Connect with us

Published

on

The federal government in 2020 and 2023 changed who it said could safely donate organs and blood, reducing the restrictions on men who have had sex with another man.

This story also ran on NPR. It can be republished for free.

But the FDAs restrictions on donated tissue, a catchall term encompassing everything from a persons eyes to their skin and ligaments, remain in place. Advocates, lawmakers, and groups focused on removing barriers to cornea donations, in particular, said they are frustrated the FDA hasnt heeded their calls. They want to align the guidelines for tissue donated by gay and bisexual men with those that apply to the rest of the human body.

Such groups have been asking the FDA for years to reduce the deferral period from five years to 90 days, meaning a man who has had sex with another man would be able to donate tissue as long as such sex didnt occur within three months of his death.

One of the loudest voices on lightening the restrictions is Sheryl J. Moore, who has been an advocate since her 16-year-old sons death in 2013. Alexander AJ Betts Jr.s internal organs were successfully donated to seven people, but his eyes were rejected because of a single question asked by the donor network: Is AJ gay?

Moore and a Colorado doctor named Michael Puente Jr. started a campaign called Legalize Gay Eyes and together got the attention of national eye groups and lawmakers. Moore said Betts was enthusiastic about becoming an organ donor when he got his drivers license. When he died at age 16, his heart, lungs, and liver were among the organs that helped prolong the lives of seven people, but his corneas went untouched.(KC McGinnis for KFF Health News) Xander and Jackson Moore look through belongings in a room dedicated to Alexander AJ Betts Jr. at home in Des Moines, Iowa.(KC McGinnis for KFF Health News)

Puente, a pediatric ophthalmologist with the University of Colorado School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Colorado, said the current patchwork of donor guidelines is nonsensical considering advancements in the ability to test potential donors for HIV.

A gay man can donate their entire heart for transplant, but they cannot donate just the heart valve, said Puente, who is gay. Its essentially a categorical ban.

The justification for these policies, set 30 years ago as a means of preventing HIV transmission, has been undercut by the knowledge gained through scientific progress. Now, they are unnecessary and discriminatory in that they focus on specific groups of people rather than on specific behaviors known to heighten HIV risk, according to those who advocate for changing them.

Since 2022, the FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research has put changes to the tissue guidance on its agenda but has yet to act on them. Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing. Your Email Address Sign Up

It is simply unacceptable, Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) said in a statement. He was one of dozens of Congress members who signed a letter in 2021 that said the current deferral policies perpetuate stigma against gay men and should be based on individualized risk assessments instead.

FDA policy should be derived from the best available science, not historic bias and prejudice, the letter read.

The FDA said in a statement to KFF Health News that, while the absolute risk transmission of HIV due to ophthalmic surgical procedures appears to be remote, there are still relative risks.

The agency routinely reviews donor screening and testing to determine what changes, if any, are appropriate based on technological and evolving scientific knowledge, the statement said. The FDA provided a similar response to Neguse in 2022.

In 2015, the FDA got rid of a policy dubbed the blood ban, which barred gay and bisexual men from donating blood, before replacing it in 2023 with a policy that treats all prospective donors the same. Anyone who, in the past three months, has had anal sex and a new sexual partner or more than one sexual partner is not allowed to donate. An FDA study found that, while men who have sex with men make up most of the nations new HIV diagnoses, a questionnaire was enough to effectively identify low-risk versus high-risk donors. The FDA’s headquarters in White Oak, Maryland, on July 20, 2020.(Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images)

The U.S. Public Health Service adjusted the guidelines for organ donation in 2020. Nothing prevents sexually active gay men from donating their organs, though if theyve had sex with another man in the past 30 days down from a year the patient set to receive the organ can decide whether or not to accept it.

But Puente said gay men like him cannot donate their corneas unless they were celibate for five years prior to their death.

He found that, in one year alone, at least 360 people were rejected as cornea donors because they were men who had had sex with another man in the past five years, or in the past year in the case of Canadian donors.

Corneas are the clear domes that protect the eyes from the outside world. They have the look and consistency of a transparent jellyfish, and transplanting one can restore a persons sight. They contain no blood, nor any other bodily fluid capable of transmitting HIV. Scientists suspect thats why there are no known cases of a patient contracting HIV from a cornea transplant, even when those corneas came from donors of organs that did infect recipients.

