
Resignations, reversals and rebellion – the 44 days of Liz Truss’s premiership
More Videos
Published
3 years agoon
By
adminLiz Truss has announced she will be leaving Downing Street just six weeks into the job.
So how did the leader go from securing her place at the top of the Conservative Party to leaving the most powerful post in the country after just 44 full days in office?
Let’s take a look.
Politics live: Sunak favourite to be new PM after Truss resigns
Monday 5 September
After a lengthy contest over the summer, Ms Truss beat Rishi Sunak to win the Conservative leadership and to become the UK’s next prime minister.
She promised to “deliver a bold plan” to cut taxes and grow the economy, and told the membership: “I campaigned as a Conservative and I will govern as a Conservative.”
Tuesday 6 September
Ms Truss travelled to Balmoral to meet the Queen and to officially be asked to form a government.
Advertisement
After returning to Downing Street through the wind and rain, she gave a speech promising the country could “ride out the storm” of the cost of living crisis.

Just days before the Queen’s death, she asked Liz Truss to form a government.
The new prime minister then began to appoint her cabinet, with close allies Therese Coffey and Kwasi Kwarteng getting top jobs as health secretary and chancellor respectively.
Wednesday 7 September
After less than 24 hours in the top job, Truss held her first cabinet meeting before facing her inaugural Prime Minister’s Questions in the Commons.
She promised to take “immediate action” on energy bills, but refused Labour’s call for a further windfall tax on the profits of oil and gas companies, telling MPs: “We cannot tax our way to growth.”
Thursday 8 September
The PM returned to the Commons to outline her energy plan, promising to set a cap on household prices for two years and to offer support to businesses for six months.
But the key policy moment was soon overshadowed by the news breaking that the Queen was gravely ill.
At 6.30pm, the palace announced her death, and soon after, Ms Truss gave a speech on the steps of Downing Street saying the monarch had been “the rock on which modern Britain was built”.
9 to 19 September
The country moved into a period of national mourning, and the new prime minister played a key part as the UK said farewell to its monarch.
After leading tributes in the Commons, she attended the accession to the throne of King Charles, and followed him to cathedral services in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Lis Truss holds her first audience with King Charles
After her first official audience with the King, rumours circulated that she had advised him not to attend the COP27 climate change summit – something he is known to have strong views about – but this was dismissed by Downing Street.
And on the day of the funeral, Ms Truss gave a reading at the service.
Tuesday 20 September
Having hosted world leaders in London for the Queen’s funeral, the PM headed to New York for her first United Nations General Assembly.
She gave her speech to the gathered delegates, and had her first official one-on-one with US President Joe Biden.

Liz Truss holds a bilateral with US President Joe Biden at the UN building in New York.
In front of the cameras, he made sure to make one point clear to her following her plan to scrap parts of the Northern Ireland Protocol – part of the post-Brexit trade deal to prevent a hard border on the island of Ireland.
“We are both committed to protecting the Good Friday Agreement of Northern Ireland and I’m looking forward to hearing what’s on your mind,” said Mr Biden.
Friday 23 September
Back in London and it was a big day for Ms Truss’s chancellor as he took to the despatch box in the Commons to deliver his so-called mini-budget, or “the growth plan”.
Some of Mr Kwarteng’s policies had been expected as the PM had made clear during her leadership campaign that she would reverse the rise in National Insurance to pay for health and social care, and lower taxes.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:22
Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng announces tax cuts for 31 million people.
But the scale of tax cuts was immense, and particular ire was targeted at the decision to scrap the 45p tax rate for the highest earners in the country, that all the measures would be funded through borrowing, and that there was no fiscal analysis from the Office of Budget Responsibility.
And the markets were spooked, with yields on gilts immediately spiking higher due to the prospect of a big surge in government borrowing.
Monday 26 September
The bad reaction to the growth plan played into the hands of Labour over the weekend as the party gathered in Liverpool for its annual conference.
And things got worse after Mr Kwarteng took to the airwaves, promising there were more tax cuts to follow.
The pound plunged as the markets made their view on the new leadership in Downing Street clear, and the Bank of England said it would “not hesitate to change interest rates as necessary”.
Tuesday 27 September
The fall-out from the mini-budget continued to grow and the pound continued to plunge.
Mortgage lenders began to remove products as fears of interest rates soaring grew stronger.
But Ms Truss had to be convinced to issue a government statement in an attempt to calm the markets.
The Treasury promised an update would be given on 23 November on how the government would ensure borrowing would not spiral out of control.
However, in an extraordinary statement on Tuesday, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said it was “closely monitoring” developments in the UK and urged Mr Kwarteng to “re-evaluate the tax measures”.
Wednesday 28 September
The markets were still in turmoil.
The chancellor organised a meeting with bankers to try to reassure them about his plans and underline his commitment to fiscal discipline, having held calls with concerned MPs the night before.

