Connect with us

Published

on

There was a key section in the president’s speech which, in the chaos of the Afghan withdrawal, might get overlooked. 

“As we turn the page on the foreign policy that has guided our nation the last two decades,” he said, “we’ve got to learn from our mistakes.

“To me, there are two that are paramount. First, we must set missions with clear, achievable goals – not ones we’ll never reach.

“And second, we must stay clearly focused on the fundamental national security interest of the United States of America.”

And then the crux: “This decision about Afghanistan is not just about Afghanistan. It’s about ending an era of major military operations to remake other countries.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Biden chose ‘not to extend forever war’

As the dust settles from the chaos of the past two weeks in Afghanistan, beyond the message the hasty exit sent to allies, foes and terrorists, a clear shift in America’s desired position in the world is emerging.

If observers thought Donald Trump’s inward looking “America first” mantra was a blip, maybe they were wrong.

More on Afghanistan

This was President Biden’s latest address to the nation from the White House.

It was the speech where he hoped to draw a line under a brutal few weeks for American leadership.

He defensively declared a mission accomplished, but he could only honestly claim a success in achieving a retreat.

“We completed one of the biggest airlifts in history, with more than 120,000 people evacuated to safety… The extraordinary success of this mission was due to the incredible skill, bravery, and selfless courage of the United States military and our diplomats and intelligence professionals,” he said.

He defended, again, his decision to bring the war to an end: “I was not going to extend this forever war, and I was not extending a forever exit.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Destroyed military planes and vehicles left by US

He reflected on the past fortnight, conceding that assumptions had been wrong but claiming that the chaos was factored in.

“The assumption was that more than 300,000 Afghan National Security Forces that we had trained over the past two decades and equipped would be a strong adversary in their civil wars with the Taliban. That assumption – that the Afghan government would be able to hold on for a period of time beyond military drawdown – turned out not to be accurate.”

For terrorist groups, there was this warning: “We are not done with you yet. To those who wish America harm, know this. The US will never rest. We will never rest. We will hunt you down to the ends of the Earth and you will pay the ultimate price.”

Yet, he said that the focus would be where terrorists hide now, not where they hid two decades ago. That, despite the evidence that al Qaeda and ISIS endure and could prosper in Afghanistan.

The president can, for now, successfully claim that this so-called forever war is over for America.

But the legacy of his decision will follow him – the impact on relations with allies because the chaos has cost them politically, the message it sends to China and Russia about American priorities, and then there is the all-important reaction of the American people – that’s what drove him.

They wanted the war finished, but it’s how it came to an end. A humiliation? People and equipment left behind; an enemy and terrorists emboldened.

South of Kabul in the city of Khost, Taliban supporters staged a mock funeral, with coffins draped in the flags of France, Britain, America and NATO.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Taliban’s mock funeral for Western nations

It was a message from them but maybe also a reflection of the end of an era in western foreign policy – America and its allies no longer able or willing to uphold their values, through force if necessary, beyond their borders.

Right or wrong, that marks a fundamental shift.

Continue Reading

US

Trump seeking to ‘manufacture a crisis’ in Chicago, says Illinois governor

Published

on

By

Trump seeking to 'manufacture a crisis' in Chicago, says Illinois governor

The governor of Illinois has accused Donald Trump of “attempting to manufacture a crisis” over reports the US president was considering deploying the military in the state.

US newspaper The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the Pentagon was drafting plans to deploy the US army in Chicago, the state capital.

It comes as part of Mr Trump’s crackdown on crime, homelessness, and illegal immigration in mainly Democrat-run cities. He recently deployed the National Guard in Washington DC.

In a statement responding to the report, governor JB Pritzker said Illinois had “received no requests or outreach from the federal government asking if we need assistance, and we have made no requests for federal intervention”.

He added: “The safety of the people of Illinois is always my top priority.

“There is no emergency that warrants the President of the United States federalising the Illinois National Guard, deploying the National Guard from other states, or sending active duty military within our own borders.”

The governor then said: “Donald Trump is attempting to manufacture a crisis, politicise Americans who serve in uniform, and continue abusing his power to distract from the pain he is causing working families.

More on Chicago

“We will continue to follow the law, stand up for the sovereignty of our state, and protect the people of Illinois.”

Officials familiar with the proposals told the Post that several options were being weighed up by the US defence department, including mobilising thousands of National Guard troops in Chicago as early as September.

The Pentagon said it would not comment on planned operations, adding: “The department is a planning organisation and is continuously working with other agency partners on plans to protect federal assets and personnel.”

People protest against President Donald Trump's use of federal law enforcement and National Guard troops in Washington DC. Pic: AP
Image:
People protest against President Donald Trump’s use of federal law enforcement and National Guard troops in Washington DC. Pic: AP

Mr Trump, however, told reporters on Friday that “Chicago is a mess,” before attacking the city’s mayor Brandon Johnson and hinting “we’ll straighten that one out probably next”.

Mr Johnson has not yet commented on Saturday’s reports, but said on Friday that the president’s approach to tackling crime has been “uncoordinated, uncalled for and unsound”.

“There are many things the federal government could do to help us reduce crime and violence in Chicago, but sending in the military is not one of them,” he added.

Read more from Sky News:
‘I’m deprived of my UK citizenship but I’m not a convicted terrorist’
Analysis: Farage has finally embraced Trump-style rhetoric
What Epstein’s right-hand woman says about Trump and Prince Andrew

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

It comes after around 800 National Guard troops were deployed in Washington DC earlier this month, despite the US capital’s mayor revealing crime in the capital was at its “lowest level in 30 years”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What’s it like having the army on DC’s streets?

According to preliminary figures from Washington DC’s Metropolitan Police, violent crime is down 26% in 2025 – after dropping 35% in 2024 compared with 2023.

In June Mr Trump ordered 700 US Army marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in California, during protests over mass immigration raids.

The deployment came against the wishes of state governor Gavin Newsom, who said: “The federal government is sowing chaos so they can have an excuse to escalate.

“That is not the way any civilised country behaves.”

Continue Reading

US

Ghislaine Maxwell was given ‘platform to rewrite history’, say Virginia Giuffre’s family

Published

on

By

Ghislaine Maxwell was given 'platform to rewrite history', say Virginia Giuffre's family

The family of Virginia Giuffre, who was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent sex trafficking accusers, have said they are “outraged” over the US Department of Justice’s release of an interview with Ghislaine Maxwell.

Maxwell – a convicted sex trafficker and ex-girlfriend of the deceased paedophile financier Epstein – refuted several claims of child sex trafficking and abuse during the two-day-long interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in July.

Reacting after the transcripts of the interview were released on Friday, Ms Giuffre’s family said it gave Maxwell the “platform to rewrite history” and showed she was “never challenged about her court-proven lies”.

“As the family of one of the most prominent survivors, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, we are outraged,” they said in a statement.

“The content of these transcripts is in direct contradiction with felon Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction for child sex trafficking.”

Virginia Giuffre was one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent accusers. File pic: AP
Image:
Virginia Giuffre was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent accusers. File pic: AP

Ms Giuffre’s family added: “This travesty of justice entirely invalidates the experiences of the many brave survivors who put their safety, security, and lives on the line to ensure her conviction, including our sister.”

Referencing Maxwell’s move to a minimum-security facility in Texas earlier this month, they said it “sends a disturbing message that child sex trafficking is acceptable and will be rewarded”.

More on Ghislaine Maxwell

“We continue to call upon the DOJ (Department of Justice) to do its job by investigating and holding accountable the many rich and powerful people who enabled Ghislaine Maxwell’s and Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes,” they concluded.

Ms Giuffre, who died by suicide in April, had previously claimed that Maxwell introduced her to Epstein and hired her as his masseuse, before she was sex trafficked and sexually abused by him and associates around the world.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Virginia Giuffre dies by suicide

She sued Prince Andrew for sexual abuse in August 2021 – saying he had sex with her when she was 17 and had been trafficked by Epstein.

The duke has repeatedly denied the claims, and he has not been charged with any criminal offences.

In March 2022, it was announced Ms Giuffre and Andrew had reached an out-of-court settlement – believed to include a “substantial donation to Ms Giuffre’s charity in support of victims’ rights”.

During her interview with Mr Blanche last month, Maxwell said Ms Giuffre’s allegation against the duke “doesn’t hold water”, and denied ever introducing Epstein to him or Sarah Ferguson.

Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts in 2001. Pic: Shutterstock
Image:
Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts in 2001. Pic: Shutterstock

She insisted Epstein and Andrew met separately, and said “I think Sarah [Ferguson] is the one that pushed that”, before saying that allegations Andrew had sex with Ms Giuffre were untrue, as she was at her mother’s 80th birthday celebrations in the countryside outside the city.

Maxwell then claimed Ms Giuffre’s allegation that she and Andrew had sexual contact in the bathroom of her London flat was not true, as the room was not big enough.

She also claimed that an image of her standing alongside Andrew with his arm around Ms Giuffre’s waist was “literally a fake photo”.

During the interview with Mr Blanche, Maxwell denied ever seeing US President Donald Trump in an “inappropriate setting” and insisted she was not aware of any Epstein ‘client list’.

Read more:
All we know about Trump and Epstein’s ‘friendship’
Trump told in May his name appears in Epstein files – report
Virginia Giuffre wanted Epstein files released, her family say

Under growing pressure to release files related to Epstein, as he promised to do during his 2024 presidential campaign, Mr Trump has made a series of denials and claims about the paedophile financier.

In July, the president told reporters on Air Force One that Epstein “stole” Ms Giuffre and other young women from his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump claims Epstein ‘stole’ Virginia Giuffre

Mr Trump has also floated a pardon for Maxwell, saying earlier this month that “nobody” had asked to but insisted that he has “the right to do it”.

“I’m allowed to do it, but nobody’s asked me to do it. I know nothing about it,” he added. “I don’t know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it.

“I have the right to give pardons, I’ve given pardons to people before, but nobody’s even asked me to do it.”

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Maxwell was sentenced in the US in June 2022 to 20 years in prison following her conviction on five counts of sex trafficking for luring young girls to massage rooms for Epstein to abuse. She has asked the US Supreme Court to overturn her conviction.

Epstein, 66, was found dead in his cell at a Manhattan federal jail in August 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. His death was ruled a suicide.

Read more from Sky News:
Man wrongly sent to El Salvador threatened with deportation to Uganda
Why Donald Trump believes he ‘deserves the Nobel Peace Prize’

His case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories due to his and Maxwell’s links to famous people like royals, presidents and billionaires, including Mr Trump.

No one other than Epstein and Maxwell has been charged with any criminal offences.

Continue Reading

US

Names released of five killed in Niagara Falls tour bus crash

Published

on

By

Names released of five killed in Niagara Falls tour bus crash

The five people who died after a tour bus returning to New York City from Niagara Falls crashed have been named.

The bus, with 54 passengers on board, crashed and rolled on Interstate 90 near Pembroke, about 30 miles (48km) east of Buffalo, New York, at around 12.30pm (5.30pm UK time) on Friday.

In an update on Saturday, New York State Police said that those who died were identified as:
• Shankar Kumar Jha, 65, of Madhu Bani, India;
• Pinki Changrani, 60, of East Brunswick, New Jersey;
• Zhang Xiaolan, 55 of Jersey City, New Jersey;
• Jian Mingli, 56, of Jersey City;
• Xie Hongzhuo, a 22-year-old student at Columbia University, from Beijing, China.

After the student was named, Columbia University said in a statement that the faculty was “devastated”.

“This heartbreaking loss is felt deeply across our community,” it added. “We are in close contact with her family and offering them our full support.

“Our thoughts and deepest sympathies are with her family, friends, and all who have been touched by this tragedy.”

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

Erie County Medical Center, where 21 passengers were hospitalised for injuries, said that as of Saturday afternoon, 14 patients are in stable condition but remain at the hospital.

More on New York

Authorities are still investigating the cause of the crash, which did not involve any other vehicles. The driver had not been charged in connection with the incident as of Friday.

State police major Andre Ray said in a news conference that the driver had become distracted, lost control and overcorrected before the bus went into the right shoulder and flipped over.

“An absolute tragedy took place,” he added. “And first and foremost, our thoughts, prayers and hearts go out to those involved, their friends and their families.”

Read more from Sky News:
What Epstein’s right-hand woman says about Trump and Prince Andrew
Multiple workers dead after bridge in China collapses
UK set to bask in 30C sunshine over bank holiday weekend

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Mr Ray added that a preliminary investigation had ruled out mechanical failure or driver impairment, and that the driver survived the crash and was cooperating with police.

Continue Reading

Trending