Currently, all donors, whether of blood, organs, or tissue, are tested for HIV and two types of hepatitis. Such tests arent perfect: There is still what scientists call a window period following infection during which the donors body has not yet produced a detectable amount of virus.

But such windows are now quite narrow. Researchers with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that nucleic acid tests, which are commonly used to screen donors, are unlikely to miss someone having HIV unless they acquired it in the two weeks preceding donation. Another study estimated that even if someone had sex with an HIV-positive person a couple of weeks to a month before donating, the odds are less than 1 in a million that a nucleic acid test would miss that infection.

Very low, but not zero, said Sridhar Basavaraju, who was one of the researchers on that study and directs the CDCs Office of Blood, Organ, and Other Tissue Safety. He said the risk of undetected hepatitis B is slightly higher but still low.

At least one senior FDA official has indirectly agreed. Peter Marks, who directs the FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, co-authored a report last year that said three months amply covers the window period in which someone might have the virus but at levels too low for tests to pick up. Scott Haber, director of public health advocacy at the American Academy of Ophthalmology, said his groups stance is that the tissue donation guideline should be at least roughly in alignment with that for blood donations.

Kevin Corcoran, who leads the Eye Bank Association of America, said the five-year abstinence required of corneal donors who are gay or bisexual isnt just badly out of date but also impractical, requiring grieving relatives to recall five years of their loved ones sexual history.

Thats the situation Moore found herself in on a July day in 2013.

Her son loved anime, show tunes, and drinking pop out of the side of his mouth. He was bad at telling jokes but good at helping people: Betts once replaced his little sisters lost birthday money with his own savings, she said, and enthusiastically chose to be an organ donor when he got his drivers license. Moore remembered telling her son to ignore the harassment by antigay bigots at school.

The kids in show choir had told him he’s going to hell for being gay, and he might as well just kill himself to save himself the time, she recalled.

That summer, he did. At the hospital, as medical staff searched for signs of brain activity in the boy before he died, Moore found herself aswering a list of questions from Iowa Donor Network, including, she recalled: Is AJ gay? Moore said her sons organs helped save or prolong the lives of seven other people, including a middle-aged woman who received his liver and with whom she sometimes exchanges messages on Facebook. (KC McGinnis for KFF Health News) Betts’ internal organs were transplanted, but his eyes went untouched because of an FDA rule that essentially bans sexually active gay men and boys from donating tissue. (KC McGinnis for KFF Health News)

I remember very vividly saying to them, Well, what do you mean by, Was he gay? I mean, he’s never had penetrative sex, she said. But they said, We just need to know if he was gay. And I said, Yes, he identified as gay.

The Iowa Donor Network said in a statement that the organization cant comment on Moores case, but said, We sincerely hope for a shift in FDA policy to align with the more inclusive approach seen in blood donation guidelines, enabling us to honor the decision of all individuals who want to save lives through organ and tissue donation.

Moore said her sons organs helped save or prolong the lives of seven other people, including a boy who received his heart and a middle-aged woman who received his liver. Moore sometimes exchanges messages with her on Facebook.

She found out a year later that her sons corneas were rejected as donor tissue because of that conversation with Iowa Donor Network about her sons sexuality.

I felt like they wasted my son’s body parts, Moore said. I very much felt like AJ was continuing to be bullied beyond the grave.

Rae Ellen Bichell: rbichell@kff.org, @raelnb Related Topics Health Industry Public Health States Colorado FDA HIV/AIDS Iowa LGBTQ+ Health Contact Us Submit a Story Tip

Continue Reading

Politics

Royal College of Psychiatrists pulls support for assisted dying bill

Published

on

By

Royal College of Psychiatrists pulls support for assisted dying bill

The Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP) has pulled its support for the assisted dying bill.

The announcement is a blow to supporters of the bill ahead of its return to the House of Commons on Friday.

It comes as plans to legalise assisted dying in Scotland passed the first stage this week.

