of the United States, the Radical Left Democrats- the enemy of the hard-working men and women of this Country- have been engaged in a Witch-Hunt to destroy the Make America Great Again movement."

The investigation into Trump was opened in 2019 by then-Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance. The probe was focused on possible bank, insurance and tax fraud. The case initially involved financial dealings of Trump’s Manhattan properties, including his flagship Fifth Avenue building, Trump Tower, and the valuation of his 213-acre estate Seven Springs in Westchester.

Last year, the investigation led to tax fraud charges against The Trump Organization and its finance chief Allen Weisselberg.

Fox News' Brooke Singman contributed to this report.

Find more updates on this story at FOXNews.com.

Continue Reading

Mandatory Reporting Laws Meant To Protect Children Get Another Look

Published

on

By

More than 60 years ago, policymakers in Colorado embraced the idea that early intervention could prevent child abuse and save lives. The states requirement that certain professionals tell officials when they suspect a child has been abused or neglected was among the first mandatory reporting laws in the nation.

This story also ran on NPR. It can be republished for free.

Since then, mandatory reporting laws have expanded nationally to include more types of maltreatment including neglect, which now accounts for most reports and have increased the number of professions required to report. In some states, all adults are required to report what they suspect may be abuse or neglect.

But now there are efforts in Colorado and other states to roll back these laws, saying the result has been too many unfounded reports, and that they disproportionately harm families that are poor, Black, or Indigenous, or have members with disabilities.

Theres a long, depressing history based on the approach that our primary response to a struggling family is reporting, said Mical Raz, a physician and historian at the University of Rochester in New York. Theres now a wealth of evidence that demonstrates that more reporting is not associated with better outcomes for children.

Stephanie Villafuerte, Colorados child protection ombudsman, oversees a task force to reexamine the states mandatory reporting laws. She said the group is seeking to balance a need to report legitimate cases of abuse and neglect with a desire to weed out inappropriate reports.

This is designed to help individuals who are disproportionately impacted, Villafuerte said. Im hoping its the combination of these efforts that could make a difference. Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing. Your Email Address Sign Up

Some critics worry that changes to the law could result in missed cases of abuse. Medical and child care workers on the task force have expressed concern about legal liability. While its rare for people to be criminally charged for failure to report, they can also face civil liability or professional repercussions, including threats to their licenses.

Being reported to child protective services is becoming increasingly common. More than 1 in 3 children in the United States will be the subject of a child abuse and neglect investigation by the time they turn 18, according to the most frequently cited estimate, a 2017 study funded by the Department of Health and Human Services Childrens Bureau.

Black and Native American families, poor families, and parents or children with disabilities experience even more oversight. Research has found that, among these groups, parents are more likely to lose parental rights and children are more likely to wind up in foster care.

In an overwhelming majority of investigations, no abuse or neglect is substantiated. Nonetheless, researchers who study how these investigations affect families describe them as terrifying and isolating.

In Colorado, the number of child abuse and neglect reports has increased 42% in the past decade and reached a record 117,762 last year, according to state data. Roughly 100,000 other calls to the hotline werent counted as reports because they were requests for information or were about matters like child support or adult protection, said officials from the Colorado Department of Human Services.

The increase in reports can be traced to a policy of encouraging a broad array of professionals including school and medical staff, therapists, coaches, clergy members, firefighters, veterinarians, dentists, and social workers to call a hotline whenever they have a concern.

These calls dont reflect a surge in mistreatment. More than two-thirds of the reports received by agencies in Colorado dont meet the threshold for investigation. Of the children whose cases are assessed, 21% are found to have experienced abuse or neglect. The actual number of substantiated cases has not risen over the past decade. More from the Mountain States

While studies do not demonstrate that mandatory reporting laws keep children safe, the Colorado task force reported in January, there is evidence of harm. Mandatory reporting disproportionately impacts families of color initiating contact between child protection services and families who routinely do not present concerns of abuse or neglect, the task force said.

The task force said it is analyzing whether better screening might mitigate the disproportionate impact of mandatory reporting on under-resourced communities, communities of color and persons with disabilities.

The task force pointed out that the only way to report concerns about a child is with a formal report to a hotline. Yet many of those calls are not to report abuse at all but rather attempts to connect children and families with resources like food or housing assistance.

Hotline callers may mean to help, but the families who are the subjects of mistaken reports of abuse and neglect rarely see it that way.

