The UK will take up to 20,000 vulnerable Afghans over the coming years as part of a resettlement plan, following the Taliban takeover of their country.
Under the new bespoke scheme – modelled on the UK’s seven-year programme to resettle Syrian refugees – the prime minister has promised thousands of Afghans who are most in need will be relocated to Britain.
The government aims for up to 5,000 Afghans who are at risk due to the current crisis in their country to be resettled in the UK in the scheme’s first year.
Priority will be given to women and girls, and religious and other minorities, who are most at risk of human rights abuses and maltreatment by the Taliban.
Image: Boris Johnson will address MPs on the unfolding crisis in Afghanistan. Pic: Andrew Parsons /10 Downing St
Mr Johnson, who spoke with US President Joe Biden on Tuesday night, unveiled the plans ahead of an emergency five-hour debate in the House of Commons on Wednesday on the unfolding crisis in Afghanistan.
Advertisement
But the prime minister has already faced calls – including from among his own Conservative MPs – to make a more generous commitment on welcoming Afghans to the UK.
The government has said the bespoke resettlement scheme will be kept under further review beyond its first year, with up to a total of 20,000 Afghans offered relocation in the long-term.
More on Afghanistan
Yet former cabinet minister David Davis, a one-time Conservative leadership contender, said the UK should be looking to accept more than 50,000 Afghans due to a “more direct moral responsibility” following Britain’s two decades’ of military intervention in Afghanistan.
The SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford said the UK should aim to grant asylum to 35,000 or more Afghan refugees, while the Liberal Democrats said the resettlement of 20,000 Afghans in Britain should be “the starting point” and “not the target”.
Labour said the government’s proposed resettlement scheme “does not meet the scale of the challenge” and risked “leaving people in Afghanistan in deadly danger”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Kabul airport chaos as people cling to plane
As well as questions over the UK’s commitment to vulnerable Afghans, Mr Johnson is also likely to face a Commons grilling over the current efforts to evacuate British nationals from Afghanistan, as well as the speed with which the Taliban were able to retake control of the country of nearly 40 million people.
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab could also face questions about why he was abroad on holiday when the Taliban entered Afghanistan’s capital Kabul.
The Syrian resettlement scheme saw 20,000 refugees relocate to the UK between 2014 and its closure earlier this year.
The Home Office admitted the new Afghanistan scheme faced “significant challenges” due to the “complex picture on the ground” in the country, but said ministers were “working at speed” to address those obstacles.
The prime minister is expected to discuss with other world leaders – at a virtual G7 meeting in the coming days – how a system can be developed to identify those most at risk in Afghanistan.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
The Taliban holds first news conference
The new Afghanistan scheme is separate to the existing Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP), which offers any current or former staff employed by the UK in Afghanistan – and whose lives are judged to be under serious threat – priority relocation to the UK.
Some 5,000 former Afghan staff and their family members are expected to be relocated to the UK by the end of this year under ARAP.
Since June, more than 2,000 former Afghan staff and their families have already been resettled in the UK under the policy.
Work continues to evacuate both British nationals, their families and former Afghan staff from Afghanistan on military flights.
Amid warnings of a “horror show” in Afghan capital Kabul as people struggle to reach planes in order to leave the country, the man in charge of the UK’s evacuation effort admitted that it was up to those fleeing to make their own way to the city’s airport.
“Much of that journey actually is for them to undertake,” said Vice Admiral Sir Ben Key, the commander of joint operations, as he offered a stark assessment of the extent of Afghanistan’s collapse into Taliban control.
“It’s quite obvious that the Taliban are now the prevalent security providers across Afghanistan, that’s a fact,” he added.
Since Saturday, 520 British nationals, diplomats and former Afghan staff have left the country on UK military flights.
Sir Ben said a total of between 6,000-7,000 British nationals, entitled persons and ARAP staff might need evacuating, although he admitted “we don’t really know” how long the UK will have to get them out of the country.
The Home Office said the new resettlement scheme for Afghan refugees would “not compromise on national security” and each person arriving on the route would have to pass strict security checks.
Commenting on the scheme, the prime minister said: “We owe a debt of gratitude to all those who have worked with us to make Afghanistan a better place over the last 20 years.
“Many of them, particularly women, are now in urgent need of our help. I am proud that the UK has been able to put in place this route to help them and their families live safely in the UK.
“The best solution for everyone is an Afghanistan that works for all Afghans.
“That means the international community coming together to set firm, political conditions for the country’s future governance.
“And it means focusing our efforts on increasing the resilience of the wider region to prevent a humanitarian emergency.”
Home Secretary Priti Patel said the scheme would “save lives”.
“We will not abandon people who have been forced to flee their homes and are now living in terror of what might come next,” she added.
The prime minister’s spokesman has refused eight times to confirm whether recognition of Palestine could go ahead if Hamas remain in power and the hostages are not released.
Keir Starmer’s spokesman was questioned by journalists for the first time since the announcement last week that the UK will formally recognise the state in September – unless Israel meets certain conditions including abiding by a ceasefire and increasing aid.
The policy has been criticised by the families of UK hostages, campaigners and some Labour MPs, who argue it would reward Hamas and say it should be conditional on the release of the remaining hostages.
A senior Hamas politician, Ghazi Hamad, speaking to Al Jazeera, said at the weekend that major nations’ decision to recognise a Palestinian state “is one of the fruits of 7 October”.
The PM’s spokesman said on Monday: “The PM is clear that on 7 October, Hamas committed the worst act of terror in Israel’s history. That horror has continued since then.
“As the foreign secretary said over the weekend, Hamas are rightly pariahs who can have no role in Gaza’s future, there is a diplomatic consensus on that. Hamas must immediately release all hostages and have no role in the governance of Gaza.”
But asked whether removing Hamas from power and releasing hostages were conditions for statehood, he said a decision on recognition would be made at the UN General Assembly meeting in September, based on “an assessment of how far the parties have met the steps we have set out. No one side will have veto on recognition through their actions or inactions.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:25
Up to 300 children could be evacuated from Gaza and given NHS treatment in the UK. The plans are reportedly set to be announced within weeks.
He added: “Our focus is on the immediate situation on the ground, getting more aid in to end the suffering in Gaza and supporting a ceasefire and a long-term peace for Israelis and Palestinians based a two-state solution.”
Starmer, who recalled his cabinet for an emergency meeting last week before setting out the new position, is following the lead of French president Emmanuel Macron, who first pledged to move toward recognising Palestinian statehood in April.
Canada has also backed recognition if conditions are met, including by the Palestinian Authority.
The prime minister had previously said he would recognise a state of Palestine as part of a contribution to a peace process.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:05
Efforts to bring Gazan children to the UK for urgent medical treatment are set to be accelerated under new government plans.
In his announcement last Tuesday, he said: “We need to see at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day. But ultimately, the only way to bring this humanitarian crisis to an end is through a long-term settlement.
“So we are supporting the US, Egyptian and Qatari efforts to secure a vital ceasefire. That ceasefire must be sustainable and it must lead to a wider peace plan, which we are developing with our international partners.
“I’ve always said we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process, at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution. With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act.”
Adam Rose, a lawyer acting for British families of hostages in Gaza, has said: “Why would Hamas agree to a ceasefire if it knew that to do so would make British recognition of Palestine less likely?”
Former UK Chancellor and current Coinbase adviser George Osborne says the UK is falling behind in the cryptocurrency market, particularly when it comes to stablecoins.
At a press conference today in which Reform UK announced the Tory police and crime commissioner for Leicestershire was joining their ranks, as well as former prison governor Vanessa Frake, I asked Nigel Farage a simple question.
But his answer wasn’t what I expected.
I asked the Reform UK leader if the six-week campaign on law and order, with the tagline “Britain is Lawless”, was in fact project fear scaring people into voting for his party.
He utterly rejected that claim and responded to me saying: “No, they are afraid. They are afraid. I dare you, I dare you to walk through the West End of London after 9 o’clock of an evening wearing jewellery. You wouldn’t do it. You know that I’m right. You wouldn’t do it.”
I am not afraid to walk in the West End of London after 9pm wearing jewellery.
I have done it many times before and will continue to do so… but perhaps that is because I do not own a Rolex.
However, just because Farage is wrong on that point, doesn’t mean he isn’t tapping into other legitimate fears across the country.
More on Nigel Farage
Related Topics:
Snatch theft does worry me, hence why I now have a phone case with a strap attached to it that I can put around my body.
And I worry about knife crime in my area and what the impact could be if I were to have children – on the weekend someone was stabbed to death a stone’s throw from my house.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:09
Farage ‘not mincing his words’
However, if we look at the statistics, it is invariably a more nuanced picture than Farage or social media might have us believe.
And the Office for National Statistics (ONS) also notes that thefts outside of the home, eg phone snatching, has increased.
However, possession of weapons has fallen in London by 29% over the last three years.
And according to the ONS, crime in England and Wales is 30% lower than in 2015, and 76% lower than 1995.
And it is a similar picture for violent crime.
In short, am I right to be more worried that snatch theft and knife crime in London is increasing? Yes, and no.
But Nigel Farage is tapping into voters’ emotions – their feelings that the country is broken. It’s a picture the Conservative Party helped to create and the Labour Party happily painted to great effect during the general election campaign of 2024.
And the more politicians of all colours tell voters that “the system is broken”, the more voters might start to believe them.