Kwasi Kwarteng faces the pressure at conference
But things went from bad to worse when the Bank of England was forced to intervene, launching a temporary bond-buying programme to prevent “material risk” to UK financial stability.
As calls increased for a U-turn and even Mr Kwarteng’s resignation, the government ruled it out, with one minister telling Sky News it was “bulls***t” to say the market chaos was due to the mini-budget.
Thursday 29 September
The chaos was not just in Westminster or the markets, it was getting through to voters as well.
After a united Labour conference and a well-received speech from party leader Sir Keir Starmer, the party surged ahead in the polls, totting up a massive 33-point lead in a YouGov poll, with many more positive surveys following over the coming days.

Sir Keir Starmer’s own conference speech is well received. Pic: AP
Translated to a general election, Sir Keir would get a vote share of 54% compared to just 21% for the Tories.
But the PM came out to defend her and Mr Kwarteng’s fiscal plans again, insisting the mini-budget was necessary to help people and businesses facing soaring living costs.
Sunday 2 October
The party faithful gathered in Birmingham for the Conservative Party conference, but many MPs stayed away amid the ongoing rows around the economic plan.
Ms Truss appeared on the BBC and made her first hint of an apology for the chaos, admitting she “should have laid the ground better” for the tax cutting mini-budget, saying she had “learnt from that” and would “make sure in future we will do a better job”.
But the rebellion was already swelling, specifically around the scrapping of the 45p tax rate, with former frontbenchers Michael Gove and Grant Shapps seeming to lead the charge.
The PM doubled down on the policy, appearing to throw her chancellor under the bus by saying it was a decision taken by Mr Kwarteng. But a spokesman later said the pair were “in lockstep” on the measure.
Monday 3rd October
The rebellion grows as MPs gossiped in the fringe events around the conference centre in Birmingham.
Mr Gove said he would vote against the 45p tax rate if it comes to the Commons, while chair of the Treasury Committee – and close Sunak ally – Mel Stride demanded OBR forecasts are brought forward.
Then came the U-turn. Mr Kwarteng confirmed the 45p plan had been scrapped just hours before he took to the stage for his conference speech, saying it had become a “distraction” and adding: “We get it, we have listened.”
Despite the blow to his authority, the chancellor insisted he has “not at all” considered resigning.
The PM echoed his comments, and insisted her focus is now “building a high growth economy”.
Tuesday 4 October
More questions were raised about the relationship between the PM and her chancellor after Ms Truss repeatedly refused to say whether she trusted Mr Kwarteng following the 45p tax rate U-turn.
But she told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby that she had “absolutely no shame” about the change of direction.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:30
PM defends tax cut reversal
Meanwhile, a fresh battle emerged over whether the government would increase benefits in line with inflation – a pledge made by her predecessor Boris Johnson.
Cabinet cohesion appeared to fall by the wayside as Leader of the House Penny Mordaunt told reporters the rise should happen, while Home Secretary Suella Braverman accused MPs of staging a “coup” against the prime minister.
Wednesday 5 October
On the final day of conference, Ms Truss got up to give her keynote speech and vowed to “get Britain through the tempest”, insisting “everyone will benefit” from the result of her economic policies.
She told the audience she and her chancellor “will keep closely co-ordinating our monetary and fiscal policy” after the government’s tax-cutting mini-budget which caused such market turmoil.
And she coined the phrase “the anti-growth coalition” as she attacked Labour, the Lib Dems, the SNP, protesters and unions.
Thursday 6 October
Conference over, and Ms Truss took to the international stage again, flying to Prague to meet with European leaders about their response to Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.
She had bilateral meetings with French President Emmanuel Macron, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala.
The summit also came after Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney revealed the UK and EU would be holding talks during the week to resolve issues around the Northern Ireland Protocol – part of the Brexit deal aimed at preventing a harder border on the island of Ireland.
But rows within her party over the mini-budget and future plans for benefits continued to roll on at home, and would need to be faced when she got back.
Friday 7 October
Worrying warnings were issued by the National Grid that the UK households and businesses might face planned three-hour outages to ensure that the grid does not collapse in the “unlikely” event gas supplies fall short of demand during the winter.
But on the same day, there was friction between Ms Truss and her Business Secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg over a campaign to advise the public to watch their energy usage.

There were tensions over Jacob Rees-Mogg’s plans.
Mr Rees-Mogg was believed to have backed a £15m campaign for over the winter to give out public information on energy saving.
But the Times reported he was overruled by the PM as she was “ideologically opposed” to such an approach as it could be too interventionist.
Monday 10 October
As markets continued to voice concerns over the mini-budget and MPs increasingly demanded an earlier update on how the chancellor plans to pay for all the measures, Mr Kwarteng confirmed he would bring forward the date of his medium-term fiscal update from the end of November to Halloween.
A spokesperson said he wanted to set out his commitment to debt falling over the medium term “as soon as possible” and the new date was “the right time to do that”.
And the government committed to it being accompanied by that all-important OBR forecast.
Tuesday 11 October
After a turbulent conference season recess, MPs returned to Westminster, with Labour promising to step up pressure on the government to U-turn on its entire mini-budget.
The chancellor opened business with Treasury Questions, and MPs saw through Ms Truss’ reversal of the National Insurance hike from earlier this year.
But there was still debate within the Tory Party about the direction of the PM, with one MP suggesting she would need to reintroduce a rise in corporation tax to pay for her policies.

The PM and chancellor say they are ‘in lockstep’ over their plans.
Meanwhile, it was leaked to the press that Ms Truss planned to ban solar panels from farmland, saying they were “a blight on the landscape”.
It caused uproar within her party and the climate change lobby, all amid her ongoing pledge to bring fracking to the UK.
Wednesday 12 October
Ahead of her second PMQs since winning the keys to Number 10, the government announced it would cap the revenues of renewable energy firms to stop them benefitting from record profits.
It was welcomed by Labour, who said it was the windfall tax they had been calling for – but they wanted more action on oil and gas companies.
During the main Commons event, Ms Truss then pledged not to cut public spending.
But it raised even more questions about how the government would pay for its plans, especially after the Institute for Fiscal Studies said the chancellor would need to find £60bn of cuts to cover them.
As Tories continued to voice their concerns and unrest grew, Ms Truss embarked on a so-called “charm offensive” to try to win back the critics within her own party, touring the tea rooms and appealing to members of the 1922.
Thursday 13 October
Mr Kwarteng got on a plane and headed to Washington DC to meet leaders of the IMF – a difficult meeting considering the organisation’s previous critcisim of his fiscal plans.
But the open revolt at home was growing, with the likes of former home secretary Priti Patel saying “market forces” could make a government U-turn on corporation tax cuts unavoidable.
Downing Street insisted the prime minister and the chancellor “remained committed” to the growth plan.
But late on Thursday, after a hasty briefing with journalists, the chancellor cut his trip short and got on a plane to head home amid rumours of further U-turns.
Mr Kwarteng insisted that his position was safe, saying: “I am not going anywhere.”
Friday 14 October
Straight from the airport, Mr Kwarteng headed to Number 10. And after just 38 days in the job, Ms Truss fired one of her closest friends and allies in an attempt to win back the confidence, not only of her party, but of the markets and the public.
In a letter to the PM, he said her “vision is the right one” but he “accepted” her position.
Within an hour, his successor was appointed – former health and foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt.

