UK
Natalie Elphicke says claims she lobbied justice secretary over ex-husband’s trial are ‘nonsense’
Accusations MP Natalie Elphicke lobbied the justice secretary in 2020 to interfere in her then-husband’s sex offences trial are “nonsense”, her spokesperson has said.
It is claimed the Dover MP, who recently defected from Conservative to Labour, approached Sir Robert Buckland when he was lord chancellor and justice secretary before the hearing of Charlie Elphicke’s case.
The Sunday Times reported that she allegedly told Sir Robert that it was unfair the case was the first to be heard at Southwark Crown Court after the COVID lockdown and that it was being overseen by Lady Justice Whipple.
One person present viewed her comments as a bid to have the case moved to a lower-profile court to spare her partner public scrutiny, while another saw it as an attempt to replace the senior judge, according to the newspaper.
Charlie Elphicke, pictured in 2020. Pic: PA
Sir Robert reportedly told the paper he rejected her plea, suggesting his intervention could undermine the constitutional doctrine of the separation of powers between parliament and the judiciary.
“She was told in no uncertain terms that it would have been completely inappropriate to speak to the judge about the trial at all,” Sir Robert said in a statement.
In a statement responding to the claims, also published in The Mail on Sunday, a spokesman for Ms Elphicke said: “This is nonsense.
“It’s certainly true that Mr Elphicke continued to be supported after his imprisonment by a large number of Conservative MPs who had known him for a long time, including some who visited him and independently lobbied on his behalf, which was nothing to do with Natalie.”
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
A Labour Party spokesman said Ms Elphicke “totally rejects that characterisation of the meeting”.
“If Robert Buckland had any genuine concerns about the meeting, then he should have raised them at the time, rather than making claims to the newspapers now Natalie has chosen to join the Labour Party,” the spokesman said.
Labour frontbencher Jonathan Ashworth also questioned the timing of the report, telling Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: “She said that is nonsense and not her interpretation of the meeting. I obviously wasn’t in the meeting so I don’t know.
“If this happened at the time, then why did the lord chancellor not raise this issue at the time through his good offices?”
Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron was also asked about the claims, but told Sky News: “I have absolutely no idea, so I’ve got really nothing to add.”
Elphicke defection ‘naked opportunism’
He went onto attack Labour for “naked opportunism” in allowing Ms Elphicke to join the party.
He said: “I’m not a fan of defectors. I think it always leaves a legacy of upset and betrayal, and everything else.
“I thought this was just naked opportunism, by Labour as much as anything.
“This is quite a right-wing Conservative MP suddenly welcomed into the Labour fold having never supported any of their policies, people or approaches.
“The revealing thing is it was like a moment where you look at the Labour Party and think – if you don’t stand for anything, then you’ll fall for stuff like this.”
Sir Robert Buckland
Ms Elphicke’s former husband and predecessor as MP for Dover, Charlie Elphicke, was convicted in 2020 of sexually assaulting two women and jailed for two years.
She ended the marriage after his conviction but supported his unsuccessful appeal, saying Mr Elphicke had been “attractive, and attracted to women” and “an easy target for dirty politics and false allegations”.
Ms Elphicke allegedly also tried to secure him better prison conditions, asking for more comfortable pillows, The Sunday Times reported, something she also denied.
Read more from Sky News:
Natalie Elphicke apologises for supporting sex offender ex-husband
What happens when an MP defects to another party?
Following news of Ms Elphicke’s defection this week, Labour MPs raised concerns about the decision to admit her to the party, citing her comments about Mr Elphicke’s case and his victims.
In a statement on Thursday, she said she condemned “his behaviour towards other women and towards me”, adding it was “right that he was prosecuted” and she was “sorry for the comments that I made about his victims”.