Environment secretary George Eustice has described a ban on exporting sausages and processed meats from Great Britain to Northern Ireland agreed as part of the Brexit process as “nonsensical”.
Under the terms of the Northern Ireland Protocol a ban will come into force if the UK and EU cannot agree new regulatory standards to cover the sale of processed meats before the end of a “grace period” on 1 July.
UK and EU officials will meet on Wednesday to discuss the protocol amid heightened political rhetoric between London and Brussels and increasing community tension in Northern Ireland.
Image: The protocol is designed to govern post-Brexit trading with Northern Ireland
A spokesman for prime minister Boris Johnson echoed Mr Eustice’s comments, saying there was “no case whatsoever” for barring the sale of chilled meets in Northern Ireland and saying its attempts to resolve the impasse had met a stony response.
European Commision lead Maros Sefcovic had warned earlier that the EU will act “swiftly, firmly and resolutely” if the UK decides unilaterally to extend the grace period.
Advertisement
His comments, published in the Daily Telegraph, came after Brexit Minister Lord Frost, who negotiated the EU withdrawal agreement, admitted the government had underestimated the impact of the customs checks and regulations required by the Protocol.
For months before and after the Brexit deal was signed in December 2020, Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other members of the government including Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis denied there would be any customs checks.
More from Business
Mr Eustice told Sky News the EU was to blame for the impasse.
“What you have to bear in mind is that the Protocol always envisaged that both parties would show best endeavours to make the Northern Ireland Protocol work, and that included recognising that Northern Ireland was an integral part of the UK and that you should support the free flow of goods to Northern Ireland,” he said.
Image: Northern Ireland has seen an increase in community tension
“What we really need the EU to do is to respect that part of the Protocol and put in place sensible measures to remove things like the nonsensical ban on selling sausages or chicken nuggets to Northern Ireland – not just requiring paperwork, but actually having an outright ban on some of those goods – that clearly doesn’t make sense.”
“We’re committed to making it work but we just need the European Union to engage in that process to iron out those issues.”
The protocol is intended to manage the technical, trading and political complexities of Northern Ireland’s unique position post-Brexit, and crucially to avoid a hard land border with Ireland.
While Northern Ireland has left the EU customs area along with the rest of the UK, it continues to abide by EU single market regulations covering all manner of goods, including food imports.
This effectively placed a customs border in the Irish Sea and means goods exported from Great Britain to Northern Ireland have to meet EU regulations and tariffs where applicable unless the two sides can agree alternatives.
Under EU rules governing food safety, to which the UK was party until 1 January, processed meats cannot be imported from outside the union.
Image: George Eustice said the EU was to blame for the impasse
A Downing Street spokesman said: “There’s no case whatsoever for preventing chilled meat from being sold in Northern Ireland.
“We think an urgent solution needs to be found
“We have not heard any new proposals from the EU.
“We have sent more than 10 papers to the Commission proposing potential solutions on a wide range of issues and we’re yet to receive a single written response.”
The Federation of Small Businesses in Northern Ireland called on both sides to end the public posturing and work on practical solutions in order to protect jobs and livelihoods.
“This gets boiled down to a single issue like whether British sausages can be sold in Northern Ireland, but there are around 30 issues the negotiators need to deal with, everything from VAT on second-hand cars to pot plants and moving pets around,” said Tina McKenzie, chair of the FSB’s Northern Ireland policy unit.
“We knew there would be issues to work through as a result of Brexit but we are now more than six months on.
“The two sides need to stop talking to their own sides through newspaper articles and get on to the closed-door diplomacy to deliver practical solutions.”
Amazon has said it will invest £40bn in the UK over the next three years as it creates thousands of jobs and opens four new warehouses.
The online shopping giant will build two huge fulfilment centres in the East Midlands, which it expects to open in 2027. The exact locations are still to be revealed.
Two others – in Hull and Northampton – were previously announced and are set to be finished this year and in 2026 respectively, with 2,000 jobs expected at each site.
Amazon is already one of the country’s biggest private employers – with around 75,000 staff.
Two new buildings will also go up at its corporate headquarters in east London, while other investment includes new delivery stations, upgrading its transport network and redeveloping Bray Film Studios in Berkshire – which it bought last year.
The £40bn figure also includes most of the £8bn announced in 2024 for building and maintaining UK data centres, as well as staff wages and benefits.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmersaid the investment into Amazon’s third-biggest market after the US and Germany was a “massive vote of confidence in the UK as the best place to do business”.
More on Amazon
Related Topics:
“It means thousands of new jobs – real opportunities for people in every corner of the country to build careers, learn new skills, and support their families,” said Sir Keir.
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, said it was a “powerful endorsement of Britain’s economic strengths”.
Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy stressed the investment would benefit communities across the UK.
“When Amazon invests, it’s not only in London and the South East,” he said.
“We’re bringing innovation and job creation to communities throughout England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, strengthening the UK’s economy and delivering better experiences for customers wherever they live.”
However, Amazon’s immense power and size continues to raise concerns among some regulators, unions and campaigners.
There have long been claims over potentially dangerous conditions at its warehouses – denied by the company, while last week Britain’s grocery regulator launched an investigation into whether it breached rules on supplier payments.
Under the industrial strategy for 2025 to 2035, the government has said it plans to cut the bills of electricity-intensive manufacturers by up to £40 per megawatt hour – up to 25% – from 2027, which could benefit more than 7,000 businesses.
These savings will come by exempting them from certain levies on bills.
Roughly 500 of the most energy-intensive companies, such as the steel industry, chemicals and glassmaking industries, will also see their network charges cut.
Image: Pic: iStock
The current 60% discount they get, via the British Industry Supercharger scheme, will increase to 90% from next year.
The government also said the energy measures would be funded through reforms to the energy system, without raising household bills or taxes.
The scope and eligibility for the scheme will be finalised after a consultation.
The policy is the first industrial strategy of its kind in eight years and comes as part of the government’s key priority of growing the economy.
Pressure was on to develop such a policy after the US’s Inflation Reduction Act boosted investment in renewable energy, and the European Union’s Net-Zero Industry Act was designed to boost domestic production.
A “bespoke” 10-year plan has been created for eight sectors where the UK is said to be strong already and there is potential for growth.
The sectors named by the government are advanced manufacturing, clean energy, creative industries, defence, digital and technologies, life sciences, professional and business services, and financial services.
The state-owned British Business Bank will expand to spur investment into smaller companies, and provide an extra £1.2bn a year by 2028-29.
The government also repeated its ambition to cut regulatory burdens, spend more on research and development and speed up the planning process.
Sam Laidlaw, the former boss of Centrica, is among the candidates being considered as the next chairman of BP, Britain’s besieged oil and gas exploration giant.
Sky News has learnt that Mr Laidlaw is being considered by BP board members as a potential successor to Helge Lund, who announced in April that he would step down.
BP’s chair search comes with the £62bn oil major in a state of crisis, as industry predators circle and the pace of its strategic transformation being interrogated by shareholders.
Elliott Management, the activist investor, snapped up a multibillion pound stake in BP earlier this year and is pushing its chief executive, Murray Auchincloss, to accelerate spending cuts and ditch a string of renewable energy commitments.
Mr Lund’s departure will come after nearly a quarter of BP’s shareholders opposed his re-election at its annual meeting in April – an unusually large protest given that his intention to step down had already been announced.
BP’s senior independent director – the Aviva chief executive Amanda Blanc – is said to be moving “at pace” to complete the recruitment process.
A number of prominent candidates are understood to be in discussions with headhunters advising BP on the search.
More from Money
Mr Laidlaw would be a logical choice to take the role, having transformed Centrica, the owner of British Gas, during his tenure, which ended in 2014.
Since then, he has had a long stint – which recently concluded – on the board of miner Rio Tinto, which has been fending off activist calls to abandon its London listing.
He also established, and then sold, Neptune Energy, an oil company which was acquired by Italy’s Eni for nearly £4bn in 2023.
Last December, Mr Laidlaw was appointed chairman of AWE, the government-owned body which oversees Britain’s nuclear weapons capability.
He also has strong family connections to BP, with his father, Christopher Laidlaw, having served as its deputy chairman during a long business career.
One person close to BP said the younger Mr Laidlaw had been approached about chairing the company during its previous recruitment process but had ruled himself out because of his Neptune Energy role.
The status of his engagement with BP’s search was unclear on Saturday.
Another person said to have been approached is Ken MacKenzie, who recently retired as chairman of the mining giant BHP.
Mr MacKenzie headed BHP during a period when Elliott held a stake in the company, and is said to have a good working relationship with the investor.
Shares in BP have continued their downward trajectory over the last year, having fallen by nearly a fifth during that period.
The company’s valuation slump is reported to have drawn renewed interest in a possible takeover bid, with rivals Shell and ExxonMobil among those said to have “run the numbers” in recent months.
Reports of such interest have not elicited any formal response, suggesting that any deal is conceptual at this stage.
BP is racing to sell assets including Castrol, its lubricants division, which could command a price of about $8bn.
This weekend, BP declined to comment, while Mr Laidlaw could not be reached for comment.