That includes Meighen Lovelace, a rural Colorado resident who asked KFF Health News not to disclose their hometown for fear of attracting unwanted attention from local officials. For Lovelaces daughter, who is neurodivergent and has physical disabilities, the reports started when she entered preschool at age 4 in 2015. The teachers and medical providers making the reports frequently suggested that the county human services agency could assist Lovelaces family. But the investigations that followed were invasive and traumatic.

Our biggest looming fear is, Are you going to take our children away? said Lovelace, who is an advocate for the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition, an organization that lobbies for the civil rights of people with disabilities. Were afraid to ask for help. Its keeping us from entering services because of the fear of child welfare.

State and county human services officials said they could not comment on specific cases.

The Colorado task force plans to suggest clarifying the definitions of abuse and neglect under the states mandatory reporting statute. Mandatory reporters should not make a report solely due to a family/childs race, class or gender, nor because of inadequate housing, furnishings, income or clothing. Also, there should not be a report based solely on the disability status of the minor, parent or guardian, according to the groups draft recommendation.

The task force plans to recommend additional training for mandatory reporters, help for professionals who are deciding whether to make a call, and an alternative phone number, or warmline, for cases in which callers believe a family needs material assistance, rather than surveillance.

Critics say such changes could leave more children vulnerable to unreported abuse.

Im concerned about adding systems such as the warmline, that kids who are in real danger are going to slip through the cracks and not be helped, said Hollynd Hoskins, an attorney who represents victims of child abuse. Hoskins has sued professionals who fail to report their suspicions.

The Colorado task force includes health and education officials, prosecutors, victim advocates, county child welfare representatives and attorneys, as well as five people who have experience in the child welfare system. It intends to finalize its recommendations by early next year in the hope that state legislators will consider policy changes in 2025. Implementation of any new laws could take several years.

Colorado is one of several states including New York and California that have recently considered changes to restrain, rather than expand, reporting of abuse. In New York City, teachers are being trained to think twice before making a report, while New York state introduced a warmline to help connect families with resources like housing and child care. In California, a state task force aimed at shifting mandated reporting to community supporting is planning recommendations similar to Colorados.

Among those advocating for cange are people with experience in the child welfare system. They include Maleeka Jihad, who leads the Denver-based MJCF Coalition, which advocates for the abolition of mandatory reporting along with the rest of the child welfare system, citing its damage to Black, Native American, and Latino communities.

Mandatory reporting is another form of keeping us policed and surveillanced by whiteness, said Jihad, who as a child was taken from the care of a loving parent and placed temporarily into the foster system. Reform isnt enough, she said. We know what we need, and its usually funding and resources.

Some of these resources like affordable housing and child care dont exist at a level sufficient for all the Colorado families that need them, Jihad said.

Other services are out there, but its a matter of finding them. Lovelace said the reports ebbed after the family got the help it needed, in the form of a Medicaid waiver that paid for specialized care for their daughters disabilities. Their daughter is now in seventh grade and doing well.

None of the caseworkers who visited the family ever mentioned the waiver, Lovelace said. I really think they didnt know about it. Related Topics Mental Health Race and Health States Children's Health Colorado Disabilities Disparities Indigenous Health Contact Us Submit a Story Tip

Continue Reading

Walmart to remove self-checkout counters from store where theft has gotten ‘very scary’

Published

on

By

Walmart said it will remove self-checkout counters at two more stores — including one where retail theft has gotten so bad that shoppers say going there has become downright “scary.”

The Arkansas-based retail giant didn’t address the problems of retail theft, saying it was ditching the self-checkout lanes at the store in Cleveland and another in Shrewsbury, Mo., as part of a wider move to improve the “in-store shopping experience.”

Shoppers who frequented the Walmart at the Steelyard Commons section of Cleveland criticized the move, saying that paying for their items in a regular checkout lane means they won’t be able to swiftly move in and out of a store that has seen several incidents of retail theft.

I am probably going to end up going to a different Walmart then because I don’t like to have to wait down here, Leah Burchnell told WEWS-TV.

Especially with all the crime thats been going down here. Its very scary. It really is.

Another shopper, Cory Sheneman, told the news station that he did not think removing the self-checkout lanes would improve the shopping experience.

“Last week we were standing in the doorway as some guy was getting tased for stealing a jacket and had his pockets fully loaded with everything he could grab, I was like, ‘Whoa,’” said Sheneman.

Last year, Walmart removed self-checkout options from three of its stores in Albuquerque, NM.

A Walmart spokesman said the company made the latest move after absorbing feedback from employees and customers as well as taking into account shopping patterns and business needs in the area.

As part of our announced plans for additional investments and improvements to facilities across the country, weve decided to remove self-checkout lanes and replace them with staffed lanes at select locations, Bryan K. Little told Supermarket News.

