Sir Keir Starmer’s communications chief Tim Allan owns a minority stake in a lobbying firm and still discusses government activity with a senior consultant at the company, Sky News can reveal.
The relationship between Tim Allan, Tom Baldwin and Strand Partners has led to accusations of a perception that one of Downing Street’s most senior figures has a conflict of interest – a potential breach of the special adviser code.
Tom Baldwin is a consultant for Strand Partners, a lobbying firm partly owned by Mr Allan, the government’s executive director of communications.
Multiple sources have told Sky News that Mr Allan and Mr Baldwin have discussed government affairs and politics since Mr Allan joined Number 10 in September. This is not challenged by Downing Street, who say the pair speak in Mr Baldwin’s capacity as a journalist.
Image: Tim Allan at a Strand Partners event in July 2024, before he took a job in government. Pic: Strand Partners
Mr Baldwin is also Sir Keir’s biographer, a commentator and has appeared on Sky News.
As part of his role for Strand Partners, he has spoken at private briefings for Strand’s corporate clients about the inner workings of government.
There is no suggestion that Mr Baldwin – who is not a lobbyist – or Strand Partners have done anything wrong.
The revelations about Mr Allan have led to cross-party calls for an investigation and a member of Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee to demand he gives up his 10% shareholding in Strand Partners.
Zack Polanski, the Green Party leader, told Sky News: “I think it’s extraordinary that someone still has shares who’s at the heart of Downing Street… I think there’s lots of questions still to be asked, I think it’s important to know what these supposed appropriate mitigations are, what exactly are those and do they pass the public sniff test?”
Mr Allen is bound by the code of special advisers that says: “Special advisers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their official duties and their private interests, financial or otherwise.”
The code also says: “Special advisers must not misuse their official position or information acquired in the course of their official duties to further their private interests or those of others.”
Image: Tom Baldwin, Journalist and Strategic Adviser at Strand Partners, speaking at a company dinner at Labour Party Conference in September 2025. Pic: Strand Partners.
Mr Baldwin and Mr Allan are understood not to discuss Strand Partners business. Mr Allan has undertaken to not take dividends or get involved in the running of the company while he is in government, and resigned as chairman on his appointment to Number 10 at the start of September.
But other lobbyists told me they are jealous of this level of access, giving rise to the perception of a conflict of interest.
Opposition parties are seeking an investigation. Lisa Smart, a Liberal Democrat frontbencher, said: “I’ve written to the cabinet secretary today because this appears to be a clear conflict of interest right at the heart of government.
“It cannot be the case that the executive director of communications for the government has shareholdings in a lobbying firm and is continuing to have conversations with senior consultants at that firm.”
Image: Tim Allan (left, behind the flag) sitting in on a Cabinet meeting, in September. Pic: Number 10/Flickr
Kevin Hollinrake, Conservative Party chairman, said: “[There] should be a full Cabinet Office investigation. I think the public need to see there are no conflicts of interest and no perceived conflicts of interests, and that’s not where we are right now.”
The member of Labour’s National Executive Committee said: “This is a massive conflict of interest when we promised integrity to the British public. The first thing he has to do is give up his shareholding.”
Since Mr Allan took up his role in September, Mr Baldwin has been allowed by Treasury officials in Downing Street to attend at least one restricted event with Chancellor Rachel Reeves, her news conference on the budget last week.
Mr Allan denies knowing about this in advance and said this is part of a multi-interview feature for a newspaper, but it is a sign of how close Mr Baldwin is with members of the government.
A Labour spokesperson said: “The allegation that Tim Allan has done anything to benefit Strand whilst in Number 10 is categorically false.
“Tom Baldwin is an established journalist, author and commentator, who regularly appears on Sky News. Any interactions with him are in his capacity as a journalist and have not related to Strand, its business or its clients.”
A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “There is a rigorous process to capture any potential conflicts of interest, and ensure appropriate mitigations are in place to reflect specific circumstances. Ahead of his appointment, Tim Allan fully complied with this process.
“This is set out in the Special Adviser Code of Conduct and lists of special adviser interests are published annually.”
A Strand Partners spokesman said: “Tom Baldwin is a journalist and the biographer of the prime minister. He does not engage in government relations for Strand and this is not part of his terms of engagement with us.
“Tim Allan sought advice on his interests from the Cabinet Office and followed every element of the advice received. He receives no financial benefit from Strand and is not involved in our operations.”
The acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the regulatory body overseeing banks in the US, is reportedly considering guidance for tokenized deposit insurance and plans to launch an application process for stablecoins by year’s end.
Acting FDIC Chair Travis Hill, who has made bullish statements about tokenization in the past, told the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s Fintech Conference on Thursday that the regulator will eventually release guidance around tokenized deposit insurance, according to reports.
The FDIC protects depositors in the event of a bank failure and insures money in accounts at banks that are insured by the regulator.
“My view for a long time has been that a deposit is a deposit. Moving a deposit from a traditional-finance world to a blockchain or distributed-ledger world shouldn’t change the legal nature of it,” Hill said, as reported by Bloomberg.
Excluding stablecoins, the total value of tokenized real-world assets surpassed $24 billion in the first half of the year, with private credit and US Treasurys making up the bulk of the market, according to a report by RedStone.
BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, is one of the most prominent players in the space and launched a tokenized money market fund called BUIDL in 2024.
Stablecoin application regime by the end of the year
At the same time, Hill reportedly announced the agency is also working on a regime for stablecoin issuance and expects to issue a proposal for an application process by the end of 2025 as part of its duties in crafting rules under the GENIUS Act, according to Law360.
He said it’s still too early to know how many institutions will be interested, but the FDIC staff is working on the standards around capital requirements, reserve requirements and risk management for FDIC-regulated stablecoin issuers.
Stablecoins have also been a high-growth area, with banks worldwide exploring this technology. The market capitalization of stablecoins is approximately $305 billion as of Friday, according to blockchain analytics platform DefiLlama.
Stablecoins have been a high-growth area this year, with a market capitalization of around $305 billion. Source: DefiLlama
Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have scrapped plans to break their manifesto pledge and raise income tax rates in a massive U-turn less than two weeks from the budget.
I understand Downing Street has backed down amid fears about the backlash from disgruntled MPs and voters.
The Treasury and Number 10 declined to comment.
The decision is a massive about-turn. In a news conference last week, the chancellor appeared to pave the way for manifesto-breaking tax rises in the budget on 26 November.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:53
‘Aren’t you making a mockery of voters?’
The decision to backtrack was communicated to the Office for Budget Responsibility on Wednesday in a submission of “major measures”, according to the Financial Times.
The chancellor will now have to fill an estimated £30bn black hole with a series of narrower tax-raising measures and is also expected to freeze income tax thresholds for another two years beyond 2028, which should raise about £8bn.
Tory shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said: “We’ve had the longest ever run-up to a budget, damaging the economy with uncertainty, and yet – with just days to go – it is clear there is chaos in No 10 and No 11.”
How did we get here?
For weeks, the government has been working up options to break the manifesto pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT on working people.
I was told only this week the option being worked up was to do a combination of tax rises and action on the two-child benefit cap in order for the prime minister to be able to argue that in breaking his manifesto pledges, he is trying his hardest to protect the poorest in society and those “working people” he has spoken of so endlessly.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
13:06
Ed Conway on the chancellor’s options
But days ago, officials and ministers were working on a proposal to lift the basic rate of income tax – perhaps by 2p – and then simultaneously cut national insurance contributions for those on the basic rate of income tax (those who earn up to £50,000 a year).
That way the chancellor can raise several billion in tax from those with the “broadest shoulders” – higher-rate taxpayers and pensioners or landlords, while also trying to protect “working people” earning salaries under £50,000 a year.
The chancellor was also going to take action on the two-child benefit cap in response to growing demand from the party to take action on child poverty. It is unclear whether those plans will now be shelved given the U-turn on income tax.
A rough week for the PM
The change of plan comes after the prime minister found himself engulfed in a leadership crisis after his allies warned rivals that he would fight any attempted post-budget coup.
It triggered a briefing war between Wes Streeting and anonymous Starmer allies attacking the health secretary as the chief traitor.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:26
Wes Streeting: Faithful or traitor? Beth Rigby’s take
But the saga has further damaged Sir Keir and increased concerns among MPs about his suitability to lead Labour into the next general election.
Insiders clearly concluded that the ill mood in the party, coupled with the recent hits to the PM’s political capital, makes manifesto-breaking tax rises simply too risky right now.
But it also adds to a sense of chaos, given the chancellor publicly pitch-rolled tax rises in last week’s news conference.
The home secretary is set to unveil sweeping reforms to tackle illegal immigration, as she considers potential changes to human rights law.
Shabana Mahmood will announce on Monday a series of measures to make it easier to remove and deport illegal migrants, and reduce the “pull factors” that make the UK attractive to asylum seekers.
The Home Office said they would be the “most sweeping reforms to tackle illegal migration in modern times”.
She is said to believe that “excessive generosity and ease of remaining” in the UK, along with systemic barriers, has made deportations extremely difficult, The Times reported.
It is understood that many of the changes set to be proposed by the home secretary will be modelled on the Danish system, under which 95% of failed asylum seekers are deported.
Denmark has tighter rules on family reunions, and restricts some refugees to a temporary stay.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:56
UK considers copying Denmark’s immigration system
Ms Mahmood is also mulling reforms to the European Convention on Human Rights and human rights law to “end the abuse of the system that leads to unjustified claims to delay or stop deportations”, a Home Office source said.
The overhaul of modern slavery laws will require migrants to make a claim that they have been a victim as soon as they arrive in the UK, rather than allowing them to raise it unexpectedly later on, which has resulted in delayed deportations, The Telegraph reported.
The number of offences qualifying foreign criminals for automatic removal is also set to be increased, the paper said.
And judges are expected to be required to prioritise public safety over claims from migrants that deporting them would breach their family rights or put them at risk of “inhuman” treatment if they were returned to their home country.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:42
Sky News witnesses people smuggling operation in Dunkirk
Deportations are up – but so are boat crossings
Ahead of next week’s announcements, the Home Office released new figures showing 48,560 people have been removed from the UK since Labour came to power.
The figure, which includes failed asylum seekers, foreign criminals and others with no right to be in the UK, is a 23% increase compared to the 16 months before last year’s election.
Ms Mahmood said: “We’ve ramped up enforcement, deported foreign criminals from our streets, and saved taxpayers millions.
However, small boat crossings continue to rise – 39,075 people have made the journey so far this year, according to Home Office figures.
That is an increase of 19% on the same point in 2024 and up 43% on 2023, but remains 5% lower than the equivalent point in 2022, which remains the peak year for crossings.