Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer is being warned that his party’s Brighton conference is “falling apart” following the dramatic resignation of a shadow minister.

The Labour leader has been rocked by Andy McDonald’s decision to quit as shadow secretary of state for employment rights and protections midway through the party’s gathering on the South Coast.

Mr McDonald’s resignation, which the left-winger announced with a blistering attack on Sir Keir’s leadership and policies – including a claim he was blocked by the leader’s office from voicing his support for a £15 per hour minimum wage – has prompted a fresh bout of Labour infighting.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Party conferences: What’s the point?

And those who had supported Sir Keir’s predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn, might look to turn up the pressure on the Labour leader when many of them speak during a rally at the left’s alternative conference, The World Transformed, in Brighton on Tuesday.

“To be honest, the conference is falling apart because of the behaviour of the leader – it’s appalling,” said former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who is among those listed to speak at the Socialist Campaign Group rally.

Mr McDonald’s resignation came hours after former Labour MP, Dame Louise Ellman, announced she was rejoining the party nearly two years after she had quit Labour over antisemitism and Mr Corbyn’s leadership.

But, despite the drama, there were claims that Sir Keir’s office had “no sense of loss” over Mr McDonald’s departure and “no tears” were being shed.

More on Labour

And, on the eve of his first in-person conference speech as party leader, Sir Keir will on Tuesday look to wrestle the focus of the conference back onto how he is trying to move Labour on from Mr Corbyn’s era.

This will include some of Sir Keir’s key shadow cabinet allies attempting to take the fight to the Conservatives on the issues of law and order, health and education.

Shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds will use his conference speech to accuse the Tories of being “soft on crime and soft on causes on crime”.

He will also announce Labour’s new plans for increased visible policing with “eyes, ears and boots on the ground”.

“In Tory Britain, people say you never see police on the beat any more,” Mr Thomas-Symonds is expected to say.

“That school children feel afraid at the bus stop, that people feel unsafe going out after dark. This is the price of years of Tory cuts to neighbourhood policing.

“With me as home secretary – if there is trouble on your street Labour will make sure that someone is there. You will see officers on the beat.

“In every community where people are frightened and afraid there will be a new police hub, and new neighbourhood prevention teams which bring together police, community support officers, youth workers and local authority staff to tackle anti-social behaviour at source.”

Meanwhile, Labour’s shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth will accuse the Conservatives of having failed to put in place a plan to tackle NHS waiting lists or to improve social care.

“The NHS is in crisis not simply because of COVID,” he is expected to say.

“The NHS is in crisis because of the Conservatives. A crisis that sees NHS services collapsing, the army called in to the aid of ambulance trusts.

“Hospitals ration chemotherapy. And more and more people taking out loans, crowd-sourcing for donations in pain and desperation.”

Subscribe to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Labour’s shadow education secretary Kate Green will also challenge the government to deliver a coronavirus crisis “recovery guarantee” for school children.

“Our children’s futures, life chances and aspirations must not be limited by the Conservatives treating them as an afterthought,” she is expected to say.

“They must not be limited by a recovery plan that the government’s own catch-up expert described as ‘feeble’.

“And they must not be limited by a weak prime minister who took months to sack a failing secretary of state.

“That is why today, conference, I am challenging the new education secretary [Nadhim Zahawi] to deliver a recovery guarantee.

“To ensure that every single child who has been let down, ignored and undervalued by this government not only recovers from the pandemic, but thrives on new opportunities to learn, play and develop – just as Labour’s plan would enable them to do.”

Continue Reading

Politics

US lawmakers tap Saylor, Lee to advance Bitcoin reserve bill

Published

on

By

US lawmakers tap Saylor, Lee to advance Bitcoin reserve bill

US lawmakers tap Saylor, Lee to advance Bitcoin reserve bill

Strategy’s Michael Saylor and BitMine’s Tom Lee are among 18 industry leaders who will look at ways to pass the BITCOIN Act and enable budget-neutral ways to buy Bitcoin.

Continue Reading

Politics

Super PAC backing ‘pro-crypto candidates‘ raises $100M

Published

on

By

Super PAC backing ‘pro-crypto candidates‘ raises 0M

Super PAC backing ‘pro-crypto candidates‘ raises 0M

The Fellowship PAC, launched in August, said it had “over $100 million” from unnamed sources to support the White House’s digital asset strategy.

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer was aware of the risks of appointing the ‘Prince of Darkness’ as his man in Washington – to an extent

Published

on

By

Starmer was aware of the risks of appointing the 'Prince of Darkness' as his man in Washington - to an extent

It was a prescient and – as it turned out – incredibly optimistic sign off from Peter Mandelson after eight years as Chancellor of Manchester Metropolitan University.

“I hope I survive in my next job for at least half that period”, the Financial Times reported him as saying – with a smile.

As something of a serial sackee from government posts, we know Sir Keir Starmer was, to an extent, aware of the risks of appointing the ‘Prince of Darkness’ as his man in Washington.

Politics latest – follow live

But in his first interview since he gave the ambassador his marching orders, the prime minister said if he had “known then what I know now” then he would not have given him the job.

For many Labour MPs, this will do little to answer questions about the slips in political judgement that led Downing Street down this disastrous alleyway.

Like the rest of the world, Sir Keir Starmer did know of Lord Mandelson’s friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein when he sent him to Washington.

More on Peter Kyle

The business secretary spelt out the reasoning for that over the weekend saying that the government judged it “worth the risk”.

Keir Starmer welcomes Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte to Downing Street.
Pic: PA
Image:
Keir Starmer welcomes Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte to Downing Street.
Pic: PA

This is somewhat problematic.

As you now have a government which – after being elected on the promise to restore high standards – appears to be admitting that previous indiscretions can be overlooked if the cause is important enough.

Package that up with other scandals that have resulted in departures – Louise Haigh, Tulip Siddiq, Angela Rayner – and you start to get a stink that becomes hard to shift.

But more than that, the events of the last week again demonstrate an apparent lack of ability in government to see round corners and deal with crises before they start knocking lumps out of the Prime Minister.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Had I known then, what I know now, I’d have never appointed him’ Starmer said.

Remember, for many the cardinal sin here was not necessarily the original appointment of Mandelson (while eyebrows were raised at the time, there was nowhere near the scale of outrage we’ve had in the last week with many career diplomats even agreeing the with logic of the choice) but the fact that Sir Keir walked into PMQs and gave the ambassador his full throated backing when it was becoming clear to many around Westminster that he simply wouldn’t be able to stay in post.

The explanation from Downing Street is essentially that a process was playing out, and you shouldn’t sack an ambassador based on a media enquiry alone.

But good process doesn’t always align with good politics.

Something this barrister-turned-politician may now be finding out the hard way.

Continue Reading

Trending