Connect with us

Published

on

Game. Seven.

On Saturday night, a World Series champion will be crowned. Will it be a Los Angeles Dodgers repeat, making them the first team to go back-to-back since the 2000 New York Yankees? Or will it be the Toronto Blue Jays‘ first title in 32 years?

Before the Dodgers and Blue Jays take the field for a winner-take-all finale to a thrilling World Series, we asked our MLB experts to break down what will decide which will be the last team standing.

We’ll cover all the action here, so tune in again later for pregame lineups, live analysis during the game and our takeaways following the final pitch.

How could the Blue Jays set up their pitching in Game 7?

The first rule of Game 7, as manager John Schneider said immediately after Game 6, is that everyone is available. He said even Kevin Gausman, who just threw 93 pitches in Game 6, will be available. No, it wouldn’t be unprecedented for him to pitch: Randy Johnson started Game 6 in 2001 for the Diamondbacks and then got the final four outs to win Game 7.

Max Scherzer is the Game 7 starter, but the Blue Jays’ bullpen is in great shape to soak up a lot of innings. Closer Jeff Hoffman didn’t pitch in Game 6, so he’s on two days of rest and could go a couple of innings. Schneider did use his four other top relievers in Game 6 (Louis Varland, lefty Mason Fluharty, Seranthony Dominguez and Chris Bassitt), but none threw more than 17 pitches, so they’re available as necessary, with Fluharty likely to be tasked at some point to get through the Shohei OhtaniWill SmithFreddie Freeman part of the lineup.

Bassitt didn’t pitch in the postseason until the ALCS but has now reeled off 7⅔ scoreless innings while allowing just one hit. Schneider has to consider him a multi-inning option. Game 4 starter Shane Bieber will be an option pitching on three days of rest after throwing 81 pitches.

Indeed, it all points to a very quick hook for Scherzer. Though he has survived his two postseason starts — two runs in 5⅔ innings against the Mariners and then three runs in 4⅓ innings against the Dodgers — he has allowed five walks and the three homers in those 10 innings, so he has hardly dominated. Remember, he was terrible in September (10.20 ERA), and his two postseason starts have come on 21 and 10 days of rest. Now, he’ll be starting on four days’ rest. With Bassitt and Bieber available, the Jays might ask for only three innings from Scherzer and will likely be willing to get him out before trouble hits. — David Schoenfield


How could the Dodgers set up their pitching in Game 7?

The Dodgers plan to open with Shohei Ohtani, and that makes sense for many reasons. For one, Tyler Glasnow, who was previously lined up to start Game 7, was used out of the bullpen to close Game 6. More importantly, though, starting is the smoothest path to getting Ohtani on the mound.

Because of the two-way rule, coming in as a reliever would mean Ohtani would have to play a position — in this case, the outfield, where he hasn’t played all season — to bat again after coming out as a reliever. That’s not the case if he opens. Ohtani could close, as he did to finish the 2023 World Baseball Classic for his native Japan, but that would present other logistical challenges. When does he warm up? And how would that be impacted by him preparing to take his turn to bat? Or if he’s preoccupied running the bases?

So, expect Ohtani to start — and stay on the mound for however long he is effective and throwing his best stuff. Glasnow should be available to pitch bulk innings after him. He has never thrown in back-to-back games, but he also threw just three pitches in Game 6. After that? Roki Sasaki will be available, though he threw 33 pitches Friday night. So might Blake Snell, who started Game 5. Ideally, the Dodgers won’t have to venture beyond that. — Alden Gonzalez


What should we expect to see from Ohtani in Game 7?

Ohtani made a start on three days’ rest once: April 21, 2023. But that was after throwing only two innings in the prior start. This time, he’ll take the mound on the biggest stage after a six-inning, 93-pitch start. So, there is no precedent from which to draw. But Ohtani loves the moment. He showed it two weeks ago, when he homered three times and threw six scoreless innings to clinch a pennant. And he showed it two years ago, when he emerged from the bullpen in Miami and struck out then-teammate Mike Trout to win Major League Baseball’s prestigious international tournament. Whatever the expectations might be, Ohtani will strive to exceed them. — Gonzalez


The Dodgers’ bats finally perked up in Game 6. What does L.A. need to do to keep that going?

The Dodgers need to be themselves. That sounds corny, and it is. But that’s part of what the Game 6 story was about. After all of their struggles on offense, the strikeouts piled up early against Kevin Gausman. But they kept working at-bats, driving up his pitch count, and put together the one rally they needed. It hasn’t been pretty, but it’s how the Dodgers are built. Mookie Betts finally checked in on offense and has to be feeling a lot better about things heading into Saturday. That’s huge. The Dodgers have scored six runs over the past three games, and the lineup is too loaded for that to continue. Of course, it doesn’t mean the funk will dissipate by Saturday. — Bradford Doolittle


The Blue Jays’ hitters were uncharacteristically quiet in Game 6. How can they get back on track?

Everyone has been uncharacteristically quiet against Yoshinobu Yamamoto this postseason, so it’s not like the Blue Jays need to change much after scoring just once in Game 6. They’re likely facing Ohtani on short rest, Glasnow on none, Sasaki on back-to-back nights or some combination of all of the above. Toronto has been in this situation as recently as the ALCS and isn’t likely to wilt at the plate for a second night in a row at home. Just like Brad said for the Dodgers, the message for the Jays going in should be to just be themselves. — Jesse Rogers


Who are the X factors on each side that could decide Game 7?

Game 7 has turned two players into Hall of Famers: Bill Mazeroski (1960) and Jack Morris (1991) probably wouldn’t be in without their World Series Game 7 performances. Hall of Famers such as Walter Johnson (1924), Yogi Berra (1956), Sandy Koufax (1965), Bob Gibson (1967) and Willie Stargell (1979) have starred in Game 7s. Unsung veterans such as Ray Knight (1986), Charlie Morton (2017) and Howie Kendrick (2019) have stepped up in the moment. Role players such as Gene Larkin (1991) and Craig Counsell (1997) have delivered late-inning heroics.

In other words, anything can happen. Anyone could be the hero. That’s the absolute beauty of this sport. The easiest answer here is the two stars: Ohtani and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. have the opportunity to put exclamation points on their wonderful postseasons. It very well could be that whoever has the better game will lead his team to victory.

If you want a less obscure X factor, let’s go with Will Smith for Los Angeles and Chris Bassitt for Toronto. The Blue Jays have at times shown their reluctance to pitch to Ohtani. If they’re giving multiple intentional walks again — although considering how that backfired in Game 6, Schneider might return to going after Ohtani like he did in Games 4 and 5 — that will give Smith opportunities to hit with a runner on base. For the Jays, it’s simply that Scherzer is unlikely to go very deep into the game, and Bassitt is the guy likely asked to chew up two or three innings in the middle section. — Schoenfield


Finally, prediction time: Who will be the last team standing?

Rogers: Toronto will win 4-2 with Max Scherzer pitching his way into the history books while Guerrero will be the easy MVP pick.

Doolittle: It’s the Dodgers’ baseball world, and the other 29 teams are just tenants. I don’t really believe that, but I do believe that the Blue Jays’ best chance to win was Friday. Now, they have to navigate a Dodgers lineup that is champing at the bit and a pitching staff that can roll out Tyler Glasnow, Shohei Ohtani and Blake Snell in the same game. I’m taking L.A. and though I’d be shocked if it’s a runaway, I don’t see it being dramatic. Dodgers 7, Blue Jays 3.

Schoenfield: Blue Jays in seven was my pick heading into the World Series, so I’ll stick with that. Their pitching situation is in much better shape, and the Dodgers will be scrambling to fill all nine innings. And, really, it’s not as if the Dodgers’ bats broke out in a huge way in Game 6. The Jays haven’t touched Yamamoto, but he’s not starting this game.

Lineups

Series tied at 3

Starting pitchers: Shohei Ohtani vs. Max Scherzer

Dodgers

TBD

Blue Jays

TBD

Live analysis

Gamecast: Follow the action pitch-by-pitch here

Check back at first pitch for our live in-game coverage.

Continue Reading

Sports

Locksley confident in job status amid Terps’ skid

Published

on

By

Locksley confident in job status amid Terps' skid

Maryland coach Mike Locksley said he’s not coaching for his job despite the team’s five consecutive Big Ten losses and continued struggles in league games and late in the season.

Locksley told reporters Tuesday that he deserves to keep his job, saying, “I’m the head coach at the University of Maryland.” After a 4-0 start, Maryland sits at 4-5 entering Saturday’s game at Illinois.

The Terrapins are just 17-45 in Big Ten games under Locksley, who has won 18 consecutive nonleague games at the school. Locksley is 37-46 overall at Maryland and is under contract through the 2027 season. His buyout if fired this year would be $13.4 million.

First-year athletic director Jim Smith, when asked by The Baltimore Sun whether Locksley would return in 2026, told the newspaper that his status would be determined at the end of the year. Smith did not hire Locksley and took over as athletic director in May after serving as Atlanta Braves senior vice president of business strategy.

After Illinois, Maryland finishes the regular season against No. 21 Michigan and Michigan State.

Continue Reading

Sports

Belichick ‘focused’ on Wake Forest, not Giants job

Published

on

By

Belichick 'focused' on Wake Forest, not Giants job

North Carolina coach Bill Belichick said he is focused on Wake Forest, after questions about potential interest in the vacant New York Giants head coaching job.

During his Tuesday news conference in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Belichick was asked what his message was to the team given the speculation about the newly opened job.

“Getting ready for Wake Forest, that’s all I got this week,” Belichick said.

As a follow-up, Belichick was asked whether players or recruits have inquired about the speculation that began after the Giants fired Brian Daboll on Monday.

“I’ve been asked about it from time to time,” Belichick said. “Look I’ve been down this road before. I’m focused on Wake Forest, that’s it. That’s my commitment to this team. This week it’s Wake Forest, next week it’s that opponent and so forth. I’m here to do the best for this team.”

Belichick is in his first season with North Carolina, which has won two straight games to bring its record to 4-5. Before coming to college coaching, Belichick spent his entire career in the NFL — winning six Super Bowls with the New England Patriots.