Jeremy Hunt is appointed as Liz Truss’s new chancellor.
He came from a very different wing of the party, and again showed Ms Truss reaching out to try and reunite MPs behind her.
In a tense press conference later that afternoon, she confirmed the latest U-turn from her government – reintroducing the rise in corporation tax to 25% – saying: “The way we deliver our mission has to changed.”
But she added the “mission remains” to deliver a “low-tax, high-wage, high-growth economy”.
Saturday 15 October
The new chancellor hit the airwaves to hammer home the message it was all change in the Treasury.
Mr Hunt said there had been “mistakes” in the mini-budget from his predecessor and his boss, and that it had been an error to “fly blind” by not having an OBR forecast alongside it.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:23
‘You’re out of your depth, prime minister?’
He revealed the government “won’t have the speed of tax cuts we were hoping for and some taxes will go up”.
And asked if this would mean a return to austerity, he replied: “I don’t think we’re talking about austerity in the way we had it in 2010. But we’re going to have to take tough decisions on both spending and tax.”
Mr Hunt also released a statement on Saturday night saying his focus was on “growth underpinned by stability”.
Monday 17 October
By Monday, the U-turns were in full swing. Mr Hunt made a statement from the Treasury saying he was reversing “almost all” of the tax cuts announced in Mr Kwarteng’s mini-budget and was scaling back support for energy bills.
He said the 1p cut to income tax would be delayed “indefinitely” and the government’s energy price guarantee would only be universal until April – not for two years as originally planned.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:10
Income tax cut to be delayed ‘indefinitely’
Meanwhile, Labour secured an urgent question in the Commons about what had happened with the ousting of the former chancellor in the days before.
Rather than answering the question, the PM sent Penny Mordaunt to the despatch box, where she said Ms Truss wasn’t “hiding under a desk” but was busy with work.
Yet in the closing minutes of the event, the prime minister came into the chamber in preparation for Mr Hunt’s statement on the long list of reversals of policy.
While many MPs welcomed the new chancellor and the change of direction, other were furious, and the attempts to settle the mood of the party did not seem to be working. Without her policies, it was unclear what the PM had to offer.
Tuesday 18 October
Ms Truss’s premiership was hanging by a thread. Questions over what further decisions Mr Hunt would make to balance the books led to rumours of abandoning the pensions triple lock, cutting benefits, and even reducing the defence budget.
Armed Forces Minister James Heappey said he remained supportive of Ms Truss, unlike many of his colleagues, but there was no more room for error after the previous day of U-turns.
During a full cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning, the chancellor told ministers every department would need to find savings, a Treasury source said, with many cabinet ministers wondering how.
Ms Truss continued to hold meetings with MPs from various factions of the party, but there was a sense in the air that things were not going her way.
Wednesday 19 October
It was just Ms Truss’s third appearance at PMQs, but a lot of pressure was mounting on her to give the performance of her life.
She told the Commons she was a “fighter” not a “quitter”, and many in her party seemed calmed by her performance.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:49
PM: ‘I’m a fighter, not a quitter’
But within hours, her Home Secretary Suella Braverman announced her exit from cabinet – technically over breaking the ministerial code, but with a resignation letter slamming the performance of the government.
Things went from bad to worse later in the evening over a vote on fracking in the Commons that Tory MPs had been told was equivalent to a “confidence vote” in the PM.
Confusion reigned. Reports of bullying tactics and man-handling came from the voting lobbies, the chief whip resigned, then was back in post, it was unclear if the three-line whip was in place and the party was furious, with MPs starting to publicly call for Ms Truss to resign.
Thursday 20 October
After the chaos of the Commons the night before, the number of MPs calling for Ms Truss to go began to pick up momentum.
The chair of the 1922 Committee, Sir Graham Brady, was seen going in the backdoor of Downing Street, and a Number 10 spokesman confirmed the pair were meeting at the PM’s request.
Deputy Prime Minister Therese Coffey was seen entering next, followed by Conservative Party Chairman Jake Berry.
Shortly after 1.30pm, after just 44 days in power, Ms Truss came out onto the street and announced she was resigning, with a new PM to be chosen within one week.

