An Austrian soldier guards the entrance to the OPEC headquarters on October 4, 2022 on the eve of the 45th Meeting of the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee and the 33rd OPEC and non-OPEC Ministerial Meeting held on October 05, in Vienna, Austria.
Joe Klamar | AFP | Getty Images
Saudi Arabia’s decision to ally with Russia and push through the largest supply cut by OPEC+ since 2020 means it’s time for the U.S. to take every available step it can to boost U.S. energy production.
That could even mean exploring the “nuclear option” — a point I mean literally, in terms of deploying nuclear power to assist in meeting the nation’s energy needs.
Energy policy is an instrument of U.S. foreign policy. Given that a former ally has joined with a current adversary, I would argue that, at least for the moment, all bets are off. It’s time to bring Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Vladimir Putin to heel, and take away some of the power that OPEC and its allies have.
The Biden administration — short-term environmental concerns aside — should offer price supports to the entire oil and gas industry, beyond the subsidies already offered, to rapidly boost production in some areas where exploration and production have slowed.
Biden, no doubt, would get pilloried by environmental groups, progressives and even some middle-of-the-road Democrats for potentially accelerating climate change, but short-run needs are paramount if the U.S. would like to maintain long-term control of both our energy security and our national security.
A multiyear price floor
With the imposition of a multiyear price floor, the U.S. could support domestic crude prices at, let’s say, $65 per barrel. That’s high enough to encourage existing fracking efforts while also encouraging additional production. Yet, it’s low enough to help pull the rug out from under a former ally that has shown its allegiance to Moscow. (We do this for all manner of commodity producers, by the way.)
Further, a more rapid addition of U.S. supplies of oil and natural gas would pressure global energy prices greatly and hurt the bottom lines of both Saudi Arabia and Russia, who are trying to ensure $100 per barrel oil to prop up their budgets — and, for Putin, to finance the ongoing war in Ukraine.
A flood of U.S. oil could drive prices back into the $20s even as U.S. companies are guaranteed to earn more.
In the 1980s, when the Saudis were the world’s “swing producer” of oil, they set the global price by raising and lowering production to send prices up or down, depending on prevailing circumstances.
The U.S. is poised to return to being the No. 1 producer next year when daily production reaches the old record of 12.3 million barrels per day from the current 11.8 million. (The U.S. has been the world’s largest producer of natural gas since 2017.)
In addition, the U.S. should expedite the build out of pipelines, transmission lines and LNG terminals so that the U.S. can more effectively — and profitably — export surplus oil and natural gas to an energy-starved world.
Adding a little fuel to that fire could help Europe avoid future disruptions of supplies as long as sanctions remain in place against a would-be Peter the Great.
An ‘all of the above energy’ policy
Beyond that, continuing an “all of the above” energy policy — which should absolutely include modern nuclear power plants — would go far in stabilizing global energy markets, ensure more than adequate supplies of power and energy here at home and, once and for all, cripple the OPEC cartel and Russia, whose economy rests almost entirely on energy exports.
And, yes, the U.S. and Europe should place a cap on Russian oil prices to also rob Moscow of the revenue it needs to sustain its invasion of Ukraine.
And, as some foreign policy experts have suggested of late, the U.S. should cut off sales of military hardware to MBS and deprive him of U.S. intelligence, rendering the alliance moot and leaving the Saudis at risk of armed conflict with regional rivals. That should be their problem from now on.
The U.S. should also strike a deal with Iran and Venezuela to allow oil to flow from those pariah states.
At the end of the day — and this may be naive — but what’s the difference between doing business with Saudi Arabia and Russia compared with doing business with Venezuela and Iran? Long ago, we learned that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
It may well be time to put that philosophy to work and turn the tables on nations whose revenue options are far more limited than our own.
— Ron Insana is a CNBC contributor and a senior advisor at Schroders.
Those $30,000 EVs are “right around the corner,” Ford’s CEO Jim Farley promises. Ford is now testing vehicles with sourcing 95% complete.
When will Ford’s $30,000 EVs be available?
Although Farley warned that EV adoption will only be about 5% of the US market in the near term, Ford sees an opportunity with more affordable electric cars.
Ford is “well-positioned” to navigate the recent US policy changes, including the loss of the $7,500 EV tax credit, Farley explained during the company’s third-quarter earnings call.
The cornerstone of its growth plans is the new Ford Universal EV Platform, a low-cost, flexible architecture that will unlock a new family of electric cars priced around $30,000. Despite scaling back EV plans, including cancelling its three-row electric SUV, Ford is doubling down on affordable EVs.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Farley confirmed during the call that EVs starting at around $30,000 are “not a distant plan,” adding that they are “right around the corner” at Ford.
CEO Jim Farley presents the Ford Universal EV Platform in Kentucky (Source: Ford)
The company is now testing vehicles, and sourcing is 95% complete. By the end of this year, Ford will begin installing equipment at its Louisville Assembly plant, where the new vehicles will be assembled. It’s also on track to start producing LFP battery cells in Michigan, which will be key to lowering costs.
Farley’s comments come as Ford’s EV sales plummeted in October following the expiration of the $7,500 federal tax credit.
Ford sold just over 4,700 electric vehicles in the US in October, 25% fewer than a year ago. Meanwhile, Ford halted production of the F-150 Lightning at its Rouge EV Center to focus on gas and hybrid models.
After reporting Q3 earnings last week, Ford said, “F-150 Lightning assembly at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center will remain paused.” The move comes after a fire at a supplier plant in New York disrupted aluminum supply, which Ford relies on for its F-Series pickups.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
A major Tesla shareholder announced that they are voting against Elon Musk’s CEO compensation package, but the odds are still in his favor.
As we have been extensively reporting over the last few weeks, Tesla shareholders are set to vote on a new compensation package for Elon Musk worth up to $1 trillion.
The package is highly controversial. On one hand, the board, Musk, and his fans are presenting it as an “all or nothing” situation on which the “future of Tesla”, or even “the world” (actual quote from Musk) hangs in the balance.
The CEO has threatened to quit if he doesn’t get the package, which he claims is mainly about increasing his stake and control over Tesla as the automaker continues to develop AI technology, which he claims to fear in the wrong hands.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
On the other hand, critics point to Musk getting more stock options than all other Tesla employees combined, despite being a part-time CEO for the better part of the last 3 years.
Furthermore, there are issues with the way the package is structured, which could lead to Musk banking tens of billions of dollars worth of options without delivering any major advancements at Tesla.
Now, Norges Bank Investment Management, Norway’s massive sovereign-wealth fund, has pronounced itself on the compensation package as a shareholder.
They are firmly against it:
“While we appreciate the significant value created under Mr. Musk’s visionary role, we are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk — consistent with our views on executive compensation.”
As of the last disclosure, the fund owns over 1% of Tesla’s stock, making it one of the most significant shareholders.
California Public Employees’ Retirement System, branded as CalPERS, also announced that it is voting against Musk’s pay package, citing reasons very similar to Norges’. The fund holds approximately 5 million shares of Tesla stock.
On the other hand, Baron Capital Management also pronounced itself on the pay package at the same time as the Norwegian fund. Unsurprisingly, given Ron Baron’s long-time support for Musk, Baron sided with Musk.
But his fund is much smaller and reportedly holds approximately 0.4% of Tesla.
The vote will be final at Tesla’s annual shareholders meeting on November 6th.
Prediction market Polymarket currently puts the odds of the package passing at 93% with $66,000 in trading volume:
Electrek’s Take
Institutional shareholders are going to make or break the vote for Musk. We know insiders and retail investors are going to vote for the package, since if you fall within either of those categories at this point, you are probably a fan.
But the institutional shareholders have other people to answer to, and they need to justify their votes.
“I like Elon and I believe in his ridiculous predictions about AI and robots” is just not enough. The proxy firms that advise those institutional shareholders have already pronounced themselves against, but the question remains: how many of them will follow the advice?
For now, it looks quite split, which would point to a yes passing as long as there’s a strong 90% yes turnout from retail shareholders, which appears to be the case.
After November 6th, Elon Musk will own Tesla forever. For better or worse.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Kia is set to launch a slate of new electric and hybrid vehicles over the next year as it looks to boost its presence in the US, European, and other global markets.
Kia preps for new electric and hybrid vehicles
Get ready to see more Kia models on the road over the next few years. The South Korean automaker plans to introduce five new or refreshed flagship models in 2026.
For the first time since it hit the market in 2019, the Seltos, one of Kia’s most popular vehicles, is getting a complete redesign.
The new Kia Seltos will be offered as a hybrid for the first time. It will launch in Korea first in 2026 alongside a partially refreshed Niro, before rolling out globally.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
In the US, Kia plans to navigate the new tariffs and policy changes by boosting local production of its most popular SUVs. The Telluride, Kia’s largest SUV, is getting an overhaul, which will also include a hybrid version for the first time.
Kia teases camouflaged 2027 Telluride SUV (source: Kia)
Kia America’s vice president, Eric Watson, confirmed the second-gen Telluride debut at the LA Auto Show later this month.
Although like nearly all automakers, Kia’s EV sales plummeted in October after the federal tax credit expired. Kia sold just 666 units of its three-row EV9 SUV and 508 EV6 models in the US last month.
The 2026 Kia EV9 (Source: Kia)
Despite this, Watson said that “Kia’s future remains very bright, and the brand will continue to grow” as it enters the holiday sales season and into 2026. Even with slower EV sales, Kia is still on track for its third straight record sales year in the US.
While Kia focuses on SUVs and hybrids, it’s delaying the EV4 electric sedan “until further notice.” Kia said the change is because “market conditions for EVs have changed.”
The Kia Concept EV2 at IAA Mobility 2025 in Munich (Source: Kia)
Kia has even bigger plans in Europe. Early next year, Kia is launching its new entry-level electric car, the EV2. The Kia EV2 is expected to be a cornerstone of Kia’s growth plans, priced under €30,000 ($35,000).
It will sit below the EV3, which is already the most popular retail EV in the UK and among the best-sellers in Europe.
Kia also plans to launch an electric version of the Siros SUV in India as it aims to play a bigger role in the global auto market.
And these are just the new vehicles Kia is launching in 2026. The Korean automaker has already introduced a wave of new models this year across key markets, such as the EV5, a midsize EV SUV, and the PV5, its first electric van.