Connect with us

Published

on

Members of the environmental group MilieuDefensie celebrate the verdict of the Dutch environmental organisation’s case against Royal Dutch Shell Plc, outside the Palace of Justice courthouse in The Hague, Netherlands, on Wednesday, May 26, 2021. Shell was ordered by a Dutch court to slash its emissions harder and faster than planned, dealing a blow to the oil giant that could have far reaching consequences for the rest of the global fossil fuel industry.
Peter Boer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

GLASGOW, Scotland — Financial institutions and individual board members could be the next targets of climate litigation cases, according to the campaigners who helped to secure a landmark courtroom victory against oil giant Royal Dutch Shell.

It comes at a time when countries are scrambling to reach consensus in the final days of the COP26 climate summit. Negotiators from 197 countries are taking part in discussions with the goal of keeping the all-important global target of 1.5 degrees Celsius alive.

There is not yet any clear indication of whether the talks will be able to meet the demands of the climate emergency.

“We have litigated against countries and been successful,” said Roger Cox, lawyer for Milieudefensie, an environmental campaign group and the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth. “Now we have shown that one can successfully litigate against fossil fuel corporations and I think that the next step is to start also litigating against financial institutions who make these emissions and fossil fuel projects possible.”

“I even think after that … board members of these large private institutions who continue to willingly frustrate achieving the Paris Agreement might even become liable in years to come under direct liability regulations,” Cox said on Tuesday.

His comments came as he spoke at The People’s Summit for Climate Justice, an event hosted by the COP26 Coalition on the sidelines of the U.N.-brokered talks in Glasgow, Scotland.

A Shell logo seen at a petrol station in London. A court in The Hague has ordered oil giant Shell to reduce its carbon emissions by 45% compared to 2019 levels by 2030, in what is widely seen as a landmark case.
SOPA Images | LightRocket | Getty Images

The Hague District Court on May. 26 ordered the Anglo-Dutch oil giant to reduce its global carbon emissions by 45% by the end of 2030, compared with 2019 levels. It also said Shell is responsible for its own carbon emissions and those of its suppliers, known as Scope 3 emissions.

The ruling marked the first time in history that a company had been legally obliged to align its policies with the Paris Agreement and reflected a watershed moment in the climate battle.

A Shell spokesperson at the time described the decision as “disappointing.” The company has since confirmed it will appeal the ruling.

‘No-one wants to go to court’

“I think there is a lot of pressure that can be generated from a legal perspective against the major public and private systemic players in climate change and the energy transition,” Cox said.

He cited young people rallying on the streets for climate action, activist shareholders trying to pressure board members to reduce emissions and a bombshell report from the International Energy Agency that said it sees “no need for investment in new fossil fuel supply” to achieve the Paris Agreement’s goals.

“That taken together gives us the best chance at this very moment to actually try to create this radical transformation that needs to happen over the next decade,” he added.

Roger Cox, environmental lawyer, in his office in Vrouwenheide, the Netherlands, on Friday, June 4, 2021. After four days of arguments, a court in The Hague accepted Cox’s line of reasoning, ruling that Royal Dutch Shell Plc must slash its greenhouse gas emissions 45% by 2030 compared to 2019 levels.
Peter Boer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

A report from a coalition of NGOs, published in March, found the world’s largest 60 banks had provided $3.8 trillion of financing for fossil fuel companies since the Paris accord was signed in 2015. The authors of the report described the findings as “shocking” and warned runaway funding for the extraction of fossil fuels and infrastructure threatened the lives of millions worldwide.

To be sure, burning fossil fuels is the chief driver of the climate emergency. Climate scientists have repeatedly stressed that the best weapon to tackle rising global temperatures is to cut greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible.

Nine de Pater, researcher and campaigner at Milieudefensie, said Tuesday that the campaign group initially sought to persuade Shell to take meaningful climate action with protests and direct talks with both the company and politicians.

“All of that didn’t make the difference that we needed,” de Pater said. “So, in the end, the last resort was this court case. It is not what you want to do, right? No one wants to go to court. It is not the most fun thing to do but it was really necessary to force Shell to go in a different direction and to make Shell stop causing dangerous climate change.”

“It is no longer possible for Shell to put profit over people — and that is historic. It is important because it is not just Shell, it is all companies now that really have to consider: ‘Am I putting profit over people?'”

A protester holds an ‘End Fossil Fuel Subsidies’ placard during the demonstration in the City of London.
Vuk Valcic | SOPA Images | LightRocket | Getty Images

On confirming its decision to appeal the court ruling in July, Shell CEO Ben van Beurden said the company agreed urgent climate action is needed “and we will accelerate our transition to net zero.”

“But we will appeal because a court judgment, against a single company, is not effective. What is needed is clear, ambitious policies that will drive fundamental change across the whole energy system. Climate change is a challenge that requires both urgent action and an approach that is global, collaborative and encourages coordination between all parties.”

‘Nothing to lose’

When asked what it would mean to see Shell successfully overturn the Dutch court ruling on appeal, Cox told CNBC: “That basically is the question that we had to ask ourselves before even starting climate litigation cases.”

Cox said he first reflected on what courtroom defeats would mean in 2012 when preparing the Urgenda Climate Case against the Dutch government. This landmark case, upheld by the Dutch Supreme Court in Dec. 2019, found the government had an obligation to immediately and significantly reduce emissions in line with human rights obligations.

“We basically felt at that time already there is nothing to lose. Either we win or we don’t, but we don’t think there is anything to lose if we lose a case,” Cox said. He added that there was a “moral obligation” to litigate and “to try to pierce through the status quo of short-term interest.”

“Obviously when you start a case like that, you always know that you might lose but when you lose, there is always something to learn for ourselves or other climate litigators that they can build upon,” Cox said. “So, you don’t stop going to the streets as youngsters, and we as adults do the same in a way, if it doesn’t immediately have an impact. You keep doing it until it has an impact.”

Continue Reading

Environment

Elon Musk slashes Tesla Robotaxi fleet goal from 500 to ~60 in Austin

Published

on

By

Elon Musk slashes Tesla Robotaxi fleet goal from 500 to ~60 in Austin

Elon Musk announced last night that Tesla is planning to “roughly double” its Robotaxi fleet in Austin next month. While an expansion of the pilot sounds positive on the surface, a look at the actual numbers reveals that Tesla is missing its own “end of year” target by a massive margin.

Just last month, Musk explicitly stated that Tesla aimed to have 500 Robotaxis in Austin by the end of the year. Now, “doubling” the current estimated fleet suggests the actual number will be closer to 60.

We have been closely tracking the rollout of the “Tesla Robotaxi” pilot in Austin, which launched back in June using Model Y vehicles.

Unlike the “Cybercab” unveiled in October, these vehicles are standard Model Ys equipped with Hardware 4, and critically, they are not driverless. They are part of a “supervised” pilot, meaning a Tesla employee sits in the front passenger seat (or driver’s seat for highway stints) to monitor the system with a finger on a killswitch ready to stop the car..  

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The service has been plagued by availability issues. As we reported recently, users in Austin are frequently met with “High Service Demand” messages, with wait times often exceeding 40 minutes. It’s not necessarily because there’s really “high demand”, but because Tesla’s ‘Robotaxi fleet” remains tiny.

In response to complaints about the service being “essentially unusable” due to lack of supply, Elon Musk took to X (formerly Twitter) late Tuesday to promise relief:

“The Tesla Robotaxi fleet in Austin should roughly double next month.”  

For those frustrated by the wait times, more cars are certainly welcome. But for investors and analysts tracking Tesla’s autonomous driving promises, this announcement serves as a confirmation of a significant missed deadline.

How many Tesla Robotaxis are in Austin?

To understand why “doubling” is actually a disappointment, we have to look at what Musk promised just a few weeks ago.

During his appearance on the All-In Podcast, which aired on October 31, 2025, Musk was explicitly asked about the scale of the fleet. His answer was unambiguous:

“We’re scaling up the number of cars to… probably we’ll have a thousand cars or more in the Bay Area by the end of this year, probably 500 or more in the greater Austin area.”  

Let’s do the math.

Based on observations from the Austin community and tracking of the vehicle VINs and plate numbers, the current Tesla Robotaxi fleet in Austin is estimated to be around 30 vehicles. In fact, 29 different Robotaxi license plates were spotted in Austin.

If Tesla “roughly doubles” that fleet in December, they will have approximately 60 vehicles on the road.

That is a far cry from the 500 that Musk projected just weeks ago. In fact, it represents a shortfall of nearly 90% against the target.

This massive miss in deployment targets is particularly ironic given Musk’s recent comments about competitors. When Waymo announced earlier this month that it had reached 2,500 active robotaxis across the US (with about 200 in Austin alone), Musk scoffed, calling them “Rookie numbers.”  

