Connect with us

Published

on

“It’s Howard o’clock” has become a slogan used on swimsuits, t-shirts, bags, mugs, bottles of wine and, even, turned into a monopoly-style drinking game.

But while Isle of Man chief minister Howard Quayle might have become an almost cult-like personality during the COVID crisis, he was also working 20 hour days, scrambling to purchase an oxygen-generating plant, and taking the “hardest decisions in my life”.

As he prepares to step down from his role next month, Mr Quayle also spoke to Sky News about the island’s strict coronavirus quarantine rules – which led to some people being imprisoned – and the effect of Brexit on the Isle of Man.

“At ‘Howard o’clock’ at 4pm every day, people would stop, get a drink and sit and listen to the briefings to let them know what was going on,” he said, as the chief minister explained how his televised news conferences gripped the Isle of Man’s 85,000-strong population last year.

The 54-year-old described the “bizarre” notion of people now wanting selfies with him, as the number of people who now recognise him on the island has rocketed, but also how he was “delighted” at the “community spirit” that was generated in the fight against coronavirus.

In March 2020, as COVID struck the world, Mr Quayle was utilising the Isle of Man’s engineering sector to leverage contacts around the world in order to secure PPE, while he faced a dilemma over ensuring the island did not run short of oxygen.

“We had always brought in our oxygen in bulk – a container or tanker would come over on a boat and fill up our holding tanks,” he said.

More on Isle Of Man

“That would last us a fortnight in normal times for our hospital. But, obviously with COVID we were under the impression we needed a shedload more.”

With a fear that supplies could be interrupted – as well as the thought a tanker journeying to and from the Isle of Man might have supplied four or five hospitals in the UK during the same time – Mr Quayle moved to buy the last oxygen-generating plant in Britain.

“If I hadn’t bought it by lunchtime, it was going to go to the Nightingale hospital in London,” he added.

Aerial view Douglas, Isle of Man stock photo
Image:
The Isle of Man has had more than 7,000 COVID cases and 48 deaths

The next challenge was to build a shed in which to store the plant, as well as create a hospital unit ready to accept COVID patients. And, later, a testing centre was established at the island’s famous TT grandstand.

But there were also tough actions to be taken.

“One of the hardest decisions of my life was stopping people coming back to the island who were island residents,” Mr Quayle said.

“We’d given them warnings, we’d told them ‘get home, we’re going to be shutting shortly’.

“Some didn’t heed the warnings and we did shut down. But once we’d eliminated COVID, we were the first place in the British Isles – if not Europe – to open up internally with no restrictions.”

Until January this year, residents on the Isle of Man enjoyed a freedom to their lives that those in the UK didn’t, but “somebody broke the rules, got in, and we had to lockdown again”.

That freedom was, in part, provided by the taking of other robust decisions.

“If you broke our quarantine rules, if you put people’s lives at risk and you were caught, you went to prison,” Mr Quayle said.

He admitted that the handing out of prison sentences caused a degree of outrage, including when a group of welders from Newcastle were caught in a supermarket when they were supposed to be isolating.

How were they caught? Because they “went in there wearing masks” when the rest of the Isle of Man’s population had no requirement to, due to their zero number of cases.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson during the first Cabinet meeting since the reshuffle at 10 Downing Street, London. Picture date: Friday September 17, 2021.
Image:
Boris Johnson is purported to want a roundabout under the Isle of Man

Although the Isle of Man is a self-governing British Crown Dependency sitting in the Irish Sea, the island was “treated as if we were in Coventry or Cornwall” when it came to the coronavirus crisis, which has seen more than 7,000 cases and 48 deaths on the island.

Mr Quayle explained that the relationship between the island and London “really improved dramatically” following Brexit, even despite the chaos that was occurring in Westminster after the 2016 referendum.

“We were lucky that we were getting information really quickly – historically that hasn’t always been the case,” he said.

“The ability for our offices to speak to their UK counterparts and discuss problems and get information back – so that we can prepare our legislation to make sure we’re compliant and get our industries ready for whatever’s going to happen – is the best it’s ever been.

“We don’t want to slip back to the old way.”

The Isle of Man government now enjoys a wide range of relationships with departments across Whitehall, rather than having just one relationship with their “godparents” in the Ministry of Justice, which formally manages the UK’s relationship with the crown dependencies.

