Why California is shutting down its last nuclear plant

Published

3 years ago

October 2, 2021

admin

Aerial view of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant which sits on the edge of the Pacific Ocean at Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County, California on March 17, 2011.

Mark Ralston | AFP | Getty Images

California is not keeping up with the energy demands of its residents.

In August 2020, hundreds of thousands of California residents experienced rolling electricity blackouts during a heat wave that maxed out the state’s energy grid.

The California Independent System Operator issues flex alerts asking consumers to cut back on electricity usage and move electricity usage to off-peak hours, typically after 9 p.m. There were 5 flex alerts issued in 2020 and there have been 8 in 2021, according to CAISO records.

On Friday, Sept. 10, the U.S. Department of Energy granted the state an emergency order to allow natural gas power plants to operate without pollution restrictions so that California can meet its energy obligations. The order is in effect until Nov. 9.

At the same time, the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, owned by Pacific Gas and Electric and located near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County, is in the middle of a decade-long decommissioning process that will take the state’s last nuclear power plant offline. The regulatory licenses for reactor Unit 1 and Unit 2, which commenced operation in 1984 and 1985 will expire in November 2024 and August 2025, respectively.

Diablo Canyon is the state’s only operating nuclear power plant; three others are in various stages of being decommissioned. The plant provides about 9% of California’s power, according to the California Energy Commission, compared with 37% from natural gas, 33% from renewables, 13.5% from hydropower, and 3% from coal.

Nuclear power is clean energy, meaning that the generation of power does not emit any greenhouse gas emissions, which cause global warming and climate change. Constructing a new power plant does result in carbon emissions, but operating a plant that is already built does not.

California is a strong advocate of clean energy. In 2018, the state passed a law requiring the state to operate with 100% zero-carbon electricity by 2045.

The picture is confusing: California is closing its last operating nuclear power plant, which is a source of clean power, as it faces an energy emergency and a mandate to eliminate carbon emissions.

Why?

The explanations vary depending on which of the stakeholders you ask. But underlying the statewide diplomatic chess is a deeply held anti-nuclear agenda in the state.

“The politics against nuclear power in California are more powerful and organized than the politics in favor of a climate policy,” David Victor, professor of innovation and public policy at the School of Global Policy and Strategy at UC San Diego, told CNBC.

Earthquake country

Diablo is located near several fault lines, cracks in the earth’s crust that are potential locations for earthquakes.

Concerns about nuclear plants and earthquakes grew after the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan. On March 11, 2011, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake struck Japan, causing a 45-foot-high tsunami. Cooling systems failed and the plant released radioactive material in the area.

In July 2013, the then on-site Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspector for Diablo Canyon, Michael Peck, issued a report questioning whether the nuclear power plant should be shuttered while further investigation was done on fault lines near the plant. The confidential report was obtained and published by the Associated Press, and resulted in an extensive review process.

The Hosgri fault line, located about 3 miles away from Diablo Canyon, was discovered in the 1970s when construction was in early stages and the NRC was able to make changes to the research and construction plans. Peck’s filing brought attention to another collection of nearby fault lines — the Shoreline, Los Osos and San Luis Bay.

All of these discussions of safety are set against a backdrop of shifting sentiment about nuclear energy in the United States.

“Since Three Mile Island and then Chernobyl there has been a political swing against nuclear—since the late 1970s,” Victor told CNBC. “Analysts call this ‘dread risk’ — a risk that some people assign to a technology merely because it exists. When people have a ‘dread’ mental model of risk it doesn’t really matter what kind of objective analysis shows safety level. People fear it.”

SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA -JUNE 30: Anti nuclear supporters at Diablo Canyon anti-nuclear protest, June 30, 1979 in San Luis Obispo, California. (Photo by Getty Images/Bob Riha, Jr.)

Bob Riha Jr | Archive Photos | Getty Images

For citizens who live nearby, the fear is tangible.

“I’ve basically grown up here. I’ve been here all my adult life,” Heidi Harmon, the most recent mayor of San Luis Obispo, told CNBC.

“I have adult kids now, but especially after 9/11, my daughter, who was quite young then, was terrified of Diablo Canyon and became essentially obsessed and very anxious knowing that there was this potential security threat right here,” Harmon told CNBC.

In San Luis Obispo County, a network of loud sirens called the Early Warning System Sirens is in place to warn nearby residents if something bad is happening at the nuclear power plant. Those sirens are tested regularly, and hearing them is unsettling.

“That is a very clear reminder that we are living in the midst of a potentially incredibly dangerous nuclear power plant in which we will bear the burden of that nuclear waste for the rest of our lives,” Harmon says.

Also, Harmon doesn’t trust PG&E, the owner of Diablo Canyon, which has a spotted history. In 2019, the utility reached a $13.5 billion settlement to resolve legal claims that its equipment had caused various fires around the state, and in August 2020 it pleaded guilty to 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter stemming from a fire caused by a power line it had failed to repair.

“I know that PG&E does its level best to create safety at that plant,” Harmon told CNBC. “But we also see across the state, the lack of responsibility, and that has led to people’s deaths in other areas, especially with lines and fires,” she said.

Heidi Harmon, former mayor of San Luis Obispo

Photo courtesy Heidi Harmon

While living in the shadow of Diablo Canyon is scary, she is also well aware of the dangers of climate change.

“I’ve got an adult kid who was texting me in the middle of the night asking me if this is the apocalypse after the IPCC report came out, asking me if I have hope, asking me if it’s going to be okay. And I cannot tell my kid that it’s going to be okay, anymore,” Harmon told CNBC.

But PG&E is adamant that the plant is not shutting down because of safety concerns.

The utility has a team of geoscience professionals, the Long Term Seismic Program, who partner with independent seismic experts to ensure the facility remains safe, Suzanne Hosn, a spokesperson for PG&E, told CNBC.

The main entrance into the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power plant in San Luis Obispo, Calif., as seen on Tues. March 31, 2015.

Michael Macor | San Francisco Chronicle | Hearst Newspapers via Getty Images

“The seismic region around Diablo Canyon is one of the most studied and understood areas in the nation,” Hosn said. ”The NRC’s oversight includes the ongoing assessment of Diablo Canyon’s seismic design, and the potential strength of nearby faults. The NRC continues to find the plant remains seismically safe.”

A former technical executive who helped operate the plant also vouched for its safety.

“The Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant is an incredible, marvel of technology, and has provided clean, affordable and reliable power to Californians for almost four decades with the capability to do it for another four decades,” Ed Halpin, who was the Chief Nuclear Officer of PG&E from 2012 until he retied in 2017, told CNBC.

“Diablo can run for 80 years,” Halpin told CNBC. “Its life is being cut short by at least 20 years and with a second license extension 40 years, or four decades.”

Local power-buying groups don’t want nuclear

PG&E offered a very different reason for closing Diablo Canyon when it set the wheels in motion in 2016.

According to legal documents PG&E submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission, the utility anticipated lower demand — not for energy in general, but for nuclear energy specifically.

One reason is a growing number of California residents buying power through local energy purchasing groups called community choice aggregators, the 2016 legal documents say. Many of those organizations simply refuse to buy nuclear.

There are 23 local CCAs in California serving more than 11 million customers. In 2010, less than 1% of California’s population had access to a CCA, according to a UCLA analysis published in October. That’s up to more than 30%, the report said.

The Redwood Coast Energy Authority, a CCA serving Humboldt County, strongly prefers renewable energy sources over nuclear, Executive Director Matthew Marshall told CNBC.

“Nuclear power is more expensive, it generates toxic waste that will persist and need to be stored for generations, and the facilities pose community and environmental risks associated with the potential for catastrophic accidents resulting from a natural disaster, equipment failure, human error, or terrorism,” said Marshall, who’s also the president of the trade association for all CCAs in California.

Consequently, the Redwood Coast Energy Authority has refused all power from Diablo Canyon.

There are financial factors at play, too. CCAs that have refused nuclear power stand to benefit financially when Diablo shuts down. That’s because they are currently paying a Power Charge Indifference Adjustmentfee for energy resources that were in the PG&E portfolio for the region before it switched over to a CCA. Once Diablo is gone, that fee will be reduced.

Meanwhile, CCAs are aggressively investing in renewable energy construction. Another CCA in California, Central Coast Community Energy, which also decided not to buy nuclear power from Diablo Canyon, has instead invested in new forms of energy.

PALM SPRINGS, CA – MARCH 27: Giant wind turbines are powered by strong winds in front of solar panels on March 27, 2013 in Palm Springs, California. According to reports, California continues to lead the nation in green technology and has the lowest greenhouse gas emissions per capita, even with a growing economy and population. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)

Kevork Djansezian | Getty Images News | Getty Images

“As part of its energy portfolio in addition to solar and wind, CCCE is contracting for two baseload (available 24/7) geothermal projects and large scale battery storage which makes abundant daytime renewable energy dispatchable (available) during the peak evening hours,” said the organization’s CEO, Tom Habashi.

Technically, California’s 2018 clean energy law requires 60% of that zero-carbon energy come from renewables like wind and solar, and leaves room open for the remaining 40% to come from a variety of clean sources. But functionally, “other policies in California basically exclude new nuclear,” Victor told CNBC.

The utility can’t afford to ignore the local political will.

“In a regulated utility, the most important relationship you have is with your regulator. And so it’s the way the politics gets expressed,” Victor told CNBC. “It’s not like Facebook, where the company has protesters on the street, people are angry at it, but then it just continues doing what it was doing because it’s got shareholders and it’s making a ton of money. These are highly regulated firms. And so they’re much more exposed to politics of the state than you would think of as a normal firm.”

Cost uncertainty and momentum

Apart from declining demand for nuclear power, PG&E’s 2016 report also noted California’s state-wide focus on renewables, like wind and solar.

As the percentage of renewables continues to climb, PG&E reasoned, California will collect most of its energy when the sun shines, flooding the electricity grid with surges of power cyclically. At the times when the electricity grid is being turbocharged by solar power, the constant fixed supply of nuclear energy will actually become a financial handicap.

When California generates so much energy that it maxes out its grid capacity, prices of electricity become negative — utilities essentially have to pay other states to take that energy, but are willing to do so because it’s often cheaper than bringing energy plants offline. Although the state is facing well-publicized energy shortages now, that wasn’t the case in 2016.

PG&E also cited the cost to continue operating Diablo, including compliance with environmental laws in the state. For example, the plant was has a system called “once-through cooling,” which uses water from the Pacific Ocean to cool down its reactors. That means it has to pump warmed ocean water back out to the coastal waters near Diablo, which alarms local environmental groups.

Finally, once the wheels are in motion to shut a nuclear plant down, it’s expensive and complicated process to reverse.

Diablo was set on the path to be decommissioned in 2016 and will operate until 2025. Then, the fuel has to be removed from the site.

“For a plant that has been operational, deconstruction can’t really begin until the fuel is removed from the reactor and the pools, which takes a couple years at least,” Victor told CNBC. Only then can deconstruction begin.

Usually, it takes about a decade to bring a nuclear plant offline, Victor told CNBC, although that time is coming down.

“Dismantling a nuclear plant safely is almost as hard and as expensive as building one because the plant was designed to be indestructible,” he said.

Politics favor renewables

All of these factors combine with a political climate that is almost entirely focused on renewables.

In addition to his academic roles, Victor chairs the volunteer panel that is helping to oversee and steward the closing of another nuclear power plant in California at San Onofre. There, an expensive repair would have been necessary to renew the plant’s operating license, he said.