We believe the changes will improve the in-store shopping experience and give our associates the chance to provide more personalized and efficient service, Little said.

The Post reached out to Walmart for comment.

Last year, Walmart employees complained that the crackdown on self-checkout counters led to “hostile” encounters with shoppers.

The big-box chain one of many retailers battling increasing theft that has eaten into their bottom lines has armed employees with handheld devices that track purchases at self-checkout registers, a Business Insider report revealed.

However, the workers claim they are not properly trained to handle sticky-fingered shoppers, many of whom have hurled things at them or become aggressive when confronted for not scanning all their purchases, the outlet reported.

Last month, Dollar General said it would pull self-checkout stands entirely from 300 of its stores where there are more instances of shoplifting and mis-scanned items.

The company said it was making the change to reduce “shrink” — the industry term for merchandise loss due to theft, damaged items and administrative errors.

Dollar General said it would also convert some of its self-checkout counters to regular cashier checkouts in 9,000 other locations.

Target said it would be limiting the number of items shoppers can buy at self-checkout lanes.

The Post has sought comment from Dollar General and Target.

Continue Reading

NYC rule will slap sugar warning labels on food, drinks including Starbucks, Dunkin' specialties

Published

on

By

Oh, sweet the ‘nanny state’ is back!

Fast-food chains and coffee shops in New York City would have to slap a warning on menu boards and packaging under a new rule from the Adams administration.

The city Health Department’s first-in-the-nation edict will mean labels warning on food and drinks with more than 50 grams of added sugar, including frozen coffee drinks from places like Starbucks and Dunkin’ Donuts, fountain sodas and even hot chocolate.

Food outlets with 15 or more stores in the US are ordered to use a warning icon a spoon loaded with heaps of sugar to alert and maybe shame sweet-toothed customers.

The proposed warning will say, Eating too many added sugars can contribute to type 2 diabetes and weight gain.”

“Type 2 diabetes is among the leading causes of premature deaths in New York City,” the Health Department said.

US Dietary guidelines recommend that added sugar should be less than 50 grams or 10% of the recommended 2,000-calorie-a-day intake.

A medium Coca-Cola drink at McDonald’s contains 56 grams of sugar and would require a warning label, according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Numerous frozen coffee and other drinks at Dunkin Donuts and Starbucks contain more than 50 grams of added sugar such as Dunkin’s Butter Pecan and Caramel Swirl frozen coffee, which are pumped up with more than 100 grams of sugar.

The health cops have drafted the new rules to enforce the Sweet Truth Act approved by Mayor Eric Adams and the City Council last year.

Restaurants that ignore the law face fines of $200 to $500 per violation.

The department is accepting public comment on the new rule, which is expected to go into effect on June 19 for prepackaged food times and Dec. 1 for beverages and food sold at the restaurant that is not packaged.

Critics blasted the rule as another example of government overreach.

“It’s the nanny state becoming the nanny city,” said state Conservative Party Chairman Gerard Kassar.

Sign up for our Metro Daily newsletter!

Please provide a valid email address.

By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Never miss a story.

Kassar said many New Yorkers are unhappy with Adams and “this nanny overreach will only make him unpopular.

“As for the City Council, I don’t consider them an arbiter on anything,” he added.

But health advocates cheered the new rule.

“With New York facing alarming rates of diabetes in both adults and children, communities deserve the truth about the amount of added sugars in foods and beverages offered at chain restaurants,” said Dr. DeAnna Nara, senior policy associate with the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

“This bill is a ground-breaking step towards empowering consumers to make better choices and encouraging the food industry to present healthier options.

Adams is grabbing the nanny baton from his predecessors, former Mayors Mike Bloomberg and Bill de Blasio.

Bloomberg, a self-professed health zealot, rammed through a controversial law a generation ago banning smoking in bars and eateries and banned trans fats from restaurants and bakeries.

He was rebuffed when he sought to ban the sale of large sugary drinks from fountains in convenience stores, which was referred to as the “Big Gulp” edict.

The courts said and the Board of Health could not do so without approval of the City Council.

Under de Blasio in 2015, the Health Department issued the first-in-the-nation mandate requiring chain restaurants to post a warning icon next to menu items that contain at least 2,300 mg of salt or sodium to help prevent heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes.

Adams, a health-conscious vegetarian, has also been on a kick to expel sugary chocolate milk and other sweetened milk from school cafeterias.

But he has faced stiff resistance from the upstate dairy industry and lawmakers including powerful House Republican Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik.

Continue Reading

Trending