Yet, the data shows that Waymo currently operates a fleet in Austin that is roughly 3x to 4x larger than what Tesla hopes to have after its expansion next month. And unlike Tesla’s pilot, Waymo’s Austin fleet is operating fully driverless, without human chaperones in the front seat.  

Electrek’s Take

Another clear case of Elon Musk’s shifting the goalposts in Tesla’s autonomous driving programs, something we’ve unfortunately become accustomed to with Tesla’s autonomy timelines.

Musk said “500 cars by end of year” just a few weeks ago. It shows he is just saying numbers and nothing is grounded in reality.

Let’s be real about what this means. It means the “unsupervised” dream is still stuck in “supervised” reality. Scaling a fleet to 500 cars when you need 1,000+ human employees to drive them (staffing multiple shifts) is an HR nightmare, not a software update. The fact that they are only getting to ~60 tells me that the “supervised” requirement is the hard limit on their growth right now.

With 7 crashes in the first few months of operations, with supervisors preventing an unknown number of additional crashes, I don’t see Tesla removing them anytime soon.

Let me rephrase that. I don’t see Tesla safely removing the supervisors anytime soon.

As this whole operation appears to be more about optics than safety, I can see removing them before it’s ready.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

AI data center ‘frenzy’ is pushing up your electric bill — here’s why

Published

on

By

AI data center 'frenzy' is pushing up your electric bill — here's why

An aerial view of a 33 megawatt data center with closed-loop cooling system on October 20, 2025 in Vernon, California.

Mario Tama | Getty Images

The data centers that power the artificial intelligence revolution are driving up electricity prices for households — and price relief may not be coming anytime soon, according to energy experts.

Residential retail electricity prices in September were up 7.4%, to about 18 cents per kilowatt hour, according to the most recent data from the Energy Information Administration.

Electricity prices closely tracked inflation from 2013 to 2023, but will likely outpace inflation at least through 2026, according to an EIA forecast from May. Some regions will be hit harder than others, it said.

Energy experts and economists point to electricity-hungry data centers that underpin AI projects as a key reason for the price inflation.

These data centers are vast warehouses of computer servers and other IT equipment that power cloud computing, artificial intelligence and other tech applications.

Read more CNBC personal finance coverage

The basic reason for rising prices: Electricity demand — including actual and forecasted demand — is outstripping new supply.

Data centers are expected to consume anywhere from 6.7% to 12% of total U.S. electricity by 2028, up from 4.4% in 2023, the U.S. Department of Energy estimated in December 2024.

John Quigley, senior fellow at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, pointed to the “data center frenzy” as the primary driver of higher electricity prices for households.

“They’re pretty much the whole boat when it comes to increases in electricity demand,” Quigley said.

“It’s going to get worse,” he said.

Affordability is the ‘most salient issue’ in politics

Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate, former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger delivers remarks during her election-night rally at the Greater Richmond Convention Center on November 04, 2025 in Richmond, Virginia.

Win Mcnamee | Getty Images

To be sure, data centers aren’t the only contributor to higher electricity prices, experts said.

But escalating electricity prices “can strain household budgets … undermine economic competitiveness … and hinder the electrification of energy systems,” researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory wrote in a recent analysis.

Rising electricity prices for U.S. households also come as politicians continue to leverage the affordability theme to garner support.

New Jersey governor-elect Mikie Sherrill and Virginia governor-elect Abigail Spanberger, both Democrats, promised to lower electricity bills for state residents. During her campaign, Spanberger said she wants to “make sure data centers don’t drive up energy costs for everyone else in Virginia.”

Pragada: These data centers are getting bigger, up to 700 megawatts

While on the campaign trail, President Donald Trump had also pledged to cut electricity and energy prices in half within his first 18 months of office.

“Affordability remains [the] most salient issue in politics,” Chris Krueger, a strategist at Washington Research Group, wrote in a research note on Tuesday.

Rising energy bills are pushing households deeper into debt, according to a recent analysis by the Century Foundation, a progressive think tank.

The average overdue balance on utility bills has risen 32% since 2022, to $789 from $597, it found. Utilities include electricity and other costs like gas and water.

Households that use electricity to heat their homes are estimated to see their winter heating bills rise to $1,205 this season, up about 10% from $1,093 last winter, according to the National Energy Assistance Directors Association.

“Consumers may again feel the pressure on their utility bills in the coming months, particularly if the winter is a cold one,” according to a Bank of America Institute report from October.

Booming electricity demand

the Google Midlothian Data Center in Midlothian, Texas, US, on Friday, Nov. 14, 2025.

Jonathan Johnson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

AI euphoria has been driving the U.S. stock market ever higher — and fueling speculation that the market is in a tech-fueled bubble that might soon pop.

Regardless of whether the market’s AI rally proves sustainable, the scale of the technology’s growth is unmistakable. The International Energy Agency expects worldwide electricity demand from AI data centers to more than quadruple by 2030.

“Global electricity demand from data centres is set to more than double over the next five years, consuming as much electricity by 2030 as the whole of Japan does today,” Fatih Birol, IEA executive director, said in that analysis.

The effects will be “particularly strong” in countries like the U.S., where data centers are projected to account for almost half of the growth in overall electricity demand, according to the IEA analysis.

The U.S. economy is on track to consume more electricity in 2030 for processing data than for manufacturing all energy-intensive goods combined, including aluminum, steel, cement and chemicals, the IEA found.

AI bubble or not, we need more power - Siemens Energy CEO

Forecasted demand has fueled the need for new infrastructure like power lines, substations and power plants, the costs of which companies at least partly pass on to residential consumers, said Quigley of UPenn.

In other words, households are partially subsidizing the AI data center expansion, he said.

While AI-driven electricity demand is happening across the U.S., some electric grid managers are better at managing costs than others,” said Quigley.

“The amount of the [price] increase will vary by region,” he said.

Amazon’s largest AI data center has seven completed buildings, with 30 total buildings planned on 1,200 acres in New Carlisle, Indiana, shown here on October 8, 2025.

Erin Black

For example, extreme weather like hurricanes, storms and wildfires contributed to “sizable” price growth in some states like California, where wildfire risk mitigation and liability insurance were “major cost drivers,” according to an October report from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, a U.S. Energy Department laboratory managed by the University of California.

After accounting for the impact of inflation, 31 states actually saw electricity prices decline from 2019 to 2024, according to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory researchers. Seventeen states saw price increases after inflation, especially in states on the West Coast and in the Northeast, they found.

Nationally, average retail electricity prices increased by 23% over that period in nominal terms, meaning before accounting for inflation, they found.

Increasing residential electrification, including electric vehicles, is among other factors pushing up electricity demand, according to the Bank of America Institute.

Continue Reading

Environment

Uber launches true driverless robotaxi operations in the Middle East with WeRide [Video]

Published

on

By

Uber launches true driverless robotaxi operations in the Middle East with WeRide [Video]

Just over a year after Uber announced a strategic partnership in the Middle East with autonomous vehicle specialist WeRide, the companies have officially begun offering the public robotaxi rides without a driver or safety operator present on board.

Today’s latest milestone involving robotaxi operations in the Middle East dates back to September 2024, when Uber and WeRide initially announced a strategic partnership to bring autonomous rides to the UAE.

Three months later, the partner officially launched autonomous rides in Abu Dhabi, but with a safety operator present in the vehicle. At the time, Uber and WeRide said the supervised rides were “laying the groundwork” for a true driverless commercial operations planned for 2025.

That day has come.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

WeRide and Uber have confirmed that commercial robotaxi operations are officially underway in Abu Dhabi without any safety operators on board – a first for the Middle East.

Uber Middle East
Source: Uber

Uber rolls out Middle East robotaxi operations in Abu Dhabi

Uber shared details of its latest milestone late this evening or in the afternoon in the Middle East, depending on where you are.

Beginning today (Wednesday) customers in Abu Dhabi can select an UberX or Uber Comfort ride that enables them to be matched with a fully autonomous WeRide robotaxi without a driver inside. Riders in the Middle East can also increase their chances of hailing one of these driverless rides by select the “Autonomous” option in the Uber app.

In order to qualify, the prosepctive rider’s route must be part of WeRide’s operating territory in Abu Dhabi and a dedicated WeRide GXR Robotaxi vehicle (seen in the featured image above) must be available.

Similar to Uber’s partnership with Waymo in Austin and Atlanta, the global rideshare network will oversee fleet operations for WeRide vehicles, handling end-to end rider support. It has tapped Tawasul Transport to facilitate vehicle cleaning, maintenance, inspections, charging, and depot management. WeRide will remain responsible for vehicle testing.

As you may recall last spring, Uber and WeRide announced an expansion to their strategic partnership beyond the Middle East (although Dubai will be the city for its next robotaxi rollout). Over the next five years, Uber and WeRide intend to deploy true driverless public rides in 15 additional cities, some of which will be in Europe.

As promised, here’s some b-roll footage from Uber showing how riders in Abu Dhabi can order a WeRide robotaxi:

Source: Uber

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending