Connect with us

Published

on

In this article

Tim Cook, chief executive officer of Apple Inc., center, arrives at U.S. district court in Oakland, California, on Friday, May 21, 2021.
Nina Riggio | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Apple prevailed on nine of 10 counts in its trial against Epic Games on Friday, but federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an injunction that prohibits Apple from preventing developers from linking out in their apps to collect payments directly and cut out Apple and its 30% take of in-app purchases.

Apple’s stock slid more than 3% on the news Friday. But Wall Street analysts and longtime Apple followers believe that the financial impact on the company will be limited.

Developers will only be able to link, and will not be permitted to build their own alternative payments mechanism into their apps, a person familiar with Apple’s thinking said. That limits the effect as Apple’s in-app payments will still be easier for a consumer than putting their credit card into a website.

JPMorgan analyst Samik Chatterjee said the ruling did not change the bank’s outlook for Apple’s services or app store businesses, noting that the decision did not recommend changes to Apple’s 30% take, and that it merely kicks off the first stage of a multistep process.

“Our view continues to be that consumers will leverage payment alternatives in the case of expensive subscriptions and in-app purchases, limiting headwinds for App Store revenues and earnings from what is an otherwise very broad base of applications,” Chatterjee wrote.

Loup Ventures founder and longtime Apple analyst Gene Munster told CNBC’s Josh Lipton that the worst-case scenario for Apple could decrease Apple’s earnings by 4% over the next year, but more likely, the effect would be closer to a 1% decrease.

“The two silver linings for investors: First, 12-18 months after the changes are implemented growth rates will return to normal,” Munster tweeted. “Second, Apple’s long-term potential is not impacted by the change.”

Apple sees the verdict as a win because it did not challenge Apple’s right to determine which software is permitted on its store, and because it did not find Apple is a monopoly under federal or state law.

“We are very pleased with the court’s ruling and we consider this a huge win for Apple,” Apple General Counsel Kate Adams said in a statement.

But investors closely watch Apple’s services business, which has grown strongly for the past few years, and includes revenue from Apple’s App Store sales in addition to online subscriptions, search licensing revenue from Google and AppleCare warranties.

Services accounts for about 20% of Apple’s revenue, but it is a profit engine for Apple, with significantly higher margins than its hardware business. Apple reported $53.77 billion in services sales in its fiscal 2020 at a 66% gross margin, much higher than the 31.5% margin for Apple’s hardware business.

Apple doesn’t break down how much of its services sales come from the App Store, but it’s a big component. Apple’s App Store grossed more than $64 billion in 2020, according to a CNBC analysis. Sensor Tower, an app analytics firm, places the number slightly higher, at $72 billion.

Worldwide, Apple grossed $47.6 billion from mobile games, collecting fees of about $14.3 billion, according to Sensor Tower statistics provided to CNBC.

The judge’s ruling on Friday highlighted how much of Apple’s App Store revenue comes from games and in particular, big spenders. Rogers said in Friday’s ruling she believed Apple’s fully burdened margin on the App Store was over 72%, based on Apple documents.

Gaming app stocks soared on Friday’s news. Shares of AppLovin, Zynga, Playtika and Roblox climbed on hopes that those gaming companies can reduce costs by directing users to their own payments, bypassing Apple’s cut.

Epic Games is a private company and its CEO Tim Sweeney said in a statement that Friday’s ruling wasn’t a win. Epic wants to be permitted to offer its own app store on iPhones.

Continue Reading

Technology

Bitcoin is down nearly 30% from its record high — history shows that’s normal

Published

on

By

Bitcoin is down nearly 30% from its record high — history shows that's normal

Justin Tallis | Afp | Getty Images

Bitcoin‘s more than 30% drop from its record high underscores the volatility that has come to characterize the cryptocurrency.

Moves from previous cycles not only show how the current price swings are all part of bitcoin’s normal operating pattern but also how they may often precede a rally, according to figures compiled by CoinDesk Data for CNBC.

Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, dropped to a low of around $80,000 late last month before staging a rally and falling again this week. When bitcoin dropped to under $81,000, that represented an approximately 36% fall from its all-time high of around $126,000 hit earlier in October. As of Thursday, bitcoin was trading at over $93,000, according to Coinmetrics, a roughly 26% decline from its record high.

These price swings may seem large but they are normal in relation to bitcoin’s history.

Bitcoin’s price movement is often referred to in “cycles.” Generally, the bitcoin cycle refers to a four-year pattern of price movement that revolves around a key event known as the halving, a change to mining rewards that is written in bitcoin’s code. While there are signs that the typical timing and patterns of the cycles could be changing, the range of price movements appears to be consistent.

In the current cycle, bitcoin has already weathered a 32.7% pullback from March to August 2024 and a 31.7% decline between January and April 2025, according to CoinDesk Data.

“Looking at previous cycles, volatility of this magnitude appears consistent with long-term trends,” Jacob Joseph, senior research analyst at CoinDesk Data, told CNBC.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Bitcoin’s ups and downs can be seen across its history.

During the 2017 cycle, there were drawdowns of around 40% twice that year and then a 29% decline in November before bitcoin reached a new record high in December.

Looking back at the 2021 cycle, bitcoin recorded declines of 31.2% in January that year and 26% in February. There was a more than 55% correction between April and June 2021 as China banned bitcoin mining. The asset then rallied to a new high in November that year.

“While deeper mid-cycle corrections have certainly occurred, nearly all of them — aside from the mining-ban-drop in 2021 — took place within a broader bullish structure, often holding above key technical levels such as its 50-week moving average,” Joseph said.

What has driven market moves?

Beginning Oct. 10, more than 1.6 million traders suffered a combined $19.37 billion erasure of leveraged positions over a 24-hour period. Many traders were forced out of their positions and the impact of that cascaded across the industry.

That effect is still being felt, according to Lucy Gazmararian, founder of Token Bay Capital.

“[It was the] biggest liquidation event in crypto’s history and that takes quite a few weeks to see the fallout from that and for the market to consolidate,” Gazmararian told “Access Middle East” on Thursday.

“It also coincided at a time when there’s a lot of concern that we are reaching the end of a bull market … so that has increased the levels of fear out there in the market.”

Cryptocurrency outflows are a sign of a 'healthy, functioning market': Analyst

In the past, when the bull market ends and there is a period of depressed prices, often dubbed a “crypto winter,” bitcoin has tended to sit 70% to 80% below its all-time high. This has not yet happened. But concern about this coming to pass is weighing on investors’ minds.

“Really the timing of the drop, where we are in the cycle, that’s making investors cautious in case we do see that 80% drop,” Gazmararian said.

Continue Reading

Technology

Meta faces Europe antitrust investigation over WhatsApp AI policy

Published

on

By

Meta faces Europe antitrust investigation over WhatsApp AI policy

Meta has been hit with an EU antitrust investigation over its use of AI features in WhatsApp, as the European bloc continues to ramp up challenges to US big tech giants.

The probe will examine whether Meta’s new policy on allowing AI providers’ access to WhatsApp may breach EU competition rules, Brussels said in a statement Thursday morning.

A new policy announced by Meta in October prohibited AI providers from using a tool allowing businesses to contact customers via WhatsApp when AI is the main service offered, the European Commission said.

While businesses may still use AI tools for functions like customer support, the bloc was concerned the new policy might “prevent third party AI providers from offering their services through WhatsApp in the European Economic Area (EEA),” it added.

“The claims are baseless,” a WhatsApp spokesperson told CNBC in a statement, adding that the app’s application programming interface (API) was not designed to support AI chatbots and “puts a strain on our systems.”

“The AI space is highly competitive and people have access to the services of their choice in any number of ways, including app stores, search engines, email services, partnership integrations and operating systems,” the company added.

It comes months on from the Commission fining Google 2.95 billion euros ($3.45 billion) for breaching antitrust rules around online advertising. In April, Apple was fined 500 million euros after being found to have breached anti-steering obligations. The same month, Meta was hit with a 200 million euros fine for breaching obligations to give consumers the choice of a service that uses less of their personal data.

Fines for breaking the EU’s antitrust rules can reach as much as 10% of a company’s annual revenue. There are no dates set for the antitrust investigation to close, but previous cases have run on for years.

“We must ensure European citizens and businesses can benefit fully of this technological revolution and act to prevent dominant digital incumbents from abusing their power to crowd out innovative competitors,” said the bloc’s Commissioner for Competition Teresa Ribera.

The investigation will cover the entire EEA apart from Italy, to avoid an overlap with its own ongoing proceedings for the possible imposition of interim measures concerning Meta’s conduct.

U.S. President Donald Trump has previously threatened the EU with an investigation that could lead to tariffs for imposing fines and regulation on the country’s tech giants.

“As I have said before, my Administration will NOT allow these discriminatory actions to stand,” he said following the EU’s Google fine in September.

Continue Reading

Technology

Software startup deploys Singapore’s first quantum computer for commercial use

Published

on

By

Software startup deploys Singapore’s first quantum computer for commercial use

Inside Horizon Quantum’s office in Singapore on Dec. 3, 2025. The software firm claimed it is the first private company to deploy a commercial quantum computer in the city-state.

Sha Ying | CNBC International

Singapore-based software firm Horizon Quantum on Wednesday said it has become the first private company to run a quantum computer for commercial use in the city-state, marking a milestone ahead of its plans to list in the U.S.

The start-up, founded in 2018 by quantum researcher Joe Fitzsimons, said the machine is now fully operational. It integrates components from quantum computing suppliers, including Maybell Quantum, Quantum Machines and Rigetti Computing.

According to Horizon Quantum, the new computer also makes it the first pure-play quantum software firm to own its own quantum computer — an integration it hopes will help advance the promising technology.

“Our focus is on helping developers to start harnessing quantum computers to do real-world work,” Fitzsimons, the CEO, told CNBC. “How do we take full advantage of these systems? How do we program them?” 

Horizon Quantum builds the software tools and infrastructure needed to power applications for quantum computing systems. 

“Although we’re very much focused on the software side, it’s really important to understand how the stack works down to the physical level … that’s the reason we have a test bed now,” Fitzsimons said. 

Quantum race

Horizon Quantum hopes to use its new hardware to accelerate the development of real-world quantum applications across industries, from pharmaceuticals to finance.

Quantum systems aim to tackle problems too complex for traditional machines by leveraging principles of quantum mechanics.

For example, designing new drugs, which requires simulating molecular interactions, or running millions of scenarios to assess portfolio risk, can be slow and computationally costly for conventional machines. Quantum computing is expected to provide faster, more accurate models to tackle these problems.

A top executive at Google working on quantum computers told CNBC in March that he believes the technology is only five years away from running practical applications.

Still, today’s quantum systems remain in the nascent stages of development and pose many engineering and programming challenges.

Investment in the space has been rising, however, as major tech companies report technological breakthroughs. Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and IBM, along with the U.S. government, are already pouring millions into quantum computing.

Investor attention also received a bump in June after Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang offered upbeat remarks, saying quantum computing is nearing an “inflection point” and that practical uses may arrive sooner than he had expected.

Nvidia CEO: Quantum computing is reaching an inflection point

Nasdaq listing

Horizon Quantum’s announcement comes ahead of a merger with dMY Squared Technology Group Inc., a special purpose acquisition company. The deal, agreed upon in September, aims to take Horizon public on the Nasdaq under the ticker “HQ.”

The software firm said in September that the transaction valued the company at around $503 million and was expected to close in the first quarter of 2026. 

The launch of its quantum computer also helps cement Singapore’s ambition to be a regional quantum computing hub. The city-state has invested heavily in the technology for years, setting up its first quantum research center in 2007.

Before Horizon Quantum’s system came online, Singapore reportedly had one quantum computer, used primarily for research purposes. Meanwhile, U.S.-based firm Quantinuum plans to deploy another commercial system in 2026.

Singapore’s National Quantum Strategy, unveiled in May 2024, committed 300 million Singapore dollars over five years to expand the sector, with a significant portion directed toward building local quantum computer processors.  

In May 2024, the National Quantum Strategy (NQS), Singapore’s national quantum initiative, pledged around S$300 million over five years to strengthen development in the sector, with a significant portion directed toward building local quantum computer processors.

Why Amazon, Google, Microsoft, IBM and numerous startups are racing to build quantum computers

Continue Reading

Trending