Connect with us

Published

on

It only lasted for a few minutes, but for a brief time last Sunday, electricity from solar provided more electricity to Australia’s national energy grid than electricity from coal-fired generating stations. Just after noon, 9,427 megawatts (MW) of electricity came from solar, while only 9,315 MW came from burning coal.

Granted, there were several factors that had to align to make that happen. First, it was a sunny day in Australia. Second, it was a Sunday when demand is typically lower than during the week. Three, it came during a time of year when demand for heat or air conditioning is low. But whatever the reason — or combination of reasons — it was a milestone and a portent of things to come in the Land Down Under, where electricity from coal has been king since 1890 when the Yallourn Power Station began operating in the state of Victoria.

Dylan McConnell, a research fellow at the University of Melbourne’s climate and energy college, told The Guardian that for those few minutes, renewable energy represented 57% of national electricity generation. “This is what I unofficially call ‘record season’,” McConnell said. “It’s actually still pretty early in the season [to get these numbers] but in spring or the shoulder seasons you have the combination of low demand, because there’s no heating or cooling, and then nice weather on the weekend. Those factors combine and you get these giant shares of renewable energy that generally push out coal.” He added the event was only “fleeting” and that “Australia was a long way from peak renewable energy.”

From 8:30 am until 5:00 pm on Sunday, energy prices in Australia went negative. Although the exact price differed by jurisdiction, it meant energy consumers were being paid to use electricity and energy producers were paying to keep their generators spinning. Unlike solar and wind producers, coal generators are particularly hard hit when prices turn negative. The costs associated with shutting down and restarting coal generators are prohibitive, meaning operators choose to keep them running even at a loss.

According to data tracking service NEMlog, South Australia had 100% of its energy needs met by wind and solar, while Victoria would have met 102% of state demand had operators not been forced to switch off during the period of negative prices. Energy analyst Simon Holmes à Court said the overall proportion of renewable energy — solar, wind, and hydro — would have been higher in the energy mix, but wind producers chose to shut down to avoid the price hit.

“There was a significant amount of curtailment,” he said. “What it shows is that there’s already more renewables that could have gone into the grid if the coal plants were more flexible and transmission was upgraded.”

A Tipping Point For Australia?

The Clean Energy Investor Group — an 18-member body that advocates for investors in large-scale renewable energy projects — is advocating for financial reforms to “align Australia with international markets” and unlock new investment.

Simon Corbell, chief executive of CEIG, said governments and regulators should bring Australia’s investment guidelines into line with global markets. “Clean energy investors currently face significant risks in the NEM, which is holding back the capital needed. To unlock an investment pipeline worth $70 billion, we need effective market reforms and policy certainty, which could also save up to $7 billion in capital costs or up to 10% of the cost of Australia’s clean energy transition.”

Modelling conducted for CEIG by Rennie Partners found that Australia needs 51 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy generation by 2042 if it is to meet its commitments under the Paris Climate Change agreement. So far, only 3 GW of new wind and solar projects have been committed, leaving a significant shortfall of 48 GW.

The sclerotic federal government led by fake Christian Scott Morrison has hardly lifted a finger to bring more renewables to the Australian continent and shows zero signs that it even understands, much less cares about, the advancing global warming crisis that is bringing fires, floods, drought, and heat waves to Australia and large sections of the rest of the world. Perhaps someday Australians will elect a real leader, one who will deal with reality rather than religious fantasies.

 

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

 

 


Advertisement



 


Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Continue Reading

Environment

Toyota is reviving the egg-shaped Previa as its first electric minivan

Published

on

By

Toyota is reviving the egg-shaped Previa as its first electric minivan

Toyota’s egg-shaped minivan, the Previa, is officially going electric. It will be revived as the first all-electric Toyota minivan. Will the funky-looking minivan find success as an EV?

When will Toyota launch its first electric minivan?

Although Toyota launched Japan’s first “electrified,” or PHEV models less than two weeks ago, we are already learning that a fully electric minivan is coming.

Toyota launched the Alphard and Vellfire PHEV minivans on December 20, offering both gas and hybrid powertrains. The new PHEV system provides up to 45 miles (73 km) of all-electric driving range, while the interior features “the quietness of a BEV.” Meanwhile, Toyota has bigger plans to enter the electric minivan market.

According to a recent report from Japan’s leading auto magazine, Best Car (via Forbes), the Toyota Previa will be revived in 2026.

Known for its egg-shaped design, the Toyota Previa was sold in the US and overseas markets in the early 1990s. However, due to stiff competition from the Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Caravan, and others, the Previa was discontinued in 1997. In its final sales year, only 3,780 units were sold, compared to a peak of around 52,000 in 1991.

Toyota-first-electric-minivan
Toyota Fine-Comfort Concept FCV minivan (Source: Toyota)

The Previa was replaced by the Sienna, which has a much more toned-down design and is still sold primarily in the North American market.

Although Toyota was expected to use the e-TNGA platform, which underpins the bZ4X electric SUV, a Toyota insider said the Previa EV will use the GA-K platform, currently used for the Crown, Camry, and RAV-4 models.

It will be available in both electric (EV) and plug-in hybrid (PHEV) options. Like its predecessor, the electric minivan is expected to feature a similar egg-like design for aerodynamics.

The revived Previa was initially developed as a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle (FCEV), but Toyota changed its plans due to a lack of demand and charging. The FCEV model was previewed as the “Fine-Comfort Ride” Concept (shown above) in 2017.

Electrek’s Take

An all-electric Toyota minivan could help the Japanese auto giant finally gain traction in the EV market. Sales of its first electric model, the bZ4X, have been slower than expected due to an early recall and an influx of mid-size electric SUVs, many times with more range and features.

Toyota is known for its hybrids, like the Prius, so it’s no surprise that it will offer a PHEV version. However, without a dedicated EV platform, the electric Previa could suffer the same fate as the bZ4X, with less range and options.

Rivals like Hyundai are also launching their first electric minivans soon. Hyundai is preparing to begin production of its Staria Electric minivan next year. It’s expected to launch in Korea next year, followed by Europe in the first half of 2026. European-made models will be imported to places like Australia and Thailand, two key overseas markets for Toyota.

Recently, reports surfaced that Toyota is dropping the bZ4X (bZ) naming system, so an electric Previa minivan could make sense.

Toyota has teased other EV revivals, including electric Land Cruiser and Supra models. It also just launched the Urban Cruiser electric SUV in Europe. Check back soon for more info on Toyota’s first electric minivan.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla replaced laid off US workers with foreign workers using H-1B visas that Musk want to increase

Published

on

By

Tesla replaced laid off US workers with foreign workers using H-1B visas that Musk want to increase

Tesla has replaced some of its US employees who were let go as part of a big wave of layoffs earlier this year with foreign workers using H-1B visas, which CEO Elon Musk is now campaigning to increase.

Over the last week, Elon Musk has been promoting the increase of H-1B visas, which are used to bring foreign workers into the US for “specialty occupations.”

Qualified foreign workers need to be sponsored by a company to get the visa, which lasts three years, extendable to six years, after which the holder needs to reapply.

The visa holder must maintain employment at the visa sponsor to retain the work visa. The worker would have to leave the country if the employment ends for whatever reason. This has led to some criticism as it gives tremendous power to the employer and can lead to a modern version of indentured servitude.

While there are obvious benefits to bringing skilled workers into the US, people are divided on the issue because those workers are often paid less than US workers, putting negative pressure on compensation, especially in the tech industry, on top of the moral questions about holding visas over the heads of foreign workers.

That’s why the US Congress has mandated a 65,000 visa cap limiting the number of H-1B visas that can be issued each fiscal year, plus an extra 20,000 for foreign people coming out of graduate programs at US universities.

Tesla has been a big user of those visas, and its CEO, Elon Musk, has been using his newfound political influence to promote increasing the cap of H-1B visas. He received significant pushback from his new friends on the right side of the political spectrum in the US, who see this visa as being used to steal jobs from Americans.

He is quite passionate about the issue, to say the least:

To be fair, Musk didn’t come to the US on a H-1B visa. He came on a student visa, and later, his own brother admitted that they were illegal immigrants in the early days of launching their Zip2 startup in the US.

Tesla’s use of H-1B visas

Over the last few days, several current and former Tesla workers reached out to Electrek to reveal that Tesla ramped up its use of H-1B visas to replace US workers it let go during a wave of layoffs earlier this year.

We reported that roughly US 15,000 employees were let go at Tesla around April 2024. Every department was affected, but the layoffs were concentrated in Texas and California, where Tesla has more workers than anywhere else.

Current and former Tesla employees said that many of the laid-off US workers were replaced by foreign workers using H-1B visas.

These claims are backed by US Department of Labor data, which show that Tesla requested over 2,000 H-1B visas during the time it was laying off US workers (via Reddit):

Again, there’s a cap of 65,000 visas for the entire US annually, and Tesla alone tried to get over 3% of them.

Tesla workers said that many employees let go were more senior engineers with higher compensation and they have been replaced with junior engineers from foreign countries at a lower pay.

Electrek’s Take

To be clear, I’m not taking a stance on H-1B here. It seems like there should be good uses for this visa, but it certainly can be abused. My goal is to share more information that could explain why Elon would want more of this visa for his businesses, and maybe not for the right reasons.

At the core, people see the problem of hiring workers from other countries who are willing to work for lower pay than US workers – taking jobs from Americans and putting pressure on overall compensation in the US.

There’s certainly value to the argument. Elon’s counterargument is that the US doesn’t have enough skilled workers, and he needs to hire people from other countries to compensate.

This argument also has some value, especially for specific sectors, like manufacturing engineering, which has become less popular in the US.

However, at Tesla and with Elon, the problem is much deeper than this.

The problem stems from the employer’s weight over the workers as a sponsor of their visas. Elon is famously hard on workers, and he doesn’t like the traditional 40-hour workweek. He often pushes Tesla employees to work 60 to 80 hours per week.

Many Tesla employees have happily done this for years, and the main motivator has been the belief in Tesla’s mission to accelerate the advent of electric transport in order to curb climate change.

Some people still believe in this mission, but Elon has eroded it over the last few years by shifting focus on self-driving and advocating for removing EV incentives in the US. It is becoming harder to make people believe that Tesla’s main goal is to accelerate the advent of EVs when its CEO is talking more about Tesla becoming “the most valuable company in the world” than its impact on climate change. And let’s not forget that he has spent a tremendous amount of effort and money over the last year to get deniers of the human impact on climate change elected.

But he has found another effective way to motivate workers to work harder and for longer hours: hold a visa over their head.

The nature of the H-1B visa being attached to your employer puts tremendous pressure on the workers.

On top of it, Tesla, like many other companies using H-1B visas, tends to hire from countries where longer workweek are already the norm. For example, India is already mostly on a 6-day workweek.

I don’t like to Tesla workers killing themselves working 80 hours per week, but if they do it passionately, by choice, for what they believe to be a great mission, it’s hard to argue against that. It’s their choice.

But if they do it because they want the “American dream” and they are afraid that getting let go will kill or slow down their chance of immigrating because they are in the country on a H-1B visa, that feels like exploitation to me.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Hyundai’s mysterious ‘OE’ EV model appears again: Is this the IONIQ 3 we’ve been waiting for?

Published

on

By

Hyundai's mysterious 'OE' EV model appears again: Is this the IONIQ 3 we've been waiting for?

Is Hyundai finally about to launch the smaller IONIQ 3 EV we’ve been waiting for? A mysterious new Hyundai ‘OE’ vehicle, which appears to be the IONIQ 5’s little sibling, has surfaced again. Here’s what we know about the new EV.

When will Hyundai launch the IONIQ 3?

Hyundai has been on a roll, launching new electric models in key global markets, including the US, Europe, China, and others.

After a new Hyundai EV model badged with the codename “OE” surfaced again, local reports suggest it could be the IONIQ 3. Hyundai has given previous electric models, such as the IONIQ 5 and IONIQ 6, codenames, including “CE” and “NE.”

The most recent model to earn a codename was the three-row IONIQ 9 SUV, unveiled at the LA Auto Show last month. Hyundai’s larger electric SUV model code was “ME” before its official debut.

After more images of the new “OE” model surfaced online, Hyundai’s Chinese joint venture, Beijing Hyundai, appeared to confirm the new EV through a local regulation portal.

The screenshots from Autospy reveal the “OE1C” codename again, confirming that it will be an electric SUV. Hyundai’s new EV is set to launch in 2026. Another “EA1C” model is also listed.

According to TheKoreanCarBlog, local rumors suggest the new EV could finally be the IONIQ 3 or even 4. The mysterious new model is expected to ride on Hyundai’s E-GMP platform, which underpins its current IONIQ 5, 6, 9, and Kia’s electric car lineup.

Although little is known about it, the IONIQ 3 will be slightly smaller than the popular IONIQ 5. It will likely be closer to Kia’s new EV3.

Kia-EV3
Kia EV3 (Source: Kia)

The recent spy shots show IONIQ-like design elements, including the wheels, door handles, and several interior features.

Hyundai’s new EV is expected to be available in single and dual-motor powertrains with 62 or 84-kWh battery pack options. For comparison, the Kia EV3 offers up to 605 km (375 mi) WLTP range with the larger (81.4 kWh) battery. The smaller (58.3 kWh) battery provides around 436 km (271 mi) range on the WLTP cycle.

Hyundai-IONIQ-5
Hyundai’s new 2025 IONIQ 5 Limited with a Tesla NACS port (Source: Hyundai)

In Europe, Kia’s smaller EV3 starts at around 36,000 euros ($38,300). The low-cost EV can be bought in Korea for under $30,000 with incentives.

It will be interesting to see how the IONIQ 3 compares to Hyundai’s new Casper Electric. The Casper Electric, known as the Inster EV in Europe, starts at just around $20,000 (27.4 million won) in Korea.

Hyundai-Casper-EV
Hyundai Casper Electric/ Inster EV models (Source: Hyundai)

Hyundai’s low-cost EV offers up to 315 km (195 miles) range in Korea and 355 km (221 miles) on the WLTP cycle. Unlike the IONIQ series, the Casper Electric is based on Hyundai’s smaller H2 platform.

The new Hyundai electric SUV will first launch in China in early 2026. For those in the US, Europe, and other overseas markets, we will have to wait to find out if it will launch in overseas markets. Stay tuned for more.

Source: TheKoreanCarBlog, Autospy

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending