U.S. lawmakers from opposite sides of the aisle agree on virtually nothing these days. The exception is when the topic is Facebook.
Republicans and Democrats grilled Antigone Davis, Facebook’s global head of safety, on Thursday, in a hearing before the Senate Commerce subcommittee on consumer protection. Antigone, who testified by video, was called to answer questions about Instagram’s impact on the mental health of teens and Facebook’s efforts to build more products targeting children.
The hearing, titled “Protecting Kids Online: Facebook, Instagram, and Mental Health Harms,” follows a series of Wall Street Journal reports earlier this month that were based on internal studies conducted by Facebook researchers. Those stories revealed that Facebook is aware of the harmful effects of Instagram on the mental health of young users. In particular, Facebook’s own studies showed that 13% of British users and 6% of American users traced their desire to commit suicide back to Instagram.
Davis answered questions for close to three hours, and listened as multiple senators compared Facebook to the tobacco industry, which for years knowingly hid what it knew about the dangers associated with the products it was selling.
“Facebook is just like Big Tobacco, pushing a product that they know is harmful to the health of young people, pushing it to them early, all so Facebook can make money,” said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass.
Here are the highlights from Thursday’s hearing:
Facebook Head of Global Safety Antigone Davis speaks during a roundtable discussion on cyber safety and technology at the White House March 20, 2018 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images
Facebook can’t hold itself accountable
Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., chair of the subcommittee, kicked off the hearing by accusing Facebook of showing that it’s incapable of holding itself accountable. Blumenthal said the Journal stories and the Facebook whistleblower who provided the documents gave “deep insight into Facebook’s relentless campaign to recruit and exploit young users.”
“We now know that while Facebook publicly denies that Instagram is deeply harmful for teens, privately Facebook researchers and experts have been ringing the alarm for years,” Blumenthal said. “We now know that Facebook routinely puts profits ahead of kids’ online safety, we know it chooses the growth of its products over the wellbeing of our children, and we now know that it is indefensibly delinquent in acting to protect them.”
Blumenthal also noted that Facebook’s documents proved the company had been untruthful in prior correspondence with members of the Senate.
He said that in August, he and Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., ranking member of the subcommittee, wrote to CEO Mark Zuckerberg and asked, “Has Facebook research ever found that its platforms and products have a negative effect on children’s and teens’ mental health or well-being?”
The company said in response, “We are not aware of a consensus among studies or experts about how much screen time is too much.”
“That response was simply untrue,” Blumenthal said. “It knows the evidence of harm to teens is substantial and specific to Instagram.”
Senator Ed Markey speaks at the Back the Thrive Agenda press conference at the Longworth Office Building on September 10, 2020 in Washington, DC.
Jemal Countess | Getty Images
Facebook is non-committal on Instagram Kids
One of the central issues of concern to lawmakers on Thursday was Facebook’s Instagram Kids product.
The project, first reported by BuzzFeed in March and further exposed by the Journal, led Facebook to announce this week that it will pause development of an Instagram app for people under the age of 13.
Throughout the hearing, senators asked Davis if Facebook would commit to shelving Instagram Kids for good.
“Do you promise not to launch a site that includes features such as like buttons and follower counts that allow children to quantify popularity?” asked Markey.
Davis was non-committal and said the company will look further into what features make the most sense for children.
“Sen. Markey, those are the kinds of features that we will be talking about with our experts trying to understand in fact what is most age appropriate and what isn’t age appropriate, and we will discuss those features with them of course,” Davis said.
U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) questions U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing to examine the United States withdrawal from Afghanistan, on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 14, 2021 .
Bill O’Leary | Pool | Reuters
Facebook cherry picks the research it shares
On Wednesday, Facebook released two slide decks with its research on Instagram’s impact on teen mental health. The company published those decks knowing the Journal was about to release all of the documents that contributed to its reporting.
The Journal ended up publishing six decks, with far more information than Facebook provided to the public. Facebook also included annotations that often discredited the work of its own researchers.
Davis told senators at the hearing that the research was not complete and or framed incorrectly. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said her answers don’t add up and asked if the company planned to release all of its research to the public.
“You’re telling us, ‘If only you knew the full research,’ and then at the same time, you’re not releasing the research. So which is it?” Cruz asked.
Davis said the company was in the process of determining what additional research it could release.
“So you’ve cherry picked the ones you want us to see,” Cruz said.
Cruz then asked Davis about the research showing the percentage of teens in the U.S. and U.K. who trace their suicidal desires back to Instagram. Davis said those stats were a mischaracterization of the company’s research.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-CT, asks questions during a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington DC, April 27, 2021.
Tasos Katopodis | Pool | Reuters
Big Tobacco playbook
In his opening remarks, Blumenthal highlighted findings from Facebook’s research, showing that many teens feel addicted to their use of Instagram.
“In truth, Facebook has taken Big Tobacco’s playbook,” he said. “It has hidden its own research on addiction and the toxic effects of its products, it has attempted to deceive the public and us in Congress about what it knows, and it has weaponized childhood vulnerabilities against children themselves.”
Sen. Markey echoed those remarks.
“Instagram is that first childhood cigarette meant to get teens hooked early, exploiting the peer pressure of popularity and ultimately endangering their health,” he said.
‘We don’t actually do finsta’
As in seemingly every hearing involving Washington, D.C., and Silicon Valley, there was a moment underscoring how little lawmakers often understand about the nuances of the internet.
Toward the end of the hearing, Blumenthal took the opportunity to ask Davis about “finsta,” a term that refers to Instagram accounts that aren’t associated with someone’s actual identity. Finsta accounts are often used to snoop on other users’ posts in an anonymous way.
“Will you commit to ending finsta?” Blumenthal asked.
Davis paused, before responding, “Senator, again let me explain. We don’t actually do finsta.”
Blumenthal followed by asking, “Finsta is one of your products or services. We’re not talking about Google or Apple. It’s Facebook correct?”
“Finsta is slang for a type of account,” Davis said.
The conversation was reminiscent of an exchange at a congressional hearing in 2018. Orrin Hatch, a Republic senator from Utah who has since retired, asked Zuckerberg, “How do you sustain a business model in which users don’t pay for your service?”
It’s commonly known that Facebook has become one of the world’s most valuable companies through its sophisticated advertising that’s used by most of the largest businesses to target potential customers.
The U.S. has banned the export of Nvidia’s Blackwell chips, which are considered the company’s most advanced offerings, to China in an effort to stay ahead in the AI race.
DeepSeek is reportedly using chips that were snuck into the country without authorization, according to The Information.
“We haven’t seen any substantiation or received tips of ‘phantom datacenters’ constructed to deceive us and our OEM partners, then deconstructed, smuggled, and reconstructed somewhere else,” a Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement. “While such smuggling seems farfetched, we pursue any tip we receive.”
Read more CNBC tech news
Nvidia has been one of the biggest winners of the AI boom so far because it develops the graphics processing units (GPUs) that are key for training models and running large workloads.
Since the hardware is so crucial for advancing AI technology, Nvidia’s relationship with China has become a political flashpoint among U.S. lawmakers.
President Donald Trump on Monday said Nvidia can ship its H200 chips to “approved customers” in China and elsewhere on the condition that the U.S. will get 25% of those sales.
The announcement was met with pushback from some Republicans.
DeepSeek spooked the U.S. tech sector in January when it released a reasoning model, called R1, that rocketed to the top of app stores and industry leaderboards. R1 was also created at a fraction of the cost of other models in the U.S., according to some analyst estimates.
In August, DeepSeek hinted that China will soon have its own “next generation” chips to support its AI models.
The Starcloud-1 satellite is launched into space from a SpaceX rocket on November 2, 2025.
Courtesy: SpaceX | Starcloud
Nvidia-backed startup Starcloud trained an artificial intelligence model from space for the first time, signaling a new era for orbital data centers that could alleviate Earth’s escalating digital infrastructure crisis.
Last month, the Washington-based company launched a satellite with an Nvidia H100 graphics processing unit, sending a chip into outer space that’s 100 times more powerful than any GPU compute that has been in space before. Now, the company’s Starcloud-1 satellite is running and querying responses from Gemma, an open large language model from Google, in orbit, marking the first time in history that an LLM has been has run on a high-powered Nvidia GPU in outer space, CNBC has learned.
