Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has been forced to water down his planned overhaul of Labour rules at the opening of the party’s conference in Brighton, as he was accused of an “almost pathological fear of democracy” in pushing for change.

The Labour leader had sought to use the Brighton gathering to alter the rules on how the party elects future leaders, including an abandonment of the system that saw Jeremy Corbyn twice elected to the party’s leadership.

However, amid opposition from trade unions and deep unhappiness from Labour’s left wing, Sir Keir watered down his package of reforms as his first in-person conference as Labour leader was threatened with being overshadowed by more internal party battles.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rayner: Starmer’s leadership ‘incredibly strong’

Sir Keir’s retreat on party rule changes included abandoning his proposal to return to an “electoral college” – made up of unions, affiliate organisations, MPs, and party members – for electing leaders and their deputies.

But Sir Keir did manage to get some reforms accepted by Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) at the start of the Brighton conference on Saturday.

These included:

• Increasing the threshold of support (from 10% to 20% of MPs) a leadership hopeful must secure before becoming an official candidate in a leadership contest

More on Labour

• Scrapping the “registered supporters” scheme which allowed people to pay £25 to vote in a Labour leadership election

• Making it harder for current MPs to be de-selected by raising the threshold for triggering a selection contest

Those rule changes approved by the NEC are set to be voted on Labour members in Brighton on Sunday.

And parts of Labour’s left wing have already vowed to continue their opposition to Sir Keir’s proposed reforms.

Mish Rahman, a senior figure from the Momentum group who sits on the NEC, said: “Changing the threshold like this will destroy the right of ordinary people to shape the future of the party.

“If this rule change passes, Labour will be well on its way to becoming the party of the Westminster elite.

“If the 20% threshold applied to the 2020 leadership election it would have been a contest between Sir Keir Starmer QC and Sir Keir Starmer QC.”

And Labour’s former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, a long-time ally of Mr Corbyn, said: “These desperate attempts to restrict the influence of party members demonstrate an almost pathological fear of democracy amongst the Labour leadership and bureaucracy.

“Defeated on their main attack on democracy they now pick away wherever they can.”

As Labour’s factions continued their battle over the party’s rulebook in Brighton, the party’s national campaign coordinator Shabana Mahmood told Mr McDonnell he “ought to know better”.

“Because actually a leader should be able to command the respect of at least one fifth of their colleagues in order to be a functioning political party in parliament, in order to try and become the government of this country,” Ms Mahmood told Sky News.

“If you can’t even persuade your colleagues who you would one day hope to be your ministers, your supporters in your own government, then how can you possibly say to the county ‘make me prime minister’?

“Keir is sending a clear message to the country that we are a serious political party, we are committed to being a functioning force in parliament, we are committed to trying to be the government of this country.

“And I’m afraid to say those who don’t like this package of measures perhaps had other reasons for what they expect a political party to be.

“We are not any one man or one woman’s fan club, we’re a serious political party and under Keir’s leadership we’re going to try and be the government of this country.”

Subscribe to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Sir Keir himself said he was “very pleased” that his revised package of reforms had been backed by the NEC.

“These proposals put us in a better position to win the next general election and I hope constituency and trade union delegates will support them when they come to conference floor,” the Labour leader said.

Are Starmer and Rayner a new Labour odd couple?

By Jon Craig, chief political correspondent, in Brighton

Sir Keir Starmer looked a little embarrassed when his deputy, Angela Rayner, paid him a tribute during her barnstorming speech at the start of Labour’s conference.

“What a contrast our leader is to the current prime minister,” she said. “Ours has a lifetime of public service. Theirs a lifetime of self-service.”

Sitting a few feet away, the Labour leader smiled awkwardly. And their hug at the end of her speech looked even more awkward and was rather half-hearted.

The relationship between Labour’s top two is awkward, too. Labour’s odd couple? Maybe. But the party is used to those: Blair-Prescott, Corbyn-Watson.

But has Ms Rayner forgiven Sir Keir for attempting to strip her of many of her responsibilities after Labour’s humiliating by-election defeat in Hartlepool in May? Almost certainly not.

And her support for her leader in the run-up to Labour’s conference and here in Brighton as he attempted to re-write Labour’s rulebook was at best lukewarm and at worst non-existent.

She either had little enthusiasm for his proposed changes or didn’t see why she should lift a finger to help after his treatment of her in May.

The Starmer inner circle will have been annoyed, too, by her glossy photo-shoot and interview in The Times’ Saturday magazine in which she said she’d like a tilt at the Labour leadership one day.

The end result of the turbulent past few days is that without his deputy’s strong and vocal backing for his reforms, Sir Keir was forced into a humiliating retreat and major concessions and has been left looking seriously weakened.

Sir Keir’s first in-person conference is widely viewed as hugely important to the Labour leader’s hopes of shaking off his critics and offering hope that he can lead them to victory at the next general election.

But there were signs some at the conference were unwilling to move on from Sir Keir’s predecessor.

