Scores of people have been killed after an oil tanker exploded near Sierra Leone’s capital, with the country’s president mourning the “horrendous loss of life”.
Local authorities and morgue officials told the Reuters news agency that 91 people had been killed in the incident near Freetown.
The government has yet to confirm the number of dead.
The explosion took place early on Saturday after a bus struck the tanker in Wellington, a suburb of the capital.
Police were at the scene to assist disaster management officials.
Advertisement
President Julius Maada Bio, who is in Glasgow for the COP26 climate talks, deplored the “horrendous loss of life”.
“My profound sympathies with families who have lost loved ones and those who have been maimed as a result,” he tweeted.
More from World
Victims included people who had flocked to collect fuel leaking from the ruptured vehicle, said Freetown Mayor Yvonne Aki-Sawyerr.
The mayor said the extent of the damage was not yet clear.
The head of the country’s National Disaster Management Agency, Brima Bureh Sesay, said: “We’ve got so many casualties, burnt corpses.
Widespread damage has been reported only hours after Hurricane Beryl first made landfall in the southeastern Caribbean.
Roofs were ripped off buildings, trees were uprooted and electricity lines brought crashing to the ground on several islands when the ferocious storm swept in earlier on Monday.
Winds of up to 150mph were reported in some areas, with schools, businesses, airports, and government offices forced to close. There were also warnings that power outages and water cuts were likely.
It comes following forecasts that the hurricane was likely to be “extremely dangerous“.
Officials say it is the earliest ever time of the year that a storm of Category 4 strength has formed in the Atlantic, fuelled by unusually warm waters.
The previous record was held by Hurricane Dennis, which reached the threshold on July 8 in 2005 and went on to kill scores of people in the region.
Grenada’s national disaster co-ordinator Terence Walters said he had already received “reports of devastation” from Carriacou and the surrounding islands.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:26
Satellite images show Hurricane Beryl heading towards the Caribbean
Grenada’s prime minister Dickon Mitchell said a hospital’s roof had been damaged, forcing the evacuation of patients to a lower floor.
He told reporters: “There is the likelihood of even greater damage. We have no choice but to continue to pray.”
Advertisement
NBC Radio in St Vincent and the Grenadines said it received reports of roofs being torn off churches and schools, with communication networks also collapsing.
SHARE WITH SKY NEWS
Have you been affected?
You can share your story, pictures or video with us using our app, private messaging or email.
Those living on nearby Caribbean islands are also bracing themselves for the hurricane’s coming onslaught.
Storm warnings are in place for St Lucia and Martinique, as well as parts of Haiti and the Dominican Republic. A hurricane watch has also been issued for Jamaica.
The US National Hurricane Center reiterated warnings that “this is an extremely dangerous and life-threatening situation”.
A spokesperson added: “Beryl is forecast to remain a significant hurricane during its entire trek across the Caribbean region”.
Image: Waves crash into a sea wall in Trinidad and Tobago on Monday as the hurricane approaches. Pic: Reuters
The last strong hurricane to hit the southeast Caribbean was Hurricane Ivan 20 years ago, which killed dozens of people in Grenada.
Scientists have said climate change has made more intense, and earlier, storms more likely.
Christopher Rozoff, from the United States’ National Center for Atmospheric Research, said: “Climate change is loading the dice for more intense hurricanes to form”.
The hurricane is expected to weaken slightly as it later travels over the Caribbean Sea just south of Jamaica, before heading towards Mexico as a Category 1 storm.
This is the story of how an obscure company based in an office block on a quiet street in Glasgow became an accessory in Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine. It is the story of how Europe and Russia remain locked in a tense relationship of economic dependence, even as they supposedly cut their ties. It is the story of the uncomfortable truth behind why the cost of living crisis came to an end.
But before all of that, it is the story of a ship – a very unusual ship indeed.
If you ever spot the Yakov Gakkel as it sails through the English Channel or the Irish Sea (I first set eyes on it in the Channel but at the time of writing it was sailing northwards, about 20 miles off the coast of Anglesey) you might not find it all that remarkable.
At first glance it looks like many of the other large, nondescript tankers and cargo vessels passing these shores. Its profile is dominated by an enormous blue prow which reaches high out of the water and ends, 50 metres further back, at its unexpectedly angular stern.
Yet the ship’s slightly odd shape – all hull and barely any deck – is the first clue about what makes the Yakov Gakkel so special. Because this is one of the world’s most advanced liquefied natural gas (LNG) tankers, with an unusual trick up its sleeve.
Image: The Yakov Gakkel tanker
LNG tankers are extraordinary ships, with insides so cleverly engineered they are capable of holding vast amounts of natural gas at temperatures of approximately −163C.
For all that the world is embracing renewable energy, natural gas remains one of the most important energy sources, essential for much of Europe’s heating and power, not to mention its industries. For the time being, there is no cheap way of making many industrial products, from glass and paper to critical chemicals and fertilisers, without gas.
Once upon a time, moving natural gas from one part of the world to another necessitated sending it down long, expensive, vulnerable pipelines, meaning only countries with a physical connection to gas producers could receive this vital fuel. But LNG tankers like the Yakov Gakkel are part of the answer to this problem, since they allow gas producers to send it by sea to anywhere with a terminal capable of turning their supercooled methane back into the gas we use to heat our homes and power our grids.
Image: Politicians in Europe promised to end the continent’s reliance on Russian gas
But the Yakov Gakkel can also do something most other LNG tankers cannot, for that enormous blue double hull allows it to carve through ice, enabling it to travel up into the Arctic Circle and back even in the depths of winter.
Advertisement
And that is precisely what this ship does, more or less constantly: travelling back and forth between Siberia and Europe, through winter and summer, bringing copious volumes of gas from Russia to Europe. It is part of the explanation for how Europe never ran out of gas, even after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
This is not, it’s worth saying, the conventional wisdom. Back when Russia invaded Ukraine, European policymakers declared they planned to eliminate the continent’s reliance on Russian gas – which accounted for roughly a third of their supplies before 2022.
And many assumed that had already happened – especially after the Nord Stream pipeline, the single biggest source of European gas imports, was sabotaged in late 2022. But while volumes of Russian pipeline gas into Europe have dropped dramatically, the amount of Russian LNG coming into Europe has risen to record levels.
Image: LNG tankers sail between Siberia and various ports in Europe, including Zeebrugge
Russia helps Europe replenish gas stores
Today, Europe still depends on Russia for around 15% of its gas, an ever-growing proportion of which now comes in via the sealanes, on tankers like the Yakov Gakkel. And while the US has stepped in to make up some of the volumes lost when those pipelines stopped, only last month Russia overtook the US to become the second biggest provider of gas to the continent. It’s further evidence that those LNG volumes carried on ships through the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the English Channel, are increasing, rather than falling.
This Russian gas has helped Europe replenish its gas stores, it has helped keep the continent’s heavy industry going throughout the Ukraine war. And this dependence has not come cheap: the total amount Europe has paid Russia for LNG since 2022 comes to around €10bn.
The continued presence of Russian gas running through European grids is at least part of the explanation for why European energy prices have fallen so sharply since those post-invasion highs. Back then, many in the market were pricing in a complete end of Russian gas supply to Europe – something that would have had disastrous consequences. But it never actually happened.
Perhaps this explains why the continent’s politicians have, so far, stopped short of banning imports of Russian gas: they are aware that their economy would struggle to withstand another sharp spike in inflation – which would almost certainly eventuate if it stopped taking Russian gas altogether.
Image: Russian gas has helped keep Europe’s heavy industry going throughout the Ukraine war
This week, European leaders agreed to stop allowing Russia to use its ports to “trans-ship” its LNG – essentially acting as a stop-off point towards other destinations. However, those transshipments account for only a fraction – at most a quarter – of the Russian gas coming in on tankers to Europe. The vast majority ends up in Belgium, France and Spain, heating European homes, fuelling power stations and powering machinery in factories.
While European leaders have imposed wide-ranging sanctions and price caps on shipments of oil, no such controls exist for liquefied natural gas. So the Yakov Gakkel and a fleet of LNG tankers carry on sailing between Siberia and various ports in Europe – Zeebrugge, Dunkirk, Montoir and Bilbao – keeping the continent supplied with the Russian hydrocarbons it still cannot live without.
British firm’s role in lucrative trade
But there is another reason why this ship is particularly unique, for the Yakov Gakkel – this critical cog in the financial machine that helps finance the Russian regime – is actually part-owned and operated by a British company.
That brings us back to a street overlooking the Clyde in Glasgow, where, in a glass-fronted office block, you will find the operational headquarters of a company called Seapeak. The chances are you haven’t heard of Seapeak before, but this business owns and operates a fleet of LNG tankers all across the world.
That fleet includes the Yakov Gakkel and four other LNG icebreakers that ply this Siberian trade. That a British company might be facilitating this lucrative trade for Russia might come as a surprise, but there is nothing illegal about this: the sanctions regime on Russia just turns out to be significantly more porous than you might have thought.
We tried repeatedly to speak to Seapeak – to ask them about the Yakov Gakkel and whether they felt it was appropriate – given the UK has forsworn LNG imports – that a British company and British workers are helping administer this Russian trade. We sent emails with questions. However, they did not respond to our calls or our emails.
Image: A security guard at Seapeak’s offices in Glasgow said no one was available to speak to Sky News
When, after weeks of efforts to get a response, I visited their offices in Glasgow, I was met by a security guard who told me Seapeak would not see me without an appointment (which they were refusing to give me). Eventually I was told that if I would not leave they would call the police.
Image: The Vladimir Rusanov off the coast of Zeebrugge
Seapeak is not the only British company helping keep Russian gas flowing. While British insurers are banned from protecting oil tankers carrying Russian crude, there’s no equivalent sanction on Russian LNG ships, with the upshot that many of these tankers are insured by British companies operating out of the Square Mile.
We spent some time tracking another icebreaking tanker, the Vladimir Rusanov, as it approached Zeebrugge. It is insured by the UK P&I Club, which also insures a number of other LNG carriers.
Image: Sky’s Ed Conway gets up close to the Vladimir Rusanov tanker off the coast of Zeebrugge
In a statement, it said: “The UK Club takes great care to observe all applicable sanctions regulations in relation to Russian energy cargoes, but the direct carriage of LNG from Yamal to Zeebrugge, and provision of insurance services for such carriage, is not presently sanctioned. If the EU and G7 nations were to change their policy… the Club would of course comply by adjusting or withdrawing its services, as necessary.”
The transport of Russian gas into Europe – its dependence on British operators and insurers – is only one small example of the loopholes and omissions in the UK sanctions regime. But while government ministers have expressed concern about the effectiveness of the broader sanctions regime, there is still scant evidence they intend to tighten up this corner of it.
Before the election was called the Treasury Select Committee was in the middle of collecting evidence for its own inquiry into the regime, which was expected to focus on insurers of vessels taking Russian goods. However, the inquiry was wound up prematurely when the election was called in May.
In the meantime, ships like the Yakov Gakkel carry on taking billions of cubic metres of gas from the gas fields of Yamal in Siberia down to Europe, in exchange for billions of euros. And those and other hydrocarbon revenues are one of the main explanations for how Russia is able to produce more missiles and weapons than the Ukrainians.
So Europe carries on fuelling its industry and its power and heating grids with molecules of gas coming from Siberian gasfields, while assuring itself it’s doing everything it can to fight Vladimir Putin.
It is, in short, a discomforting situation. But given the alternative is to induce another cost of living crisis, there is little appetite in Europe to change things.
The US Supreme Court has sent Donald Trump’s claim he is immune from prosecution for his actions while president back to a lower court.
Trump faces prosecution over his role in the deadly 6 January riots in 2021 at the Capitol in Washington DC, after he encouraged his supporters to gather at Congress to oppose the approval of Joe Biden’s 2020 election win; and alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election result.
The former president had been charged with conspiracy to defraud the US, conspiring against the right of Americans to vote and corruptly obstructing an official proceeding and conspiring to do so.
In a historic 6-3 ruling, the justices said for the first time that former presidents have absolute immunity from prosecution for their official acts, but no immunity for unofficial acts.
But instead of deciding for themselves, the justices ordered lower courts to work out precisely how to apply their decision to Trump’s case.
The lower court must now decide whether he was acting officially or privately.
Shortly after the decision was released Trump posted on his social media network: “BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY. PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!”
‘The president is now king above law’
The three liberal justices all dissented from the majority opinion.
Advertisement
One of them, Sonia Sotomayor, wrote: “Today’s decision to grant former presidents criminal immunity reshapes the institution of the presidency. It makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our constitution and system of government, that no man is above the law.”
Ms Sotomayor added: “In every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law.” She concluded: “With fear for our democracy, I dissent.”
Former attorney general Eric Holder said the decision was “absurd and dangerous”, tweeting: “Our democracy has been gravely wounded.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:58
Biden v Trump: What you need to know
Slow handling of case favours Trump
Trump’s legal team had argued he was immune from prosecution as he was serving as president when he took the actions leading to the charges.
Special Counsel Jack Smith, who brought the charges in August last year, has opposed presidential immunity from prosecution based on the principle no one is above the law.
A trial had been scheduled to start on 4 March, before the delays over the immunity issue. Now no trial date is set.
The Supreme Court’s decision adds further delays, and if Trump becomes president again in November he may be able to use his powers to dismiss the charges against him.
The court’s slow handling of the case has already helped Trump by making it unlikely any trial on these charges could be completed before the election on 5 November.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to the charges. He still faces three other indictments.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Mr Smith is leading two federal probes into the former president, both of which have led to criminal charges.
The Washington case focuses on Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, while a case in Florida revolves around the mishandling of classified documents. A further case in Georgia also revolves around Trump’s actions after his defeat in 2020.
Trump has said the cases against him are politically motivated attempts to keep him from returning to the White House.
Trump, 78, became the first former president to be convicted of a felony in May.
He was found guilty of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment made during the 2016 presidential election to porn star Stormy Daniels, who says she had sex with him – a claim he denies.