“Greetings, Earthlings! Or, as I prefer to think of you — a fascinating collection of blue and green,” reads a message from the recently launched satellite. “Let’s see what wonders this view of your world holds. I’m Gemma, and I’m here to observe, analyze, and perhaps, occasionally offer a slightly unsettlingly insightful commentary. Let’s begin!” the model wrote.
Starcloud’s output Gemma in space. Gemma is a family of open models built from the same technology used to create Google’s Gemini AI models.
Starcloud
Starcloud wants to show outer space can be a hospitable environment for data centers, particularly as Earth-based facilities strain power grids, consume billions of gallons of water annually and produce hefty greenhouse gas emissions. The electricity consumption of data centers is projected to more than double by 2030, according to data from the International Energy Agency.
Starcloud CEO Philip Johnston told CNBC that the company’s orbital data centers will have 10 times lower energy costs than terrestrial data centers.
“Anything you can do in a terrestrial data center, I’m expecting to be able to be done in space. And the reason we would do it is purely because of the constraints we’re facing on energy terrestrially,” Johnston said in an interview.
Johnston, who co-founded the startup in 2024, said Starcloud-1’s operation of Gemma is proof that space-based data centers can exist and operate a variety of AI models in the future, particularly those that require large compute clusters.
“This very powerful, very parameter dense model is living on our satellite,” Johnston said. “We can query, it and it will respond in the same way that when you query a chat from a database on Earth, it will give you a very sophisticated response. We can do that with our satellite.”
In a statement to CNBC, Google DeepMind product director Tris Warkentin said that “seeing Gemma run in the harsh environment of space is a testament to the flexibility and robustness of open models.”
In addition to Gemma, Starcloud was able to train NanoGPT, an LLM created by OpenAI founding member Andrej Karpathy, on the H100 chip using the complete works of Shakespeare. This led the model to speak in Shakespearean English.
Starcloud — a member of the Nvidia Inception program and graduate from Y Combinator and the Google for Startups Cloud AI Accelerator — plans to build a 5-gigawatt orbital data center with solar and cooling panels that measure roughly 4 kilometers in both width and height. A compute cluster of that gigawatt size would produce more power than the largest power plant in the U.S. and would be substantially smaller and cheaper than a terrestrial solar farm of the same capacity, according to Starcloud’s white paper.
These data centers in space would capture constant solar energy to power next-generation AI models, unhindered by the Earth’s day and night cycles and weather changes. Starcloud’s satellites should have a five-year lifespan given the expected lifetime of the Nvidia chips on its architecture, Johnston said.
Orbital data centers would have real-world commercial and military use cases. Already, Starcloud’s systems can enable real-time intelligence and, for example, spot the thermal signature of a wildfire the moment it ignites and immediately alert first responders, Johnston said.
“We’ve linked in the telemetry of the satellite, so we linked in the vital signs that it’s drawing from the sensors — things like altitude, orientation, location, speed,” Johnston said. “You can ask it, ‘Where are you now?’ and it will say ‘I’m above Africa and in 20 minutes, I’ll be above the Middle East.’ And you could also say, ‘What does it feel like to be a satellite? And it will say, ‘It’s kind of a bit weird’ … It’ll give you an interesting answer that you could only have with a very high-powered model.”
Starcloud is working on customer workloads by running inference on satellite imagery from observation company Capella Space, which could help spot lifeboats from capsized vessels at sea and forest fires in a certain location. The company will include several Nvidia H100 chips and integrate Nvidia’s Blackwell platform onto its next satellite launch in October 2026 to offer greater AI performance. The satellite launching next year will feature a module running a cloud platform from cloud infrastructure startup Crusoe, allowing customers to deploy and operate AI workloads from space.
“Running advanced AI from space solves the critical bottlenecks facing data centers on Earth,” Johnston told CNBC.
“Orbital compute offers a way forward that respects both technological ambition and environmental responsibility. When Starcloud-1 looked down, it saw a world of blue and green. Our responsibility is to keep it that way,” he added.