Labour general secretary David Evans faced heckles of “Oh Jeremy Corbyn!” as he asked members from the conference stage why they joined the party.

Yet Mr Evans later won a vote he called himself on his position, suggesting both he and Sir Keir retain the support of a majority of members in Brighton over their efforts to reform Labour’s structures.

Among those who have been touted as a possible replacement for Sir Keir, Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner used a pre-conference newspaper interview to confirm she would be willing to stand as a leadership candidate in the future.

“I think a lot of the time, especially when women get asked this question, we say ‘oh no, no, that’s not what we want’,” she told Sky News.

“And it makes us look like we’re not ambitious. I want every woman in this country to be ambitious.”

In her conference speech on Saturday, Ms Rayner spoke of her ambition to be deputy prime minister in a future Labour government as she unveiled Labour’s plans to boost employment rights.

And she compared the current post-COVID pandemic situation to the post-Second World War choices facing British voters.

“In 1945, the country faced a choice between a Tory government who sought the credit for our shared achievement but longed for the status quo that preceded it, where the state would step back and the market would rule again, where people knew their place and took what they were given,” she said.

“Or a Labour government that would harness the values that saved a nation, and make a country fit for those who had fought for it.

“Our country chose to face that future. Now conference, let us face the future again.”

Continue Reading

Politics

What Labour is doing to keep the welfare rebels quiet

Published

on

By

What Labour is doing to keep the welfare rebels quiet

Government whips will be overestimating the number of Labour rebels over welfare cuts as a form of “expectation management”, Dame Harriet Harman has said.

Speaking to Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, the Labour peer and former deputy leader shed light on some of the dark arts that have traditionally been associated with government whipping operations – whereby MPs are encouraged to vote in line with the government.

Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are facing a looming rebellion over the chancellor’s decision to impose nearly £5bn worth of welfare cuts, as outlined in the spring statement on Wednesday.

Politics latest: Trump threatens chancellor’s economic plan

Dame Harriet said the “first thing” the government whips will be doing is suggesting that the rebellion will be larger than it is – so it looks less damaging when smaller numbers emerge.

“You’ll see floating around that there’s going to be 50 Labour MPs rebelling against their own government within a year of having been elected on a Labour manifesto,” she explained.

“And probably that’s because they think they’ll be considerably fewer than that. And they’re just setting the expectation.”

More on Benefits

Alongside this, Dame Harriet said there has always been talk about whips – who are responsible for enforcing party discipline – “blackmailing people with private information”.

She said that while this used to be the case when she was first elected as an MP in the 1980s, it would not be happening under the current government.

However, she said the whips will have a “spreadsheet of every single one of the 411 Labour members of parliament because the whips’ job is to get the government business through”.

“They’ll be identifying those who think that they might be at risk of voting against or abstaining,” she said.

“And they will talk to them, and they’ll be reminding them that actually, they really need to be supporting the government and think about the good things the government’s doing – think about the waiting lists coming down in your area.

“Don’t destabilize the government when we’ve only just started, because you know you want to focus the minds of everybody in your constituency on the fact that things are getting better in some areas.

“So they’ll be saying: ‘You promised you’d be voting with the whip. How can you be breaking that promise?'”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Beth Rigby looks at the key moments from Reeves’s spring statement

Read more:
Spring statement 2025 key takeaways
Backlash over welfare cuts on ‘people that need extra help’

A number of Labour MPs have already expressed their concerns at the changes, particularly following the government’s own impact assessment which stated that around 250,000 families – including 50,000 children – could be pushed into poverty.

Debbie Abrahams, the MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth and the chair of the work and pensions select committee, said: “All the evidence points to cuts in welfare leading to severe poverty and worsened health conditions. How will making people sicker and poorer get people into jobs?”

And Leeds MP Richard Burgon added: “Making cuts instead of taxing wealth is a political choice, and taking away the personal independence payments from so many disabled people is an especially cruel choice.

“A disabled person who can’t cut up their own food without assistance, and can’t go to the toilet without assistance, and can’t wash themselves without assistance will lose their personal independence payment.”

Continue Reading

Politics

PM unveils £2bn transport boost to stop North being ‘held ransom’ by outdated system

Published

on

By

PM unveils £2bn transport boost to stop North being 'held ransom' by outdated system

Sir Keir Starmer has unveiled what he says is a major transport boost to stop the North being “held to ransom” by a Victorian-era system.

The prime minister said the £2.15bn investment was a “downpayment for growth” in northern England and a “vote of confidence” in its “world-beating industries”.

Some £415m of the total will be used to improve rail services between Manchester, Huddersfield, Leeds and York.

Politics latest: Follow live updates

Number 10 also said local leaders would get more than £1bn to boost transport, while an additional £270m will be provided to bolster buses and £330m set aside for road maintenance.

The prime minister is due to visit a factory in the North on Friday to urge regions to speed up projects such as a mass transit system in West Yorkshire, a new rail station in Liverpool’s Baltic Triangle area, and the redevelopment of Bury Interchange.

“The North is home to a wealth of talent and ingenuity,” said Sir Keir.

More on Transport

“But for too long, it has been held to ransom by a Victorian-era transport system which has stifled its potential.”

He added: “I lived in Leeds for years, I get that this has real-world impacts – missed appointments, children late to school, work meetings rescheduled – all leading to insecurity and instability for working people.

“My government won’t stand by and watch. We are rolling up our sleeves, and today’s downpayment for growth is a vote of confidence in the North’s world-beating industries.”

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer attends a press conference at the UK Ambassador's Residence after a meeting with European leaders on strengthening support for Ukraine in Paris, France, March 27, 2025. REUTERS/Stephanie Lecocq/Pool
Image:
The PM says poor transport leads to ‘insecurity and instability for working people’. Pic: Reuters

The multibillion-pound TransPennine Route Upgrade will reduce journey times between Manchester and Leeds from 50 to 42 minutes, while people will save 10 minutes from Manchester to York.

Electrification of the line has been long-delayed.

Sir Keir said it was time industry in the region “had a government on their side to get the North motoring again”.

He said the government was spending “double as much on local transport in the North than the South”.

Read more from Sky News:
‘Disgraceful’ amount of sewage dumped in rivers
Just Stop Oil ends direct action

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said reliable and affordable public transport links are “essential for kickstarting economic growth and putting more money in people’s pockets”.

She added: “The transport system outside of London and the South East has been plagued by delays and cancellations, frustrated by strikes and failing infrastructure because upgrades that were promised were never delivered.”

Continue Reading

Politics

South Carolina dismisses its staking lawsuit against Coinbase, joining Vermont

Published

on

By

South Carolina dismisses its staking lawsuit against Coinbase, joining Vermont

South Carolina dismisses its staking lawsuit against Coinbase, joining Vermont

South Carolina has become the latest US state to dismiss its lawsuit against crypto exchange Coinbase over its staking services, which had accused the crypto exchange of offering unregistered securities.

The lawsuit was officially dismissed in a joint stipulation between the crypto exchange and the South Carolina Attorney General’s securities division on March 27.

“South Carolina just joined Vermont to dismiss its unfounded staking lawsuit against Coinbase,” the firm’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, said in a March 27 X post.

“This is not just a victory for us, but for American consumers and we hope it’s a sign of things to come in the few states left that restrict staking.”

South Carolina dismisses its staking lawsuit against Coinbase, joining Vermont

South Carolina Attorney General and Coinbase’s joint stipulation. Source: South Carolina Attorney General

South Carolina and Vermont were two of 10 US states that took legal action against Coinbase’s staking services on June 6, 2023 — the same day that the federal securities regulator filed its lawsuit against the crypto exchange.

The Securities and Exchange Commission officially dismissed that lawsuit on Feb. 27, 2025.

The other eight US states that filed enforcement action similar to South Carolina were Alabama, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, Washington and Wisconsin. 

Grewal said he hoped to see other states follow suit, and that South Carolina residents lost an estimated $2 million in staking rewards as a result of the lawsuit.

“The 52 million Americans who own crypto deserve commonsense consumer protections and clear rules,” he said. “We applaud South Carolina for standing up for justice and hope the remaining states with bans on staking will take notice.”

South Carolina introduces Bitcoin reserve bill

Meanwhile, a state lawmaker has just introduced the “Strategic Digital Assets Reserve Act of South Carolina” on March 27, which could see the state treasurer allocate up to 10% of certain state funds to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC).

Unlike most US state crypto reserve bills, North Carolina’s House Bill 4256, introduced by Rep. Jordan Pace, mentioned Bitcoin on several occasions for the Strategic Digital Assets Reserve that the bill seeks to establish.

South Carolina dismisses its staking lawsuit against Coinbase, joining Vermont

Source: Jordan Pace

The bill allows South Carolina’s treasurer, currently Curtis Loftis, to establish a Bitcoin reserve that exceeds no more than 1 million Bitcoin — a high ceiling that the US federal government is also looking to reach or exceed with its recently established Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The treasurer would be able to add Bitcoin to South Carolina’s General Fund, the Budget Stabilization Reserve Fund any other investment fund that they manage.

Related: Coinbase files FOIA to see how much the SEC’s ‘war on crypto’ cost

While no mention of stablecoins, non-fungible tokens, Ether (ETH) or any other crypto tokens was made, the House bill said the Strategic Digital Assets Reserve wouldn’t be limited to Bitcoin.

According to Bitcoin Law, 42 Bitcoin reserve bills have been introduced at the state level in 19 states, and 36 of those 42 bills remain live.

Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to create a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a Digital Asset Stockpile, both of which will initially use cryptocurrency forfeited in government criminal cases.

Magazine: Comeback 2025: Is Ethereum poised to catch up with Bitcoin and Solana?

Continue Reading

Trending