Connect with us

Published

on

After appearing on screen with neo-Nazis, violent prisoners, drug addicts and Jimmy Savile, Louis Theroux says he doesn’t shy away from “the troubling side of life”.

But for his latest project, the documentary maker has stepped away from the camera to delve into one of the UK’s most notorious murder cases.

Jeremy Bamber has spent more than three decades in jail after being convicted of fatally shooting his adoptive parents Nevill and June, his sister Sheila Caffell and her six-year-old twin sons, Daniel and Nicholas, in 1985.

White House Farm near Maldon, Essex, where the murders took place
Image:
White House Farm near Maldon, Essex, where the murders took place
Crime murder victims of Jeremy Bamber his adoptive June Bamber his sister mother Sheila Caffell and her sons Nicholas Caffell and Daniel Caffell
Image:
June Bamber (L), her daughter Sheila Caffell and grandchildren Nicholas and Daniel were all killed

He has always protested his innocence and insists the murders at the family’s farmhouse in Essex were committed by Ms Caffell – a model nicknamed “Bambi” who was diagnosed with schizophrenia – before she turned the gun on herself.

It is a version of events that police initially believed, and Theroux says there are “legit” people who think Bamber is serving a whole-life prison term for a crime he didn’t carry out.

“Across the board you’ll find people who believe there were serious problems with the case, in terms of how it was investigated and how it was prosecuted,” he tells Sky News.

“There are things that are quite hard to explain on both sides.

“There was no forensic evidence of his presence at the farm, which is kind of extraordinary.”

Jeremy Bamber is escorted by police: Pic: Anglia Press Agency/Sky UK
Image:
Jeremy Bamber was convicted of murdering five members of his family: Pic: Anglia Press Agency/Sky UK

Theroux says former detective Mark Williams-Thomas – who helped expose Savile’s sexual abuse – is one of those who believes Bamber “didn’t do it”.

He explains: “There’s a lot that’s positive about people attempting to find cases of historic crime in which there may have been an error.

“A lot of them are legit people. There are a lot of prominent journalists who would say they would feel Bamber is innocent.

“It’s not by any means a kind of fringe belief.”

While viewers are used to seeing Theroux feature in his documentaries, he is executive producer of The Bambers: Murder At The Farm, a new four-part series which re-examines the case and explores evidence that has emerged since the original trial.

It features first-hand testimony and previously unseen archive footage, as well as recordings of Bamber talking to a journalist while in jail.

Jeremy Bamber, who has spent 33 years in jail for killing his family
Image:
Bamber, who is serving a whole life prison term, continues to protest his innocence

So does Theroux himself believe Bamber committed the murders?

He remains tight-lipped on that, apologising for being “coy”, but admits the documentary has made him ask questions about who was responsible.

Theroux says: “Whether you think Jeremy Bamber did it or whether you think Sheila did it, both scenarios have anomalies, or at least require one to accept… surprising and in some cases seemingly anomalous details.

“The journey I went on was hearing something and going ‘If Jeremy Bamber did it, how did they explain that?’ – or ‘If Sheila did it, how would they explain that?'”

He adds: “Because of the nature of the case, we’re not in the realm of absolute certainty.”

The Bambers - Murder At The Farm. Pic: Sky UK
Image:
Bamber (R) was branded ‘warped and evil beyond belief’ by a judge. Pic: Sky UK

The documentary’s makers had hoped to interview Bamber, but director Lottie Gammon says the Ministry of Justice refused to allow it.

She says some of those campaigning for Bamber’s release have “legitimate” concerns, including how police treated the murder scene.

“There’s a lot of question marks over their behaviour,” she says.

“No one really clearly explains – because they didn’t really have to during the trial – how did he do this crime? That’s not something that was nailed down.

“Because there are these loose threads, many loose threads, it’s easy for people to look at it and have questions.

“I think this case is quite suited to the online world now of deep diving into these cases – especially over lockdown, these groups have really proliferated.”

Jeremy Bamber (L) is escorted by police. Pic: Anglia Press Agency/Sky UK
Image:
Bamber (L) pictured being escorted by an officer. Pic: Anglia Press Agency/Sky UK

What happened in the White House Farm murders?

