Connect with us

Published

on

When NHL players signed a new collective bargaining agreement in 2020, they earned a massive win: the league agreed to allow players to participate in the 2022 and 2026 Olympic Games. NHL players, uniformly, have fought to return to the Olympics. It’s a dream for so many to be able to represent their countries on an iconic stage. And for the players who aren’t selected? Well, it often means a two-week vacation in the middle of the season. Nobody hates that.

In the previous CBA, there was no language about Olympic participation. So players had little recourse when the league and its owners decided to skip the 2018 Games, citing concerns about schedule disruption and injury risks.

Though the players won this battle, the new Olympic CBA clause always carried a caveat: it was contingent on the NHL and NHLPA reaching a deal with the International Ice Hockey Federation and International Olympic Committee. And those talks are never easy.

The four sides talked on and off for the last several months — bypassing some arbitrary deadlines — and finally reached an agreement on Friday. Here’s a look at what was discussed in those meetings, what the 2022 Olympic ice hockey tournament could look like, and an explanation on how it all could be called off again.

What were the key issues that the two sides were negotiating?

The NHL still isn’t crazy about the idea of sending players to the Olympics, but since the league agreed with the players, they negotiated on their behalf in good faith.

One thing the NHL wanted out of an Olympic agreement was expanded media and advertising rights. In a February 2020 meeting, the NHL outlined some of the things they wanted — NHL logos and advertisements featured in Olympic games, the ability to use Olympic highlights on NHL Network or NHL.com — which they hoped would help promote the game. The NHL felt good about the way discussions went in that meeting.

But the climate has changed since then, including the NHL switching broadcast partners from NBC, which is also home to the Olympics. Ultimately, the NHL didn’t get those expanded media rights. The IOC and IIHF didn’t have an appetite to make more concessions to the league. Those involved with the discussions said the IIHF and IOC knew they held leverage, as NHL players have been pretty adamant (privately and publicly) about how badly they wanted to go.

The IIHF and IOC already agreed to pick up travel costs and insurance for NHL players. If players are allowed to have guests, the IIHF and IOC will cover costs for the guests, as well.

Another big issue that came up was COVID insurance: What would happen if a player contracts COVID at the Olympics, and if it affects him afterward? The NHL and NHLPA found a provider for COVID insurance, but it was expensive, and the IIHF and IOC said they would not cover it. Now it will be up to the individual player to purchase that insurance. Sources said most NHL players would probably skip getting that additional insurance, especially after knowing how strict the protocols will be.

All players who participate in the Olympics will be required to take the COVID vaccine, however there could be very limited exemptions on a case-by-case basis. Sources say “an overwhelming majority” of NHL players are already vaccinated.

So, is it a done deal?

Yes, but there’s a catch: the sides did agree to an opt-out clause that gives the NHL and NHLPA the chance to pull out of the Olympics, should COVID conditions worsen or otherwise pose a threat to the health and safety of players.

Another reason the NHL and NHLPA could pull out is if the 2021-22 NHL season is affected by game cancellations. If the league feels like it needs to use the Olympic break to make up games — to get a full season in, and recoup as much hockey-related revenue as possible — it could exercise this clause. The language is extremely vague, but the opt-out deadline is believed to be sometime in early January. So that’s something to monitor.

What will the Olympic break look like?

The NHL is scheduled to break from games from Thursday, Feb. 3 through Tuesday, Feb. 22. All-Star Weekend in Las Vegas, Nevada — on Feb. 4 and 5 — was going to happen with or without Olympic participation.

Olympians who attend All-Star Weekend will leave directly from Las Vegas that Sunday, Feb. 6, for travel to Beijing.

The league has an unreleased alternative schedule prepared if, for whatever reason, NHL players do not end up attending the Olympics.

When was the last “best-on-best” tournament in men’s hockey?

The last time NHL stars populated the majority of the rosters was the World Cup of Hockey tournament held in Sept. 2016 in Toronto. While the tournament had its highlights — who can forget the electrifying 23-and-under “Team North America” featuring Connor McDavid and Auston Matthews? — it was also a preseason event, with gameplay that confirmed it.

Canada won the World Cup, just like it won the previous two “best-on-best” Olympic tournaments in Vancouver (2010) and Sochi (2014). Team USA famously took silver with an overtime loss to Sidney Crosby and the Canadians in 2010; and infamously lost bronze against Finland after Canada defeated the Americans in the Sochi semifinals.

The NHL did not participate in the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, ending a run of five consecutive tournaments in which they allowed their players to appear. The league cited the team owners’ continuing opposition to the Olympic break during the regular season, and the fact that the IOC had decided not to cover participation costs associated with travel, insurance and accommodations for the players and guests.

The NHL also didn’t see enough value in the South Korean market to justify games being played at inopportune times back in North America. China is a different story.

What’s the format for the 2022 Winter Olympic men’s hockey tournament? What will the rosters look like?

It’s the same format used for the last three Winter Games. There are three groups comprised of four teams apiece. The 12 teams are ranked by record after group play, and the top four teams advance to the quarterfinals — typically, the three group winners and the best second-place team after tie-breakers. The other eight teams, seeded by record, play in qualification-round playoff games to advance to the quarterfinals.

The winners in the semifinals advance to play for the gold medal; the losers in the semifinals play for bronze.

Participating Olympic teams must submit their “long lists” of players by Oct. 15. The provisional playing rosters will be announced by January.

Which teams have qualified?

The three groups for the 2022 Winter Olympics have been announced. Nine teams qualified for the tournament in the initial round; Denmark, Slovakia and Latvia qualified in a round of qualification games played Aug. 26-29. China, the host nation, automatically gets a spot. Here are the groups, with rankings via the IIHF:

Group A

Canada (1)
USA (6)
Germany (7)
China (12)

Group B

Russian Olympic Committee (2)
Czech Republic (5)
Switzerland (8)
Denmark (11)

Group C

Finland (3)
Sweden (4)
Slovakia (9)
Latvia (10)

What are the COVID protocols for the Beijing Games? How do they compare to the Tokyo Olympics or the 2020 Stanley Cup Playoff bubbles?

NHL players have gotten used to COVID protocols for the last year and a half, from daily testing to hotel isolation to the masks and social distancing inside venues. That especially goes for players who lived inside the Toronto and Edmonton “bubbles” during the 2020 playoffs. The restrictions at the Olympics will closely resemble those standards — although there probably won’t be a Tim Horton’s truck in China.

The Tokyo Olympics provided the direct template. Almost all spectators were barred from events. Everyone at the Games was required to wear masks at all times and socially distance. Athletes that didn’t stay in the Olympic Village were kept in designated hotels. They were barred from taking public transportation to events, and used specific transports provided to them. The IOC developed sports-specific guidelines for position tests, from how competitors could be replaced and disqualification standards in team sports.

The Beijing Games are expected to go well beyond Tokyo’s protocols. According to the New York Times, organizers announced they were redesigning 39 venues this summer to ensure that athletes “have practically no contact with referees, spectators or journalists,” and that those groups are also separated from each other. It also reported on “all-day armpit thermometers, with tiny transmitters to sound the alarm should someone develop a fever.”

The Chinese government and IOC are still working on protocols. However according to a memo sent out by NHLPA Executive Director Donald Fehr: “All indications are that the entire Games — venues, the Village, places to eat, etc. — will be placed in a very tight bubble enforced by the Chinese government.” Fehr also wrote that “it is anticipated that there also will be significant restrictions on where players can go even within the bubble (no walking around or sightseeing), with whom they can socialize (only those on their regular contact list, perhaps not even other athletes in the Village), as well as numerous other requirements, like daily COVID testing, social distancing, mask wearing, and frequent temperature checks. It is also likely that players will be required to file daily activity plans and wear GPS location devices to assist with contract tracing and ensure protocol compliance.”

Again, no protocols have been finalized for next February’s Olympics. Questions about how testing will be treated and quarantine specifics for travel have yet to be established.

Continue Reading

Sports

Gregory, in second season, promoted to Vandy DC

Published

on

By

Gregory, in second season, promoted to Vandy DC

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Vanderbilt coach Clark Lea has promoted Steve Gregory to defensive coordinator and Nick Lezynski to co-defensive coordinator, the school announced Monday.

Lea served as his own defensive coordinator last season after he demoted the previous coordinator, Nick Howell, following the 2023 season.

Gregory was associate defensive coordinator and secondary coach. He joined Vanderbilt following five seasons as an NFL assistant.

Lezynski is entering his fourth season at Vanderbilt. He was hired as linebackers coach and was promoted to defensive run game coordinator in 2023.

Under Lea’s direction, Gregory and Lezynski helped the Vanderbilt defense show marked improvement. The scoring defense rose from 126th in 2023 to 50th in 2024 and rushing defense from 104th to 52nd. Vanderbilt held consecutive opponents under 100 rushing yards (Virginia Tech and Alcorn State) for the first time since 2017, and a 17-7 win over Auburn marked the lowest point total by an SEC opponent since 2015.

The Commodores were 7-6, their first winning record since 2013.

Continue Reading

Sports

Source: Texas eyes ex-WVU coach Brown for role

Published

on

By

Source: Texas eyes ex-WVU coach Brown for role

Texas is targeting former West Virginia and Troy coach Neal Brown for a role on its 2025 coaching staff, a source confirmed to ESPN.

The role is still to be determined, and a deal is not finalized but could be soon, the source said. Brown spent the past six seasons coaching West Virginia and went 37-35 before being fired in December. He went 35-16 at Troy with a Sun Belt championship in 2017.

247 Sports first reported Texas targeting Brown.

The 44-year-old Brown spent time in the state as offensive coordinator at Texas Tech from 2010 to 2012. He also held coordinator roles at Troy and Kentucky.

After back-to-back College Football Playoff appearances, Texas is set to open spring practice March 17.

Continue Reading

Sports

Sources: FSU, Clemson, ACC expected to settle

Published

on

By

Sources: FSU, Clemson, ACC expected to settle

Florida State and Clemson will vote Tuesday on an agreement that would ultimately result in the settlement of four ongoing lawsuits between the schools and the ACC and a new revenue-distribution strategy that would solidify the conference’s membership for the near future, sources told ESPN on Monday.

The ACC board of directors is scheduled to hold a call Tuesday to go over the settlement terms. In addition, Florida State and Clemson have both called board meetings to present the terms at noon ET Tuesday. All three boards must agree to the settlement for it to move forward, but sources throughout the league expect a deal to be reached.

According to sources, the settlement includes two key objectives: establishing a new revenue-distribution model based on viewership and a change in the financial penalties for exiting the league’s grant of rights before its conclusion in June 2036.

This new revenue-distribution model — or “brand initiative” — is based on a five-year rolling average of TV ratings, though some logistics of this formula remain tricky, including how to properly average games on the unrated ACC Network or other subscription channels. The brand initiative will be funded through a split in the league’s TV revenue, with 40% distributed evenly among the 14 longstanding members and 60% going toward the brand initiative and distributed based on TV ratings.

Top earners are expected to net an additional $15 million or more, according to sources, while some schools will see a net reduction in annual payout of up to about $7 million annually, an acceptable loss, according to several administrators at schools likely to be impacted, in exchange for some near-term stability.

The brand initiative is expected to begin for the coming fiscal year.

The brand fund, combined with the separate “success initiatives” fund approved in 2023 and enacted last year that rewards schools for postseason appearances, would allow teams that hit necessary benchmarks in each to close the revenue gap with the SEC and Big Ten, possibly adding in the neighborhood of $30 million or more annually should a school make a deep run in the College Football Playoff or NCAA basketball tournament and lead the way in TV ratings.

The success initiatives are funded largely through money generated by the new expanded College Football Playoff and additional revenue generated by the additions of Stanford, Cal and SMU, each of which is taking a reduced portion of TV money over the next six to eight years, while the new brand initiative will involve some schools in the conference receiving less TV revenue than before.

As a result of their inclusion in the College Football Playoff this past season, SMU athletic director Rick Hart said, the Mustangs and Tigers each earned $4 million through the success initiatives.

Sources have suggested Clemson and Florida State would be among the biggest winners of this brand-based distribution, though North Carolina and Miami are others expected to come out with a higher payout. Georgia Tech was actually the ACC’s highest-rated program in 2024, based in part on a Week 0 game against Florida State and a seven-overtime thriller against Georgia on the final Friday of the regular season.

Basketball ratings will be included in the brand initiative, too, but at a smaller rate than football, which is responsible for about 75% of the league’s TV revenue.

If ACC commissioner Jim Phillips is able to get this to the finish line Tuesday, it would be a big win for him and for the conference during a time of unprecedented change in collegiate athletics — particularly for a league that many speculated would break apart when litigation between the ACC and Florida State and Clemson began in 2023.

Both schools would consider it a win as well after they decided to file lawsuits in their home states in hopes of extricating themselves from a grant of rights agreement that, according to Florida State’s attorneys, could have meant paying as much as $700 million to leave the conference. The ACC countersued both schools to preserve the grant of rights agreement through 2036.

Although the settlement will not make substantive changes to the grant of rights, it is expected that there will be declining financial penalties for schools that exit before 2036, with the steepest decreases coming after 2030 — something that would apply to any ACC school, not just Clemson and Florida State.

The specific financial figures for schools to get released from the grant of rights were not readily available. But the total cost to exit the league after the 2029-30 season is expected to drop below $100 million, sources said.

The current language would require any school exiting before June 2036 to pay three times the operating budget — a figure that would be about $120 million — plus control of that team’s media rights through the conclusion of the grant of rights.

This was seen as a critical piece to the settlement, allowing flexibility for ACC schools amid a shifting college football landscape, particularly beyond the 2030 season, when TV deals for the Big Ten (2029-30), Big 12 (2030) and the next iteration of the College Football Playoff (2031) come up for renewal — a figure Florida State’s attorneys valued at more than $500 million over 10 years.

Sources told ESPN that there’d just be one number to exit the league, not the combination estimated by FSU of a traditional exit fee and the loss of media from the grant of rights.

In addition to securing the success and brand initiatives, viewed within the league as progressive ideas to help incentivize winning, Phillips also guided the recently announced ESPN option pickup to continue broadcasting the ACC through 2036.

Continue Reading

Trending