Connect with us

Published

on

Oil wells pumping outside of Midland Texas.
Joe Sohm | Visions of America | Universal Images Group | Getty Images

The Biden administration’s decision to release oil from U.S. reserves is a “mistake,” former U.S. Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette told on Wednesday.

“I do think it’s a bad policy choice. There’s no question about that,” he told CNBC’s “Capital Connection” one day after President Joe Biden announced that 50 million barrels of oil would be released from the country’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

China, India, Japan, South Korea and the U.K. will also be releasing their oil reserves as part of global efforts by high energy-consuming countries to cool energy prices.

The SPR in the U.S. is a national security asset meant to protect the country and its citizens from supply disruptions, such as during emergency situations, said Brouillette, who served as energy secretary under former President Donald Trump.

“It’s not a supply emergency, and the only emergency I can … see in this case is a political emergency,” he said.

The Biden administration’s action shows they are concerned about the midterm elections in 2022, Brouillette said.

“This is driving the decision — perhaps more than anything else — because as I said earlier, it’s not a supply emergency,” he said.

It’s a mistake, we should not be using it for these purposes.
Dan Brouillette
Former U.S. Energy Secretary

Oil producers in the U.S. pump around 11 million barrels per day, according to the Energy Information Administration.

“The issue for the United States is not [oil] supply, it’s politics,” Brouillette said. “I hate to see these types of decisions … the Strategic Petroleum Reserve being used in this way. It’s unfortunate.”

“It’s a mistake, we should not be using it for these purposes,” he added.

Three presidents have used the SPR as an emergency response tool in the past, according to the Office of
Fossil Energy and Carbon Management.
The drawdowns were ordered to help stabilize the market during Libya’s civil war, Hurricane Katrina and the Persian Gulf War.

Energy inflation

Oil prices have risen more than 60% so far this year as economies reopened and there was a sharp rebound in demand.

The U.S. asked OPEC and its allies to increase production in order to tamp down prices, but the oil alliance stuck to its plan of adding supply gradually.

Brouillette said using the SPR to “strike back” at OPEC is “absolutely … the wrong approach,” and there are other levers the U.S. can use.

Instead of tapping the reserves, the U.S. should allow projects such as the Keystone XL pipeline, a major U.S.-Canada oil pipeline that was expected to carry about 830,000 barrels per day of Alberta oil sands crude to Nebraska. It was officially canceled in June after Biden revoked a key permit needed for a U.S. stretch of the 1,200-mile project.

Washington could also allow oil production on federal land, the former energy secretary said.

One of the first things Biden did when he was inaugurated in January was to sign a slew of executive actions on climate change, including one to halt new oil and natural gas leases on public lands and water. The suspension has been blocked for now, and a record offshore lease sale opened this month.

Increasing production is a better way to influence prices, Brouillette said, noting that the U.S. was a swing producer for many years and essentially set the world’s oil prices.

“Our ability to produce 13 million barrels a day of oil really did shape the marketplace for three to four years,” he said. “It’s important that we return to that approach — not using a national asset like the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in order to affect pricing.”

— CNBC’s Pippa Stevens, Matt Clinch, Natasha Turak and Emma Newburger contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Environment

The US’s first lithium from oilfield wastewater is coming this year

Published

on

By

The US’s first lithium from oilfield wastewater is coming this year

Element3 just raised a fresh round of funding to launch the first US commercial lithium extraction plants, and it’s sourcing the lithium from oil and gas wastewater in Texas. That’s a big deal because it means there will be a domestic lithium supply for EVs and battery storage within a few months.

The critical materials extraction company announced the close of its Series A funding round led by TO VC. Fort Worth, Texas-based Element3 will use the money to deploy its first extraction plants on oil and gas company Double Eagle Energy Holding’s water infrastructure in the Permian Basin by the end of 2025. That means Element3 will become the first new lithium extraction player in the US to reach commercialization, with its first commercial shipments expected by year-end.

Element3’s breakthrough technology pulls battery-grade lithium from the Permian Basin’s produced water, turning a waste stream from oil and gas drilling into a valuable domestic resource. With a lithium carbonate plant already installed in the region, the company says its vertically integrated setup is ready to supply lithium for the US energy transition.

“This funding accelerates our mission to build American lithium independence from the ground up,” said Hood Whitson, Element3’s founder and CEO. “While other US projects are still in planning and years away from production, we’re bringing our plants online now and shipping product this year. Using existing oilfield infrastructure, we can move faster, cleaner, and at a fraction of the cost.”

