Connect with us

Published

on

The Sandie Peggie case has been such a high-profile story because it gets to the heart of the debate about trans rights versus women’s rights, which has been so fraught in recent years – especially in Scotland.

While the Supreme Court ruled in April that the Equality Act referred to a person’s biological sex – with major ramifications over who can use female-protected spaces – we are still waiting for long-delayed government guidance on how this should be applied. We are told it’s due “as soon as possible”.

Government minister Dame Diana Johnson brightly told Darren McCaffrey on Sky’s Politics Hub on Monday that organisations “just need to get on with it – the law is clear”.

But with so many organisations waiting for government guidance before changing policy – that’s clearly not the case.

Tap here for the latest political news

Campaigners have criticised the Peggie tribunal for not following the Supreme Court’s lead more directly. The tribunal didn’t find that it was wrong to let Dr Upton use the female changing rooms – just that action should have been taken after Ms Peggie complained.

Her lawyers say that is hugely problematic, as it puts the onus on a woman to complain.

More on Scotland

The political reaction has been swift. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has long been outspoken on this issue, and she has posted a typically punchy statement in response to the case.

“It’s ridiculous it took two years to reach a verdict that was so obvious from the start,” she wrote on X.

“This entire episode is indicative of a system wasting time and taxpayers’ money to please a small cabal of activists.”

Nurse Sandie Peggie, pictured outside the Edinburgh Tribunals Service after she won a claim for harassment. Pic: PA
Image:
Nurse Sandie Peggie, pictured outside the Edinburgh Tribunals Service after she won a claim for harassment. Pic: PA

But it’s not just the Tories. Scottish Labour MP Joani Reid described Ms Peggie’s treatment as “a disgrace…enabled by a warped NHS culture and fostered by a Scottish government that refused to listen to women’s concerns”.

Of course, the SNP have always been hugely supportive of trans rights, attempting to pass gender recognition laws which would have made it much easier for people to self-ID. That legislation was blocked by the UK Supreme Court.

John Swinney gave a carefully worded response when asked about the issue on Monday, saying “it’s important to take time to consider the judgment” with no further comment on the questions raised by the case.

Sir Keir Starmer, too, has long been dogged by criticism over the lack of clarity in some of his answers to the question “what is a woman”, although he has sought to be more definite in recent years.

Anna Turley, the chair of the Labour Party, said on Monday that it’s more important to get the Supreme Court guidance right than to get it out quickly.

But Monday’s judgment shows the urgent importance of both.

Continue Reading

Politics

OCC boss says ‘no justification’ to judge banks and crypto differently

Published

on

By

OCC boss says ‘no justification’ to judge banks and crypto differently

Crypto companies seeking a US federal bank charter should be treated no differently than other financial institutions, says Jonathan Gould, the head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

Gould told a blockchain conference on Monday that some new charter applicants in the digital or fintech spaces could be seen as offering novel activities for a national trust bank, but noted “custody and safekeeping services have been happening electronically for decades.”

“There is simply no justification for considering digital assets differently,” he added. “Additionally, it is important that we do not confine banks, including current national trust banks, to the technologies or businesses of the past.”

The OCC regulates national banks and has previously seen crypto companies as a risk to the banking system. Only two crypto banks are OCC-licensed: Anchorage Digital, which has held a charter since 2021, and Erebor, which got a preliminary banking charter in October.

Crypto “should have” a way to supervision

Gould said that the banking system has the “capacity to evolve from the telegraph to the blockchain.”

He added that the OCC had received 14 applications to start a new bank so far this year, “including some from entities engaged in novel or digital asset activities,” which was nearly equal to the number of similar applications that the OCC received over the last four years.

Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould giving remarks at the 2025 Blockchain Association Policy Summit. Source: YouTube

“Chartering helps ensure that the banking system continues to keep pace with the evolution of finance and supports our modern economy,” he added. “That is why entities that engage in activities involving digital assets and other novel technologies should have a pathway to become federally supervised banks.”

Gould brushes off banks’ concerns

Gould noted that banks and financial trade groups had raised concerns about crypto companies getting banking charters and the OCC’s ability to oversee them.

Related: Argentina weighs letting traditional banks trade crypto: Report

“Such concerns risk reversing innovations that would better serve bank customers and support local economies,” he said. “The OCC has also had years of experience supervising a crypto-native national trust bank.”