The amount you can save in a tax-free cash ISA has been slashed from £20,000 to £12,000 in the budget.
The cut will come into effect from April 2027, but it will not affect over-65s, who will be allowed to stick to the £20,000 limit.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves hopes the cut will get savers investing and help boost the economy, but experts have warned it could have a detrimental effect and put people off saving completely.
In the lead-up to the budget, banks, building societies and campaigners warned it could force people to pay more tax.
So, will it? Here we explain what a cash ISA is, what’s changed and what impact it could have on your savings.
What is a cash ISA?
It’s a tax-free savings account, meaning you don’t have to pay tax at all on any interest you earn. Before today you could deposit up to £20,000, but Reeves has cut this to £12,000.
Some cash ISAs are instant access, while others require you to lock money in for a certain period of time to get higher interest rates.
What does this mean for savings?
It’s important to stress that the full ISA limit – the amount you can deposit across three types of tax-free ISA accounts (cash, innovative finance, and stocks and shares) – is staying at £20,000.
But if neither of the other ISA options appeal (you may be a more cautious saver who doesn’t want to put money in stocks that can go up and down), you’ll have to look for another savings account once you get to £12,000. Bonds would be one option – but these aren’t tax-free.
The amount you could have to pay depends on your personal savings allowance.
Basic rate taxpayers are allowed to earn £1,000 in interest before paying income tax at 20%.
Higher-rate taxpayers can earn £500 in interest before paying tax.
Tax benefits aside, the change will mean you’ll earn less interest in a cash ISA.
Here’s an example…
You have £20,000 in savings, and you are happy to lock it away for a year.
Under the old cap, you would be able to place all of that money into a one-year cash ISA.
The highest interest rate on offer is 4.28%, according to The Private Office, meaning you would earn £856 of tax-free interest.
But under today’s changes, you can only add up to £12,000 into it, meaning the interest earned drops to £513.60.
Let’s say you put your remaining £8,000 into the top-paying one-year bond, which is offering 4.5%, rather than an innovative finance or stocks and shares ISA.
On the face of it, you might think it’s a higher rate, so you’ll get a better return – but take into account the tax you would have to pay and that interest rate drops to 3.6%, giving you a £288 return.
Add those together, and your interest has dropped by £55 to £801.60.
For a higher-rate taxpayer in the same situation, the change is more drastic.
They would still earn the £513.60 in their cash ISA, but the interest rate on their one-year bond would effectively drop to 2.7% after the tax deduction, giving them £216 in interest.
In total, across both accounts, they would have earned £729.60, instead of £856.
“It’s not just people with loads of money that this will affect. A basic rate taxpayer will breach the personal savings allowance with just £22,223 in the top one-year bond paying 4.5%,” Anna Bowes, saving expert at The Private Office, said.
What is Reeves trying to do?
Reeves is hoping that lowering the cap will push people to put their savings into a stocks and shares ISA instead, but cash ISAs are significantly more popular.
Around 14.4 million people have a cash ISA, according to figures from AJ Bell, while 4.2million hold a stocks and shares ISA.
Before the budget Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, warned: “Tinkering with the cash ISA allowance would be an ineffective way to promote investing, with more than half of Brits saying that, if faced with a cash ISA cut, they would simply move their money to a different savings account.
“It would also add significant further complexity to the system when Labour said before the general election they were committed to simplification.”
Banks and building societies, which use money in cash ISAs to lend to customers, warned the cut could cause mortgage rates to rise.
The important things to remember
One of the real risks of the cut is the psychological impact it will have on savers, with several experts warning that people may withdraw their cash even if it’s nowhere near the £12,000 simply through lack of understanding.
“On one hand, slashing the cash ISA allowance from £20,000 to £12,000 will not have a dramatic effect on most people,” Adam French, head of news at Moneyfacts, said.
“The average amount saved into a cash ISA in the 2023/24 tax year was just under £7,000 per person. However, cultural and behavioural barriers to investing run much deeper than the limit on what can be saved into a cash ISA.”
Selby warned that it could create a “scarcity mindset”, resulting in savers taking a “use it or lose it approach” towards contributions.
The plus side is the new limit is unlikely to affect money already stashed away in your cash ISA.
MoneySavingExpert Martin Lewis said the limits usually only applied to new money being put in – but we should get more confirmation of this in due course.
Plans have been announced for a new “landmark tower” in London with double the floor space of Britain’s tallest building, The Shard.
JPMorgan Chase unveiled details of the proposed office block after banks escaped having their taxes raised in the budget earlier this week.
The US multinational bank said the new building in Canary Wharf, in the east of the capital, would have a floor space of three million square feet. The Shard, in London Bridge, covers 1.3 million square feet.
However, the final design of the tower, including its height, is still being finalised.
A spokesperson for the firm told Sky News that they hoped to have clarity “soon” on how tall the building would be and the number of storeys. But it is expected to be one of the biggest office blocks in Europe.
JPMorgan Chase boss Jamie Dimon reportedly signed off on the plans late last week.
It came after Sir Keir Starmer’s business envoy Varun Chandra flew out to New York to personally “offer assurances about the government’s business-friendly policies,” the Financial Times reported on Friday.
Image: The Shard is the tallest building in western Europe. Pic: Reuters
The company also warned in a press release that its plans were “subject to a continuing positive business environment in the UK”, as well as planning permission from local authorities.
JPMorgan Chase said the project could contribute up to £9.9bn to the UK economy over six years, including by generating 7,800 jobs, many of them in the construction industry.
The tower would house up to 12,000 people and serve as JPMorgan Chase’s main UK headquarters and its most significant presence in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
The firm, which employs 23,000 people in the UK, said the tower would be “one of the largest and most sophisticated in Europe”.
The building is being designed by British architects Foster and Partners, known for landmarks projects including the new Wembley Stadium and London’s Millennium Bridge.
Mr Dimonsaid: “London has been a trading and financial hub for more than a thousand years, and maintaining it as a vibrant place for finance and business is critical to the health of the UK economy.
“This building will represent our lasting commitment to the city, the UK, our clients and our people.”
Mr Dimon added: “The UK government’s priority of economic growth has been a critical factor in helping us make this decision.”
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she was “thrilled” about the announcement, while Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan said it represented a “huge vote of confidence in the capital’s future”.
An influential City group is urging investors to oppose plans that would guarantee a multimillion pound share bonanza to executives at Anglo American as it finalises a $33bn merger with Canada’s Teck Resources.
Sky News understands that the Investment Association’s IVIS voting advisory service has issued next month’s vote on amendments to Anglo’s long-term incentive awards with a ‘red-top’ alert – its strongest possible warning against the resolution.
The development comes days after rival miner BHP approached Anglo for a second time about a potential takeover, before abruptly withdrawing.
Anglo, the mining group which owns De Beers, wants to amend its share awards to guarantee that they would pay out at least 62.5% of their value if the merger completes.
Institutional Shareholder Services, which has recommended that shareholders vote in favour of the merger itself, has also recommended opposition to the bonus scheme amendments.
“The amending of awards to reflect M&A factors not envisioned when the awards were first granted is not considered inappropriate in the UK market per se,” ISS said in a report to clients.
“However, in this case, the amending of in-flight LTIP awards in order to ensure a minimum payout linked to the completion of the merger transaction is.
“Indeed, the linking of variable incentives to the completion of transactions is not considered good practice, which is itself recognised by the company.”
Sticking to Labour’s manifesto pledge and freezing income tax thresholds rather than raising income tax has hurt low- and middle-income earners, an influential thinktank has said.
Millions of these workers “would have been better off with their tax rates rising than their thresholds being frozen”, according to the Resolution Foundation’s chief executive, Ruth Curtice.
“Ironically, sticking to her manifesto tax pledge has cost millions of low-to-middle earners”, she said.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her budget speech that the point at which people start paying higher rates of tax has been held. It means earners are set to be dragged into higher tax bands as they get pay rises.
The chancellor felt unable to raise income tax as the Labour Party pledged not to raise taxes on working people in its election manifesto.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:47
Budget: What does the public think?
But many are saying that pledge was broken regardless, as the tax burden has increased by £26bn in this budget.
When asked by Sky News whether Ms Reeves would accept she broke the manifesto pledge, she said:
More on Budget 2025
Related Topics:
“I do recognise that yesterday I have asked working people to contribute a bit more by freezing those thresholds for a further three years from 2028.”
“I do recognise that that will mean that working people pay a bit more, but I’ve kept that contribution to an absolute minimum”.
Welcome news
The Resolution Foundation thinktank, which aims to raise living standards, welcomed measures designed to support people with the cost of living, such as the removal of the two-child benefit cap, which limited the number of children families could claim benefits for.
The announced reduction in energy bills through the removal of as yet unspecified levies was similarly welcomed.
The chancellor said bills would become £150 cheaper a year, but the foundation said typical energy bills will fall by around £130 annually for the next three years, “though support then fades away”.
More to come
This budget won’t be the last of it, Ms Curtice said, as economic growth forecasts have been downgraded by independent forecasters the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and growth is a “hurdle that remains to be cleared”.
“Until that challenge is taken on, we can expect plenty more bracing budgets,” she added.
It comes despite Ms Reeves saying as far back as last year, there would be no more tax increases.
Ultimately, though, the foundation said, “The great drumbeat of doom that preceded the chancellor’s big day turned out to be over the top: the forecasts came in better than many had feared.”