The US has promised condolence payments to the relatives of 10 civilians killed in a drone strike in Afghanistan.
The victims, including seven children and an Afghan aid worker, were killed on 29 August in a strike the US said was aimed at a suicide bomber.
But Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said on Thursday that the 10 civilians were not a threat to US forces, who were in the process of withdrawing from the country at the time.
They were also not affiliated with the Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K) terrorist group.
It was not clear whether the condolence payments have actually been offered yet or how much money is being offered, but there is also work under way to help some of the relatives relocate to the US.
The strike killed Zemaray Ahmadi, a 36-year-old who worked for aid organisation Nutrition & Education International, along with his sons Zamir, Faisal and Farzad – aged 20, 16 and 12.
Six of his nieces and nephews were also said to have died: a boy and girl both aged two, girls aged five and seven, a six-year-old boy and a 28-year-old man.
More on Afghanistan
Related Topics:
Image: Two of the children killed in the drone strike on 29 August. Pics: AP
Mr Ahmadi had been driving a vehicle into the driveway of his family compound when it was struck by the Hellfire missile.
The US had initially defended the strike, saying it targeted an Islamic State “facilitator” and disrupted the group’s ability to carry out attacks.
But reports quickly showed that Mr Ahmadi had been a long-time worker at a US aid organisation and there were no signs of a secondary blast, despite the Pentagon claiming that the vehicle contained explosives.
Weeks after the deaths, Marine General Frank McKenzie, head of US Central Command, said innocent civilians had been killed in what he described as a “tragic mistake”.
Last month Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin had said: “We now know that there was no connection between Mr Ahmadi and ISIS-Khorasan, that his activities on that day were completely harmless and not at all related to the imminent threat we believed we faced.
“We apologise, and we will endeavour to learn from this horrible mistake.”
The issue of condolence payments was raised on Thursday in a meeting between Dr Colin Kahl, under secretary of defence for policy, and Dr Steven Kwon, founder and president of the charity which had employed Mr Ahmadi.
Mr Kirby said: “Dr Kahl reiterated Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin’s commitment to the families, including offering ex gratia condolence payments.”
He did not say how much money would be offered.
The drone strike followed a suicide bombing by ISIS-K which killed 169 Afghans and 13 US military personnel at Kabul’s airport in late August.
Donald Trump has denied posting an AI image of himself as pope – and said Catholics who were offended “can’t take a joke”.
A picture of the president wearing white and gold robes in the style of a pontiff was posted to his account on Truth Social and caused outcry among some Christians.
“I had nothing to do with it, somebody made a picture of me dressed like the Pope and they put it out on the internet,” he said on Monday.
“That’s not me that did it, I’ve got no idea where it came from, maybe it was AI.”
When it was pointed out to him that some Catholics were offended by the image, he replied: “Oh, they can’t take a joke.”
“The Catholics loved it,” he also claimed.
Image: Pic: Donald Trump/Truth Social
President Trump insisted that he first saw the image – which was posted on Friday night on his Truth Social account and later promoted by the White House on its official X account – on Sunday evening.
He also noted that first lady Melania Trump “thought it was cute”.
President Trump was not baptised as a Catholic and therefore is ineligible to be pope, neither is he allowed to participate in the conclave.
Some 133 cardinal electors – those under the age of 80 – will take part in the conclave and begin voting for the new pontiff on Wednesdayafter the death of Pope Francis last month.
The rituals of the event, held in the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican, are elaborate and date back centuries.
At Sony Production studios in Culver City, an area of Los Angeles steeped in the movie business, a steady stream of cars and lorries comes and goes through the security gate.
It occupies the MGM lot which dates back to 1924. Gone With the Wind, The Wizard of Oz and Citizen Kane were shot here and, more recently, Interstellar and The Dark Knight Rises. But this is no longer the beating heart of movie making.
In Tinsel Town the bright lights of the film industry have been fading for some time. Production in Hollywood has fallen by 40% in the last decade, sometimes moving to other states like New Mexico, New York and Georgia, but more often outside the US entirely.
A recent survey of film and TV executives indicates that Britain, Australia and Canada are now favoured locations over California when it comes to making movies.
San Andreas, a blockbuster film about a California earthquake, was shot in Australia. In America, a film about an Irish family settling in New York, was shot in Canada.
Image: Although about a California disaster, San Andreas was actually shot in Australia. Pic: Jasin Boland/THA/Shutterstock
The exodus of the film industry from Hollywood is mostly owing to economic reasons, with other countries boasting lower labour costs and more expansive tax incentives. But as productions have moved overseas, studios across Los Angeles are frequently empty and those who work behind the scenes are often out of work.
More on Tariffs
Related Topics:
President Trump has approached this problem with a familiar reaction – sweeping tariffs, a 100% tariff on all foreign made films coming into the USA.
‘It’s a different kind of situation than producing cars overseas’
Justine Bateman is a filmmaker and sister of actor Jason Bateman. She is glad Trump is looking for solutions but does not understand how the tariffs will work. “I will say, I’m very glad to hear that President Trump is interested in helping the film business. But part of the problem is we just don’t have very much detail, do we?,” she says.
“He’s made this big announcement, but we don’t have the detail to really mull over. He doesn’t even say whether it’s going to be films that are shown in the cinema or streaming movies, for example.
“Tariffs can be a profitable situation for when we’re just talking about hard goods, but something like a film and, particularly if you’ve got an American film that takes place in the south of France, you want to be in a particular location.
“So it’s a different kind of situation than producing cars overseas and bringing them back here.”
At the Hand Prop Room in Los Angeles, they supply props for TV and film. The warehouse is brimful of virtually any prop you could imagine, from portraits of former presidents, to replica handguns to African artefacts and 18th century teapots. The walls are decorated with posters from some of the productions they’ve supplied, including Babylon, Oppenheimer and Ghostbusters.
Image: Reynaldo Castillo believes the tariffs could be harmful to Hollywood unless properly thought through
‘It needs to be thought through’
In the past five years, the prop shop has been impacted by the COVID pandemic, by both the writers’ and actors’ strikes and the globalisation of the film industry. Business is at an all time low.
“It’s not helping when so many productions are not just leaving the state, but also leaving the country,” says Reynaldo Castillo, the general manager of the Hand Prop Room. “It’s Hollywood, we have the infrastructure that nobody else has and I think maybe to a certain point we took it for granted.
“I think we can all agree that we want more filming to stay in the country to help promote jobs. But you also don’t want to do something to hurt it.
“How does it work? Are there exceptions for X, Y, and Z? What about independent movies that have small budgets that are shot somewhere else that would destroy their ability to make something? It needs to be thought through and make sure it’s implemented the right way.”
Some of the world’s most famous names have arrived at the Met Gala in New York for what has become known as the biggest night in fashion.
Each year A-list celebrities provide plenty of talking points as they pose for the world’s press in outfits that are often as stylish as they are bizarre.
The annual event ushers in the spring exhibit for the Costume Institute at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, with this year’s theme of “Superfine: Tailoring Black Style” celebrating the style, politics and history of the way black men dress.
Diana Ross, Lewis Hamilton, Sabrina Carpenter and Alicia Keys are among the celebrities in attendance.
Here are some of the best outfits from the Met Gala 2025 so far.
Image: English actor Damson Idris arrived looking like a racing driver – complete with sparkling helmet. Pic: Reuters
Image: Idris, who is set to appear in upcoming movie “F1”, underwent a quick costume change with the help of two assistants. Pic: Reuters
Image: US singer Sabrina Carpenter. Pic: AP
Image: US actress Sydney Sweeney. Pic: Reuters
Image: American music royalty Diana Ross. Pic: AP
Image: White Lotus star Patrick Schwarzenegger. Pic: AP
Image: Hollywood actress Demi Moore. Pic: Reuters
Image: White Lotus star Walton Goggins. Pic: AP
Image: US model and actor Alton Mason. Pic: Reuters
Image: US singer Alicia Keys, left, and rapper Swizz Beatz. Pic: AP
Image: US rapper and singer Lizzo. Pic: Reuters
Image: English-Albanian pop star Dua Lipa. Pic: Reuters
Image: Norwegian billionaire Gustav Magnar Witzoe. Pic: AP
Image: British Formula 1 driver and Met Gala co-chair Lewis Hamilton. Pic: Reuters
Image: US rapper Megan Thee Stallion. Pic: Reuters
Image: US Olympic gymnast Simone Biles. Pic: Reuters
Image: US tennis legend Serena Williams. Pic: Reuters
Image: Kim Kardashian poses during the Met Gala. Pic: Reuters
Image: US singer and actress Janelle Monae with American film costume designer Paul Tazewell. Pic: Reuters
Image: Colombian singer Shakira at the Met Gala. Pic: Reuters