Connect with us

Published

on

MPs have backed a tax hike to boost funds for dealing with the NHS treatment backlog and to reform social care in England.

On Wednesday night, the House of Commons voted by 319 to 248, majority 71, in favour of a 1.25 percentage point rise in National Insurance contributions from next April.

The backing for Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s plans, which he admits are a breach of a Conservative manifesto promise not to raise major taxes, came despite five Tory MPs rebelling to vote against the government.

They included former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey. And a further 37 Conservative MPs recorded no vote, with many of them choosing to actively abstain.

Ministers have said the estimated £12bn a year raised by the new “health and social care levy” will be used to help tackle soaring waiting lists for NHS treatments as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

It will also be spent on changes to the social care system that are scheduled to come into force from 2023.

But Labour have branded the UK-wide rise in National Insurance – paid by workers and businesses – as a “tax on jobs” and claimed it would not fix the problems in social care.

More on Social Care

During a Commons debate on the government’s plans, Labour’s shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves accused ministers of attempting to rush the plans through parliament before they “unravel”.

Wednesday night’s vote on the proposals came just a day after Mr Johnson had announced them, with some criticising the little time MPs were given to consider them.

Ms Reeves told MPs: “Social care is a huge challenge facing our country. There are other challenges facing us too. We need to do things differently.

“Labour’s test is simple: Does it fix the problem? And does it do so in a fair way? The answer to both those questions in relation to these proposals is no.

“That is why Labour will vote against this unfair, job taxing, manifesto-shredding, tax bombshell this evening.”

The government also faced opposition from its own benches to the proposals, with Tory former minister Jake Berry telling the prime minister he risks creating an “un-Conservative” and permanent “NHS tax”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Social care tax rise: Regressive or progressive?

The Rossendale and Darwen MP, who chairs the Northern Research Group of Tories, said: “If you create an NHS tax, you have an NHS tax forever, it will never go down, it can only go up.

“No party is ever going to stand at an election and say I’ve got a good idea, vote for me, I’ll cut the NHS tax.

“So I just think there’s huge danger for us in creating such a hypothecated tax and having it on people’s payslips.

“It is fundamentally un-Conservative and in the long term it will massively damage the prospects of our party because we will never outbid the Labour Party in the arms race of an NHS tax and that’s why I don’t think this is the right way to do it.”

Prominent Conservative backbencher Steve Baker claimed his party were “in a dreadful position” and would have to “rediscover what it stands for”.

“We all know that eventually as a socialist you run out of other people’s money and I have to say I’m sorry ministers I’m not going to be able to vote with you tonight because some of us are going to have to be seen to be standing for another path,” he said.

Peter Bone criticised Number 10 for conflating social care reform with extra money to deal with NHS waiting lists, and fellow Tory MP Richard Drax asked where was “the vision of this Singapore-style low-tax economy attracting the world’s best to this country”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Raising taxes ‘a very Conservative thing to do’

Outside of the Commons, Mr Johnson’s former chief adviser Dominic Cummings posted on Twitter: “Tell your friends: the Tories are making the young – who can’t get a house & working for average/below average income, already screwed by a decade of hapless Tory government – to work harder to subsidise older richer people. They promised to do the opposite.”

Immediately before Wednesday night’s vote, the prime minister spent almost an hour addressing a meeting of the Tory party’s 1922 Committee.

He assured Conservative backbenchers that the party remained committed to free enterprise, the private sector and “low taxation”.

But he said he could not think of a “better use” for taxpayers’ money than spending on the NHS.

Earlier on Wednesday, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned the money raised by the National Insurance increase risked being permanently swallowed up by the NHS with “little if any” left over for social care.

Under the government’s plans the NHS will get the majority of the £36bn raised in the first three years, with £5.4bn for social care in England.

Health Secretary Sajid Javid has insisted that “more and more” of the money raised by the levy would go towards social care in future years, but he has failed to say how much and when.

Yet Mr Javid told Sky News on Wednesday there will be “enough money” to pay for reforms to the care sector.

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive an additional £2.2bn in health and social care spending from the tax rise.

The SNP claimed Scotland could be “sold short” and receive “less in return than the money taken from Scottish-based National Insurance payers”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Securitize hires former PayPal exec as US tokenization gains traction

Published

on

By

Securitize hires former PayPal exec as US tokenization gains traction

Major tokenization platform Securitize has doubled down on its push to bring tokenized equity to US investors, naming a former PayPal executive as its new general counsel.

Securitize on Tuesday announced the appointment of ex-PayPal executive Jerome Roche, who led the company’s expansion into digital asset projects, including the PayPal USD (PYUSD) stablecoin.

Securitize also said its tokenized securities are already available to US investors, challenging the notion that most issuers prefer to offer such products abroad due to local stock access.

“There’s been a perception that tokenized securities must be offered primarily outside the US, but our experience shows the opposite,” Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo told Cointelegraph.

“Clear regulatory path” for tokenized stocks in the US

According to Securitize, operating real-world asset (RWA) tokenization offerings inside the US regulatory perimeter is “not only possible, but scalable, at institutional quality.”

“We’ve demonstrated that there is a clear regulatory path for issuers to natively tokenize assets for US investors,” Domingo said.

“These are not synthetic representations, or derivatives, but real securities onchain,” the CEO said, adding:

“We operate using SEC-regulated infrastructure, including a registered transfer agent broker-dealer, and fund admin, which allows US investors to access and legally hold tokenized securities in a fully compliant framework.”

Securitize’s optimistic outlook on the US tokenization comes days after the platform obtained regulatory approval to operate as an investment company and a trading ánd settlement system in the European Union on Nov. 26. According to the company, the approval positioned it as one of the first operators for regulated digital securities infrastructure in both the US and EU.

Source: Securitize

“For the first time, modern ledger technology is giving us the ability to record ownership, settle transactions, and move value in ways that are fundamentally better than the fragmented systems we’ve inherited,” Securitize’s newly appointed general counsel, Roche, said in the announcement.

“Innovation only works when it fits squarely within the guardrails of applicable law,” he added, underscoring Securitize’s global push for regulated tokenized securities.

Related: US Treasurys lead tokenization wave as CoinShares predicts 2026 growth

Securitize’s news is another sign of the US warming to tokenization. On Monday, the Securities and Exchange Commission dropped its investigation into rival tokenization platform Ondo Finance.

Ondo said the decision marks a new chapter for tokenized securities in the US, where they are poised to become a “core part of the capital markets.”