The S & P 500 last week wrapped up the third quarter, falling more than 5%. It was the third consecutive quarter of declines for the index, marking the longest losing streak since 2008. Stocks and commodities have since broadly rallied in the first days of the fourth quarter . But after yet another troublesome quarter in the books, we thought it would again be helpful to look back and highlight what went right — and wrong — in the three months ended Sept. 30. Here’s a snapshot of the best and worst performers in the Investing Club’s 34-stock portfolio for the third quarter, starting with our four top performers. Top performers Taking the crown was TJX Companies (TJX), with a strong gain of about 11.4% in the third quarter. We didn’t own TJX for the totality of the quarter, but it was still a relative outperformer from the time of our initiation. Since our first buy on Aug. 24 , shares of the off-price retailer fell about 3.6%, versus a 13.4% slide in the S & P 500. We used that decline to scale deeper into our TJX position a few times. The retail sector is going through an apparel inventory glut right now and is frantically working to right-size positions through heavy markdowns, liquidations, and by cancelling orders. This has created a unique moment for off-price chains, including TJX’s flagship chain TJ Maxx, as it gives them an opportunity to pick up all sorts of quality merchandise for next to nothing. At the same time, gasoline prices in the U.S. hit a high in June before falling nearly every day in the third quarter. This much needed relief at the pump added support to consumer stocks, with the thought being that people would have a little more breathing room in their discretionary budgets than when gasoline averaged $5 a gallon. The runner up was Wynn Resorts (WYNN), which climbed 10.6% higher in the quarter. Shares of this casino operator made a big push near the end of the quarter, after it was announced that tour groups from mainland China would be allowed back into gambling hub Macao in November. The news was greeted positively by investors, as it was the first real sign that Beijing was moderating its strict zero-Covid restrictions. Starbucks (SBUX) came in third place, jumping 10.3% over the quarter. Like TJX, we didn’t own SBUX for the full quarter, but it was also a relative outperformer from our first buy. We initiated a position in the coffee retailer on Aug. 22, and shares fell less than 1%, compared to a 13.3% drop in the S & P 500 for the rest of the quarter. The stock was a steady riser throughout the quarter thanks to a great earnings report, in which the company topped expectations on every line and issued better than expected guidance for the next quarter. But the real catalyst in the quarter was the company’s mid-September investor event, where management outlined its reinvention plan and provided medium-term financial targets . The event was nearly universally praised by Wall Street . Fourth was Devon Energy (DVN), which gained 9.1% in the quarter and was the top performing energy stock in our portfolio. The solid gains in Devon came despite a subdued period for energy stocks, weighed down by falling crude prices. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) – the U.S. oil benchmark – dropped to around $80 a barrel by the end of September, falling more than 17% since the start of the quarter. One thing that separated Devon from other U.S.-based oil-and-gas producers was its deal-making. The company announced another immediately accretive bolt-on transaction in the quarter, this time purchasing Validus Energy, an Eagle Ford operator, for a total cash consideration of $1.8 billion. Devon announced the purchase of RimRock Oil & Gas, for $865 million, in the second quarter. What stood out about the Validus deal was that Devon said the outlook for its variable dividend increased by up to 10% on a per-share basis at strip pricing. The incremental cash flow also provided more firepower to execute on its share repurchase program. Looking back at our second quarter’s top performers , they were filled with health-care and consumer staple stocks — companies with very little economic sensitivity that can grow in a slowdown. This time it was quite different, with discretionary stocks leading the pack and an oil company in fourth. If anything, this goes to show the difficulty of predicting what sector or group of stocks will outperform from one quarter to the next. It’s why we always strive to stay diversified and invest in high-quality companies across different industries. Worst performers The worst performer for the club was Halliburton (HAL), which fell 21.5% in the third quarter. Shares slumped as WTI plummeted. As an oilfield services company that makes its money when oil-and-gas exploration companies increase spending on drilling, the decline in the price of crude oil made public and private drillers less incentivized to increase capacity. The weak performance came despite a better-than-expected second quarter earnings report and commentary that still has us encouraged about expanding margins in the new upcycle. Second from the bottom was Nvidia (NVDA), which declined about 19.9% amid the continued rout in semiconductor stocks. It was another tough quarter, as the chip maker pre-announced disappointing second-quarter results — for the three months ending July 31 — in early August due to the gaming chip glut. But, of course, the issues facing the gaming market are expected to take multiple quarters to fix, leading management to provide a much weaker view for its fiscal third quarter, which ends Oct. 31, than what was anticipated. And to add insult to injury, the U.S. government announced restrictions on the sale of Nvidia’s artificial intelligence graphics processing units (GPU) to Chinese customers with military end markets. The company said this restriction put up to $400 million of revenue at risk for the fiscal third quarter. Despite the numerous headwinds, Nvidia’s leadership in its data center business is unrivaled, and the launch of its new gaming chip could be what is needed to restart the gaming cycle. Bausch Health Companies (BHC) was our third worst performing stock, falling about 17.6%. Shares of this specialty pharmaceutical company were hit hard in late July after a surprise ruling from the U.S. District Court of Delaware invalidated some of the company’s Xifaxan patents. This decision, which is being appealed by Bausch, means a generic Xifaxan, which treats irritable bowel syndrome, could enter the market in 2025. Xifaxan is one of the most important franchises at legacy Bausch Health. Still, in a bright spot of news, the company in late September completed a debt exchange offer that reduced its total debt load by about $2.5 billion. The fourth worst stock was Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), which declined about 17.1% in the quarter. The chip maker’s quarterly results were met with mixed reviews, as the company reiterated its full year guidance but lowered the outlook for its PC business for the rest of the year. AMD was able to maintain its outlook because strength in its data center and embedded businesses are expected to offset the PC division. Still, broader concerns about the health of the semiconductor industry overpowered the stock in the quarter. Such worries include the U.S. government restricting the sale of artificial intelligence chips to customers in China with military end markets (something AMD said was immaterial to its business) and the sustainability of data center demand. Importantly, we think AMD will continue to gain server market share on competitor Intel for many more years. That’s a big reason why we stick by our small position. Semiconductor stocks remained one of the most difficult corners of the market to invest in, as their lofty valuations — which needed to come down as interest rates rose — and weakening fundamentals have forced investors to debate whether their long-term potential is worth the short-term pain. Of our four semis, NVDA and AMD are repeat offenders on our quarterly underperforming list, but we can take some solace in the fact that we made aggressive sales in both in early April . (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long TJX, WYNN, SBUX, DVN, HAL, NVDA, BHC, AMD. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images
The S&P 500 last week wrapped up the third quarter, falling more than 5%. It was the third consecutive quarter of declines for the index, marking the longest losing streak since 2008.
Stocks and commodities have since broadly rallied in the first days of the fourth quarter. But after yet another troublesome quarter in the books, we thought it would again be helpful to look back and highlight what went right — and wrong — in the three months ended Sept. 30.
Here’s a snapshot of the best and worst performers in the Investing Club’s 34-stock portfolio for the third quarter, starting with our four top performers.
A worker repairs a power line in Austin, Texas, U.S., on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2021.
Thomas Ryan Allison | Bloomberg | Getty Images
The rapid expansion of data centers in Texas is driving electricity demand higher during the winter, compounding the risk of supply shortfalls that could lead to blackouts during freezing temperatures.
The Lone Star state is attracting a huge amount of data center requests, driven by its abundant renewable energy and natural gas resources as well as its business friendly environment. OpenAI, for example, is developing its flagship Stargate campus in Abilene, about 150 miles west of Dallas-Forth Worth. The campus could require up to 1.2 gigawatts of power, the equivalent of a large nuclear plant.
The North American Electric Relibaility Corporation warned this week that data centers’ round-the-clock energy consumption will make it more difficult to sustain sufficient electricity supply under extreme demand conditions during freezing temperatures like catastropic Winter Storm Uri in 2021.
“Strong load growth from new data centers and other large industrial end users is driving higher winter electricity demand forecasts and contributing to continued risk of supply shortfalls,” NERC said of Texas in an analysis published Tuesday. Texas faces elevated risk during extreme winter weather, but the state’s grid is reliable during normal peak demand, NERC said.
During Uri, demand spiked for home heating in response to the freezing temperatures at the same time power plants failed in large numbers due to the same weather. Texas grid operator ERCOT ordered 20 gigawatts of rolling blackouts to prevent the system from collapsing, according to a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission report. The majority of the power plants went offline ran on natural gas.
It was the “largest manually controlled load shedding event in U.S. history” resulting 4.5 million people losing power for several days. At least 210 people died during the storm. Most of the fatalities were connected to the outages and included cases of hypothermia, carbon monoxide poisoning, and medical conditions exacerbated by freezing termperatures, according to FERC.
Data center requests surge
In the years since Uri, Texas has received a staggering amount of requests from data centers, crypto mining facilities and industrial customers seeking a grid conenction. More than 220 gigawatts of projects have requested connection as of this month, a 170% increase over the 83 gigawatts of project requests back in January, according to data published Wednesday by ERCOT.
About 73% of the projects requesting connection are data centers, according to ERCOT.
If all of those projects were actually built, they would be equivalent to the average annual power consumption of nearly 154 million homes in Texas, according to a CNBC analysis based on 2024 household electricity data. But the Lone Star state only has a population of about 30 million people.
Beth Garza, a former head of ERCOT’s watchdog, said she is very skeptical these projects will all get built, describing the scale of the numbers as “crazy big.” More than half the projects have not submitted planning studies, according to ERCOT.
“There’s not enough stuff to serve that much load on the equipment side or the consumption side,” said Garza, who served as director of ERCOT’s Independent Market Monitor from 2014 through 2019. “There’s just so much stuff in the world to make those kinds of numbers work.”
Phantom data centers are showing up in grid connection requests across the U.S. as developers shop the same projects around to mutliple jurisdictions, said John Moura, the director of NERC’s reliability assessments. This makes it difficult for utilities to forecast future demand conditions.
Reliability at risk
The projects that ERCOT has approved to actually connect to the grid is much smaller at 7.5 gigawatts, but this is still a subsantial amount of new demand. By comparison, the six county region in southeastern Pennsylvania that includes Philadelphia, with a population of 1.7 million people, had a peak demand of about 8.6 gigwatts in 2024, according to the state utility board.
Texas’ supply and demand balance can become tight during winter and potentially fall into deficit. The state has 92.6 gigawatts of available resources and peak demand in an extreme Uri-like scenario could reach about 85.3 gigawatts, according to NERC.
But avalaible power could fall to around 69.7 gigawatts in extreme winter weather, leaving a supply deficit of more than 15 gigawatts. This is due to typical power plant maintainence and forced plant outages as well as reductions in power capacity due to winter conditions.
“What’s important to understand is the tightness we’re seeing,” Moura said. NERC’s winter assessment only included data center facilities that have reached certain milestones to filter out speculative projects, he said.
“I can’t stress enough how much of a monumental change this is for the electric industry,” Moura said of the data center requests. One solution is for data centers to show flexibility in their electricity consumption to help keep demand and supply in balance during extreme winter scenarios, he said.
In the case of Uri, natural gas plants made up 58% of all the unplanned outages in Texas, according to FERC. Freezing tempartures reduced gas production, led to challenges delivering fuel and problems transmitting electricity as power lines fell.
Texas has adopted rules to harden natural gas infrastructure for extreme winters in the wake of the storm.
When gas plants go out in such a large way, solar and battery storage also face challenges, according to NERC. Peak demand in winter is in the early morning hours when sunlight is lower and batteries may not have had enough time recharge, Moura said.
With data centers running around the clock, “maintaining sufficient battery state of charge will become increasingly challenging for extended periods of high loads, such as a severe multi-day storm like Winter Storm Uri,” NERC said in its analysis.
“Power shortfalls and rolling outages really could happen in the next few years in certain regions” of the U.S. as demand from facilities like data centers outstrips supply, said Rob Gramlich, president of power consulting firm Grid Strategies. “Those are unacceptable to everybody in the United States.”
Garza said she’s confident that the reliable demand from data centers will bring new supply. “Plants love that kind of of opportunity,” she said. “My expectation is that then attracts additional private capital investment to meet those supply needs.”
Business: Baker Hughes is an energy technology company with a portfolio of technologies and services that span the energy and industrial value chain. The company operates in two segments: oilfield services and equipment and industrial and energy technology. The OFSE segment provides products and services for onshore and offshore oilfield operations across the lifecycle of a well, ranging from exploration, appraisal, and development, to production, rejuvenation, and decommissioning. OFSE is organized into four product lines: well construction; completions, intervention and seasurements; production solutions and subsea and surface pressure systems. The IET segment provides technology solutions and services for mechanical-drive, compression and power-generation applications across the energy industry, including oil and gas, liquefied natural gas operations, downstream refining and petrochemical markets, as well as lower carbon solutions to broader energy and industrial sectors.
Stock Market Value: $47.84 billion ($48.48 per share)
Activist: Ananym Capital Management
Ownership: n/a
Average Cost: n/a
Activist Commentary: Ananym Capital Management is a New York-based activist investment firm which launched on Sept. 3, 2024, and is run by Charlie Penner (a former partner at JANA Partners and head of shareholder activism at Engine No. 1) and Alex Silver (a former partner and investment committee member at P2 Capital Partners). Ananym looks for high quality but undervalued companies, regardless of industry. They would prefer to work amicably with their portfolio companies but are willing to resort to a proxy fight as a last resort. According to their most recent 13F filing, they manage $260 million across 10 positions.
What’s happening
On Oct. 21, Ananym Capital announced that they have taken a position in Baker Hughes and are calling on the company to spin out its oilfield services and equipment business, arguing such a step could help push up the stock price by at least 60%.
Behind the scenes
Baker Hughes is a leading provider of energy and industrial technology services. The company was formed through the 2017 merger of legacy Baker Hughes and GE Oil & Gas, combining best-in-class intellectual property shared by GE spinoff assets and the technical expertise from both organizations.
The company operates through two primary segments: industrial and energy technologies and oilfield services and Equipment. The IET unit (55% of projected 2025 revenue and 60% of projected 2025 EBITDA) is a long-cycle industrial and energy business focused on gas technology equipment, including turbines and compressors, and aftermarket services, including new energy applications. The OFSE unit (45%/40%) is a short-cycle oilfield equipment and production services business with an end-to-end portfolio of oilfield services and equipment for well construction and production.
Management has built up a strong track record of effective execution, and that success has been reflected in the share price, with the company delivering strong returns of 28.26%, 75.29% and 232.98% over the past 1-, 3- and 5-year periods, respectively.
Within IET, the company has taken advantage of its leading position in LNG, in which Baker now has 95% global footprint for the turbomachinery required in plant construction, a market that is expected to grow at a 10% compound annual growth rate through 2030.
Additionally, the company has a strong position in power generation, as Baker is one of few original equipment manufacturers supplying smaller-scale turbines and complete behind-the-meter power solutions. These offerings have allowed the company to play a pivotal role in helping to address rapidly growing data center demand, as its data center orders have gone from $0 to $550 million in just two quarters. As such, management is heavily investing in this opportunity — developing larger-scale power systems to support mega-data center deployments.
Furthermore, Baker’s pending acquisition of Chart Industries is expected to further strengthen IET’s position in power, LNG, and industrials. As a result, IET is approaching a 20% EBITDA margin, with further margin expansion expected as the business mix continues to shift toward aftermarket services, which generate long-term recurring revenue streams supported by contracts exceeding 10 years and margins of 35% or more.
For OFSE, management has taken steps to meaningfully improve the segment’s earnings mix and reduce its cyclical commodity exposure. This includes exiting or downsizing non-core ventures and low-margin product lines, such as its surface pressure control joint venture with Cactus; prioritizing the Middle East and international markets (now 75% of OFSE revenue), which are less correlated to commodity prices; and implementing strong pricing discipline and cost cutting measures by enforcing minimum margin thresholds on new contracts, consolidating product lines and simplifying reporting. However, despite these efforts, OFSE remains highly subject to commodity volatility, affecting both the segment’s performance and the company’s overall valuation.
Currently valued at about 9x EBITDA, Baker trades more closely with oilfield services peers (6–7x EBITDA), than its industrial and energy technology peers (16–18x), despite IET being the majority of the company’s revenue and EBITDA. An implied sum-of-the-parts multiple for Baker would put the company at approximately 13x.
It is for this reason that Ananym has launched a campaign at Baker calling for the company to either continue growing IET relative to OFSE or to pursue a sale or spin of OFSE.
Ananym believes that a potential separation could result in an about 51% immediate upside through realizing Baker’s sum of parts valuation, even when assuming $100 million dis-synergies from separation. Moreover, this upside does not reflect much of the potential long-term growth tailwinds and margin expansion expected from these ongoing operational initiatives — value drivers that shareholders should also be better positioned to realize through such a move.
Founded in September 2024, this is Ananym’s third public activist campaign. Knowing Charlie Penner and Alex Silver as we do, we would expect them to strive to work amicably with management to create value for shareholders. As such, they have already expressed full confidence in management to choose the optimal path forward, and the company’s strong operational track record fully supports that confidence.
Moreover, on Oct. 6, the company announced a review of its capital allocation, business, cost structure, and operations.
With all signs pointing towards alignment between the two parties, we do not expect that they will insist on, or even ask for, board representation or continue to engage in much more of a public campaign. Rather, we expect them to work amicably with Baker behind the scenes to unlock meaningful shareholder value. However, this cooperative approach should not be confused for weakness, as they are fiduciaries to their own investors and will do whatever is necessary to create value at their portfolio companies. Thus, should management fail to act decisively, Ananym could quickly shift to a more assertive stance.
Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional research service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio manager of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist investments.
First Solar just cut the ribbon on a huge new factory in Iberia Parish, Louisiana, and it dwarfs the New Orleans Superdome. The company’s $1.1 billion, fully vertically integrated facility spans 2.4 million square feet, or about 11 times the size of the stadium’s main arena.
The factory began production quietly in July, a few months ahead of schedule, and employs more than 700 people. First Solar expects that number to hit 826 by the end of the year. Once it’s fully online, the site will add 3.5 GW of annual manufacturing capacity. That brings the company’s total US footprint to 14 GW in 2026 and 17.7 GW in 2027, when its newly announced South Carolina plant is anticipated to come online.
The Louisiana plant produces First Solar’s Series 7 modules using US-made materials — glass from Illinois and Ohio, and steel from Mississippi, which is fabricated into backrails in Louisiana.
The new factory leans heavily on AI, from computer vision that spots defects on the line to deep learning tools that help technicians make real‑time adjustments.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry says the investment is already a win for the region, bringing in “hundreds of good-paying jobs and new opportunities for Louisiana workers and businesses.” A new economic impact analysis from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette projects that the factory will boost Iberia Parish’s GDP by 4.4% in its first full year at capacity. The average manufacturing compensation package comes in at around $90,000, more than triple the parish’s per capita income.
First Solar CEO Mark Widmar framed the new facility as a major step for US clean energy manufacturing: “By competitively producing energy technology in America with American materials, while creating American jobs, we’re demonstrating that US reindustrialization isn’t just a thesis, it’s an operating reality.”
This site joins what’s already the largest solar manufacturing and R&D footprint in the Western Hemisphere: three factories in Ohio, one in Alabama, and R&D centers in Ohio and California. Just last week, First Solar announced a new production line in Gaffney, South Carolina, to onshore more Series 6 module work. By the end of 2026, the company expects to directly employ more than 5,500 people across the US.
If you’re looking to replace your old HVAC equipment, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you’re finding a trusted, reliable HVAC installer near you that offers competitive pricing on heat pumps, check out EnergySage. EnergySage is a free service that makes it easy for you to get a heat pump. They have pre-vetted heat pump installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions. Plus, it’s free to use!
Your personalized heat pump quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – *ad
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.