  • On 7 August 1985, Jeremy Bamber rings police claiming his father had called him to say his sister Sheila Caffell had ‘gone crazy’ and had a gun
  • Police attend White House Farm and find the bodies of Bamber’s parents Nevill and June, Ms Caffell and her twin sons Nicholas and Daniel
  • Officers initially treat the case as a murder-suicide after Ms Caffell is found with her fingers around the rifle used in the shootings
  • A silencer which allegedly had traces of Ms Caffell’s blood on it is found in a cupboard three days after the murders
  • A month after the killings, Bamber’s then girlfriend, Julie Mugford, tells police he plotted to kill his parents for £436,000 inheritance
  • Bamber is charged with the murders and stands trial in 1986
  • The trial hears expert evidence that Ms Caffell – who had two gunshot wounds – could not have placed the silencer in the cupboard given her injuries from the first shot
  • A jury finds Bamber guilty by majority verdict and he is sentenced to five life prison terms
  • The judge, Mr Justice Drake, calls Bamber ‘warped and evil beyond belief’

Bamber has lost several legal challenges over his conviction since the original trial, including an appeal which was dismissed in 2002.

At the time, the Court of Appeal judges said the more they examined the detail of the case, the more likely they thought that “the jury were right”.

They also concluded there was no conduct by the police or prosecution which would have “adversely affected the jury’s verdict”.

In 2011, Bamber contacted Ofcom over a documentary about him which he claimed invaded his privacy – but the complaint was rejected.

Theroux believes the convicted killer will “probably take issue with parts” of his latest series.

“Whether or not you believe he did it, he’s on a campaign to have himself freed,” he says.

“I think he’d appreciate the fact we’ve done a nuanced and forensic view, but we’ve clearly included material that undermines or disputes that (campaign).”

Jeremy Bamber pictured in October 1985
Image:
Bamber has lost several legal challenges over his conviction

The four-part series, airing on Sky Crime, has been made by Theroux’s production company Mindhouse, which he founded with his wife, producer Nancy Strang, and fellow documentary maker Aaron Fellows.

Now aged 51, Theroux says he intends to keep making documentaries for another “good 25 to 30 years”.

“You could either say that’s a lot or a little,” he adds.

“The stories I most enjoy are not overly cuddly. I think there’s a reason I’ve been on BBC2 for 25 years, as opposed to BBC1.

“I’m interested in stories that have a dimension to them that is in some ways troubling.

“I don’t think you should shy away from the troubling side of life – that’s sort of my bread and butter.”

Louis Theroux is the executive producer of The Bambers: Murder At The Farm. Pic: Freddie Claire
Image:
Louis Theroux is the executive producer of The Bambers: Murder At The Farm. Pic: Freddie Claire

But despite the recent success of his celebrity interview podcast Grounded, a reboot of Theroux’s TV show When Louis Met… – when he famously spent time with the likes of Savile, Max Clifford and Neil and Christine Hamilton – isn’t on the cards.

“I’ve got a lot older. Times have changed, TV’s changed,” he says.

“It would be like doing Weird Weekends again. It would be quite weird, wouldn’t it?

“I would never rule out doing programmes that feature celebrities in… a single person profile, or go on a journey with someone and I’m on camera. I could see that happening and that would be fun.”

The documentary begins airing on Sunday 29 September. Pic: Sky UK

The Bambers: Murder At The Farm will premiere on Sky Crime and NOW on Sunday 26 September at 9pm.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Matty Healy reacts to Taylor Swift’s ‘diss track’

Published

on

By

Matty Healy reacts to Taylor Swift's 'diss track'

Matty Healy has reacted to new tracks by supposed ex-girlfriend Taylor Swift that are rumoured to be about him.

The 1975 frontman is never named in any tracks featuring on Swift’s new album, The Tortured Poets Department, but fans have assumed several references are about him.

Many have interpreted the lyrics of the first song on the album, Fortnight, to be about him, where she sings: “And I love you, it’s ruining my life, I touched you for only a fortnight.”

It’s widely assumed he’s also the subject of the track Guilty As Sin, where she sings about having “fatal fantasies” about someone from her past while in a relationship.

Fans are also suggesting the song The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived appears to allude to Healy “ghosting” her.

“You tried to buy some pills, from a friend of mine, they just ghosted you, now you know what it feels like,” she sings.

In a video circulating online, Healy was approached by a reported photographer in Los Angeles and asked how he rates his “Taylor diss track” and how he thought it compared to the other songs on the 31-track double album.

Healy, looking confused, responded: “My diss track?”

The photographer reiterated: “Yeah, Taylor’s new song?”

“Oh!” Healy laughed, adding: “I haven’t really listened to that much of it, but I’m sure it’s good.”

Read more:
The other people Swift referenced in Tortured Poets
The original ‘it girl’ who inspired Swift’s new song

Last May, Healy made a surprise appearance during the Nashville performance of Swift’s Eras tour to play with her support act, indie singer-songwriter Phoebe Bridgers.

Swift also sung two The 1975 songs at their London gig in February 2023.

By June last year, reports surfaced that the pair were “no longer romantically involved”, with a source telling US outlet People the relationship was “always casual”.

“She had fun with him, but it was always casual,” the source said.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Drake ordered to delete diss track featuring AI-generated voice of Tupac Shakur

Published

on

By

Drake ordered to delete diss track featuring AI-generated voice of Tupac Shakur

Tupac Shakur’s estate has threatened to sue Drake and ordered him to delete a track featuring an AI-generated copy of the late rapper’s voice.

Drake released the song Taylor Made Freestyle – a diss track aimed at Kendrick Lamar – on his Instagram page on Friday, which features verses created by AI software mimicking both Shakur and Snoop Dogg.

In a cease-and-desist letter seen by Sky News’ US partner NBC News, Howard King, an attorney who represents Shakur’s estate, requested that Drake remove the track from all platforms where it is publicly available.

The letter sent on Wednesday states the Canadian rapper has until midday on Thursday to confirm he will remove it or the estate will “pursue all of its legal remedies” against him.

“Not only is the record a flagrant violation of Tupac’s publicity and the estate’s legal rights, it is also a blatant abuse of the legacy of one of the greatest hip-hop artists of all time,” Mr King wrote.

“The estate would never have given its approval for this use.”

The letter also outlines the estate’s “dismay” regarding the topic of the track, saying Lamar is “a good friend to the estate who has given nothing but respect to Tupac and his legacy publicly and privately” and that this “compounds the insult”.

In the track, the AI-generated voice of Shakur urges Lamar to respond to Drake’s previous diss track about him released several days prior, saying lines like: “Kendrick, we need ya, the West Coast saviour / You seem a little nervous about all the publicity / You asked for the smoke, now it seem you too busy for the smoke.”

Tupac was killed in 1996. Pic: Walik Goshorn/MediaPunch/IPx/AP
Image:
Tupac was killed in 1996. Pic: Walik Goshorn/MediaPunch/IPx/AP

The letter claims the track and its popularity have created the “false impression that the estate and Tupac promote or endorse the lyrics for the sound-alike”.

Shakur’s estate is also seeking damages including all profits from the record, which has so far only been posted on Drake’s Instagram page, as well as additional damages for substantial economic and reputational harm caused.

Read more:
Musicians react to AI songs flooding the internet
J Cole: I feel ‘terrible’ about Kendrick Lamar diss track

The letter claimed Drake’s non-consensual use of Shakur’s likeness violates Shakur’s right to publicity, an intellectual property right protecting against the misappropriation of somebody’s name or image.

Sky News has contacted representatives of Drake for comment.

The AI-generated voice of prominent rapper Snoop Dogg was also used on the track.

Snoop Dogg posted a video on his Instagram story shortly after the diss track was posted, where he said: “They did what? When? How… What’s going on… I’m going back to bed.”

The use of AI in the music industry has been the subject of heavy debate since last year, when Drake’s own voice was cloned alongside The Weeknd by the artist known as Ghostwriter.

The track was taken down from all platforms shorty after it was released in April.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Baby Reindeer: Writer Richard Gadd tells fans to stop speculating about characters

Published

on

By

Baby Reindeer: Writer Richard Gadd tells fans to stop speculating about characters

Richard Gadd has urged fans of his hit show Baby Reindeer to stop speculating about who the characters in his show are based on in real life.

The Netflix series is based on the real-life story of its writer Gadd, who also plays the lead character, and his warped relationship with a female stalker.

Fans have been speculating online about the identity of the stalker played by Jessica Gunning in real life (spoiler warning), as well as who another character, seen sexually assaulting Gadd in the series, is based on.

The character, played by Tom Goodman-Hill, is a TV writer who repeatedly sexually assaults Gadd’s character and supplies him with drugs.

Gadd addressed his fans on his Instagram story on Tuesday, saying: “People I love, have worked with, and admire… are unfairly getting caught up in speculation.

“Please don’t speculate on who any of the real-life people could be. That’s not the point of our show. Lots of love, Richard.”

Read more on Sky News:
Richard Osman reveals Thursday Murder Club cast
Police launch manhunt for Home and Away star

Pic: Netflix
Image:
Pic: Netflix

The show is based on the hit Edinburgh Fringe one-man stage play Gadd performed in 2019.

Gadd, who plays Donny Dunn, a character based on himself, said he didn’t expect the show to “blow up” in the way it has since its release on 11 April.

“I’m super proud of it. I really believed in this show, but the fact it’s gone so stratospheric so quickly, for such a cult, quite niche story… it’s kind of amazing. It’s clearly struck a chord,” he said on This Morning.

The writer, actor and comedian is also an ambassador for We Are Survivors, a charity which supports male survivors of sexual abuse.

Continue Reading

Trending