Connect with us

Published

on

He calls it the “Unselect Committee” and his appearance before it is uncertain, to say the least.

Certainly, Donald Trump showed no inclination in the wake of his subpoena.

“The committee is a total BUST that has only served to further divide our country,” he opined on his Truth Social media platform.

From its start, he has dismissed these congressional hearings as a political witch hunt.

Given his ongoing record of resistance to legal probing, dragging a former president before this particular set of accusers would suggest a struggle: some legal analysts in the United States are already calling the move “symbolic”.

At this, the last scheduled hearing of the 6 January committee, the subpoena may have grabbed the headline, but new film of the assault on the Capitol gripped the audience.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Jan 6 Committee has released previously unseen footage of congressional leaders phoning officials for help during the assault.

There was compelling new video of congressional leaders, ashen-faced in secure rooms beneath the Capitol building, negotiating national guard troops to come and protect their lives and their institution.

More on Donald Trump

It delivered a fresh perspective to this prime-time hearing that brought a US audience back to the reality of the crisis that was 6 January 2021.

The committee’s presentation has been carefully crafted over four months, and the big finish had the best footage.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump subpoenaed on Jan 6 riot

It was the visual aid in pulling together the threads of this committee’s insurrection story, one it says places Donald Trump at the centre, before and after the 2020 election.

Vice-chair Liz Cheney says they have “sufficient information to consider criminal referrals” and that could be the key to what happens next.

Having laid out a “prosecution by proxy”, the big question will be around actual prosecution, in an actual courtroom, which is a decision for the US Justice department.

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

A “prosecution proper” would lay out much of the same detail, no doubt, but it would be tested in court; open to cross-examination and less open to accusations of political motivation.

Short of a progression towards a criminal trial, the committee will be satisfied, for now, with its business.

Read more:
Storming the Capitol: How four hours of mayhem unfolded
The ‘medieval battle scene’
Astonishing testimony may help committee resonate with public

Its members are no fans of Donald Trump and his re-shaping of the Republican Party.

They will take the view that there’s never a bad time to remind a voting public of one individual’s influence in undermining democracy – as they would have it – but a good time is probably a month short of their midterm elections.

Continue Reading

US

Trump told to sack Pete Hegseth over reports of second war plans group chat

Published

on

By

Trump told to sack Pete Hegseth over reports of second war plans group chat

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has been linked to a second group chat about sensitive military operations, which he reportedly shared with his wife, brother and personal lawyer.

The messages sent via the Signal messaging app are again understood to have contained details of an attack on Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis in March.

The second chat group, initially reported by The New York Times, included about a dozen people. It revealed details of the schedule of the airstrikes, according to the Reuters news agency.

Two sources with knowledge of the matter told Sky News’ US partner network NBC News there were 13 people in the second chat group, and Mr Hegseth divulged the information despite an aide warning him about using an unsecure communications system.

Mr Hegseth’s wife, Jennifer, a former Fox News producer, has attended sensitive meetings with foreign military counterparts, while his brother was hired at the Pentagon as a Department of Homeland Security liaison and senior adviser.

Military details from the first chat group were revealed by a journalist from The Atlantic magazine who was accidentally added to the Signal app by national security adviser Mike Waltz.

Mr Hegseth then shared sensitive information with cabinet officials about last month’s airstrike on targets in Yemen, which was later leaked.

Read more from Sky News:
What is Signal?
Who is Pete Hegseth?

Serious questions are being asked of Mike Waltz (left) and Pete Hegseth (pictured in February). Pic: AP
Image:
Mike Waltz (left) and Pete Hegseth (right) have used Signal to discuss sensitive government matters. Pic: AP

‘A non-story,’ says White House

But the White House has consistently defended Mr Hegseth.

Donald Trump dismissed the original leak as “something that can happen”.

Responding to the latest chat group, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said: “No matter how many times the legacy media tries to resurrect the same non-story, they can’t change the fact that no classified information was shared.

“Recently-fired ‘leakers’ are continuing to misrepresent the truth to soothe their shattered egos and undermine the President’s agenda, but the administration will continue to hold them accountable.”

The “leakers” referred to in the White House statement are four senior officials who were ousted from the Pentagon last week as part of an internal leak investigation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Leaked war plans: ‘Fairly serious’

‘Hegseth put lives at risk’

The New York Times reported that the second chat – named “Defence | Team Huddle” – was created on Mr Hegseth’s private phone.

It detailed the same warplane launch times as the first chat.

Several former and current officials have said sharing those operational details before a strike would have certainly been classified, and their release could have put pilots in danger.

Democratic politicians have repeatedly called for Mr Hegseth to step down.

“We keep learning how Pete Hegseth put lives at risk,” Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said in a post on X.

“But [Donald] Trump is still too weak to fire him. Pete Hegseth must be fired.”

The latest claims about Mr Hegseth emerged as Yemen’s Houthi rebels reported another wave of US airstrikes on Sunday, including on the capital Sanaa.

The Houthis said at least 12 people had been killed, with 30 more injured.

The US says its bombing campaign is in response to Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes.

Continue Reading

US

Trump100 Day 92: Is Trump’s deportation policy firm or cruel?

Published

on

By

Trump100 Day 92: Is Trump's deportation policy firm or cruel?

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

The row over the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador from the US in error in March, continues to rock Washington DC.

US correspondent Martha Kelner speaks to Ron Vitiello, Donald Trump’s former acting director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, about the case and if the president’s border policies are working as he planned.

If you’ve got a question you’d like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@sky.uk.

Don’t forget, you can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

NB. This interview was recorded before Kilmar Abrego Garcia was moved from the CECOT prison – where terror suspects are held in severe conditions – to another detention centre in El Salvador.

Continue Reading

US

DHL suspends some shipments to US amid Trump tariff regime

Published

on

By

DHL suspends some shipments to US amid Trump tariff regime

DHL Express is suspending some shipments to the US as Donald Trump’s new tariff regime takes effect.

From 21 April, shipments worth more than $800 (£603) to US consumers from “any origin” will be temporarily suspended.

New rules that came into effect at the start of April made such shipments subject to increased customs checks.

“This change has caused a surge in formal customs clearances, which we are handling around the clock,” said the parcel delivery service.

Shipments going from business to business worth more than $800 aren’t affected by the suspension, but DHL warned they may also face delays.

Shipments under $800 to either businesses or consumers are not impacted, but one British cycle manufacturer suggested its US customers may need to split orders over $800 into “smaller shipments” to avoid the red tape.

Read more:
The art of doing a deal with Trump
Is there method to Trump’s madness?

More on Tariffs

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: Tariffs are making US ‘rich’

Trump targeting ‘deceptive’ practices

From May, shipments from China and Hong Kong that are worth less than $800 “will be subject to all applicable duties”, according to the White House.

“President Trump is targeting deceptive shipping practices by Chinese-based shippers, many of whom hide illicit substances, including synthetic opioids, in low-value packages,” it said in a statement.

Until now, deliveries worth less than $800 didn’t incur any duties, which allowed low-cost companies Chinese like Shein and Temu to make inroads in the US.

Both have warned their prices will now rise because of the rule changes, starting on 25 April.

Continue Reading

Trending