Connect with us

Published

on

The prime minister’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney will not leave his job at Number 10, Sky News understands, despite furious calls for him to be dismissed.

Sir Keir Starmer’s closest confidante has been under fire in recent days following a briefing row that saw allies of the PM say Sir Keir Starmer would fight any attempts to remove him from office.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting was also accused of plotting to replace Sir Keir Starmer after the chancellor’s autumn budget.

Mr Streeting has strongly denied the claim, and accused Number 10 of having a “toxic” culture and of attempting to “kneecap” him.

Sir Keir also disavowed the briefings, saying he “never authorised” the attack on his health secretary, and said cabinet ministers should not be briefed against.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Beth Rigby analyses claims Wes Streeting wants the prime minister’s job

This morning, several national newspapers led with calls from Labour MPs and unnamed ministers for Mr McSweeney to resign or be sacked – the chief of staff himself becoming a victim of anonymous briefings.

But Sky News understands that he categorically denies he was “directly or indirectly” behind the briefings and will be remaining in his job.

More on Sir Keir Starmer

Mr McSweeney has been in post as chief of staff since October 2024, and is credited as being a key architect of Labour’s transformation following the 2019 election defeat and subsequent victory in 2024.

Mr Streeting was not among those who had called for Mr McSweeney to go, saying on Wednesday that “there wouldn’t be a Labour government” without him.

But he had a furious reaction to the briefings against him, telling Mornings With Ridge And Frost: “I do think that going out and calling your Labour MPs ‘feral’ is not very helpful.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Speaking to Sky News, Health Secretary Wes Streeting denied plotting to oust the prime minister.

He added: “I do think that trying to kneecap one of your own team when they are out, not just making the case for the government, but actually delivering the change that we promised, I think that is also self-defeating and self-destructive behaviour.”

Sir Keir said at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday: “Let me be clear. I’ve never authorised attacks on cabinet members. I appointed them to that post because they’re the best people to carry out that job.”

He also said: “Morgan McSweeney, my team and I are absolutely focused on delivering for the country.”

The prime minister and his health secretary spoke “very briefly” later that evening, in which he apologised.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sir Keir Starmer insists no one from Downing Street briefed against Wes Streeting.

On Thursday, Sir Keir said that he had been “assured that no briefing against ministers was done from No 10”, and it appears that no formal investigation into who spoke to journalists on Tuesday is under way.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused Sir Keir of having “lost control of Number 10” and said two weeks from the 26 November budget, “the government has descended into civil war”.

Continue Reading

Politics

US bank regulator clears national banks to facilitate crypto transactions

Published

on

By

US bank regulator clears national banks to facilitate crypto transactions

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has affirmed that national banks can intermediate cryptocurrency trades as riskless principals without holding the assets on their balance sheets, a move that brings traditional banks a step closer to offering regulated crypto brokerage services.

In an interpretive letter released on Tuesday, the regulator said banks may act as principals in a crypto trade with one customer while simultaneously entering an offsetting trade with another, a structure that mirrors riskless principal activity in traditional markets. 

“Several applicants have discussed how conducting riskless principal crypto-asset transactions would benefit their proposed bank’s customers and business, including by offering additional services in a growing market,” notes the document.

According to the OCC, the move would allow customers “to transact crypto-assets through a regulated bank, as compared to non-regulated or less regulated options.”

Banks, United States, Donald Trump
The OCC’s interpretive letter affirms that riskless principal crypto transactions fall within the “business of banking.” Source: US OCC

The letter also reiterates that banks must confirm the legal permissibility of any crypto activity and ensure it aligns with their chartered powers. Institutions are expected to maintain procedures for monitoring operational, compliance and market risks.

“The main risk in riskless principal transactions is counterparty credit risk (in particular, settlement risk),” reads the letter, adding that “managing counterparty credit risk is integral to the business of banking, and banks are experienced in managing this risk.”

The agency’s guidance cites 12 U.S.C. § 24, which permits national banks to conduct riskless principal transactions as part of the “business of banking.” The letter also draws a distinction between crypto assets that qualify as securities, noting that riskless principal transactions involving securities were already clearly permissible under existing law.

The OCC’s interpretive letter — a nonbinding guidance that outlines the agency’s view of which activities national banks may conduct under existing law — was issued a day after the head of the OCC, Jonathan Gould, said crypto firms seeking a federal bank charter should be treated the same as traditional financial institutions.

According to Gould, the banking system has the “capacity to evolve,” and there is “no justification for considering digital assets differently” than traditional banks, which have offered custody services “electronically for decades.”

Related: Trump’s national security strategy is silent on crypto, blockchain

From ‘Choke Point 2.0’ to pro-crypto policy

Under the Biden administration, some industry groups and lawmakers accused US regulators of pursuing an “Operation Choke Point 2.0” approach that increased supervisory pressure on banks and firms interacting with crypto.

Since President Trump took office in January after pledging to support the sector, the federal government has moved in the opposite direction, adopting a more permissive posture toward digital asset activity.

Magazine: Quantum attacking Bitcoin would be a waste of time: Kevin O’Leary