However, a closer relationship with Westminster doesn’t appear to stretch to all aspects of UK government thinking.

Mr Quayle said his government “had no involvement whatsoever” in Boris Johnson’s purported plan for road tunnels between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, to conjoin in an underground roundabout beneath the Isle of Man.

“We looked upon it with a level of bemusement!,” he admitted.

He added it “would have been nice to have that connectivity” but doubted whether the level of vehicle traffic would make such a project economically viable.

“It was a little bit frustrating that people just hadn’t thought it through – it was a good soundbite, but I never thought it was going to happen,” Mr Quayle said.

“We have our regular flights, we have our ferry service, it would have been nice to have but I couldn’t see the British taxpayer getting a return.

“At the end of the day you’ve got to get bang for your buck.”

Nairbyl Bay by night stock photo
Isle of Man, England, Northern Europe, Port Erin, Astronomy
Image:
There are numerous dark sky sites on the island

But while Brexit may have brought benefits, recent staff shortages – especially in hospitality – on the Isle of Man are “probably an element” of the UK’s exit from the EU, coupled with the historically low unemployment rate on the island.

“We need to attract more people to come to the island and that’s something we’re working on,” Mr Quayle said.

“We help, we offer grants and things to 20-40-year-olds, we’re looking to attract entrepreneurs.”

And he touted the island’s countryside, with a UNESCO status as a biosphere region; along with its numerous dark sky sites for galaxy-gazing, low crime rates, and a recent boost to internet speeds, as pull factors for those in the UK who now find themselves mainly working remotely.

“We had an IT company who relocated to the island and we didn’t know how that would go – it went exceptionally well,” he said.

“Because people who were working on software would go home and within 10 minutes they could be on their mountain bikes in a plantation.”

But Mr Quayle, who is standing down next month after the island’s upcoming general election, will leave a decision on whether the Isle of Man will copy the UK in taking Afghan refugees, following Afghanistan’s capture by the Taliban, to whoever succeeds him as chief minister.

So, as his five-year term as chief minister comes to an end, are there any regrets?

“I’ve given it my best, you’re always going to make mistakes, I’m not perfect,” he said.

“Everything I’ve done has always been, in my head, what’s the best I could do for the island so I don’t have any regrets.

“With COVID, hindsight is a wonderful thing and, if we’d shut down a week earlier, we would have had even less cases.”

But he added: “There was no manual. We were all making it up, in all jurisdictions, as we were going along.”

Continue Reading

Politics

All four UK governments ‘failed to appreciate’ scale of COVID pandemic threat – inquiry finds

Published

on

By

All four UK governments 'failed to appreciate' scale of COVID pandemic threat - inquiry finds

All four UK governments failed to appreciate the scale of the threat posed by COVID-19 or the urgency of the response the pandemic required, a damning report published on Thursday has claimed.

Baroness Heather Hallett, the chair of the inquiry, described the response to the pandemic as “too little, too late”.

Tens of thousands of lives could have been saved during the first wave of COVID-19 had a mandatory lockdown been introduced a week earlier, the inquiry also found.

Noting how a “lack of urgency” made a mandatory lockdown “inevitable”, the report references modelling data to claim there could have been 23,000 fewer deaths during the first wave in England had it been introduced a week earlier.

The UK government first introduced advisory restrictions on 16 March 2020, including self-isolation, household quarantine and social distancing.

Had these measures been introduced sooner, the report states, the mandatory lockdown which followed from 23 March might not have been necessary at all.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

All four UK govts ‘failed to appreciate’ scale of pandemic

COVID-19 first emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan at the end of 2019, and as it developed into a worldwide pandemic, the UK went in and out of unprecedented lockdown measures for two years starting from March 2020.

More on Covid Inquiry

Lady Hallett admitted in her summary that politicians in the government and devolved administrations were forced to make decisions where “there was often no right answer or good outcome”.

“Nonetheless,” she said, “I can summarise my findings of the response as ‘too little, too late'”.

Report goes long way to answer inquiry’s critics

This scathing report goes a long way to answer the Covid 19 Inquiry’s critics who have consistently attacked it as a costly waste of time.

They tried to undermine Lady Hallet’s attempt to understand what went wrong and how we might do better as a lame exercise that would achieve very little.

Well, we now know that Boris Johnson’s “toxic and chaotic” government could well have prevented at least 23,000 deaths had they acted sooner and with greater urgency.

The response was “too little, too late”. And that nobody in power truly understood the scale of the emerging threat or the urgency of the response it required.

The grieving families who lost loved ones in the pandemic want answers. They want names. And they want accountability.

But that is beyond the remit of this Inquiry.

The publication of the report into Module 2 will bring them no comfort, it may even cause them more distress but it will bring them closer to understanding why the UK’s response to this unprecedented health crisis was so poor.

And we can easily identify the “advisors and ministers whose alleged rule breaking caused huge distress and undermined public confidence”.

Or who was in charge of the Department of Health and Social Care, as it misled the public by giving the impression that the UK was well prepared for the pandemic when it clearly was not.

‘Toxic culture’ at the heart of UK government

The report said there was “a toxic and chaotic culture” at the heart of the UK government during the pandemic.

The inquiry heard evidence about the “destabilising behaviour of a number of individuals” – including former No 10 adviser Dominic Cummings.

It said that by failing to tackle this chaotic culture – “and, at times, actively encouraging it” – former PM Boris Johnson “reinforced a culture in which the loudest voices prevailed and the views of other colleagues, particularly women, often went ignored, to the detriment of good decision-making”.

‘Misleading assurances’

The inquiry found all four governments in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland failed to understand the urgency of response the pandemic demanded in the early part of 2020.

The report reads: “This was compounded, in part, by misleading assurances from the Department of Health and Social Care and the widely held view that the UK was well prepared for a pandemic.”

The report notes how the UK government took a “high risk” when it significantly eased restrictions in England in July 2020 – “despite scientific advisers’ concerns about the public health risks of doing so”.

Lady Hallett has made 19 key recommendations which, if followed, she believes will better protect the UK in any future pandemic and improve decision-making in a crisis.

Repeated failings ‘inexcusable’

In a statement following the publication of Thursday’s report, Lady Hallett said there was a “serious failure” by all four governments to appreciate the level of “risk and calamity” facing the UK.

She said: “The tempo of the response should have been increased. It was not. February 2020 was a lost month.”

Read more:
A timeline of the UK’s response to the pandemic

Lady Hallett said the inquiry does not advocate for national lockdowns, which she said should have been avoided if at all possible.

She said: “But to avoid them, governments must take timely and decisive action to control a spreading virus. The four governments of the UK did not.”

Lady Hallett said none of the governments were adequately prepared for the challenges and risks that a lockdown presented, and that many of the same failings were repeated later in 2020, which she said was “inexcusable”.

She added: “Each government had ample warning that the prevalence of the virus was increasing and would continue to do so into the winter months. Yet again, there was a failure to take timely and effective action.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Prospective CFTC chair’s nomination advances through committee

Published

on

By

Prospective CFTC chair’s nomination advances through committee

Michael Selig’s nomination to chair the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission is headed for a vote on the Senate floor after clearing a committee hurdle. 

In a Thursday notice, Republican leaders with the Senate Agriculture Committee said they had advanced Selig’s nomination following a Wednesday hearing. The vote was reportedly along party lines, with no Democrats supporting Selig as US President Donald Trump’s pick to replace acting Chair Caroline Pham.

Politics, Government, Congress, CFTC
Source: Senate Agriculture Committee Republicans

The prospective CFTC chair answered questions from senators on Wednesday regarding potential conflicts of interest, his policy positions on DeFi and digital assets and the dearth of leadership at the federal agency. Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal supported his confirmation, citing Selig’s support for a digital asset market structure bill moving through Congress.

Selig was Trump’s second pick to chair the CFTC following the withdrawal of Brian Quintenz’s nomination. Selig will need support from at least 50 senators to be confirmed.

Related: CFTC’s Caroline Pham confirms push to greenlight leveraged crypto trading in US

Four commissioner seats are still open

Even if Selig were to be confirmed quickly, Trump has not announced any nominees to fill the two remaining Republican and two Democratic seats at the CFTC. Since September, Pham has served as the agency’s sole Republican commissioner.