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The US oil and gas industry produces over 1 trillion gallons of wastewater annually, containing an estimated 250,000 tons of lithium carbonate – more than half the country’s projected supply gap by 2030. By tapping into that wastewater, Element3 avoids many challenges that delay conventional lithium mining, such as lengthy permitting, land disruption, and high carbon emissions. Instead, it uses existing infrastructure, turning waste into a new, low-carbon supply stream.

Recovering lithium from wastewater is significantly more environmentally friendly than conventional mining. It doesn’t require digging new pits, evaporating vast ponds, or consuming large amounts of fresh water. It also eliminates the need to transport raw materials internationally, helping reduce emissions tied to global supply chains.

“So much capital has gone into onshoring battery manufacturing, but far less into securing the upstream supply of lithium itself,” said Joshua Phitoussi, managing partner at TO VC. “Traditional mining takes billions and more than a decade to bring online. Element3’s approach is faster, cheaper, and uses an already abundant resource. This means that Element3 will be the first [direct lithium extraction] company to get to commercial scale, and could become a top three domestic lithium producer within the next three years.”

Read more: A $1.2B battery-grade lithium refinery breaks ground in Oklahoma


The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

DOE props up dying coal with $625M days after Wright mocks clean energy subsidies 

Published

on

By

DOE props up dying coal with 5M days after Wright mocks clean energy subsidies 

The US Department of Energy (DOE) announced it will spend $625 million to “expand and reinvigorate” the US coal industry, claiming it will boost energy production and help rural communities. Energy Secretary Chris Wright praised “beautiful, clean coal” as “essential to powering America’s reindustrialization and winning the AI race.”

The Trump administration argues this spending will keep aging coal plants running, lower electricity costs, and prevent blackouts. But this so-called coal revival plan wastes millions when clean energy is cheaper and growing at a breakneck pace.

What the $625 million will fund

According to the DOE press release, the funds will prop up coal-fired power plants through several programs:

  • $350 million to restart or upgrade old coal plants, improving their capacity and reliability.
  • $175 million for projects bringing power to rural areas, aiming to deliver cheaper, more reliable coal-fired electricity.
  • $50 million to upgrade coal plant wastewater systems, reducing water pollution and extending plant life.
  • $25 million for “dual-firing” retrofits, so plants can switch between coal and other fuels like natural gas.
  • $25 million to develop 100% natural gas co-firing, keeping boilers running efficiently if a plant uses gas instead of coal.

Wright claims these DOE coal investments will “keep electricity prices low and the lights on without interruption.” He also touted coal as the “backbone” of industries like steel and cement, insisting it’s “necessary to feed the AI boom.” In short, the administration is betting that propping up coal now will secure US energy supply for factories and data centers.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum also said at a press conference in Washington that 13.1 million acres of federal land will be opened up in Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming for coal leasing.

‘This is a colossal waste of money’

Environmental experts and clean energy advocates blasted the DOE’s coal plan as wasteful, polluting, and economically foolish. “The Trump administration is hell-bent on supporting one of the oldest, dirtiest electricity sources. It’s handing our hard-earned tax dollars over to the owners of plants that cost more to run than new, clean energy, while giving those plants a free pass to keep polluting,” said Amanda Levin, policy analyst at NRDC. “Propping up coal means dirtier air and water, destruction of public lands, and higher utility bills for struggling families… This is a colossal waste of money at a time when the federal government should be spurring on new energy sources that can power the AI boom and help bring down utility bills.”

Levin’s frustration is echoed by others. The Sierra Club warned that continuing to subsidize coal will lead to “skyrocketing bills,” worse health outcomes, and a “decaying environment.” The Environmental Defense Fund noted that modern clean energy like solar, wind, and battery storage is now cheaper and faster to deploy – the real solution for powering a high-tech economy affordably. Critics argue that pouring more money into coal props up “dirty, uncompetitive plants from the last century” instead of investing in 21st-century energy.

Coal’s decline vs. clean energy’s rise

The backlash is fueled by coal’s sharp decline in the US power mix. Coal generated only about 15% of US electricity in 2024, down from 50% in 2000, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), as cheap natural gas and booming solar and wind power have eaten away coal’s market share. No new US coal plants are planned, and dozens of aging coal plants are slated for retirement in the next few years due to high costs and old age. In fact, wind and solar produced more electricity than coal in the US last year for the first time ever, and the EIA reported last week that wind and solar combined provided 19% more electricity than did coal during the first seven months of 2025.

Against that backdrop, pouring hundreds of millions into coal flies in the face of market trends and climate urgency. Analysts are skeptical that the DOE’s coal push will change coal’s long-term outlook, calling it at best a short-term boost for a “zombie” industry that can’t compete in the long run.

Electrek’s Take

Spending $625 million to revive coal – the dirtiest, most carbon-heavy energy source – is a ridiculous move when clean energy is cleaner and cheaper. It’s an especially hypocritical move given that just last week, Wright canceled $13 billion of funding for renewable energy projects and dismissed renewables’ need for federal subsidies at a press conference, saying:

If you can’t rock on your own after 33 years, maybe that’s not a business that’s going places.

Guess it slipped Wright’s mind that US fossil fuels already receive about $760 billion a year in federal subsidies, according to the International Monetary Fund, after nearly two centuries of government support. And just days later, he’s handing hundreds of millions more in taxpayer dollars to a dying coal industry that isn’t “rocking on its own.”

This hefty taxpayer-funded handout is highly unlikely to reverse coal’s decades-long decline, but it could slow cleaner investments and keep polluting plants on life support. At a time when the government “should be spurring new energy sources to power the AI boom,” funneling money into dirty 19th-century fuel is an embarrassing, damaging throwback.

Read more: The oil shill running the Energy Dept. just banned the words ‘climate change’


The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Used EVs are flying off the lot, but is it a smart time to buy?

Published

on

By

Used EVs are flying off the lot, but is it a smart time to buy?

A few years ago, it was basically a Tesla, Nissan Leaf, or Chevy Bolt if you were looking for a used electric vehicle. Nowadays, you can buy used Toyota, Ford, Hyundai, Chevy, or Honda EVs for about the same, or even less than, gas-powered cars.

Is now the time to buy used EVs?

Used EVs are now the fastest-selling cars in the US. A record 40,960 used electric vehicles were sold in the US in August, according to Cox Automotive, up 59% from the same month in 2024.

Despite also hitting a new record in August with 146,332 units sold, new EV sales increased by only 17.7% compared to last year.

With the federal tax credit of $7,500 for new and $4,000 for used EVs set to expire on September 30, buyers are rushing to lock in the savings.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

So, why are used EVs flying off the lot compared to new models? For one, there are so many more options to choose from. Used electric vehicles from Ford, Volkswagen, BMW, Toyota, and Honda are starting to appear at dealerships across the US.

Buy-used-EVs
Ford F-150 Lightning (Source: Ford)

In 2022, a flood of new options, like the Ford F-150 Lightning, Toyota bZ4X, Cadillac Lyriq, and BMW i4, launched in the US. Since many buyers opt for a three-year lease, these same EVs are now hitting the used market.

Perhaps, even more importantly, the price is comparable to that of a similar gas-powered car, but it typically offers significantly more.

Used-EV-prices-August-2025
New and Used EV prices in the US in August 2025 (Source: Kelley Blue Book)

The price premium over used ICE vehicles is now just $897, the lowest on record. In fact, 14 makes had a lower average EV price than their gas-powered counterpart.

The top five selling used EVs, the Tesla Model 3, Tesla Model Y, Chevy Bolt EV, Tesla Model S, and Ford Mustang Mach-E, were all priced below the market average. Tesla’s Model 3 led used EV sales with an average price of $23,278, while the Nissan LEAF ($12,890) and Chevy Bolt ($14,705) remained the most affordable.

Buy-used-EVs
The 2023 Hyundai IONIQ 5 (Source: Hyundai)

Cox Automotive expects another strong month for both used and new EV sales, with the IRA tax credit expiring at the end of September. How automakers react with price changes and incentives will impact sales through the end of 2025.

Since electric vehicles have fewer moving parts, require little maintenance, and offer more advanced software, safety, and connectivity technology, the new wave of used models may be your best bet for an affordable EV.

With models like the Honda Prologue, Hyundai IONIQ 5, and Chevy Equinox EV leading the way in new EV sales, more used EVs are already starting to hit the market. The top six selling new EVs in August were the Tesla Model Y, Model 3, Honda Prologue, Chevy Equinox EV, Hyundai IONIQ 5, and Ford Mustang Mach-E.

There are still two days left to grab the EV savings. If you’re curious, you can use the links below to see what’s available in your area.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending