Biden threatens ‘consequences’ for Saudi Arabia after OPEC cut, but his options are limited
US President Joe Biden and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman arrive for the family photo during the Jeddah Security and Development Summit (GCC+3) at a hotel in Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea coastal city of Jeddah on July 16, 2022.
Mandel Ngan | Afp | Getty Images
President Joe Biden is angry at Saudi Arabia for its decision to slash oil production along with its OPEC allies against U.S. wishes, and he’s made no secret of it.
With the global economy on a knife-edge and energy prices high, Washington sees the kingdom’s move – which it made in coordination with Russia and other oil-producing states – as a snub and a blatant display of siding with Moscow.
The oil producer group in early October announced its largest supply cut since 2020, to the tune of 2 million barrels per day from November, which its members say is designed to spur a recovery in crude prices to counter a potential fall in demand.
For this, Biden said in an interview with CNN on Tuesday that there would be “consequences.” He did not go into further detail as to what those consequences might be.
But what are the Biden administration’s options, and could they backfire?
Weapons and anti-trust laws
The Saudi-U.S. relationship was founded, broadly speaking, on the principle of energy for security. Washington has since the 1940s provided billions of dollars in military and security aid to Saudi Arabia. But in recent years, and particularly since the Obama administration began making diplomatic inroads with Iran, Riyadh feels that the U.S. commitment to its security has waned.
“The truth is, neither side has been holding up their end of the bargain for nearly 10 years now,” Michael Stephens, an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, told CNBC.
“And what you’re seeing, I think, are permanent fractures in the relationship that are based on the fact that neither side really sees as much strategic benefit in the other as they did 20 years ago,” Stephens said, adding that Saudi Arabia’s OPEC oil production cut “is a reflection of that.”
The potential “consequences” Washington can put into action include cutting its military support to the Saudi kingdom, and going after OPEC with U.S. laws.
A file photo of cannisters containing Patriot missiles to intercept missiles fired at Saudi Arabia or its neighboring countries.
Greg Mathieson | Mai | The LIFE Images Collection | Getty Images
Indeed, just one day before Biden’s comments, Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, demanded that the U.S. immediately halt all cooperation with Saudi Arabia — including weapons sales.
“The United States must immediately freeze all aspects of our cooperation with Saudi Arabia, including any arms sales and security cooperation beyond what is absolutely necessary to defend U.S. personnel and interests,” Menendez said in a statement.
In an earlier interview with CNBC, Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn, asked, “What’s the point of looking the other way when the Saudis chop up journalists and repress political speech inside Saudi Arabia if when the chips are down, the Saudis effectively choose the Russians over the U.S.?”
Even Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., weighed in, demanding in a tweet that, “If Saudi Arabia, one of the worst violators of human rights in the world, wants to partner with Russia to jack up US gas prices, it can get Putin to defend its monarchy. We must pull all US troops out of Saudi Arabia, stop selling them weapons & end its price-fixing oil cartel.”
Beyond withholding military aid, there are legal channels the U.S. government can pursue.
One is the NOPEC bill, which stands for No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels. This would classify OPEC as a cartel and subject its members to anti-trust legislation.
Something long discussed by lawmakers, the bill is designed to protect U.S. consumers and businesses from artificial oil spikes.
It passed a Senate committee in early May and hasn’t yet been signed into law, but could expose OPEC countries and partners to lawsuits for coordinating supply cuts that raise global crude prices.
The bill would still need to be passed by the full Senate and House and signed into law by the president to go into effect. OPEC ministers have previously criticized the NOPEC bill, warning it would bring greater chaos to energy markets.
Consequences for the U.S. – and for crude prices
The decision by OPEC+ – which constitutes OPEC and its non-OPEC allies like Russia – to cut its output “underscores the extent to which the Biden administration has lost its ability to influence Saudi OPEC+ policy,” said Torbjorn Soltvedt, principal MENA analyst at risk intelligence firm Verisk Maplecroft.
“The White House has few good options despite Biden’s warning of ‘consequences’ after the cut,” he said, noting U.S. lawmakers’ threats of anti-trust legislation and removal of U.S. military assets from Saudi Arabia.
While both courses of action would send a clear message, this could backfire for both the U.S. and for crude prices.
“Both of these options would threaten to break already fraught relations, which in turn would put even greater upward pressure on oil and fuel prices,” Soltvedt said.
“In short, a breakdown in U.S.-Saudi relations would mean a higher Middle East risk premium for the global oil market and higher oil and fuel prices,” he explained. “This is the opposite of what the White House is trying to achieve ahead of midterm elections in November.”
It’s also key to note that the 2 million barrel per day cut will not in fact be as big as that headline figure; several member states have already been far short of their individual production ceilings, and Iraq for instance has indicated it will be producing more than its assigned quota.
Still, many American politicians have long been out of patience with the nature of the U.S.-Saudi relationship, especially as U.S. imports of Saudi oil have shrunk over the years and more than 80% of the Middle East’s crude exports now go to Asia.
This has made a growing number of U.S. lawmakers question, Soltvedt said, “why the American navy should underwrite the security of Middle Eastern oil exports when those barrels are increasingly going East rather than West.”
— CNBC’s Sam Meredith contributed to this report.
Cargo scooters are a rare breed, filling a niche that exists between typical e-bikes/e-scooters with minimal storage and larger cargo-specific models designed for utility. But that dearth of cargo scooters may be changing, based on several interesting new models we’ve seen lately, including the recently unveiled Lightfoot cargo electric scooter.
Yet unlike the few other cargo scooters rolling around out there, the Lightfoot has one major advantage: its built-in solar panels keep it charged up directly from the sun.
It’s not the first solar-powered scooter we’ve seen, but it’s definitely the most eye-catching model yet.
Developed by Otherlab, the Lightfoot electric cargo scooter features a pair of 120W solar panels on either side, hiding a large 45.2 L (12-gallon) storage compartment. One panel is hinged, opening the entire side of the vehicle for easy cargo access, then locking back in place for secure storage.
Also hidden away by those panels are the equally large UL-certified 1.1 kWh battery and the 600W on-board charger (just in case you do need to plug it into the grid for a quicker charge than you’d get from the solar panels). In fact, the company claims an 80% charge is possible in just 90 minutes from a 110V wall outlet. Based on the company’s figures, it looks like solar charging is likely to fill the battery at a rate of roughly 7-8% per hour (around 3 miles or 5 km of additional range per hour of sun exposure). That means heavy utility users will likely still rely on the wall plug from time to time, but there’s nothing wrong with outdoor parking helping to extend the range.
The company rates the scooter’s range as up to 37 miles (60 km) per charge and claims an extra 18 miles (30 km) of range can be added per day from the solar panels.
That means the scooter could actually be purely solar-charged when used for modest duty cycles, i.e. less than 18 miles (30 km) per day. As the company explained, “If you only need it for a few short errands a day, park it in your driveway and it will always be ready for you. For many riders, we’re hoping this means saying goodbye to plug-in charging altogether.”
With a 20 mph (32 km/h) top speed, the scooter is said to be “bike lane legal” without requiring any additional license or registration.
The Lightfoot is also designed to be easy to work on with minimal mechanical components. The dual motor system relies on hub motors instead of centrally mounted motors, meaning there are no chains or belts to deal with. Between those two 750W rated (1 kW peak) motors, the scooter should get up to speed pretty quickly while laying down nearly 2,000 watts of power.
The company is offering a 1-year warranty on the entire scooter, with an even longer 2-year warranty for the major components consisting of the frame, motors, controllers, brakes, lighting, and front suspension. The scooter is also covered by an “ironclad buy-back guarantee” with the company promising to buy the scooter back from any riders who are “unsatisfied with their purchase for any reason.”
Set to begin deliveries in January 2025, the Lightfoot is now available for purchase with an MSRP of US $4,995.
Electrek’s Take
Look, I’m split here. My inner mechanical engineer is drooling over this thing, while my inner MBA is wondering how you sell it to a broader market than… people like me. My two professional backgrounds have often been in conflict before, but this is peak engineer’s delight meets ultra-niche aesthetic.
Sure, I would 100% ride the hell out of this thing. I’d ride it everywhere with zero qualms about the appearance. But I’m probably not the best representative of the average scooter customer since I tend towards the tech nerd side of the spectrum. And so I hope that the Lightfoot can find wider appeal than I fear it may be limited to.
Oh, and for all of those ready to hammer out the “AcTuAlLy ThAt’S NoT tHe MoSt EfFiCiEnT WaY tO dO iT…” comments, I think that’s missing the point. The whole idea here isn’t to maximize every photon, but rather to not waste the ample sunlight that otherwise simply bakes the paint on every other scooter and moped out there (and don’t get me started on the “moped” linguistic purists). Sure, you’re probably only ever getting appreciable solar charging from one panel at a time, but why not maximize your chances of catching those rays whenever you can?
So all told, I love this thing. I just wonder how many people will love it as much as I do.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Hyundai confirms IONIQ 9 SUV debut date while teasing first look at its ‘lounge-like’ interior
Hyundai will finally unveil its first three-row electric SUV, the IONIQ 9, at the LA Auto Show next week. With its debut around the corner, we are getting a sneak peek at the SUV’s “lounge-like” interior.
Hyundai IONIQ 9 will debut on November 21, 2024
The 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 9 will make its first appearance at AutoMobility LA (LA Auto Show) on Thursday, November 21, 2024.
Hyundai will hold a news conference inside the LA Convention Center to unveil its new flagship three-row electric SUV. The event will be live-streamed starting at 9:10 am PT (12:10 pm ET).
Although rumors claimed that Hyundai would reveal its new SUV at the LA Auto Show, this is the first time it has officially confirmed the debut date. Previously, the company left it open, saying it would make its first appearance in November.
Ahead of its official debut, Hyundai previewed the IONIQ 9’s “lounge-like” interior. Simon Loasby, head of Hyundai’s Design Center, boasted that “IONIQ 9 offers the ultimate lounge-like environment.”
The spacious and “nature-inspired” interior features Hyundai’s latest software and connectivity tech. Based on its advanced E-GMP platform, following the IONIQ 5 and 6, the larger SUV includes a flat floor for an open space cabin.
What to expect
Hyundai has been dropping new teasers leading up to its debut. Earlier this week, we got a look at the IONIQ 9’s new LED light bar, similar to the Tesla Cybertruck.
The IONIQ 9 features Hyundai’s new “Aerosthetic” design, which blends aerodynamics with a sleek aesthetic look.
Although prices and specs have yet to be revealed, the IONIQ 9 is expected to be similar in size to the Kia EV9. Also based on the E-GMP platform, the EV9 is 197.2″ long, 77.9″ wide, 70.1″ tall, with a wheelbase of 122″. That’s about the size of its Telluride.
However, with its flat-floor design, the EV9 provides more rear legroom (42″) than a Cadillac Escalade.
Kia’s three-row EV9 starts at about $55,000, so IONIQ 9 prices are expected to start at about the same or slightly higher. More premium trims could cost upwards of $80,000.
The IONIQ 9 will be built at Hyundai’s massive new Metaplant America (HMGMA) alongside the updated 2025 IONIQ 5 model. The new 2025MY has more range, features, and an sleek new design. It even includes a Tesla NACS charging port, which the IONIQ 9 is also expected to feature.
Hyundai said all US-made EVs qualify for a $3,750 federal tax credit. However, once the battery portion of the plant opens, they are expected to be eligible for the full $7,500. Until then, Hyundai is passing the $7,500 on through leasing.
Last week, Hyundai announced that 2025 IONIQ 5 prices will start at $43,975 (including a $1,475 destination fee). The extended-range SE RWD trim, with a range of up to 318 miles, starts at $46,550.
Check back next week for all the details on the new IONIQ 9 SUV. And keep an eye out for more teasers leading up to its debut on Thursday, November 21, 2024.
With the new 2025 IONIQ 5 arriving at dealerships any day, Hyundai is offering clearance prices on 2024 models. You can use our link to find the best deals on Hyundai’s IONIQ 5 at a dealer near you.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Buy now, pay later firms like Klarna and Block’s Afterpay could be about to face tougher rules in the U.K.
Nikolas Kokovlis | Nurphoto | Getty Images
Klarna, which is known for its popular buy now, pay later business, announced Wednesday that it’s confidentially filed IPO documents with the SEC.
The Swedish payments company has yet to publicly file its IPO prospectus. The company said the offering would follow the SEC’s review process and is subject to market conditions.
Analysts recently valued Klarna, which was founded in 2005, in the $15 billion range. At its peak during the pandemic-led surge in fintech stocks and e-commerce, the company had a valuation of $46 billion in a funding round led by SoftBank’s Vision Fund 2.
But Klarna took an 85% haircut in its most recent primary fundraising round, in 2022, when the company raised money on a valuation of $6.7 billion.
In addition to SoftBank, Klarna’s roster of shareholders includes Sequoia Capital and London-based firm Atomico.
Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski previously told CNBC in an interview that unfavorable rules in Europe on employee stock options could risk the company losing talent to U.S. tech giants such as Google, Apple and Meta.
Plans for an IPO have been in the works for some time. In a February interview with CNBC’s “Closing Bell,” Siemiatkowski said an IPO in 2024 was “not impossible.” Affirm, one of the company’s key competitors, went public in 2021 and is now valued at about $18 billion.
In August, Klarna said it swung to a profit in the first half of the year.
Klarna’s decision to go pursue a listing in the U.S. represents a major blow to European stock exchanges, which have been trying to encourage local tech companies to list at home.
The London Stock Exchange, for example, has made reforms to make the U.K. a more attractive market for tech companies to list, including the ability for founders to issue dual-class shares that enable entrepreneurs to maintain control over a company’s strategy and direction.
Siemiatkowski hadn’t previously committed to listing in one market over another, and London was among the markets he was considering for Klarna’s IPO.
However, in 2021 he said that the firm was more likely to list in the U.S. than the U.K., due in part to higher visibility.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports7 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Environment1 year agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway