Nearly all residential roads in Wales become 20mph

Published

1 week ago

September 17, 2023

admin

The first minister of Wales insists “fewer lives will be lost” on Welsh roads – as the new national speed limit of 20mph is introduced across the country.

Nearly all roads in built-up or residential areas in Wales have now become, by default, 20mph instead of 30mph.

The plan is hugely controversial – with the leader of the House of Commons Penny Mordaunt describing it this week as “absolutely insane, even by the standards of the Labour Welsh government.”

But Mark Drakeford told Sky News the new law is about safety, not politics.

“It’s not a political item in any sense, it is grounded in the evidence,” he said.

“The key positive is reduced speed means fewer accidents, and fewer lives being lost. The evidence I think is incontrovertible, that lower speed limits reduce accidents, reduce damage done to people.

“I have no doubt that the Tories will try to weaponise this sort of thing, it’s just in their nature. I am very confident people in Wales will see through that.”

The Welsh government hopes the new law, which has cost £32m to introduce, will see 40% fewer collisions, save six to 10 lives a year and up to 2,000 avoiding injury.

Mr Drakeford said the results from Spain demonstrate the benefits.

“In 2019, Spain introduced a law very similar to what we have in Wales,” he said.

“They’ve had a 20% reduction in urban deaths that have followed, 34% reduction in cyclist fatalities.”

The rollout comes after two years of trials in eight areas of Wales, including in the Heath, north Cardiff.

Parents attending a baby group at the local community centre have mixed feelings over whether it has worked.

“I think there’s no doubt that people are safer if cars are driving slower and injuries are less severe is an accident, so I think it’s a positive thing,” one mother told Sky News.

Road rage risk

Richie, one of the fathers at the group, doesn’t feel the new limit has worked.

“I think there’s been a huge amount of road rage with it,” he said. “I was overtaken yesterday doing 20mph, a guy was doing 40mph, I don’t agree with it at all – it’s a horrendous idea.”

Melanie, another mother, doesn’t think a blanket roll-out is the right approach.

She said: “I don’t know if people really abide to it. I often see people flouting 20mph, particularly around the park. I think it makes sense, particularly around schools and parks…the whole of Cardiff? I don’t think so.”

There are numerous campaign groups against it, mainly focusing on the impact in their local area.

Stephen Clark is a member of the group “20mph Limit – Democracy for Wales” in Heath. He admits 20mph is safer, but only in the places that it is required.

“It is not necessary in the main arteries that run through the city where people travel daily, to and from work. I just feel it’s very unfair on the general public,” he says.

“I believe it leads to more erratic driving. It’s very difficult to adjust to this new 20mph speed limit because you’re constantly having to monitor your speed.”

An online petition against the scheme has secured more than 70,000 signatures. There are economic concerns too.

The Welsh government’s own report has found that over a 30-year period the economic impact of the slower speed limit could be in the region of £4.5bn. It is keen to focus on the £92m annual saving to the NHS.

Welsh Conservative shadow transport minister Natasha Asghar MS urged the Labour government to scrap the “vanity project”, saying the 20mph policy will “slow emergency services down, cost the economy up to £9bn, and impact people’s livelihoods”.

The new speed limit will be enforced by police as normal, but the first minister told Sky News there will be an educational approach to the public in the first instance.

“We are very committed, alongside the police colleagues, to an approach that is about education, informing, giving people time to ensure they understand the law has changed, nobody is going to be rushing in with a heavy hand,” Mr Drakeford said.

“There will come a point where people who are persistently refusing to do the things that everybody else is doing, then they won’t be able to do that with impunity.”

UK

Met Police chief calls for more legal protections as army on standby to replace firearms officers

Published

8 hours ago

September 25, 2023

admin

Met Police chief calls for more legal protections as army on standby to replace firearms officers

The head of the Metropolitan Police has demanded increased legal protections for officers after a revolt by armed police left the army poised to fill in.

Soldiers are on standby for armed police after scores of Metropolitan Police officers stood down from firearms duties following a murder charge against one of their colleagues.

The force’s commissioner Sir Mark Rowley welcomed a review into the situation by Home Secretary Suella Braverman.

And in an open letter he told her to “let the police police”.

“It is essential that we have a system which commands the confidence of officers and the communities they serve,” he wrote.

“Of course, where wrongdoing takes place, the public expect us to be held to the highest standards.

“I have been clear on this in all areas of policing, and the use of force must be no exception.

“The system that judges officers’ actions should be rooted in integrity and decisions should be reached swiftly, competently and without fear or favour.

“A review is needed to address accountability mechanisms, including the policies and practices of the Independent Office for Police Conduct and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), ideally with a focus on the threshold for investigating police use of force and involvement in pursuits.”

He added: “The review announced today is therefore a very welcome development.

“I have spoken publicly in recent weeks about the need to let the police police.

“Our commitment to delivering change in the Met is unflinching and we are making positive progress, but that progress is undermined by a system not set up to help officers succeed.”

More than 100 officers have reportedly handed in permits allowing them to carry weapons, prompting Scotland Yard to turn to the military for assistance.

The crisis has emerged after an unnamed officer was charged with murder over the shooting of unarmed Chris Kaba, 24, who was killed in September last year in Streatham Hill, south London.

The officer accused of his murder is named only as NX121 after a district judge granted an anonymity order.

Ms Braverman said: “We depend on our brave firearms officers to protect us from the most dangerous and violent in society.

“In the interest of public safety, they have to make split-second decisions under extraordinary pressures.

“They mustn’t fear ending up in the dock for carrying out their duties. Officers risking their lives to keep us safe have my full backing and I will do everything in my power to support them.

“That’s why I have launched a review to ensure they have the confidence to do their jobs while protecting us all.”

UK

‘Let the police police’: Met commissioner’s letter to home secretary in full

Published

8 hours ago

September 25, 2023

admin

'Let the police police': Met commissioner's letter to home secretary in full

Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has written and open letter to Home Secretary Suella Braverman, urging her to “let the police police”.

Below is the letter in full:

Dear Home Secretary,

I welcome your announcement earlier today that you will be launching a review into how police officers are held to account when force is used.

You will know from our previous discussions that it is an area that I believe is long overdue for reform to address a number of imbalances.

In the UK we proudly police by consent, embracing the principles of accountability, transparency and independent scrutiny. It is essential that we have a system which commands the confidence of officers and the communities they serve.

Of course, where wrongdoing takes place the public expect us to be held to the highest standards. I have been clear on this in all areas of policing, and the use of force must be no exception.

The system that judges officers’ actions should be rooted in integrity and decisions should be reached swiftly, competently and without fear or favour.

A review is needed to address accountability mechanisms, including the policies and practices of the Independent Office for Police Conduct and the Crown Prosecution Service, ideally with a focus on the threshold for investigating police use of force and involvement in pursuits.

The review announced today is therefore a very welcome development.

I have spoken publicly in recent weeks about the need to let the police police. Our commitment to delivering change in the Met is unflinching and we are making positive progress, but that progress is undermined by a system not set up to help officers succeed. I have identified pursuits and use of force as areas where we see the most glaring unfairness.

I make no comment on any ongoing matters that are sub judice but the issues raised in this letter go back further.

Accountability matters, but we should not have allowed ourselves to develop a system where police officers get investigated for safely pursuing suspects, just because the suspect acts recklessly and as a result injures themselves or someone else.

This is unfair on our officers and discourages them from chasing down criminals.

Armed officers know they need to justify their actions, especially when lethal force is used. They are extremely well trained and an intrinsic part of their training reinforces that shots can only be fired if absolutely necessary to save life.

Officers are individually responsible and accountable for their actions. Consequently, we have one of the safest models of armed policing in the world.

UK

Will armed officer’s murder charge force change in how police shootings are reported?

Published

8 hours ago

September 25, 2023

admin

Will armed officer's murder charge force change in how police shootings are reported?

Britain’s streets without the specialist firearms officers and armed response vehicles that are dotted around major cities will be more dangerous places.

The army is being called in as back-up to the officers withdrawing their service but they do not have the experience to deal with the split-second decisions that are made every day by the police.

As then head of specialist operations, Sir Mark Rowley was the man responsible for the expansion in the number of firearms officers in London.

It was designed to deal with the threat that emerged from the marauding firearms attacks in Mumbai in 2008 and Paris in 2015.

Thankfully, that threat has never materialised, although the officers were called in to deal with the terrorist knife attacks in Woolwich in 2013, London Bridge in 2017 and Fishmongers’ Hall in 2019.

However, the same officers deal with 4,000 incidents involving firearms or suspected firearms every year.

They discharge their weapons on fewer than two of those but when they do the results can have a devastating effect on the officers themselves and on community relations.

There have been a small number of controversial shootings, most notably that of Azelle Rodney in 2005 and Mark Duggan in 2011, that led to the London riots that summer.

In the case of Azelle Rodney, following an inquiry finding that his killing was “not justified”, PC Anthony Long was eventually charged with murder, nine years after the shooting, and acquitted at trial.

In Mark Duggan’s case, an inquest jury found that he was lawfully killed, three years after the shooting, and no officer faced charges.

The process of charging officers with murder or manslaughter is a fraught one, but in the case of Chris Kaba, it has proceeded more quickly than usual, as the Independent Office for Police Conduct collected body-worn footage, CCTV, witness statements and forensics before passing their file to the Crown Prosecution Service.

The CPS decided to charge the officer NX121, with murder, for shooting Mr Kaba through the windscreen of the Audi he was driving in Kirkstall Gardens, Streatham.

The vehicle was being followed, having been identified as used in a firearms incident the previous day, but Mr Kaba was unarmed.

The investigation and charge process took a little over a year but it has given rise to fears among firearms officers across the country that they are being judged for doing their jobs.

The details of the case cannot be discussed because of laws in Britain that mean the case against the officer could be prejudiced by reporting.

That is one of the things Sir Mark, now the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, would like to change but he would also like the CPS to strengthen the legal protection for officers who use force.

Offering his support to his officers, Sir Mark wrote to the Home Secretary on Sunday, voicing their concern “that even if they stick to the tactics and training they have been given, they will face years of protracted legal proceedings”.

However, there is another dimension to the debate.

In the case of Mark Duggan, the issue that provoked the London riots, was the belief in Tottenham that a criminal of Duggan’s experience would not have pointed a firearm at an armed police officer – and that he had, in effect, been executed.

Policing in Britain is performed by consent, and the police in London, and elsewhere, continue to face a challenge in the narrative that arose in Tottenham.

They are trained to believe that criminals will attempt to shoot them, but the reality, some believe, is very different.