New Republican-Only Conservative Climate Caucus Light On Science, Heavily Pro-Fossil Fuels
Recently, Republicans received some favorable climate-related coverage. Utah’s 3rd District Congressman John Curtis announced the formation of a Conservative Climate Caucus. It came with a roster of roughly 60 Congresspeople, none of them particularly well known names. While they are light on content, they have sufficient info on their site to make a few early assessments. It’s possible that their actual actions will pleasantly surprise me, but the start is inauspicious.
First, though, it’s worth looking at some prior art in conservative climate actions.
There have been a few Republicans at the climate change table in the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus for years, and they include big names like Romney, Murkowski, Graham, Rubio, and Gaetz, all of whom are missing from the new Caucus (although it’s easy to understand why Gaetz wasn’t invited). And until the 2018 midterms, they were actually fully bi-partisan as their policy, with newcomers required to join in matched pairs.
Their solution is a revenue-neutral carbon fee and dividend, along with reduced regulation. It’s a good policy, as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go nearly far enough and it would have needed to start in 1990. We need governments to make tough choices, we need carrots to draw first-movers, and we need sticks to beat recalcitrant industries with. A carbon fee that’s low and capped at a too-low rate is exactly one policy lever. The carbon fee and dividend is bog-standard conservative economic policy, outside of Libertarian ideologues. Place a price on negative externalities and let the market take care of the rest.
The Climate Leadership Council is another legacy group focused on climate action. It was founded by senior Republican luminaries including former Secretaries of State James A. Baker and George P. Shultz, and Rob Walton, former Chairman of Walmart. Its focus is a revenue-neutral climate fee and dividend as well, along with a side helping of deregulation. Since its very conservative founding, it’s branched out to be a bi-partisan effort as well, and gained approval of Nobel Laureates in economics and corporate sponsorship. That corporate involvement is telling, by the way. There are 8 big fossil fuel-oriented emitters in the set, all of which have been doing quite well at greenwashing and notably less well at actually eliminating fossil fuels. When BHP, ExxonMobil, and BP are bellying up to the bar, the reasonable question of greenwashing arises. But the policies include a border carbon adjustment as well, and there are worse policy sets. They would start their fee at $40 per ton per the report and increase it above inflation until it hit $80, which is too low, but still better than nothing.
So many conservative policy strategists and economists favor carbon taxes. But watch what happens when sensible administrations implement this conservative Pigovian tax:
- In Australia, center-left Labor brought a carbon tax in. The right-wing Liberals — with the support of the Oz version of the Heritage Foundation and coal baron money — derided it utterly, fought an election on it, and when they won, canceled it.
- In Canada, the centrist Liberals brought in a revenue-neutral carbon fee and dividend to tax payers. The increasingly right-wing Conservatives derided it, fought two elections against it, thankfully losing both, and in a recent policy convention, refused to include climate change and action in their policies.
It’s like the Affordable Care Act, a Republican-created and tested policy that the conservative Obama Administration brought in. The Republicans immediately derided it as ObamaCare and fought tooth and nail against it for years. Consistency and so-called conservative parties like the Republicans don’t go hand in hand anymore.
So the new Republican-only Conservative Climate Caucus exists in a context. It doesn’t have big names associated with it. It’s inherently partisan. It’s entered a place where two pre-existing, well structured, well thought-through actually conservative caucuses and political action groups with senior Republican engagement already exist. And it doesn’t have a coherent policy it stands behind.
But it does have a set of ‘beliefs’, and they’ve already tipped their hand about what they are really all about. Let’s look at what they believe, point by point.
“The climate is changing, and decades of a global industrial era that has brought prosperity to the world has also contributed to that change.”
“Contributed to.” Right. The science is clear that we would be experiencing very slow cooling in a stable climate, but instead are seeing radically rapid heating, over 100 times faster than the heating which melted the continental glaciers 20-25 thousand years ago.
So yes, this is a belief. It’s not the reality. But that’s also not a policy indicator, so we can somewhat ignore it.
“Private sector innovation, American resources, and R&D investment have resulted in lower emissions and affordable energy, placing the United States as the global leader in reducing emissions.”
“Global leader.” Right. Germany is off 40% in GHG emissions since 1990. US emissions are about the same as they were in 1990, after having risen through 2010 or so. You have to cherrypick your timeframes to pretend the US is a global leader in emissions reduction when its per capita emissions are still among the highest in the world and its historical emissions are a full 25% of the global historical total.
This is a point of faith on the right. They really seem to believe this is true. So yes, more unsupported belief, not reality. And also not policy, although it’s a pointer to policy.
“Climate change is a global issue and China is the greatest immediate obstacle to reducing world emissions. Solutions should reduce global emissions and not just be “feel good” policies.”
China is not the greatest immediate obstacle in the real world. It is on track to hitting its (admittedly weak) Paris Agreement targets nine years early. It built as much wind and solar in 2020 as the rest of the world combined, 72 GW of wind and 48 GW of solar. It has 38,000 km of high-speed electrified passenger rail in operation, enough to circle the equator. It has well over 400,000 electric buses on the roads of its cities when no other country has 1,000 in operation. It buys 50% of all electric vehicles. It builds virtually all of the solar panels used globally. Chinese firms are two of the top five global wind turbine manufacturers.
China remained signatory to the Paris Agreement and acted when Republicans took the US out of the Agreement and regressed. For the past four years, the largest single obstacle to climate action was the United States. This is Sinophobic posturing, and indicative of policy that will not be useful. It sells well, and Biden does it too, but it remains harmful, finger-pointing nonsense.
And yet again, not policy, just a pointer to where policy might go.
“Practical and exportable answers can be found in innovation embraced by the free market. Americans and the rest of the world want access to cheaper, reliable, and cleaner energy.”
“Innovation” is a right-wing mantra as well. What it translates to is research funding, funding for the fossil fuel industries for failed carbon capture technologies, and yet more billions for nuclear energy. Innovation has already been embraced by the free market. It’s called wind and solar power. And it’s delivering cheaper, reliable, and actually clean — not ‘cleaner’ — energy globally today.
Germany and Denmark are running well over 40% on renewable electricity and their grid reliability metrics are vastly better than the US’. The average German and Dane see less than 15 minutes of power interruptions annually.
No one in the US sees anything approaching that level of reliability.
But this suggests policies. They extrapolate to:
These are no climate-friendly policies. These are fossil fuel industry friendly policies.
“With innovative technologies, fossil fuels can and should be a major part of the global solution.”
No, they won’t. This is #hopium from the fossil fuel industry, the Republican’s primary sponsors. The fossil fuel industry has to dwindle to a petrochemicals industry providing industrial feedstocks, perhaps 20% of a barrel, probably less.
This is indicative of energy and climate policies which are not about the greatest good for the greatest number, but the greatest good for the smallest number, specifically fossil fuel oligarchs like the Kochs.
“Reducing emissions is the goal, not reducing energy choices.”
Eliminating emissions is the goal, and some energy choices do not make that at all possible. Physics makes that very clear. More meat for the fossil fuel industry at the expense of the climate here.
So what this all means is that if — big if — Republicans actually come up with a climate policy at the federal level based on the new Caucus, it will be pretty much what Trump did.
- Point fingers at other countries
- Give lots of money and love to the fossil fuel industry
- Pretend that the US is a leader, as opposed to a laggard
There is no intersection visible between the sane, empirically based policies of the Democratic Party, which is actually focused on the greatest good for the greatest number, and the policies of the Republican Party at this point.
Organize now to keep them out of power in 2022 and 2024.
Heybike has just announced the launch of its new X-Series, with the Mars 3.0 and Ranger S 3.0 Pro comprising the first two big new models. Or maybe not so “big”, as they’re actually kinda compact-sized, at least for full-suspension e-bikes. They’re both 20″ wheel folding e-bikes, and they pack in a lot of performance into comfortable rides. I’ve been testing both, and today we’re jumping in with both feet to check out how well the Mars 3.0 rides.
First of all, as usual, it’s fun to start with a video review. So check out my riding experience below, then keep reading for the nitty gritty details.
Heybike Mars 3.0 Video Review
Heybike Mars 3.0 Tech specs
- Motor: 750W continuous (1,400W peak) rear geared hub motor
- Top speed: 45 km/h (28 mph), though it can technically be unlocked to go around 48 km/h or 30 mph
- Range: Claimed up to 104 km (65 mi)
- Battery: 48V 13Ah (624 Wh) battery in down tube
- Brakes: Hydraulic two-piston disc brakes on 180×2.0 mm rotors
- Transmission: 8-speed Shimano Altus
- Extras: Color LCD display, LED head & tail lights with turn signals, full-suspension, 4″ fat tires, smartphone app connectivity, passcode and NFC chip theft protection, and included fenders & rear rack
- Price: $1,299 (on sale at launch for $1,199)
More is more
Heybike has been on a roll lately with its growing lineup of electric bikes, and the new Mars 3.0 looks like it might just be the brand’s most exciting release yet. While it hasn’t yet been available to the public, I got a chance to check it out ahead of time, and based on everything we’ve seen and experienced so far, this full-suspension fat tire folder is a serious upgrade over the previous Mars. In fact, it gives nearly every other 20″ folding e-bike a serious run for its money.
The Mars 3.0, part of Heybike’s new X Series, is all about power, speed, and rider experience. It brings a beefed-up motor system, smoother folding, and suspension that actually works, plus a host of smart tech features that elevate it above your average budget folder. Here’s everything you need to know about Heybike’s newest electric mini-beast.
Powerhouse performance: the Galaxy Perform eDrive
Let’s start with what matters most to a lot of riders: power. The Mars 3.0 is built around Heybike’s proprietary “Galaxy Perform eDrive” system, and it delivers serious muscle. With a 750W nominal motor (peaking at 1,400W) and an eyebrow-raising 95Nm of torque, this thing jumps off the line harder than almost anything in its class.
Heybike claims a 0–20 mph time of just 6 seconds, and from what we’ve seen, that figure just about checks out. It’s quick, it’s punchy, and it’s powerful. That’s thanks to a nicely tuned torque sensor, which gives you more immediate and natural-feeling pedal assist than the old-school cadence systems we still see on far too many folders.
For anyone looking for more thrill, the speed limiter that comes programmed out of the box to 20 mph can be bumped to 28 mph through the Heybike App or the display. And for those who really want to live dangerously (or ride on private property), the display lets you push just a bit past 30 mph when fully unlocked. That turns the Mars 3.0 into a sort of moped-lite, ideal for riders who want motorcycle vibes without the licensing hassle, though it may push into actual moped laws in some states.
Real suspension, real comfort
It’s hard to overstate how rare it is to see real full suspension on a folding e-bike that doesn’t cost several thousand dollars. But the Mars 3.0 doesn’t just slap a spring on the back and call it a day, it uses a legitimate Horst link suspension setup in the rear and a hydraulic fork up front.
The result? A bike that actually absorbs bumps and trail chatter, instead of pogoing around or bottoming out. That makes a huge difference whether you’re tackling dirt trails or just dealing with broken city pavement.
Combine that suspension with the wide fat tires, and you’ve got a genuinely cushy ride, even at higher speeds. It’s not a downhill mountain bike, but for commuting, cruising, and exploring, it’s leagues ahead of other folders in this category.
Smart features that don’t feel gimmicky
Heybike’s recent bikes have been leaning more into tech, and in the Mars 3.0, those features actually add value.
The NFC card startup is one of those little touches that will make the bike feel more premium to some, though I find it to be a hassle. Maybe that’s because I’m usually parking somewhere safe and not worrying about e-bike theft as much, but the hassle of swiping the card or entering the PIN code is just an added step at startup for me.
That said, I’m sure a lot of people will like it, and so here is how it works. Tap the included NFC card to start, just like unlocking a Tesla. Don’t have your card handy? You can also unlock the bike via a PIN code or the Heybike app, which also gives you control over various ride settings like throttle mode, assist levels, and max speed.
The bright, full-color TFT display is easy to read and gives you all the basics: speed, battery, distance, assist level, and more, with a layout that actually feels well designed instead of thrown together.
And speaking of throttle: riders can choose whether they want it to follow the pedal assist level or always run at full power. It’s adjustable in the app and gives you more control over how you want to ride, something more e-bikes should offer. And you can even adjust how extreme you want the throttle or pedal assist ramping to feel. Want gentle starts? Set it at level 1. Want to fly off the line? Choose level 5. It’s a nice little customization feature that lets riders tune their ride instead of being stuck with whatever the company programmed.
Stops as well as it goes
Going fast is fun, but stopping fast is important too. Heybike didn’t skimp here either. The Mars 3.0 gets an upgraded hydraulic disc brake system with thick 2.0 mm rotors. Not only do they provide more bite and better heat management, but they also feel more confidence-inspiring when braking from 30+ mph.
That extra thickness means it can handle more heat and longer braking, which is important when stopping heavy bikes or descending hills, or both.
Braking is smooth, controlled, and powerful, which is crucial for a bike that accelerates this quickly and invites you to push its limits.
Drivetrain and gear shifting
The Mars 3.0 uses a Shimano Altus 8-speed setup, which isn’t top-tier, and frankly is closer to the bottom of the Shimano tier structure, but is fine for a bike at this price point. Shifting is fine and predictable, and the integration with the motor assist system is solid, gear changes are reflected in the pedal response in a way that feels natural and intuitive thanks to the torque sensor.
It’s the kind of drivetrain setup you’d normally expect on a bike like this. It’s not going to change your world, but it gets the job done.
Utility meets design
This thing is both fun and practical. The rear rack is upgraded and sturdier than the previous generation Mars e-bike, and the bike has a high weight capacity (up to 440 lbs total payload for the bike). Whether you’re hauling groceries, gear, or even a kid seat, the Mars 3.0 looks like it can handle it.
The new folding system is fast and easy, with better pivot points and a more ergonomic latch. Heybike says it takes 10 seconds to fold, and that’s not an exaggeration. It actually feels smooth and simple, which isn’t always the case with fat tire folders. Of course, the bike is heavy as hell at 70 lb (32 kg), and so sometimes the tricky part isn’t merely folding it, but manipulating it while folding it. As long as you’re relatively strong, it should be fine. Small women or others with less upper body strength may still have trouble. I can’t really imagine my wife folding this e-bike. She’s a strong woman, but there’s no amount of fortitude that can make up for the back muscles it takes to lift a 70 lb e-bike, even folded in half.
Final thoughts
The Mars 3.0 isn’t more than just a modest upgrade over the previous version. I’d call this a whole new beast. With real power, actual suspension, and smart features that make it more refined and useful, this is a folding e-bike that doesn’t ride like a compromise.
It’s not trying to be ultra-lightweight or minimalist. It’s a chunky, techy, high-speed, full-featured ride that’s more about fun and performance than portability. But hey, it still folds, which checks the box on portability… mostly.
For an incredibly reasonable $1,299 (or promotional price of $1,199) , the Mars 3.0 could end up being one of the best bang-for-your-buck full-suspension e-bikes of the year. It’s perfect for anyone who wants a powerful, full-suspension ride that doesn’t take up a ton of garage space, and who doesn’t mind the occasional speed-induced grin.
If you’re in the market for a go-anywhere, do-anything, rip-through-the-city-and-still-fold-it-up kind of e-bike that sports full suspension, the Heybike Mars 3.0 is absolutely one to watch.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Elon Musk is getting his wish; Tesla Cybertrucks are going to be used by the US military, but perhaps not in the way he intended.
The U.S. Air Force is looking to purchase two Tesla Cybertrucks and use them for what amounts to target practice.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has touted the Cybertruck as being “bulletproof” and designed to “survive the apocalypse.” He suggested it could be used by the military and even directly pitched the electric pickup truck to the US military.
Considering that the Cybertruck has turned out to be a commercial flop and Tesla is currently experiencing issues selling it, despite reduced production, the automaker could benefit from a Cybertruck order from the US military.
It looks like it is about to get one.
According to new documents first obtained by ‘The War Zone‘, the U.S. Air Force Test Center (AFTC) is looking to acquire 33 target vehicles—including two Tesla Cybertrucks—for delivery to the White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) in New Mexico,
The list of requested vehicles includes various sedans, pickups, SUVs, and bongo trucks, but there are no specific brand requirements for those, except for the Cybertrucks.
They plan to use these vehicles as targets for precision-guided weapons. Why would they need a specific vehicle such as the Cybertruck?
In the document, they had to explain the reason behind requesting a vehicle from a specific brand. They wrote:
[Redacted] intends to use specific Tesla manufactured vehicles for target vehicle training flight test events. In the operating theatre it is likely the type of vehicles used by the enemy may transition to Tesla Cyber trucks as they have been found not to receive the normal extent of damage expected upon major impact. Testing needs to mirror real world situations. The intent of the training is to prep the units for operations by simulating scenarios as closely as possible to the real world situations.
It sounds like the justification is that the US military believes that its enemies might start using the Tesla Cybertruck, and it wants to make sure its weapons work on it.
Here’s the document in question:
Electrek’s Take
That’s pretty funny. The US military is buying Tesla Cybertrucks to use as targets to shoot missiles at because they think enemies might start using them.
The jokes write themselves. You read that headline, and you would think that it’s Trump trying to get back to Musk by literally blowing up his dumpster of a truck.
However, the most astonishing aspect is that the US military is not wrong here.
As we previously reported, Chechen leader and self-proclaimed “Putin’s foot soldier” Ramzan Kadyrov managed to obtain a couple of Cybertrucks, which he outfitted with guns. Then he claimed that they went to war in Ukraine.
Now, less than a year later, the US military wants to ensure it is equipped to take down Cybertrucks.
Anyway, good for Tesla. It needs all the Cybertruck sales it can get, considering it is currently selling them at a rate of 20,000 per year when Musk aimed for 500,000 a year.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
The Genesis Electrified G80 will no longer be sold in the US. Genesis has already pulled the luxury EV sedan from its website.
Genesis pulls the Electrified G80 EV from its US lineup
The Electrified G80 went on sale in the US in the first half of 2023, but has struggled to gain any momentum. Last year, Genesis introduced an updated model with longer range, more interior space, and added luxury, claiming it’s now at the flagship level.
Those in the US may never get to see it. Genesis has already removed the Electrified G80 from its website, with only the GV60 and Electrified GV70 now listed.
The luxury car maker confirmed to Car and Driver on Wednesday that the electric G80 sedan is no longer being offered in North America.
Genesis explained that “the customer is at the core of every decision we make, and we remain flexible as we adapt to ever-changing consumer needs and market conditions.”
The 2024 Electrified G80 was the final model year, and the 2025 version was never sold in the US. Powered by an 87 kWh battery, the Electrified G80 was rated with an EPA-estimated range of 282 miles. Although the updated model boasted a larger battery (94.5 kWh) with increased range (up to 295 miles) in Korea, it still falls short of rivals like the Lucid Air or Tesla Model S.
Genesis sold just 397 models in 2024 and another 77 in the first half of 2025. In comparison, Lucid sold over 5,000 Air sedans in H1, while Tesla has sold 2,715 Model S sedans in the US.
Although Korean automakers, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis, dodged the maximum 25% tariff, they will still face a 15% duty on imported vehicles. As its slowest-selling EV, it’s no surprise to see Genesis dropping it from its lineup.
With the $7,500 federal tax credit expiring at the end of September, Genesis is pushing big discounts on its remaining EV models.
Genesis is offering an $18,000 EV Lease Bonus on the 2025 Electrified GV70 and $13,750 bonus for the 2025 GV60. Leases currently start as low as $389 per month.
Looking to test one out for yourself? You can use our links below to view 2025 Genesis GV60 and Electrified GV70 models in your area.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike