WASHINGTON — The Department of the Interior today announced its intent to assess potential opportunities to advance clean energy development on the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). This significant milestone is part of the Biden-Harris administration’s goal to create thousands of jobs through the deployment of 30 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind by 2030.
“The Interior Department is committed to developing a robust and sustainable clean energy economy,” said Secretary Deb Haaland. “We know that offshore wind development has the potential to create tens of thousands of good-paying, union jobs across the nation. This is an important first step to see what role the Gulf may play in this exciting frontier.”
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) will publish a Request for Interest (RFI) in the Federal Register on Friday, June 11, to assess interest in potential offshore wind development in the OCS. The RFI will be focused on the Western and Central Planning Areas of the Gulf of Mexico offshore the states of Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama. Although the primary focus of the RFI is on wind energy development, BOEM is also seeking information on other renewable energy technologies.
“The Biden-Harris administration has energized the offshore wind industry by announcing the first ever national offshore wind energy goal, creating a roadmap for the future of this innovative industry,” said BOEM Director Amanda Lefton. “I’m excited to see the Gulf be a potential part of this historic effort.”
“The Gulf of Mexico has decades of offshore energy development expertise. Today’s announcement represents the first step in harnessing that expertise and applying it to the renewable energy sector,” said Mike Celata, regional director of BOEM’s Gulf of Mexico office in New Orleans. “Working directly with our partners in the Gulf, we will make sure that offshore renewable energy development proceeds in an orderly, safe, and environmentally responsible manner.”
To date, BOEM has leased approximately 1.7 million acres in the OCS for offshore wind development and has 17 commercial leases on the Atlantic, from Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras.
Once published the RFI will open a 45-day public comment period to solicit indications of competitive interest and additional information on potential environmental consequences and other uses of the proposed area. BOEM will consider data received in response to this RFI to determine next steps in the renewable energy leasing process in the Gulf of Mexico.
As part of this process, BOEM will convene the Gulf of Mexico Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Task Force to help coordinate planning, solicit feedback, and exchange scientific and process information. BOEM will hold its first task force meeting on June 15. The task force comprises members representing federal, Tribal, state and local governments from Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama.
Tesla’s Chairwoman Robyn Denholm complains that everyone is talking about the high-profile departures at the automaker, but no one is talking about the people they are hiring.
Can she name one? Literally, name just one.
At Electrek, we have been closely reporting on the talent exodus at Tesla.
The issue has been ongoing for a few years, but it clearly accelerated following a significant wave of layoffs in April 2024.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
To name a few:
Omead Afshar, Vice President of Sales and Manufacturing for North America and Europe, departed in June 2025. Afshar was a close confidante of CEO Elon Musk and was instrumental in the ramp-up of Gigafactory Texas.
Milan Kovac, head of the Optimus humanoid robot program, announced his departure in June 2025.
Drew Baglino, Senior Vice President of Powertrain and Energy Engineering, left the company in April 2025. A long-time Tesla veteran, Baglino was a key figure in the development of Tesla’s battery and powertrain technology.
Rohan Patel, Vice President of Public Policy and Business Development, also departed in April 2025. Patel was the face of Tesla’s government relations and policy efforts.
Rebecca Tinucci, Senior Director of the Supercharger business, left in April 2025. Tinucci oversaw the significant expansion of Tesla’s global charging network.
David Lau, Vice President of Software Engineering, departed in April 2025. Lau played a crucial role in the development of Tesla’s vehicle software and its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features.
Troy Jones, Vice President of North American Sales and Service, left in July 2025. Jones was a long-serving executive responsible for a significant portion of Tesla’s sales and delivery operations.
Pete Bannon, Vice President of Hardware Engineering, who was involved in the development of Tesla’s custom chips, including the Dojo supercomputer, left in August 2025.
Recently, the Financial Times released a report highlighting the talent exodus at Tesla and Chairwoman, Robyn Denholm, complained that the media only focuses on the departures and not the people “joining” Tesla, which she described as “still a magnet for talent”:
“There are always headlines about people leaving, but I don’t see the headlines about people joining. Our bench strength is outstanding . . . we actually develop people really well at Tesla and we are still a magnet for talent.”
However, she couldn’t name a single one.
To be clear, we primarily report on higher-profile and senior-level departures (directors and above), but we track all of them.
Just for example, here are a dozen people at important but not senior roles at Tesla who departed over the last month but were never reported:
Basil Sobchak
Time at Tesla: 10 years, 6 months
General Role: Vehicle Service Lead
Patrick Barr
Time at Tesla: 8 years, 7 months
General Role: Facilities Maintenance Lead
Luke Sanders
Time at Tesla: 7 years, 1 month
General Role: Production Management (Model Y – Fremont)
Indra K Vijay
Time at Tesla: 6 years, 1 month
General Role: Software Engineering Management
Logan Roy
Time at Tesla: 5 years, 3 months
General Role: Mechanical Engineering (Battery Structures)
Lexi Hayden
Time at Tesla: 4 years, 4 months
General Role: Technical Program Management (Semi Validation)
Francisco Fernández
Time at Tesla: 4 years, 3 months
General Role: Supply Chain Management
Andrew Wells
Time at Tesla: 3 years, 8 months
General Role: Construction Management (Gigafactory Texas)
Aleksi V.
Time at Tesla: 3 years, 3 months
General Role: Production Management (Drive Unit & Battery)
Page Bailey
Time at Tesla: 2 years, 1 month
General Role: Engineering (Production & Components)
Sam Thorpe
Time at Tesla: 2 years, 1 month
General Role: Technical Program Management (Lithium Refinery)
Harika Kasula
Time at Tesla: 1 year, 7 months
General Role: Manufacturing Controls Engineering (Cybertruck)
However, we cannot produce the same thing about new hires, not only for the last month, but for the last year.
With all the departures, Tesla almost exclusively promotes internally to fill the position, and the vast majority of new hires are at the intern and junior levels.
There is one part of Denholm’s statement that is accurate: Tesla is still able to attract talent, but only from recent graduates, and even then, there’s room to worry.
Tesla has now slipped into 9th place this year, according to Universum:
This is obviously still good, but it is on a pronounced downtrend.
Electrek’s Take
Look, turnover in large companies is absolutely normal, but the story is much bigger than that.
First off, Denholm remains a joke. She is complaining about the media not reporting on new Tesla hires, but the company hasn’t announced any new hires in years, and I literally can’t find any.
If she is going to claim that, she should at least name a few. Is she capable of doing that, or is her entire job about trying to secure increasingly more ridiculous compensation packages for Elon Musk?
On the other hand, I can find dozens of critical veteran Tesla employees leaving over the last year and hundreds of experienced employees.
The talent exodus is real, and the fact that Tesla’s chairwoman is dismissing it should be worrying.
We are referring to many of the individuals responsible for the company’s success, who are being replaced by juniors and interns.
Now, I’m the first to admit that this is not all bad. Fresh eyes and young talent can do a lot, but it doesn’t dismiss the fact that there’s a talent exodus at Tesla.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Kia plans to introduce a new electric vehicle, codenamed CB, to its growing lineup. The new EV is part of an agreement that Kia reached with its union this week.
Kia agrees to build a new EV in Korea
While many automakers are scaling back, Kia is doubling down on electric vehicles, batteries, and other EV technology.
After reaching an agreement with its labor union on Tuesday, we are learning Kia has another EV in the pipeline, and it’s not the EV2, EV3, EV4, EV5, EV6, or EV9. So, what is the “secret” new electric car?
Okay, so it’s not exactly a secret, at least not anymore, but more of a new development. According to local sources (via KEDGlobal), little is known about the model. Since it’s still in the early stages of development, Kia has yet to determine exactly how big it will be or what segment it will launch.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Kia will begin producing the new EV, codenamed CB, at its Hwaseong Plant 2 in South Korea by 2030. The electric vehicle was just one of several new projects Kia agreed to with its labor union.
Kia EV4 models during safety testing in Europe (Source: Kia UK)
The company also confirmed plans to begin building its second electric van, the PV7, at its dedicated Hwaseong EVO plant, starting in 2027. Kia currently produces the mid-size PV5 van at the facility, marking the first model in its Platform Beyond Vehicle (PBV) lineup.
The PV7 will measure 5.9 meters in length, slightly longer than the PV5, which is up to 4.7 meters (Long Wheelbase version).
Kia PV5 Tech Day event (Source: Kia)
Kia’s agreement comes as the company looks to take a lead in electrification over the next few years. It also outlined plans to advance battery packs, power electronics (PE) modules, and other core EV components to help establish a domestic supply chain.
In Europe, Kia plans to nearly triple EV production within the next two years. Kia’s CEO, Ho Sun Song, told Automotive News Europe earlier this month that the company plans to build about 100,000 EV2 models, its smallest electric car, at its Zilina plant in Slovakia in 2027.
Kia unveils EV4 sedan and hatchback, PV5 electric van, and EV2 Concept at 2025 Kia EV Day (Source: Kia)
Kia expects to build an additional over 80,000 EV4 models, its first electric hatch, at the facility by 2027. Combined with EV4 Fastback, or the sedan version, which is produced in South Korea, Song said that “the EV4’s combined global production is expected to reach approximately 100,000 units.”
The first EV4 rolled off the assembly line at the Zilina plant in August, marking a milestone as the first electric vehicle Kia built in Europe.
Kia starts EV4 hatchback production in Europe, its first EV built in Europe (Source: Kia UK)
Kia is already gaining traction in the region. Through August, Kia sold 71,179 electric vehicles in Europe, marking a 56% increase compared to the same period in 2024.
The EV3 has been Kia’s biggest hit, ranking as its second-best-selling vehicle behind the Sportage. It’s the seventh top-selling EV in Europe, behind the Tesla Model Y, Model 3, and Volkswagen’s ID.3, ID.4, and ID.7. Through the first eight months of the year, Kia sold over 45,000 EV3s in Europe.
With the EV4 and EV5 rolling out and the EV2 set to launch in 2026, Kia expects to gain an even bigger share of the market.
Electrek’s Take
Kia already offers, or plans to offer, an electric vehicle in nearly every segment with the EV2, EV3, EV4 (hatchback and sedan), EV5, EV6, and EV9.
The new EV, codenamed CB, could be an even smaller EV1 entry-level model as Kia doubles down on affordability. On the other hand, it could also be a possible EV7 or EV8, something to sit in between the EV6 and the three-row EV9.
Since it’s still in the early stages of development, it could be just about anything: an electric pickup, off-roader, luxury car, etc.
What do you think (or hope) it will be? We should learn more about it as it gets closer to launch. Stay tuned.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
When most folks think of electric trikes, they picture big cargo haulers or mobility-style cruisers with two wheels in the back and a basket full of groceries. But there’s another category of three-wheeled electric bikes that’s more fun, more niche, and undeniably cooler: sidecar e-bikes.
Yep, they actually exist. And they’re awesome.
Sidecar electric bikes are just what they sound like: an electric bike with a third wheel off to the side, usually supporting a passenger-sized pod or platform. They’re the bicycle version of the old-school sidecar motorcycles.
Unlike traditional trikes, where the third wheel adds stability or cargo capacity behind the rider (or occasionally in front of the rider in the case of “tadpole” trikes), sidecar e-bikes carry their payload beside you, often evoking that vintage motorcycle vibe. They’re rare, quirky, and a guaranteed head-turner.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
So why don’t we see more of them?
For starters, sidecar e-bikes are usually custom-built or smaller-batch productions, which means they come with a higher price tag than your typical two-wheeler or three-wheeler. And while they can definitely carry a kid, a dog, or even big cargo, they’re not quite as nimble or efficient as your average e-bike.
While there are retail options like the Mod Easy Sidecar e-bike (which the Austin, Texas-based company modified below as part of a promotion with a local distillery), the number of retail sidecar e-bike options pales in comparison to traditional electric trikes.
But what they lack in practicality, they make up for in pure fun. There’s just something inherently joyful about cruising around town with your doggo (or kiddo) riding shotgun in a sidecar. It turns a boring commute into a joyride and transforms everyday errands into rolling adventures. I’ve test-ridden a few over the years, and every time I do, I feel like I’m starring in my own two-wheeled road trip movie.
From a usability standpoint, sidecar e-bikes offer a unique middle ground between a cargo bike and a passenger trike. You get added capacity, sure, but you also get separation – whether that’s space for a wiggly toddler, a hyper dog, or just a bag of ice you don’t want melting on your lap. They also provide a lower center of gravity than a rear-mounted child seat or rack, which can make for a smoother, more balanced ride, especially when turning.
But despite that separation, they can actually be more fun to ride together. Parents can keep an eye on their kids in the sidecar instead of being blind to whatever they’re doing in the back of the trike. The same goes for a pup, which the owner can watch to see if they’re having a good time or ready to arrive at the dog park already.
Many models even offer the ability to remove the sidecar entirely, converting back into a typical two-wheeled e-bike, a neat trick not found on most other e-trikes.
But there are drawbacks. The first major one is the higher price than a typical e-trike due to the lower volume production.
Storage can be awkward, too, since the added width makes it tough to fit through tight doorways or narrow bike paths. Handling also takes some getting used to, since the asymmetrical design can pull a bit to one side, especially during acceleration or on uneven pavement.
Still, for those looking to stand out and haul their precious cargo with style, sidecar e-bikes are an underappreciated gem in the micromobility world. They’re not for everyone, but that’s kind of the point. If you want a bike that puts smiles before specs, you might just be a sidecar kind of person.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.