Connect with us

Published

on

In this article

Electric vehicle maker Tesla rolled out a long-awaited software update Friday night that allows customers to request access to its controversial Full Self-Driving Beta (FSD Beta) software.

The move delighted fans of CEO Elon Musk and Tesla, but it risks drawing the ire of federal vehicle safety authorities who are already investigating the automaker for possible safety defects in its driver-assistance systems.

FSD Beta is an unfinished version of Tesla’s premium driver-assistance software, FSD, which the company sells in the U.S. for $10,000 upfront, or $199 a month.

FSD is marketed with the promise of enabling a Tesla to automatically change lanes, navigate on the highway, move into a parking spot, or roll out from a parking spot to drive a small distance at a slow pace without anyone behind the wheel.

FSD Beta gives drivers access to an “autosteer on city streets” feature, which has yet to be perfected and enables drivers to automatically navigate around urban environments alongside other vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists and pets without moving the steering wheel with their own hands. Drivers are supposed to remain attentive, however, with both hands on the wheel and prepared to take over driving at any time.

None of Tesla’s driver assistance systems — including the company’s standard Autopilot package, premium Full Self-Driving option, or FSD Beta — make Teslas autonomous.

The company previously made FSD Beta available to about 2,000 people, a mix of mostly employees and some customers, who test it out on public roads even though the software hasn’t been debugged.

The new download button could ostensibly lead to a rapid expansion in the number of participants who are not trained regulatory officials.

Government response

Tesla CEO Elon Musk gestures as he visits the construction site of Tesla’s Gigafactory in Gruenheide near Berlin, Germany, August 13, 2021.
Patrick Pleul | Reuters

Last week, when CEO Musk announced new details about the FSD beta button, Jennifer Homendy, the head of the National Transporation Safety Board, voiced concern over the company’s plans in an interview with The Wall Street Journal.

Homendy said, “Basic safety issues have to be addressed,” before Tesla expands FSD Beta to other city streets and regions. The NTSB chief was also displeased that the company was conducting testing of the unfinished product with untrained drivers on public roads in lieu of safety professionals.

Homendy also remarked — and in interviews with Autonocast, an industry podcast, and the Washington Post — that Tesla’s use of the term Full Self-Driving for a “level 2” driver assistance system is misleading and confusing.

Musk himself said last week in a tweet that FSD Beta now seems so good it can give drivers the wrong idea that they don’t need to pay attention to driving while FSD Beta is engaged, even though they are supposed to remain attentive and at the wheel at all times.

On Saturday, after Tesla enabled the “request full self-driving beta” feature in its vehicles — a fan blog named Teslarati shared a post on Twitter asking, “Does Tesla have a fair chance after NTSB Chief comments?”

Musk replied to them on Twitter with a link to the Wikipedia biography of Homendy. While Musk has previously urged his tens of millions of followers on Twitter to alter a description of his own career on Wikipedia, he shared this link to Homendy’s bio there without comment.

CNBC reached out to Tesla and the NTSB — neither was immediately available to comment on Saturday.

Safety score

Musk has been promising Tesla owners an FSD beta download button for months. In March 2021, he wrote in a tweet that the forthcoming button would give users access to the latest FSD Beta build as soon as their car connected to Wi-Fi.

He changed that approach, however. Now, Tesla has a calculator it uses to give drivers a “safety score,” and determine who will be allowed to get and use FSD Beta software.

Screen-shots shared with CNBC by Tesla owners with FSD indicate that the company’s “safety score” is akin to an insurance risk factor score.

Tesla’s systems tabulate a drivers’: “Predicted Collision Frequency, Forward Collision Warning per 1,000 Miles, Hard Braking, Aggressive Turning, Unsafe Following Time, and Forced Autopilot Disengagements,” according to correspondence and screenshots viewed by CNBC.

Tesla’s system does not, at this time, appear to measure and account for how often drivers fail to keep their hands on the wheel, how quickly they take over driving when prompted, or how consistently they keep their eyes on the road.

Only users who have a great driving record for a full week, in Tesla’s view, may gain access to FSD Beta.

Before Tesla released its FSD Beta button (and the 10.1 version of FSD Beta, which is expected this weekend, too) CNBC asked the California DMV Autonomous Vehicles Branch how pervasive and safe FSD Beta-equipped vehicles have been in use in the state so far.

The DMV declined an interview request but said, in an e-mailed statement:

“Based on information the information Tesla has provided the DMV, the feature does not make the vehicle an autonomous vehicle per California regulations. The DMV continues to gather information from Tesla on its beta release – including any expansion of the program and features.  If the capabilities of the feature change such that it meets the definition of an autonomous vehicle per California’s law and regulations, Tesla will need to operate under the appropriate regulatory authorization. Regardless of the level of vehicle autonomy, the DMV has reminded Tesla that clear and effective communication to the driver about the technology’s capabilities, limitations and intended use is necessary. The DMV is reviewing the company’s use of the term ‘Full Self-Driving’ for its technology. Because it is ongoing, the DMV cannot discuss the review until it is complete.”

Continue Reading

Technology

Palo Alto CEO Nikesh Arora confronts Wall Street skeptics after company’s biggest bet yet

Published

on

By

Palo Alto CEO Nikesh Arora confronts Wall Street skeptics after company’s biggest bet yet

Nikesh Arora of the United States on the first hole during the third round of The Alfred Dunhill Links Championship at The Old Course on October 02, 2021 in St Andrews, Scotland.

David Cannon | David Cannon Collection | Getty Images

When Nikesh Arora was named CEO of Palo Alto Networks in June 2018, the cybersecurity company was valued at about $19 billion and was taking on large networking vendors like Cisco and Juniper, which were building security into their products.

Seven years later, Palo Alto’s market cap has expanded by sixfold, driven in part by an acquisition spree that’s seen Arora spearhead more than 20 deals in an effort to create a one-stop shop for all things cybersecurity.

Arora’s ambitions took a dramatic turn last week, when Palo Alto announced by far its biggest bet to date: the $25 billion purchase of Israeli identity security platform CyberArk.

Wall Street’s reaction so far has been downbeat, with multiple analysts downgrading the stock, and the shares dropping 16% since news of the deal first leaked out last Tuesday.

Not only does CyberArk represent Palo Alto’s heftiest deal in the 20 years since its founding, but it’s the second-biggest U.S. tech acquisition announced in 2025, after Alphabet’s $32 billion purchase of Wiz, another cloud security company from Israel.

Alphabet had become a more notable player in Palo Alto’s universe even before the calendar turned. In the company’s 2024 annual report published in October, Palo Alto named Alphabet as a competitor for the first time, listing it alongside Cisco and Microsoft as companies “that have acquired, or may acquire, security vendors and have the technical and financial resources to bring competitive solutions to the market.” In 2023, Cisco paid $28 billion for Splunk, which focuses on data protection.

The era of cybersecurity megadeals coincides with a surge in the number of sophisticated cybercrimes tied to rapid advancements in artificial intelligence.

With CyberArk, Palo Alto is making a big splash in the identity management market, taking on the likes of Okta as well as Microsoft and IBM’s HashiCorp. It also puts the company into further competition with CrowdStrike, the other pure-play security company that’s topped $100 billion in market cap.

Expect to see more tech M&A ahead, says Axios' Dan Primack

In an interview with CNBC soon after last week’s announcement, Arora said CyberArk fits squarely into his company’s focus on AI and, in this case, the complexities that come with granting permissions and access. Arora said that with M&A he looks for emerging trends, particularly when it involves technology that’s at a crossroads.

“Our entire acquisition strategy, our organic product growth strategy, our selling strategy, has always been based on that approach,” said Arora, 57, who’s seen his personal wealth top $1 billion with the big run-up in the stock.

In CyberArk’s earnings report last week, the company said revenue jumped 46% in the latest quarter to $328 million, equal to about 14% of Palo Alto revenue, based on the most recent report. Arora said in the conference call announcing the deal that he intends to work with CyberArk CEO Matt Cohen and Chairman Udi Mokady to “accelerate the pace of innovation.”

“We look for great products, a team that can execute in the product, and we let them run it,” Arora told CNBC. “This is going to be a different challenge, but we’ve done well 24 times, so I’m pretty confident that our team can handle this.”

Most of Arora’s acquisitions over the years have been of smaller startups. That includes a $400 million deal to buy Dig Security and the $625 million purchase of Talon Cyber Security in 2023. Last month, the company closed its takeover of Seattle-based startup Protect AI for an undisclosed amount.

Appetite for risk

Before joining Palo Alto, Arora spent a decade at Google, including his last three years there as chief business officer. Some analysts called him the “acting CEO,” due to his lengthy roster of responsibilities, such as strategic partnerships and navigating the needs of advertisers.

In 2014, Arora left Google to join SoftBank as head of its internet and media operations business and vice chairman of the overall company. At SoftBank, Arora had been tapped as the likely successor to visionary founder and CEO Masayoshi Son. But less than two years after taking the job, Arora resigned. As he explained it, Son told him he was going to keep running the show for another five to 10 years.

Roughly 10 months before leaving SoftBank, Arora said he was buying more than $480 million worth of stock in the Japanese conglomerate, which he said involved taking an “enormous risk” reflecting his confidence “about the future” of the company.

While that’s all firmly in the past, Arora said that over the years, he’s “scavenged” different leadership qualities from each of his mentors, including an appetite for risk from Son.

“It’s about finding role models for certain behaviors and wanting to understand what makes them really successful,” he said. “That’s my model.”

Masayoshi Son, chairman and chief executive officer of SoftBank Group Corp., speaks during the company’s annual general meeting in Tokyo, Japan, on Friday, June 27, 2025.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Investors weren’t completely sold on Arora when he joined Palo Alto in 2018, said Joseph Gallo, an analyst at Jefferies. He was a skilled and experienced businessman but some worried that he hadn’t created a notable product or founded a company like many of his industry peers, said Gallo, who recommends buying Palo Alto shares.

Arora made up for it with an ability to spot trends ahead of the curve, Gallo said. That included investing aggressively in a transition from on-premises technology to the cloud and then recognizing early the power of AI.

In his first few years at the company, Arora made numerous acquisitions for a total of about $3 billion, helping Palo Alto penetrate the cloud security space as more businesses were moving their workloads to Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure and Google’s cloud.

“Every company wishes they were in Palo Alto shoes, where they could actually offer all these different products,” said Andrew Nowinski, an analyst at Wells Fargo who has a buy recommendation on the stock. “It’s very difficult. You’re not going to see many vendors like Palo Alto.”

With its expansion into identity management, Palo Alto is going big in a space that’s viewed by experts as a key spending area for IT in the coming years.

“You can’t slow down your spending because the hackers aren’t slowing down,” Nowinski said. “That’s your growth driver.”

Ofer Schreiber, senior partner and head of YL Ventures’ Israel office, said Palo Alto has helped take an extremely fragmented market, consisting of lots of point solutions, and created a centralized vendor for clients.

According to a joint report from IBM and Palo Alto published in January, the average organization uses 83 different security products from 29 separate companies.

“From the customer’s perspective, it’s much more convenient dealing with with one vendor with multiple products tightly integrated,” Schreiber said. “You can’t really be just a one-product company.”

Still, Arora is in untested waters with CyberArk.

Palo Alto’s shares dropped on all five days following the announcement of the deal. It’s the first time at Palo Alto that Arora has led a multibillion-dollar purchase, and he now faces the execution challenges of integrating thousands of new employees.

Analysts at KeyBanc lowered their rating to the equivalent of hold from buy, due partly to concerns about a lack of “meaningful synergies” in the product offerings and a view that customers would prefer an “independent vendor solely focused on identity.”

But TD Cowen’s Shaul Eyal still recommends buying the shares. He said that what’s made Arora successful is his “relentless focus on execution” and his strategy of betting on sizeable markets where Palo Alto can quickly scale and become the leader or runner-up.

That, and his ability to bundle.

“It’s all about upsell,” Eyal said. “Every other second, third, fourth module you’re selling to an existing customer flows straight to the bottom line.”

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Palo Alto Networks CEO on acquisition: CyberArk is poised to 'disrupt' the market

Continue Reading

Technology

Former X CEO Linda Yaccarino takes helm at digital health company eMed

Published

on

By

Former X CEO Linda Yaccarino takes helm at digital health company eMed

Linda Yaccarino, CEO of X Corp., attends the Milken Institute Global Conference 2025 in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., May 5, 2025.

Mike Blake | Reuters

Linda Yaccarino, the former chief executive of Elon Musk’s social media platform X, is pivoting into health care.

The digital health company eMed Population Health on Tuesday announced it has appointed Yaccarino as its new CEO. EMed is developing a population health management platform for the blockbuster weight loss and diabetes drugs called GLP-1s, the company said. It had raised a total $22 million as of 2022, according to PitchBook.

Yaccarino, who rose rose to the top of NBCUniversal’s global advertising business before joining X, will help eMed establish “game-changing partnerships” and navigate complex markets, the company said.

“The healthcare industry has been disrupted by technology, but not yet completely transformed by it,” Yaccarino said in a statement. “There is an opportunity to combine technology, lifestyle, and data in a new powerful way through the digital channels that impact consumers directly in ways that have never been done before.”

EMed is part of the growing group of digital health companies that are trying to capitalize on the sky-high demand for GLP-1s. Goldman Sachs analysts expect 15 million U.S. adults to be on anti-obesity drugs by 2030, and they predict the industry could reach $100 billion in annual revenue by that time.

Yaccarino stepped down from her role as CEO at X in July and did not disclose a reason for her departure. EMed said she is a “highly sought-after leader” with an “undeniable ability to negotiate new partnerships.”

“To be a leader in today’s healthcare marketplace, companies need to have a fearless tenacity that allows them to not only grow, but to also be brave enough to step forward and redefine an entire industry,” Yaccarino said.

WATCH: Linda Yaccarino steps down as CEO of Elon Musk’s X after two years in the role

Linda Yaccarino steps down as CEO of Elon Musk’s X after two years in the role

Continue Reading

Technology

Palantir stock pops 8% after blowout quarter driven by AI, efficiency demand

Published

on

By

Palantir stock pops 8% after blowout quarter driven by AI, efficiency demand

Palantir reports $1 billion in revenue for the first time

Palantir stock popped more than 8% Tuesday after the software analytics provider lifted its full-year outlook, boosted by the artificial intelligence wave.

CEO Alex Karp called the earnings results a “once in a generation, truly anomalous quarter” during an earnings call with analysts.

“We’re very proud and we’re sorry that our haters are disappointed, but there are many more quarters to be disappointed, and we’re working on that too,” he added.

U.S. revenues grew 68% year over year $733 million, while U.S. commercial revenues nearly doubled to $306 million.

Palantir’s U.S. government revenues rose 53% from the year-ago period to $426 million as the company continues to benefit from President Donald Trump‘s focus on efficiency.

Read more CNBC tech news

The company’s revenues grew 48% and topped $1 billion in quarterly revenue for the first time ever. That surpassed the $940 million in revenues forecast by analysts polled by LSEG.

“‘I’ve been cautioned to be a little modest about our bombastic numbers, but honestly, there’s no authentic way to be anything but have enormous pride and gratefulness about these extraordinary numbers,” he said.

Adjusted earnings came in at 16 cents per share and ahead of the 14-cent-per-share estimate. Net income jumped 144% to about $326.7 million, or 13 cents per share. That’s up from $134.1 million, or 6 cents per share a year ago.

Palantir also upped its full-year guidance.

The company now expects revenues to range between $4.142 billion and $4.150 billion. That’s up from its previous forecast calling for $3.89 billion to $3.90 billion.

Palantir shares have soared more than 120% this year and the company’s market cap topped $400 billion due to ongoing AI tailwinds and a bet on its contracts with the government.

Last week, the company joined the list of 20 most valuable U.S. companies after joining the top 10 U.S. tech firms club in May.

However, investors are paying a hefty multiple for a company that makes a fraction of revenue relative to many of its peers. Shares currently trade 277 times forward earnings.

Analysts have raised concerns about the company’s growth and valuation.

Jefferies analyst Brent Thill maintained an underperform rating following the results, citing a “disconnected between valuation and achievable growth.”

While PLTR carries a rich valuation premium and remains a high-risk investment, the one-of-a-kind growth [plus] margin model puts it into a unique category of one that warrants a premium, in our view,” wrote Piper Sandler’s Brent Bracelin, who is overweight on shares.

WATCH: Palantir reports $1 billion in revenue for the first time

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Palantir YTD stock chart.

Continue Reading

Trending