But he won two Super Bowls with the New York Giants as a defensive coordinator under Bill Parcells in the 1986 and 1990 seasons. Belichick often references Giants Hall of Fame linebacker Lawrence Taylor, who went to North Carolina and attended the season opener against TCU in Chapel Hill.

Continue Reading

Sports

Wetzel: Feds are the best hope to police sports betting’s wild west

Published

on

By

Wetzel: Feds are the best hope to police sports betting's wild west

Emmanuel Clase had made over $12 million as a relief pitcher and was set to pocket an additional $6.4 million next season from the Cleveland Guardians. At just 27 years old with the ability to throw a 95 mph cutter, there were likely many more millions to come.

You’d think that would be enough to avoid possibly throwing it all away in a sports betting scandal.

Yet federal prosecutors allege that Clase, over the past few years, routinely conspired with a couple of as-yet-unnamed gamblers to throw certain pitches in certain ways so they could successfully bet on the outcome — below a specific speed, for example. (Yes, over/under 97.95 mph is a bet that is offered.)

Prosecutors said the gamblers involved won at least $400,000 in bets involving Clase. A portion, sometimes as little as $2,000 (fractional when compared with his salary), was allegedly kicked back to Clase.

That included a May 28, 2025, game against the Los Angeles Dodgers, where, a federal indictment states, two bettors wagered $4,000 that his first pitch would be either a ball or hit the batter.

Clase apparently did his part, throwing it low and out of the strike zone. Dodgers outfielder Andy Pages swung anyway, though, missing the ball for a strike.

The bet was a bust.

Clase went on to retire the side in order, securing a save in the Cleveland victory. It was of little help to the bettors, though, one of whom sent Clase a “.gif image of a man hanging himself with toilet paper,” per the indictment. Clase texted back “a sad puppy dog face.”

We can only imagine the emojis Clase has been using since his arrest on Sunday that didn’t cost him just the rest of that massive contract and a potential lifetime ban from Major League Baseball, but possibly up to 20 years in prison.

Everything potentially lost for so little.

Clase and Guardians starter Luis Ortiz — also indicted Sunday for similar alleged “pitch-rigging” activities — are innocent until proven guilty, of course, but if you are looking for a near sure thing to count on, it’s the feds. They rarely lose.

And that might be the only thing that can uphold the integrity of sports in America. At least we can hope.

Recent weeks have seen a parade of sports wagering scandals, schemes and indictments. Pro basketball. College basketball. Now MLB.

The accused range from the rich and famous to the broke and obscure, from young men to old heads. Trying to design a preventative, educational system seems impossible. Who can even explain the individual motivations or circumstances? Some needed money; others didn’t. Some were naive; others were worldly.

There is little in common between, say, a respected, 49-year-old Hall of Famer turned NBA coach such as Chauncey Billups, three players on the 4-27 University of New Orleans basketball team and a Dominican relief pitcher in the prime of his lucrative MLB career.

The way to stop this stuff is to stop it from starting. The fear of getting caught — and the fact that the federal government is catching people on a regular basis — might be the only thing that can scare everyone (or most everyone) straight.

Common sense says federal prosecutors won’t find everything. They are trying, though, with offices out of New York and Philadelphia busting people making small wagers on random pitches, the playing rotation of late-season NBA games and even hoops point spreads out of the obscure Southland Conference.

No one should think they are safe.

Gamblers, of course, have been fixing sports about as long as sports have existed. Baseball itself has seen a World Series compromised and its all-time hit king barred from Hall of Fame enshrinement due to this stuff.

A pitch in the Cleveland dirt somehow seems quaint.

Yet never before has sports wagering been so front of mind in America. Not only is it legal in 38 states and the District of Columbia, but teams, leagues, media outlets and everyone else are cashing in on the business. It’s on your TV. It’s on your phone. It’s in your face whether you gamble or not. Promo Code: Everywhere.

That has likely led to more temptation. Some of the college players have bet on themselves or participated in unsophisticated plots — one New Orleans player was allegedly overheard at a timeout telling two others to stop scoring to prevent their team from accidentally covering (the spread was 23; they lost by 25).

The good news? The ease of betting has also certainly led to easier detection, at least if bets are made through legal sources. The integrity monitoring systems are excellent.

There is a movement to ban individual prop bets, such as a player’s rebounding totals or the speed of a pitch. Those are easiest to manipulate, after all. MLB announced Monday that prominent U.S. sportsbooks are placing a $200 betting limit on baseball wagers centered on individual pitches and prohibiting such bets from being included in parlays in an attempt to decrease the incentive for manipulation. These are good ideas.

Yet sports wagering comes in many forms — legal, yes, but also through illegal books or offshore accounts. Then there is daily fantasy and the prediction market, where there is a near lack of government oversight.

This feels like whack-a-mole. Legislation is always a reaction, not a prevention.

In the end, the fear of being busted is about the only universal deterrent. Corruption is an individual decision, and prison is a powerful disincentive. No one wants to be the next guy sending sad puppy dog faces.

Continue Reading

Trending