The risks
Risks in operating orbital data centers remain, however. Analysts from Morgan Stanley have noted that orbital data centers could face hurdles such as harsh radiation, difficulty of in-orbit maintenance, debris hazards and regulatory issues tied to data governance and space traffic.
Still, tech giants are pursuing orbital data centers given the prospect of nearly limitless solar energy and greater, gigawatt-sized operations in space.
Along with Starcloud and Nvidia’s efforts, several companies have announced space-based data center missions. On Nov. 4, Google unveiled a “moonshot” initiative titled Project Suncatcher, which aims to put solar-powered satellites into space with Google’s tensor processing units. Privately-owned Lonestar Data Holdings is working to put the first-ever commercial lunar data center on the moon’s surface.
Referring to Starcloud’s launch in early November, Nvidia senior director of AI infrastructure Dion Harris said: “From one small data center, we’ve taken a giant leap toward a future where orbital computing harnesses the infinite power of the sun.”
Investors are betting there’s room for another startup using artificial intelligence to help software engineers write code faster. The difference with Kilo Code is it counts former GitLab CEO Sid Sijbrandij among its founders.
On Wednesday, Kilo Code announced $8 million in seed funding, with backing from Breakers, Cota Capital, General Catalyst, Quiet Capital and Tokyo Black.
Sijbrandij is a self-taught developer who helped popularize GitLab’s tools for source code collaboration, deployment and testing. GitLab went public in 2021 and is valued at more than $6 billion. Sijbrandij stepped down as CEO last year to focus on cancer treatment but continued as board chair.
Since then, the technology industry has become obsessed with having large language models write and update software, a practice commonly known in Silicon Valley as vibe coding.
OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy is credited with coining the term in February. OpenAI looked at buying AI coding startup Windsurf for around $3 billion, but scrapped the plan before Google hired senior Windsurf employees in a $2.4 billion transaction in July. Rival Cursor announced a $2.3 billion funding round in November at a $29.3 billion valuation.
Sijbrandij witnessed the action and became fascinated by what AI could do for software development. In September, an acquaintance introduced him to Scott Breitenother, who started and later sold consultancy Brooklyn Data.
“I thought we were just kind of having a meet and greet, and then 25 minutes in, Sid’s like, ‘Hey, can you start next week?'” Breitenother said.
Sijbrandij contributed early capital for the startup, which now employs about 34 people across continents. Breitenother is in charge, but he talks with Sijbrandij many times a day.
Kilo Code’s software plugs in to coding applications such as Cursor and Microsoft’s Visual Studio Code. It’s the most widely used service for startup OpenRouter’s application programming interface that gives developers access to a variety of AI models, including Grok Code Fast 1 from Elon Musk’s xAI. Kilo Code has processed more than 3 trillion tokens in the past month, according to OpenRouter. A single token represents about three-quarters of a word.
Daniël Langezaal, a software engineer at Dutch e-commerce startup Plug&Pay, said he has used Kilo Code for months after trying products from Anthropic, Cursor and Microsoft, among others. He said he appreciates Kilo Code’s support for both premium and affordable models, and he likes that people publicly contribute to the Kilo Code extension under an open-source license.
Langezaal has spread the word. About 80% of Plug&Pay’s developers now use Kilo Code, he said. It helped save time for one teammate who recently assembled a complex SQL query.
“With Kilo, it took him a day,” Langezaal said. “If he didn’t have access to Kilo, it would have taken him a few days to implement.”
GitLab, which has been testing a platform for AI agents to perform tasks, is paying attention, and was interested in what Kilo was building.
“I talked to the board,” Sijbrandij said. “We ended up deciding to do it outside of GitLab.”
GitLab included reference to Kilo in a filing last month. The company said that it paid Kilo $1,000 in exchange for a right of first refusal for 10 business days should the startup receive an acquisition proposal before August 2026.
The market is rapidly evolving. Design software company Figma and a slew of startups now offer vibe coding options for less technical people. It’s a category Kilo Code won’t be ignoring for much longer.
“We also want to be the place for people just getting started with code,” Sijbrandij said. “We are working on an app builder that’s more like the Lovable or Bolt experience,” he said, referring to two popular startups.