Connect with us

Published

on

MPs have backed a tax hike to boost funds for dealing with the NHS treatment backlog and to reform social care in England.

On Wednesday night, the House of Commons voted by 319 to 248, majority 71, in favour of a 1.25 percentage point rise in National Insurance contributions from next April.

The backing for Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s plans, which he admits are a breach of a Conservative manifesto promise not to raise major taxes, came despite five Tory MPs rebelling to vote against the government.

They included former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey. And a further 37 Conservative MPs recorded no vote, with many of them choosing to actively abstain.

Ministers have said the estimated £12bn a year raised by the new “health and social care levy” will be used to help tackle soaring waiting lists for NHS treatments as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

It will also be spent on changes to the social care system that are scheduled to come into force from 2023.

But Labour have branded the UK-wide rise in National Insurance – paid by workers and businesses – as a “tax on jobs” and claimed it would not fix the problems in social care.

More on Social Care

During a Commons debate on the government’s plans, Labour’s shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves accused ministers of attempting to rush the plans through parliament before they “unravel”.

Wednesday night’s vote on the proposals came just a day after Mr Johnson had announced them, with some criticising the little time MPs were given to consider them.

Ms Reeves told MPs: “Social care is a huge challenge facing our country. There are other challenges facing us too. We need to do things differently.

“Labour’s test is simple: Does it fix the problem? And does it do so in a fair way? The answer to both those questions in relation to these proposals is no.

“That is why Labour will vote against this unfair, job taxing, manifesto-shredding, tax bombshell this evening.”

The government also faced opposition from its own benches to the proposals, with Tory former minister Jake Berry telling the prime minister he risks creating an “un-Conservative” and permanent “NHS tax”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Social care tax rise: Regressive or progressive?

The Rossendale and Darwen MP, who chairs the Northern Research Group of Tories, said: “If you create an NHS tax, you have an NHS tax forever, it will never go down, it can only go up.

“No party is ever going to stand at an election and say I’ve got a good idea, vote for me, I’ll cut the NHS tax.

“So I just think there’s huge danger for us in creating such a hypothecated tax and having it on people’s payslips.

“It is fundamentally un-Conservative and in the long term it will massively damage the prospects of our party because we will never outbid the Labour Party in the arms race of an NHS tax and that’s why I don’t think this is the right way to do it.”

Prominent Conservative backbencher Steve Baker claimed his party were “in a dreadful position” and would have to “rediscover what it stands for”.

“We all know that eventually as a socialist you run out of other people’s money and I have to say I’m sorry ministers I’m not going to be able to vote with you tonight because some of us are going to have to be seen to be standing for another path,” he said.

Peter Bone criticised Number 10 for conflating social care reform with extra money to deal with NHS waiting lists, and fellow Tory MP Richard Drax asked where was “the vision of this Singapore-style low-tax economy attracting the world’s best to this country”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Raising taxes ‘a very Conservative thing to do’

Outside of the Commons, Mr Johnson’s former chief adviser Dominic Cummings posted on Twitter: “Tell your friends: the Tories are making the young – who can’t get a house & working for average/below average income, already screwed by a decade of hapless Tory government – to work harder to subsidise older richer people. They promised to do the opposite.”

Immediately before Wednesday night’s vote, the prime minister spent almost an hour addressing a meeting of the Tory party’s 1922 Committee.

He assured Conservative backbenchers that the party remained committed to free enterprise, the private sector and “low taxation”.

But he said he could not think of a “better use” for taxpayers’ money than spending on the NHS.

Earlier on Wednesday, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned the money raised by the National Insurance increase risked being permanently swallowed up by the NHS with “little if any” left over for social care.

Under the government’s plans the NHS will get the majority of the £36bn raised in the first three years, with £5.4bn for social care in England.

Health Secretary Sajid Javid has insisted that “more and more” of the money raised by the levy would go towards social care in future years, but he has failed to say how much and when.

Yet Mr Javid told Sky News on Wednesday there will be “enough money” to pay for reforms to the care sector.

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive an additional £2.2bn in health and social care spending from the tax rise.

The SNP claimed Scotland could be “sold short” and receive “less in return than the money taken from Scottish-based National Insurance payers”.

Continue Reading

Politics

£104bn of water industry investment will come from bill payers, environment secretary concedes

Published

on

By

£104bn of water industry investment will come from bill payers, environment secretary concedes

Steve Reed has conceded that the bulk of the £104bn of water industry investment which he boasts Labour has attracted since coming to office will come from bill payers.

In an interview with Sky News, the environment secretary sought to blame the previous Tory government for a string of high profile investors walking away from the sector over the last year.

Mr Reed does not accept claims that further threats to jail water bosses and promises to curb price rises have deterred investment.

Instead, he told Sky News that “by bringing in the £104bn of private sector investment that we secured at the end of last year, we can make sure that the investment is going in to support” the industry.

When challenged that the £104bn was total expenditure not total investment, and that bill payers would pay back this expenditure over the coming decades, Mr Reed conceded this was right – and the money ultimately is coming from bill payers.

“The money comes in from investors up front so we can do that spending straight away,” he said.

“Over decades, the investors got a modest return from the bills that customers are paying. That’s how investment works.”

Some investors have warned they do not think it viable to fund the UK water sector because of the hostile political tone of ministers and lack of certainty.

Ministers have said the government does not want to renationalise water as it would mean years of legal wrangling and cost a lot of money.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Minister rules out nationalising the water

Labour has launched a record 81 criminal investigations into water companies over sewage dumping since winning the election last year.

Water company bosses could be jailed for up to five years and the companies fined hundreds of millions of pounds if they are found guilty.

Mr Reed committed to not interfering with those prosecutions, saying it would be “highly inappropriate” for any minister to do so.

Read more:
Key recommendations from the water report

Labour to eliminate unauthorised sewage spillages in 10 years

He rejected suggestions ministers will be pressured to ensure water bosses do not serve jail time as this will deter investors.

“It’s a judicial process, it would be highly inappropriate for any ministerial interference in the process,” Mr Reed said.

“They will work their way through the court system, as they should do, and ministers will decide on sanctions after.”

Continue Reading

Politics

COINS Act model law offers blueprint for crypto regulation in India

Published

on

By

COINS Act model law offers blueprint for crypto regulation in India

COINS Act model law offers blueprint for crypto regulation in India

Hashed Emergent’s Vishal Achanta told Cointelegraph that COINS Act aims to turn India from a “regulatory minefield” into a destination of choice for the crypto community.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage says he would send violent offenders to El Salvador under crime crackdown

Published

on

By

Nigel Farage says he would send violent offenders to El Salvador under crime crackdown

Nigel Farage has said violent UK offenders could be jailed overseas under his plans to cut crime by half.

The Reform UK leader named El Salvador as a likely destination, though he said he has not held conversations with officials there and “multiple” partners would be considered.

El Salvador is home to a notorious mega-prison, the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT).

Politics Live: Starmer explains how he plans to make people ‘better off’

In a speech on law and order on Monday, Mr Farage said: “It is quite astonishing that to keep a prisoner in a British prison it costs nearly £52,000 a year.

“You could send a child Eton for that price.

“So we can send some of our worst violent criminals overseas to serve their terms. If that means Ian Huntley goes to El Salvador. Well, our attitude is ‘so be it’.”

Huntley is serving a life term for the murders of two 10-year-old girls, Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, in Soham, Cambridgeshire, in 2002.

Salvadoran police officers process alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua recently deported by the U.S. government to be imprisoned in the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) prison, as part of an agreement with the Salvadoran government, in Tecoluca, El Salvador, in this handout image obtained March 16, 2025. Secretaria de Prensa de la Presidencia/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES
Image:
El Salvador is home to a notorious super-max prison. Pic: Reuters/El Salvadoran government

Asked if he had spoken to any members of the El Salvadoran government about his plans, Mr Farage said he had not but “we do know they’re quite happy to take American violent offenders”.

In March, the Trump administration deported more than 130 alleged Venezuelan gang members to the CECOT while the US president has also spoken of sending “homegrown criminals” to the super max facility.

Reform UK said it wanted to create 10,000 “dynamic” prison places overall by renting cells in third party countries, at a cost of £250m per year. This would involve “multiple partners including El Salvador”, according to a document outlining the plan in further detail.

This will come alongside a number of policies aimed at cutting crime by half if Mr Farage’s party wins the next election.

The Clacton MP wants to hire another 30,000 police officers, put stop and search in every area where knife crime is prevalent and implement a zero-tolerance policy to shoplifting so every offence “however small” is prosecuted.

Mr Farage also said he would free up to 10,000 more prison places by deporting foreign criminals to their country of origin, saying he has already spoken to Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama about this.

He said he would take back British offenders who are incarcerated overseas in return but if countries are still reluctant “we’ll make it very straightforward. We’ll just end travel”.

Mr Farage did not say how much the plans would cost or how they would be funded in his speech, which marks the start of a six week “lawless Britain” campaign.

However, in response to questions from media he said the plans would cost £17.4bn over a five-year parliament.

He said the cost of crime is far greater than that so “it isn’t really a question of can we afford to do this, it’s really a question of we can’t afford not to do this”.

He insisted he would not have to raise taxes, saying the money would come from “huge cuts” to public spending including axing HS2 and net zero policies and reducing the size of the state.

Mr Farage claimed his plans are necessary because parts of Britain are facing “nothing short of societal collapse” due to spiralling crime rates.

Read More:
Government to conduct review into state pension age
Farage: Ex-Reform chair liking antisemitic post a ‘little mistake’

Sir Keir Starmer has made halving serious violent crime one of the missions of his government, but the pledge has been somewhat overshadowed by his controversial early prison release scheme, aimed at freeing up prison capacity due to overcrowding.

A spokesperson for the prime minister said he is already deporting foreign national offenders, adding that Mr Farage’s plans are “unfunded and lack detail” and that “we are getting on with it”.

The spokesperson ruled out moving prisoners overseas, saying the government is “focused on investing and fixing prisons here”.

He added: “In the last 14 years we saw only 500 places added to prison estate and since then we have been going further to free up space in our prisons.”

Continue Reading

Trending