Connect with us

Published

on

Cynthia DiBartolo, CEO, Tigress Financial Partners, at the New York Stock Exchange.
Source: NYSE

Robinhood’s highly anticipated IPO last month was led by Wall Street heavy hitters Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase.

But the extensive list of underwriters also included boutique minority-owned firms Ramirez & Co. and Siebert Williams Shank.

Of the 17 firms that helped underwrite the offering, four were owned by minorities, women or military veterans, a category known as MWVBEs.

It’s becoming a trend: 13 of the 25 biggest IPOs of U.S. tech companies in the past year included two or more such firms, according to FactSet.

Tech companies and Wall Street banks, long run and controlled predominantly by white men, came under intense pressure in mid-2020 to improve their diversity after the police murder of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter protests that followed. Companies made promises to do better, creating social justice philanthropic programs, commiting to more diverse hiring practices, and adding internships for minority candidates, among other moves.

At the time, the IPO market was still mostly closed from the Covid-19 shutdowns and subsequent economic downturn. It slowly reopened in July and August and then flung open in September, when Snowflake held the largest U.S. software offering on record.

In Snowflake’s IPO, the cloud database vendor included four MWVBEs as underwriters — the same four that Robinhood later used. Unity’s share sale, which came right after Snowflake’s, had two of the firms. Airbnb‘s IPO in December included a dozen.

Despite the progress, Cynthia DiBartolo isn’t ready to celebrate.

Over 35 years after entering the finance industry, and a decade after founding investment firm Tigress Financial Partners, DiBartolo has emerged as a fierce advocate for women and minority participation in deal-making. Even though Robinhood added four firms to its roster of underwriters, DiBartolo said that for a company touting its role in democratizing investing, the opportunity was there to make a real splash.

“While we applaud what they did, I think they could’ve brought in more firms to make it more inclusive and make an bigger statement,” DiBartolo said in an interview. “Long before Robinhood existed, long before anyone heard of that company, diverse firms were fighting to bring equality of opportunity to diverse investors. We didn’t have the balance sheet or fire power of a Robinhood.”

In July, Tigress became the first disabled- and woman-owned floor broker to become a member of the New York Stock Exchange. Previously, her firm was among five MWVBEs that served as underwriters for cloud software vendor Monday.com’s IPO.

Now, DiBartolo is working to make sure that the dozens of firms like hers get a regular seat at the table.

DiBartolo created what she calls a diversity questionnaire, or request for information (RFI), for participation in offerings. The objective, she said, is make it easier for companies selling stock, issuing debt or doing share buybacks to vet minority and women-owned firms. American Airlines, she said, has already sent the RFI to firms in the category for future deals.

‘Everyone has reputational risk’

JPMorgan is taking her work a step further, DiBartolo said. The bank is collecting the data from the questionnaires filled out by MWVBEs to build a database that can automate the due diligence process for its clients. DiBartolo said she’s talking to other Wall Street banks about doing something similar.

A JPMorgan spokesperson confirmed the process is underway.

“JPMorgan’s goal is to expand the opportunity for more minority- and women-led firms to be included in debt and equity capital markets issuances,” the company said in an email. “We are building a searchable database based on a streamlined industry RFI which will allow us to evaluate better the strengths and capabilities each firm has to offer our issuer clients.”

The RFI asks firms to fill out details about their principals, the work they’ve done, their expertise and whether there are any legal or regulatory issues that need to be disclosed.

“Everyone has reputational risk,” DiBartolo said. “You want to know who the firms are, who’s behind them, how much of the workforce is diverse, what’s the regulatory history, and is there any pending litigation. These are all questions you should ask.”

DiBartolo is part of other organizations taking different approaches to diversify deal making. At Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.’s Rainbow PUSH Coalition, an organization fighting for social justice, DiBartolo is chairperson of the steering committee for financial services.

Inside Rainbow PUSH is a 25-year-old group called The Wall Street Project, which advocates for women- and minority-owned businesses in finance. Rebecca Cruz, director of business development at the project, said anytime she reads about a U.S. company that’s raising $100 million or more in an IPO, she sends a letter to the CEO and CFO. In the letter, she encourages the companies to consider including some of the eight minority-owned firms that are members of the organization, providing some detail on what the MWVBEs have accomplished.

Cruz said she follows news clips and press releases about confidential IPO filings so she can reach companies before their prospectuses get published to get the conversations started earlier.

“We’re not pressuring them, we’re saying it’s good for business to include these firms on the transaction,” she said. “The companies that we work with all have proven themselves on Wall Street in transactions. These aren’t fly-by-night firms.”

Many of the firms have been around for decades, managing money for clients, trading, underwriting municipal bond sales and corporate debt deals and, in some cases, doing proprietary research.

While they’re a tiny fraction of the size of the Wall Street giants and are even much smaller than well-known mid-market firms like William Blair, Raymond James and Piper Jaffray, Cruz is out to show companies that it’s not just a good public relations decision to add diversity to their underwriter list. It’s also good business that brings opportunities to reach different classes of investors.

Muriel Siebert, the first woman to ever hold a seat on the New York Stock Exchange.
New York Daily News | Getty Images

Siebert Williams Shank was formed in a 2019 merger of two firms founded in the 1990s, Siebert Cisneros Shank the Williams Capital Group. The firm has been very active over the past 12 months, helping underwrite IPOs for Robinhood, Krispy Kreme, Marqeta, Oatly, Bumble, Affirm, Airbnb and many others.

Sobani Warner is the head of equities at Siebert Williams Shank and was director of equity at Williams starting in 2000. She said that while the firm, in its various parts, has been underwriting equity deals for two decades, there’s been a clear sea-change in the past year and a half as shareholders and activist groups have been demanding stronger action towards diversity.

“The tech companies along with companies in a variety of industries, perhaps all industries, are seeking to play their part in this really positive transition we’re going through,” Warner said in an interview.

Improving economics

Still, firms like Siebert Williams Shank tend to get a tiny combined sliver of the overall IPO. An analysis of fee data from S&P Global Market Intelligence and CNBC published last year showed that between 2016 and the first half of 2020, MWVBEs each made about $167,620 per IPO and secondary offering, compared to $1.4 million per deal for middle-market firms.

Warner said there has been “positive movement” in deal economics recently, though she didn’t provide specifics. More important than the revenue from any specific offering, she said, is the opportunity to show what these firms can offer a company, so the relationship is there when its time for debt financing, strategic advisory help and even share buybacks.

“This is a good way for us to get to know them and for them to understand our capabilities,” Warner said. “The IPO is perhaps the first transaction we do but the expectation is that the IPO will be the first of many.”

Marqeta celebrates IPO at the Nasdaq on June 9th, 2021.
Source: The Nasdaq

Payment-tech company Marqeta, based in Oakland, California, provides one potential example.

When Marqeta was gearing up for its public market debut earlier this year, the company turned to Lise Buyer, an adviser to pre-IPO companies, for help in navigating the expansive universe of potential underwriters.

Seth Weissman, Marqeta’s chief legal officer, said he and finance chief Tripp Faix asked Buyer for the top 10 minority and women-owned firms. From there, they did some research and narrowed the list to six. In the bakeoff among those firms, Marqeta chose two: Siebert Williams Shank and Seelaus, a woman-owned firm based in New Jersey.

“You can actually reach different investors and give people who otherwise might not get a shot at the opportunity to get in on an IPO,” Weissman said. “What you’re counting on is they don’t bring the same set of investors to the table every single time.”

Weissman said that location played a big role in its choice of Siebert Williams Shank, which is co-headquartered in Oakland. Early in the pandemic, Marqeta launched an initiative to help small businesses in Oakland that were hurt by the Covid-19 shutdowns.

For Seelaus, the Marqeta deal is one of eight billion-dollar-plus tech IPOs the firm has been part of in the past year, according to FactSet. Prior to that, it was only involved in two of that size: Lyft and Peloton, both in 2019.

“We have a much bigger seat at the table in the equity capital market, which is really exiting,” said Annie Seelaus, whose father founded the firm in 1984. She joined in 2009 and was named CEO in 2015.

Seelaus said a confluence of events in 2020 started to turn the tide. The push for diversity and inclusion alongside the broader social justice movement was clearly important, she said. Last week, the SEC approved new Nasdaq rules that will require companies listing on the exchange to meet gender and racial diversity requirement for their boards or explain in writing why they haven’t.

Meanwhile, Seelaus, said, the emergence of special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) created a whole new market for a different type of IPO.

SPACs raised a record $83.4 billion in 2020 and exceeded that number in the first three months of this year. So far in 2021, they’ve raised $121.2 billion, almost nine times the amount for all of 2019, according to SPAC Research.

In a SPAC, a blank-check company goes public through an IPO and then hunts for a target to buy, eventually turning the acquired business into the operating entity. SPAC IPOs tend to use a different set of underwriters than traditional IPOs and in some cases have handed over much better economics to the alternative firms.

Most notably, in July 2020, Bill Ackman paid a group of six MWVBEs a total of 20% of the underwriting fees for the IPO of Pershing Square Tontine Holdings. He told Yahoo Finance in an interview that the number was 10 to 20 times the normal rate, and said the firms were “going to do the work, you’re going to be part of the team.”

Bill Ackman, founder and CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management.
Adam Jeffery | CNBC

Rainbow PUSH’s Wall Street Project is urging companies to pay MWVBEs at least 5% of the fees, with stock allocation in the 10% to 15% range, said Cruz.

Seelaus wasn’t on the Pershing Square IPO, but her firm has been involved with several others, including the Belong Acquisition Corp. IPO and Freedom Acquisition Corp. 1 offering, both this year. She said one things SPACs are doing better than traditional IPOs is bringing the firms in early in the process.

“We never want to be a box-checking exercise at the last moment,” Seelaus said. “We want to be treated like a real player and have the opportunity to add value to the transaction.”

The trend has still not become ubiquitous.

On the day before Robinhood’s IPO, foreign language learning app Duolingo raised more than $500 million in its share sale. The offering was led by Goldman Sachs and included nine other firms. None were owned by women or minorities.

In an interview after its Nasdaq debut on July 28, Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn said the roster of underwriters “is not something we concentrated on.”

Von Ahn highlighted the importance of diversity among its workforce and on its board, which is 50% women. But he said the possibility of adding diverse underwriters didn’t come up in discussions.

Correction: A prior version of this story had the incorrect company name in paragraph 13. It’s been updated to say American Airlines.

WATCH: Why Ursula Burns believes the DEI movement is not another false start

Continue Reading

Technology

Here’s what’s behind Tesla’s 3-year sales low in China

Published

on

By

Here's what's behind Tesla’s 3-year sales low in China

Tesla's China sales hit 3-year low: Here's why

Tesla sales in China dropped to a three-year low in October, raising concerns the electric vehicle maker could see its first full-year sales decline in the country this year.

Fierce competition from local rivals such as NIO and Li Auto — both reporting this week — and a bruising price war in the face of a down economy pushed Tesla’s China sales to 26,006 last month. The U.S. automaker’s share in the Chinese EV market shrank to 3.2% in October from 8.7% in September.

“Tesla is getting surrounded by a swarm of Chinese automakers — from above, below, left and right,” Michael Dunne, CEO of Dunne Insights and auto analyst, told CNBC. “Like a swarm of drones, each is taking some sales from the company with a target on its back.”

Tesla’s newest direct competitor in the upper echelon of the Chinese EV market is Xiaomi. The smartphone maker’s YU7 sports utility vehicle and SU7 sedan posted record sales in October despite accidents that raised concerns about the cars’ safety.

The auto newbie sold nearly 109,000 cars in the third quarter — compared with 170,000 for Tesla. Xiaomi’s EV unit turned a profit for the first time.

Late bloomer Leapmotor is pressuring Tesla, too. The Chinese EV startup was founded in 2015, but only this year started beating out its local peers in terms of sales and stock price. Analysts credit its in-house production for keeping costs down. Its C10 mid-sized SUV is priced at roughly half of a Model Y. Leapmotor also has a JV partnership with Europe’s Stellantis.

Leading EV sales in China this year is the Geely Geome Xingyuan. The hatchback is not a direct competitor to Tesla since it serves the cheaper end of the market with its sub $10,000 price tag. Yet it is an indication of where Chinese buyers are at — budget-conscious but looking for value.

The Geome Xingyuan’s success also highlights another trend — traditional automakers such as Geely making inroads in EVs. That trend is turning Huawei into a more notable Tesla rival. The Chinese tech giant partners with old-line carmakers like Seres, Chery, and Beijing Auto. The Aito M8, a Seres model, has become popular among high-end SUVs.

Despite the steep competition, Tesla’s Model Y is still holding up, ranking 6th in the overall market. At Tesla’s annual general meeting this month, Musk said he expected the Chinese to approve the company’s “Full-Self Driving” software in early 2026.

Yet analysts say Tesla needs to refresh its models to keep pace with its local rivals.

Tu Le, founder of consultancy firm Sino Auto Insights, sees 2026 as a “pivotal year” for Tesla in China.

“Reality is catching up to Tesla in China,” Tu said. “Tesla has done an admirable job via price cuts, non-price-cut price cuts and other tricks to maintain sales of almost five and four-year-old cars versus some of the world’s most advanced EVs. But not keeping up with the Xiaomi’s, BYD’s and XPeng’s seems to be finally starting to show itself in its monthly sales.”

Last month, Tesla reported its total third-quarter revenue increased 12% from a year earlier to $28.10 billion, following two straight periods of declines.

Even with the overall revenue growth, Tesla’s third quarter was marked by a continuing sales slump in Europe, driven partly by competition from EV makers like Volkswagen and BYD.

Continue Reading

Technology

How Alibaba overcame Beijing’s crackdown to become an AI giant

Published

on

By

How Alibaba overcame Beijing's crackdown to become an AI giant

The business behind Alibaba: How China’s tech titan makes billions

On a cold November evening in Shanghai in 2020, the world’s largest IPO was abruptly canceled by Chinese regulators.

It was Ant Group, the fintech affiliate of tech giant Alibaba. The company’s founder Jack Ma, one of China’s most famous billionaires, was under scrutiny for comments seemingly criticising the country’s financial regulators.  

What followed was four years of pressure on Ma’s empire.

Since the IPO cancelation, more than $400 billion has been wiped off Alibaba’s value, even with a more recent rally. In the months after the failed public listing, Ma retreated from the public eye and Alibaba, China’s biggest e-commerce player, looked down and out, with management and structure changes bearing little fruit. The moves were not characteristic of the grit the company had shown in the past and a far cry from its strong position now.

But those who know Ma know never to count him out.

“The hallmark of Jack and his personality is that he never gave up,” Brian Wong, a former Alibaba executive and author of “The Tao of Alibaba,” told CNBC.

Wong features in my new show “Built for Billions,” in which I explore Alibaba’s most testing moments and delve into how it grew to become one of the world’s biggest tech companies and one of the most advanced artificial intelligence players.

Understanding Alibaba

I’ve been covering tech for more than a decade with much of my focus centering on China. I lived in the world’s second-largest economy for three years, from October 2018 to December 2021 when Alibaba was undergoing this significant shift. The company’s reach cannot be overstated from its humble beginnings in 1999 as a business to business online marketplace in the early days of the internet.

Now Alibaba’s business touches everything from food delivery to global e-commerce, cloud computing and artificial intelligence. Nowhere is the company’s brand and scale more evident than during Singles Day, an annual shopping event pioneered by Alibaba that sees huge discounts and deals across its platforms. What was once a single day of discounts has now become a more prolonged event that runs several weeks.

I have attended Alibaba’s Singles Day in both Shanghai — where it featured a huge gala with celebrities and music performances — and at its headquarters in Hangzhou. The whole company is mobilized as billions of dollars are transacted across its platforms in a short space of time. Those experiences provided a real insight into the scale of the company.

Alibaba has sometimes been compared to U.S. tech giant Amazon. But it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison.

“Alibaba now, is seen as a serious player in technology, not just an e-commerce company,” Duncan Clark, an early advisor to Alibaba and chairman of consultancy firm BDA China, told CNBC’s “Built for Billions.”

Pressure and reinvention

After the Ant Group IPO cancelation, Alibaba and indeed all of China’s tech sector faced a reckoning. Beijing began cracking down on domestic tech firms by tightening regulation.

One popular view was that Beijing was concerned about the power the country’s entrepreneurs were wielding.

Ma’s empire endured tightened regulations and even a nearly $3 billion antitrust fine in 2021.

There was a level of soul searching taking place at the company that was now battling a tougher domestic market with a weak consumer and rising challenges from players like PDD and JD.com. How could Alibaba reinvigorate growth? And was Jack Ma done for good?

When I left China in 2021, I was struck by how fixated international markets were with Ma. It was as if his reappearance served as a sign of Alibaba’s standing with the Chinese government. For instance, Alibaba’s stock would jump if Ma was spotted somewhere.

Is Jack Ma back? Inside the rise, fall and return of China's tech mogul

This overshadowed what was happening in the background. Alibaba had undergone one of the biggest restructures in history. But it wasn’t changing the giant’s fortunes. Daniel Zhang, who had succeeded Ma as CEO and eventually chairman some years prior, unexpectedly announced plans to step down in 2023. His successors were two well-respected veterans, current CEO Eddie Wu and President Joe Tsai.

They steadied the ship, refocused the company on its core e-commerce business, while simultaneously investing in AI. The results were a sharp improvement in business, particularly in more recent quarters.

Was Ma gone for good? It seemed not. In February, Ma was among a handful of entrepreneurs who met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in a rare meeting.

“He’s in his early 60s now, but he’s still pretty vibrant. He has homes and yachts and all that stuff. But one senses that he’s not done yet,” Clark said.

Alibaba quietly turns into AI giant

How Alibaba quietly became a leader in AI

Alibaba’s approach was different to some of its U.S. rivals, instead focusing on open source or open weight AI models which are free for developers to download and use. The company’s models are now among some of the most popular globally for developers to use.

CEO Wu has cemented Alibaba’s commitment to its reinvention as an AI company. In his first letter to employees after taking the reins, Wu called for Alibaba to return to the startup mindset and set two strategic priorities: “user first” and “AI-driven.”

The focus on AI has benefitted the company’s cloud business. It also comes at a time when AI development is being framed as a race between U.S. and Chinese companies and Alibaba is emerging as one of China’s key players.

“Wherever you look, whatever you touch, China is moving closer towards that vision of dominating AI race by 2030, Alibaba is participating and being an important player,” Ashley Dudarenok, a China digital expert and investor told “Built for Billions.”

Continue Reading

Technology

Holiday air travel, Novo Nordisk trial results, ‘Wicked: For Good’ debut and more in Morning Squawk

Published

on

By

Holiday air travel, Novo Nordisk trial results, 'Wicked: For Good' debut and more in Morning Squawk

John Williams, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, during a farewell symposium for former De Nederlandsche Bank NV President Klaas Knot at the central bank headquarters in Amsterdam, Netherlands, on Friday, Oct. 3, 2025.

Lina Selg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

This is CNBC’s Morning Squawk newsletter. Subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox.

Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day:

1. Cutting losses

The stock market is coming off a rough week as investors mulled concerns about the state of the artificial intelligence trade and the economy. But stocks regained some ground on Friday, bolstered by renewed hope for another interest rate cut.

Here’s what to know:

  • The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 each dropped close to 2% last week. The Nasdaq Composite tumbled 2.7% for its third straight negative week as tech felt the brunt of the declines.
  • But the market bounced on Friday, after New York Federal Reserve President John Williams said he sees “room for a further adjustment” on interest rates.
  • Fed funds futures began pricing in a higher likelihood of a rate cut at the Fed’s December meting following Williams’ commentary. Traders now see a more than 73% chance of a decrease next month, up from around 42% a week ago, according to CME’s FedWatch tool.
  • On the other hand, Boston Fed President Susan Collins said over the weekend that she sees “reasons to be hesitant” about lower rates at the central bank’s next policy meeting.
  • Speaking to NBC News’ “Meet the Press” on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledged that some sectors are feeling economic pressure but said he believes the U.S. won’t enter a recession next year.
  • Follow live markets updates here.

2. Consumer sentiment

Dado Ruvic | Reuters

A legal filing released on Friday accuses Meta of halting internal research that allegedly found that people who stopped using Facebook became less depressed and anxious.

Meta allegedly started the study in 2019 to examine the impacts of its products on “polarization, news consumption, well-being, and daily social interactions,” the legal brief said. The filing is tied to high-profile litigation against social media platforms — including Meta, Google’s YouTube, Snap and TikTok — from plaintiffs such as school districts and state attorneys general.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said the company disagrees with the allegations, which he said “rely on cherry-picked quotes and misinformed opinions in an attempt to present a deliberately misleading picture.”

3. Missed shot

The Novo Nordisk A/S logo during a news conference in Mumbai, India, on Tuesday, June 24, 2025.

Dhiraj Singh | Bloomberg | Getty Images

U.S.-listed shares of Novo Nordisk fell more than 10% this morning after the Danish drugmaker announced that its Alzheimer’s trial didn’t meet its main target.

Analysts expected the trial — which tracked if semaglutide, the active ingredient in diabetes and weight loss drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, helped slow cognitive decline — to be a long shot. However, previous trials found that use of the drug helped with Alzheimer’s-related biomarkers.

Martin Holst Lange, Novo’s chief scientific officer, said the company felt it had a “responsibility to explore semaglutide’s potential, despite a low likelihood of success.”

4. Home for the holidays

Planes line up on the tarmac at LaGuardia Airport on November 10, 2025 in New York City.

Spencer Platt | Getty Images News | Getty Images

U.S. airlines are expecting another record Thanksgiving travel period. As American Airlines operations chief David Seymour put it: “The stakes are high.” Lobbying group Airlines for America estimated that airlines will service more than 31 million people between Nov. 21 and Dec. 1.

The holiday travel frenzy comes not long after the end of the federal government shutdown which resulted in disrupted travel for 6 million flyers, according to A4A. Officials announced last week that air traffic controllers and technicians who had perfect attendance while the government was closed will get $10,000 bonuses.

Get Morning Squawk directly in your inbox

5. Defying gravity

Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo star in Universal’s “Wicked: For Good.”

Universal

Universal’s “Wicked: For Good” raked in around $150 million in domestic ticket sales this weekend. It’s the second-biggest opening weekend for a 2025 film release and the largest-ever debut for a Broadway adaption. The film’s haul also exceeds that of the first film installment of “Wicked,” which was released last year.

Around 10 million “Wicked: For Good” tickets were sold during the opening weekend, according to data EntTelligence. Paul Dergarabedian, head of marketplace trends at Comscore, said that the movie-musical could help this year’s Thanksgiving film slate give 2024’s record period “a run for its money.”

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast’s planned spinoff of Versant.

The Daily Dividend

Here’s what we’re keeping an eye on this holiday week:

CNBC Pro subscribers can see a full calendar and rundown for the week here.

CNBC’s Sean Conlon, Jeff Cox, Annie Nova, Yun Li, Kif Leswing, Leslie Josephs, Elsa Ohlen and Sarah Whitten, as well as Reuters, contributed to this report. Josephine Rozzelle edited this edition.

Continue Reading

Trending