In December, the Bangladesh foreign ministry sent a note verbale, an unsigned diplomatic correspondence, seeking the repatriation of Ms Hasina. The same was acknowledged in New Delhi.
Randhir Jaiswal, a spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs in India, said: “We confirm that we have received a note verbale from the Bangladesh High Commission today in connection with an extradition request.
“At this time, we have no comment to offer on this matter.”
The India-Bangladesh extradition treaty of 2013 includes provisions under which an extradition request can be turned down under Article 6 of the treaty.
The interim government of Mr Yunus does not represent the entire political spectrum of the country and once a democratically-elected government is in place, a legitimate demand could be considered by New Delhi.
Cosy relationship
India has had a very cosy relationship with Ms Hasina over her 20-year rule.
Image: Crowds celebrate the resignation of Ms Hasina in Dhaka last summer.
Pic: Reuters/Mohammad Ponir Hossain
Image: A policeman aims his weapon at protesters during an imposed curfew on 5 August.
Pic: Reuters/Rajib Dhar
Many in Bangladesh believe New Delhi played a pivotal role in bringing her to power in 2007, and allegedly helped her authoritarian rule over three terms.
India has also been accused of turning a blind eye on issues of large-scale corruption, cronyism and human rights violations.
New Delhi played into Hasina’s narrative
The main opposition – Khalida Zia’s Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) – was not as friendly to India.
Then there is the issue of keeping the Islamist party, Jammat-e-Islami, at bay, which Ms Hasina had banned.
New Delhi played into Ms Hasina’s narrative, “that if not her” then fundamentalists would take over Bangladesh in a sensitive and restive northeastern region of India.
The fear blind-sided mandarins and the right-wing political leadership.
Image: Protesters celebrate beside a defaced portrait of Ms Hasina on 5 August 2024.
Pic: Reuters/Fatima Tuj Johora
Image: People run past a vehicle set on fire by protesters during a rally against Ms Hasina on 4 August.
Pic: Reuters/Rajib Dhar
New Delhi kept all its eggs in Hasina’s basket
India failed to foster good relations with opposition political parties and kept all its eggs in Ms Hasina’s basket.
An official from the Bangladesh high commission, who didn’t want to be named, told Sky News: “There were a number of times when former PM Khalida Zia and her BNP tried reaching out to New Delhi, especially during her long incarceration, only to be rejected and unaccommodated by the political establishment.
“It was done to keep Hasina on side.”
Since Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s right-wing Hindu nationalist government took over in 2014, this relationship has grown stronger.
Close ties of the two nations
Both countries share a 2,500-mile-long border, but more than that, the nations are steeped in cultural, social and economic bonds.
There are more than 13 million Hindus living in Bangladesh, making up 8% of the population.
During the unrest and its aftermath, there was violence against the community and a number of Hindu temples were targeted by protesters.
A number of times, Mr Modi’s government raised concerns about the safety and security of the minority Hindu community.
This is the second time that Ms Hasina has taken refuge in India.
After the massacre of 18 of her family members, including her father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1975, she, her husband and children lived in New Delhi for six years until 1981.
There is some uncertainty about her future in India, but New Delhi will not be pressured into handing over the former premier anytime soon.
This is shown in the shelter and unwavering support by India of the Dalai Lama since 1959, under tremendous Chinese pressure.
New Delhi and Dhaka will get an impetus to reset their relationship when Mr Modi and Mr Yunus meet on the sidelines of a regional summit in Thailand in early April.