Kern County, CA – March 23: LADWPs Pine Tree Wind Farm and Solar Power Plant in the Tehachapi Mountains Tehachapi Mountains on Tuesday, March 23, 2021 in Kern County, CA.(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Irfan Khan | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

“The situation of Diablo is in some sense more tragic, because in Diablo you have a plant that’s operating well,” Victor said. “A lot of increasingly politically powerful groups in California believe that [addressing climate change] can be done mainly or exclusively with renewable power. And there’s no real place for nuclear in that kind of world.”

The pro-nuclear constituents are still trying. For example, Californians for Green Nuclear Power is an advocacy organization working to promote Diablo Canyon to stay open, as is Mothers for Nuclear.

“It’s frustrating. It’s something that I’ve spent well in excess of 10,000 hours on this project pro bono,” said Gene Nelson, the legal assistant for the independent nonprofit Californians for Green Nuclear Power.

“But it’s so important to our future as a species — that’s why I’m making this investment. And we have other people that are making comparable investments of time, some at the legal level, and some in working on other policies,” Nelson said.

Even if California can eventually build enough renewables to meet the energy demands of the state, there are still unknowns, Victor said.

“The problem in the grid is not just the total volume of electricity that matters. It’s exactly when the power is available, and whether the power can be turned on and off exactly as needed to keep the grid stabilized,” he told CNBC. “And there, we don’t know.”

“It might be expensive. It might be difficult. It might be that we miss our targets,” Victor told CNBC. “Nobody really knows.”

For now, as California works to ramp up its renewable energy resources, it will depend on its ability to import power, said Mark Z. Jacobson, a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford. Historically, the state has imported hydropower from the Pacific Northwest and Canada, and other sources of power from across the West.

“California will be increasing renewable energy every year from now on,” Jacobson told CNBC. “Given California’s ability to import from out of state, there should not be shortfalls during the buildout.”

Environment

Is your state at risk? These 15 states face huge job losses if the IRA is repealed

Published

41 mins ago

April 1, 2025

admin

Is your state at risk? These 15 states face huge job losses if the IRA is repealed

The repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) would wipe out thousands of US jobs, especially in the booming EV and battery manufacturing sectors, according to a new report from the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT).

IRA job creation is at stake

Since the IRA’s passage in 2022, the ICCT writes that automakers and battery manufacturers have committed around $125 billion to US-based projects, creating hundreds of thousands of American jobs. (The BlueGreen Alliance’s EV Jobs Hub puts announced EV investment even higher, at $212.5 billion.)

The ICCT’s new study, “How the Inflation Reduction Act is driving US job growth across the electric vehicle industry,” projects that the IRA would drive a net creation of more than 118,000 new direct jobs across the US EV, battery, and charging industries from 2026 to 2030.

However, if key provisions of the IRA are rolled back, up to 130,000 direct manufacturing jobs would be lost by 2030. An IRA repeal would cause direct job losses of about 30,600 in vehicle production, 85,000 in battery manufacturing, and 14,200 in charging infrastructure.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Moreover, another 310,000 indirectly connected jobs could vanish by 2030. Stephanie Searle, chief program officer at ICCT, said, “These job losses would cascade throughout the economy, affecting not just autoworkers but also employees in mineral processing, retail, hospitality, and others dependent on a strong manufacturing base.”

According to ICCT’s analysis, states that have become hubs for EV and battery production – like Michigan, Texas, and Tennessee – face the most significant losses. Michigan alone can lose nearly 16,000 jobs, with Texas and Tennessee potentially shedding around 13,000 jobs. The ripple effects would extend beyond factories, impacting retail, hospitality, and mineral processing businesses.

This alarming outlook comes as US policymakers plan to impose a new 25% tariff on imported vehicles to bring manufacturing jobs back home. However, ICCT’s study demonstrates that Joe Biden’s signature policy has already achieved a domestic manufacturing boom and job creation.

“Most of the job losses associated with IRA repeal are in the Midwest and southern states, where significant EV and battery investments have been announced,” noted Peter Slowik, co-author of the report. “The 15 states where we project the greatest number of jobs at risk are Michigan, Texas, Tennessee, Nevada, California, Kentucky, Georgia, Ohio, Indiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Illinois, Arizona, New York, and Alabama.”

Electrek’s Take

The current administration claims to want to create domestic manufacturing and jobs. It just wants to do it with the stick (tariffs) instead of the carrot (IRA tax credits). The thing is, the carrot is already working. Investors have already said they will pull out without incentives. The stick is going to beat the EV and battery industry to death, and some states are going to suffer a lot more than others. The irony is, some of those states are the biggest supporters of the Trump administration’s policies.

To limit power outages and make your home more resilient, consider going solar with a battery storage system. In order to find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and you share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –trusted affiliate link*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Environment

Ford Mustang Mach-E is off to a hot start in 2025: Here’s how it stacks up against other top EVs

Published

2 hours ago

April 1, 2025

admin

Ford Mustang Mach-E is off to a hot start in 2025: Here's how it stacks up against other top EVs

The electric SUV is off to a record start in 2025, but was it enough to outsell GM’s Chevy Equinox EV or the Honda Prologue? Here’s how Ford Mustang Mach-E sales stacked up against other top-selling EVs in the first quarter.

Ford Mustang Mach-E among the top-selling EVs in Q1

Ford EV sales jumped 11% in the first three months of 2025, reaching 22,550 units. While the Lightning electric pickup saw sales slide 7% in Q1, the Mustang Mach-E picked up the pace.

Despite “limited inventory,” the Mustang Mach-E is off to a record start with 11,607 models sold in Q1, up 21% from the prior year. The hot start was enough for Ford’s Mustang Mach-E to place among the top-selling EVs in the US.

Although GM remained the “number two seller of electric vehicles in the US” after EV sales nearly doubled to 31,887, the Mach-E outsold every GM EV model.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Chevy is now the fastest-growing EV brand in the US, thanks to the electric Equinox and Blazer SUVs rolling out. GM sold 10,329 Equinox and 6,187 Blazer EVs in the first quarter, contributing over 16,500 to GM’s EV sales combined.

	Q1 2025 sales	YOY change
Ford Mustang Mach-E	11,607	+21%
Chevy Equinox EV	10,329	N/A
Honda Prologue	9,561	N/A
Hyundai IONIQ 5	8,611	+25%
Volkswagen ID.4	7,663	+24%
Chevy Blazer EV	6,187	+934%
Toyota bZ4X	5,610	+203%

EV sales in the US by model Q1 2025

Outside of Tesla’s models, the Honda Prologue and Hyundai IONIQ 5 have been some of the best-selling EVs in the US.

The Honda Prologue had its best sales month of the year with 2,884 units sold in March. Through the first three months of 2025, Honda has sold 9,561 Prologues in the US, still behind the Mach-E.

Ford-Mach-E-top-selling-EVs — 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E (Source: Ford)

After introducing the upgraded 2025 model (now with up to 318 miles of range and a Tesla NACS charging port), Hyundai IONIQ 5 sales rose 26% in the first quarter, with 8,611 units sold.

Since Rivian does not provide a breakdown for R1S and R1T sales, we will have to wait for registration data to be released for a full comparison.

Ford said the 2025 model year Mustang Mach-Es are now in transit and will arrive on dealer lots by the end of the month.

Check back for more first-quarter EV sales numbers. We’ll update the list as more data is released.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Environment

JackRabbit XG Pro review: A faster, more powerful micro e-bike built for off-roading

Published

2 hours ago

April 1, 2025

admin

JackRabbit XG Pro review: A faster, more powerful micro e-bike built for off-roading

We recently covered the launch of the JackRabbit OG2 Pro and XG Pro electric bikes, which added more range and power to the existing micro e-bike lineup from JackRabbit. Having spent a few weeks testing the XG Pro myself, I can attest to just what that means from the perspective of someone with saddle time doing things you wouldn’t have thought possible on a micro e-bike.

To get a sense of what I mean, check out my video review of the JackRabbit XG Pro below.

Or keep reading for my full written thoughts on this fun, high-performance ride stuffed into the body of a much smaller-than-expected micromobility device.

JackRabbit XG Pro video review

[embedded content]

JackRabbit XG Pro tech specs

Motor: 749 geared rear hub motor
Top speed: 20 mph (32 km/h) – or faster 24 mph (39 km/h) in off-road mode
Range: 48 miles (77 km)
Battery: 720 Wh battery (2x 360Wh RangeBuster batteries)
Max load: 275 lb (125 kg)
Bike weight: 37 lb (16.7 kg)
Brakes: Front and rear mechanical disc brakes on 180 mm rotors
Wheels: 2.8×20″ off-road tires
Price: $2,249
Extras: Thumb throttle, 90-degree fold-flat rotatable handlebars (in high-rise format), foldout Mega Metal footpegs, bell, LCD display, kickstand, LED lights that run off the main batteries, plus plenty of optional accessories

What’s new and different?

Don’t forget to check out my article on the launch to see what makes this model so different from the original JackRabbit XG. But to summarize, the XG Pro gets a more powerful motor, larger brakes, high-rise handlebars, wider tires, faster top speed, bigger batteries, and just generally feels like a major upgrade in simply every way.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

A lot of those upgrades go a long way towards turning this into a highly competitive bike on more than just convenience. Now, the XG Pro competes on performance as well.

Previously, JackRabbit’s big claim to fame was that its bikes were more convenient. They were smaller and lighter while still offering 20 mph speeds, and that was the big advantage. However, you paid for it with limited range and lower power. Now, however, the JackRabbit XG has massively upgraded the range to over 48 miles (77 km) with the inclusion of not just one but two of JackRabbit’s RangeBuster big-boy batteries. These have nearly 2.5x the capacity of the standard airline-friendly batteries offered by JackRabbit and the resulting range is more than you’d find in many heavier e-bikes with similar battery capacities.

JackRabbit XG Pro: Seriously powerful and torquey

I don’t have a lot of hills to test when I do my riding in Florida, but I can say that the 749W motor will easily wheelie me if I’m not careful (no doubt aided by the short wheelbase), and so the torque is appreciable.

I can also tell you that I towed nearly 100 pounds (45 kg) of kayak and camping gear for around 10 miles, including up sandy berms that might not have been crazy steep but were a serious test of the bike’s ability to climb an off-road grade at slower speeds (i.e. without the benefit of momentum).

So let’s just say that the power and torque are there, and you’re not going to struggle to climb a medium-sized hill.

At the same time, the small footprint and lightweight (for an e-bike) 37-lb design meant that I could strap it to my kayak and take it camping on an uninhabited island that is inaccessible by motorboat. That’s a whole other story, though. Maybe I should write a separate article on that adventure?

The 20 mph (32 km/h) top speed of the previous JackRabbit models also got a boost on the XG Pro up to 24 mph (39 km/h), though only in the new Off-Road Mode. To access this, you can’t simply pop into the display menu and choose the “More speed, please” option. You have to first reach out to JackRabbit and sign a waiver that also includes confirming that you are over 18 and pledge to only use the mode on true closed course, off-road scenarios. From there, you get access to the unlock, which is so convoluted that no one will ever discover it on accident. If you are explicitly told how to do so (which I’m not sure how it won’t eventually leak online), you wouldn’t be able to figure it out from mere button-mashing.

In unlocked mode, the JackRabbit XG Pro’s 24 mph top speed gives higher-performance riders more of what they are looking for, truly unleashing those 749 watts for peak performance.

How well does it ride?

There’s no suspension on the bike (unless you opt for the add-on suspension seat post), but you do get 2.8 inch tires that put more air volume between you and the road. That results in a better ride that isn’t as jarring as you’d expect on a small, non-suspension bike.

If you’re doing actual off-roading, which I highly recommend because of how fun it is on the JackRabbit XG Pro, then you’ll be rising out of the saddle anyway much of the time. In the same way that you drop the seat on the mountain bike because you won’t be using it much of the time anyway, you stand on the pegs and let your bent legs serve as suspension when you approach bigger obstacles.

With the knobbier off-road tires, you also get better grip, though the little bike wants to turn so hard that I am still worried about losing it in a few corners on loose gravel and sand. In my own testing, I covered plenty of different types of terrain, finding grassy fields to be my favorite place to ride the XG Pro. It did fine on gravel and sand too, but the looser terrain also had me feeling a bit squirrely, and the short wheelbase likely contributed to that. But back on grassy pasture to hold the loose soil together, I could fly around at nearly top speed and feel solid.

Who is the JackRabbit XG Pro for?

With its off-road credentials spoken for, I still think the XG Pro has plenty of room left for on-road riding. As a commuter, I can see the XG Pro being a fast, long-range option for a super convenient micromobility device. The included LED lights make it highly visible to other road users at night, and the small size means it can fold up and stow away in an office or apartment.

In fact, I really love the sideways-turning handlebars that spin 90-degrees for even more compact storage. With the bars turned and footpegs folded, the entire bike is a mere 7 inches (18 cm) wide, something you could never claim with an e-bike.

So in my opinion, the XG Pro is great for anyone who wants to enjoy the trails on the same bike they use to get to work or class, and doesn’t have the space in their life for anything bigger. You’ve got to enjoy looking different though, as it’s always going to be a unique and somewhat weird-looking ride compared to what most of us consider a ‘normal’ bike or scooter.

Is it an e-bike?

That brings me to a common question regarding all of the JackRabbits. Are they even truly e-bikes? By definition, probably not. JackRabbits don’t have pedals, instead opting for lighter and more compact foot pegs. That means that the JackRabbit is technically in the class of seated electric scooters.

However, the company refers to it as a micro e-bike, and I’m inclined to agree largely on the basis that it rides and feels like a bike, especially considering that most Americans use their throttles on their e-bikes almost all the time anyway. The pedals on most e-bikes these days are just glorified footrests that have the ability to spin, so JackRabbit basically said, “Enough with the charade,” and took away that rarely used ability.

The fixed footrests on the Jackrabbit remove the bicycle definition, but I can attest to the JackRabbit still feeling like a bike, even if you can’t pedal it. It leans into turns like a bike and feels like a bike when riding over obstacles because it uses a bike’s handlebars and wheels instead of the smaller scooter handlebars and wheels common among scooters.

So much like the Romeo and Juliet cliche, this is basically the rose by any other name situation. It still smells as sweet, and it still rides as good.

Is the JackRabbit XG Pro worth it?

I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again: If you’re looking for the best dollar-per-watt bargain, then move on. JackRabbit will never be the answer for you. These bikes cost a premium. The XG Pro is the new flagship model and is priced at an eye-watering US $2,249. The OG2’s $1,249 looks downright fiscally responsible by comparison.

But then again, JackRabbit isn’t trying to compete on price. Despite now matching other popular e-bikes on power, speed, and range, it will always be a more expensive alternative due to the company’s unique design that requires them to invest in building their own major components. They don’t benefit from off-the-shelf frames and batteries. Instead, they’ve invested the hard work in engineering new designs, not to mention paying for the tooling to make that happen. You can’t ask for innovation at the price of mediocrity.

For anyone on a budget, there are cheaper ways to get the same speed, power, and range. But there aren’t lighter ways to do it, or more convenient ways, or (in my opinion) cooler-looking ways. And that’s the whole point of JackRabbit. These bikes were originally designed as the perfect solution for college students getting around campus. And after many years and many new models, the company has grown into a fun solution for so many different types of people who share the same basic needs: a small yet potent e-bike-like vehicle for getting around without taking up too much space. Now, everyone from students to professionals ride them, and they’ve become a favorite among RVers, boat owners, private plane pilots, and anyone who needs a super-compact ride.

So in my opinion, the question of whether or not the JackRabbit XG Pro is worth it comes down to whether you want these capabilities in this form factor. You can find it for cheaper, but it’s not going to be as small or lightweight or slick. That’s the magic sauce at JackRabbit, and when you ride it, you damn well feel that magic.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.