Dr Lade Smith, president of the RCP, said: “The RCP has reached the conclusion that we are not confident in the Terminally Ill Adults Bill in its current form, and we therefore cannot support the Bill as it stands.”

The move is significant because, under the bill’s current stipulations, a panel including a psychiatrist would oversee assisted dying cases.

The RCP outlined a number of issues it had with the current bill, including: the bill not making provision for unmet needs, whether assisted suicide is classed as a treatment or not, what the psychiatrists’ specific role on the panel would be, and the increased demand the bill puts on psychiatrists.

If the college support remains withdrawn, and the bill passes, it isn’t clear what effects it may have.

More on Assisted Dying

Kim Leadbeater, the MP behind the bill, has confirmed it will include a clause that means anyone who does not want to be involved in the process will not have to do so.

Supporters of the bill argue it would ease the suffering of dying people, while opponents argue it would fail to safeguard some of the most vulnerable people in society.

Kim Leadbeater MP defends changes to Assisted Dying Bill
Image:
MP Kim Leadbeater talking to Sky News

Questions over the bill

The more prominent role of a psychiatrist in the bill came about after a previous amendment.

Initially, the bill said that after two independent doctors approved an assisted dying case, it would then need to be further approved by a High Court judge.

Read more from Sky News:
‘Sixteen killed’ in Israeli strike on Gaza hospital
Menendez brothers’ murder sentences reduced
PM rejects Enoch Powell comparison

But MPs on the parliamentary committee scrutinising the bill voted to remove that clause in March.

Instead, Ms Leadbeater proposed a voluntary assisted dying commissioner that included an expert panel with a psychiatrist.

She said this was a “strength, not a weakness,” but opponents of the bill disagreed, saying removing the High Court judge “fundamentally weakens protections for the vulnerable”.

However, amid changes and amendments to the original bill, there has been growing concern about safeguarding and timeframes, Sky News political correspondent Ali Fortescue reported.

Friday’s debate was already delayed from 25 April, to give MPs more time to consider amendments.

If the bill passes on Friday, it will move to the House of Lords, where it will undergo similar legislative stages, and if it passes that too, it won’t come into effect until at least 2029, after its implementation was delayed.

Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung Electronics to acquire heating and cooling solutions provider FläktGroup for 1.5 billion euros

Published

on

By

Samsung Electronics to acquire heating and cooling solutions provider FläktGroup for 1.5 billion euros

A Samsung Group flag flutters in front of the company’s Seocho building in Seoul. 

Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

Samsung Electronics on Wednesday announced that it would acquire all shares of German-based FläktGroup, a leading heating and cooling solutions provider, for 1.5 billion euros ($1.68 billion) from European investment firm Triton. 

Samsung said the acquisition would help it expand in the heating, ventilation and air conditioning business as the market experiences rapid growth. 

“Our commitment is to continue investing in and developing the high-growth HVAC business as a key future growth engine,” said TM Roh, Acting Head of the Device eXperience (DX) Division at Samsung Electronics.  

The acquisition of FläktGroup stands to bolster Samsung’s position in the HVAC market against rivals such as LG Electronics. 

FläktGroup supplies heating, HVAC solutions to a wide range of buildings and facilities, notably data centers which require a high degree of stable cooling. Samsung said it anticipates sustained growth in data center demand due to the proliferation of generative AI, robotics, autonomous driving and other technologies.

FläktGroup has more 60 major customers, including leading pharmaceutical companies, biotech and food and beverage firms, and gigafactories, according to Samsung’s statement.

Samsung said in March that its HVAC solutions had achieved double-digit annual revenue growth over the past five years, and that the company aimed to boost revenue by more than 30% in 2025.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Cassie tells court ‘freak offs’ became like a job as she alleges years of abuse by Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs

Published

on

By

Cassie tells court 'freak offs' became like a job as she alleges years of abuse by Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Sean “Diddy” Combs’s former girlfriend Cassie has told his sex-trafficking trial that “freak offs” with male escorts became like a job, as the music mogul allegedly abused and sexually exploited her for years.

The musician and model, whose full name is Casandra Ventura, did not look at Combs as she took to the witness stand in court in Manhattan, New York.

Over about six hours, the 38-year-old, who is eight months pregnant with her third child with husband Alex Fine, at times became emotional as she alleged she was degraded by her former partner during their 10-year on-off relationship.

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial: Day 2 – As it happened

Sean 'Diddy' Combs makes a hand gesture to family members at his New York trial. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Combs made a heart gesture to family members in court. Pic: Reuters/Jane Rosenberg

Sean "Diddy" Combs watches as former girlfriend Casandra "Cassie" Ventura reacts during testimony to prosecutor Emily Johnson at Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., May 13, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane
Image:
Ms Ventura became emotional at times. Pic: Reuters/Jane Rosenberg


Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty and strenuously denied allegations of sexual abuse. His lawyers argue that although he could be violent, he never veered into sex trafficking and racketeering, and that all sexual encounters were consensual.

Ms Ventura, who is the central witness in the prosecutors’ case, began by telling the jury how Combs was violent to her over the course of their relationship, giving her black eyes and bruises.

The hip-hop star became increasingly controlling, she said, and was allegedly abusive over the smallest perceived slights. “You make the wrong face, and the next thing I knew I was getting hit in the face,” she said.

Ms Ventura was 19 when she signed to his label, Bad Boy, she said, and 22 when, during the first year of their relationship, Combs first proposed a “freak off” – a sexual encounter with a third party. Her “stomach churned”, she said, and she was “confused, nervous, but also loved him very much” and wanted to please him. She described him as “charming” but “polarising”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Combs’s family arrive for Day 2

‘There was no space to do anything else’

Throughout her time on the stand, she gave graphic details of these drug and drink-fuelled encounters with male escorts, saying Combs would watch and masturbate, and often record the encounters and watch the videos back.

They could last for hours or even days, she said – telling the court the longest went on for four days. They ended up becoming weekly events and took priority over her music career, jurors heard. While she had hits with singles Me & U and Long Way 2 Go in 2006, and signed a 10-album deal with Bad Boy, jurors heard she only released one album.

“Freak-offs became a job where there was no space to do anything else but to recover and just try to feel normal again,” Ms Ventura said. Each time, she added, she had to recuperate from lack of sleep, alcohol, drugs “and other substances”, and “having sex with a stranger for days”.

Read more:
The rise and fall of Sean Combs

Diddy – a timeline of allegations
Everything you need to know about the trial

Sean 'Diddy' Combs and Cassie Ventura at the 2017 Costume Institute Benefit Gala ub 2017. Pic: zz/XPX/STAR MAX/IPx 2017/AP
Image:
Combs and Cassie pictured in 2017. Pic: zz/XPX/STAR MAX/IPx 2017/AP

Alleged violence detailed in court

Ms Ventura told the court she began feeling as if she could not say no to Combs’s demands because “there were blackmail materials to make me feel like if I didn’t do it, it would be held over my head in that way or these things would become public”.

She was also worried about potential violence, she told the court. When asked in court how frequently Combs became violent with her, Ms Ventura responded: “Too frequently.”

The rapper “would mash me in the head, knock me over, drag me, kick me”, she said. “Stomp me in the head if I was down”.

Ms Ventura also told the court that Combs kept cash, jewellery, guns and “sometimes tapes from cameras” in safes at several properties in New York, Los Angeles, Miami and Alpine, New Jersey.

“The guns came out here and there. I always felt it was a little bit of a scare tactic,” she told the court.

Pic: CNN via AP
Image:
This footage from 2016 was made public in 2024. Pic: CNN via AP

Towards the end of her first day of evidence, a surveillance video made public last year, which showed Combs allegedly beating Ms Ventura at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016, was played to jurors in court for a second time.

“How many times has he thrown you like that before?” prosecutor Emily Johnson asked her.

“Too many to count,” Ms Ventura replied.

On Monday, prosecutors in their opening statement told the court that while Combs’s public persona was that of a “charismatic” hip-hop mogul, behind the scenes he was violent and abusive.

His defence lawyers argued that the case is really about nothing more than the rapper’s sexual preferences, which they said should remain private, and do not make him a sex trafficker.

The trial is to last about eight weeks.

Ms Ventura is set to continue giving evidence on Wednesday.

Continue Reading

Trending