Liz Truss announces her resignation.
You may like
World
Israeli soldier describes arbitrary killing of civilians in Gaza
Published
7 hours agoon
July 7, 2025By
admin
An Israeli reservist who served three tours of duty in Gaza has told Sky News in a rare on-camera interview that his unit was often ordered to shoot anyone entering areas soldiers defined as no-go zones, regardless of whether they posed a threat, a practice he says left civilians dead where they fell.
“We have a territory that we are in, and the commands are: everyone that comes inside needs to die,” he said. “If they’re inside, they’re dangerous you need to kill them. No matter who it is,” he said.
Speaking anonymously, the soldier said troops killed civilians arbitrarily. He described the rules of engagement as unclear, with orders to open fire shifting constantly depending on the commander.
The soldier is a reservist in the Israel Defence Force’s 252nd Division. He was posted twice to the Netzarim corridor; a narrow strip of land cut through central Gaza early in the war, running from the sea to the Israeli border. It was designed to split the territory and allow Israeli forces to have greater control from inside the Strip.
He said that when his unit was stationed on the edge of a civilian area, soldiers slept in a house belonging to displaced Palestinians and marked an invisible boundary around it that defined a no-go zone for Gazans.
“In one of the houses that we had been in, we had the big territory. This was the closest to the citizens’ neighbourhood, with people inside. And there’s an imaginary line that they tell us all the Gazan people know it, and that they know they are not allowed to pass it,” he said. “But how can they know?”
People who crossed into this area were most often shot, he said.
More on War In Gaza
Related Topics:
“It was like pretty much everyone that comes into the territory, and it might be like a teenager riding his bicycle,” he said.

The soldier is seen in Gaza. Photos are courtesy of the interviewed soldier, who requested anonymity
The soldier described a prevailing belief among troops that all Gazans were terrorists, even when they were clearly unarmed civilians. This perception, he said, was not challenged and was often endorsed by commanders.
“They don’t really talk to you about civilians that may come to your place. Like I was in the Netzarim road, and they say if someone comes here, it means that he knows he shouldn’t be there, and if he still comes, it means he’s a terrorist,” he said.
“This is what they tell you. But I don’t really think it’s true. It’s just poor people, civilians that don’t really have too many choices.”
He said the rules of engagement shifted constantly, leaving civilians at the mercy of commanders’ discretion.
“They might be shot, they might be captured,” he said. “It really depends on the day, the mood of the commander.”
He recalled an occasion of a man crossing the boundary and being shot. When another man came later to the body, he too was shot.
Later the soldiers decided to capture people who approached the body. Hours after that, the order changed again, shoot everyone on sight who crosses the “imaginary line”.

The Israeli soldier during his on-camera interview with Sky News
At another time, his unit was positioned near the Shujaiya area of Gaza City. He described Palestinians scavenging scrap metal and solar panels from a building inside the so-called no-go zone.
“For sure, no terrorists there,” he said. “Every commander can choose for himself what he does. So it’s kind of like the Wild West. So, some commanders can really decide to do war crimes and bad things and don’t face the consequences of that.”
The soldier said many of his comrades believed there were no innocents in Gaza, citing the Hamas-led 7 October attack that killed around 1,200 people and saw 250 taken hostage. Dozens of hostages have since been freed or rescued by Israeli forces, while about 50 remain in captivity, including roughly 30 Israel believes are dead.
He recalled soldiers openly discussing the killings.
“They’d say: ‘Yeah, but these people didn’t do anything to prevent October 7, and they probably had fun when this was happening to us. So they deserve to die’.”
He added: “People don’t feel mercy for them.”
“I think a lot of them really felt like they were doing something good,” he said. “I think the core of it, that in their mind, these people aren’t innocent.”

The IDF soldier during one of his three tours in Gaza
In Israel, it is rare for soldiers to publicly criticise the IDF, which is seen as a unifying institution and a rite of passage for Jewish Israelis. Military service shapes identity and social standing, and those who speak out risk being ostracised.
The soldier said he did not want to be identified because he feared being branded a traitor or shunned by his community.
Still, he felt compelled to speak out.
“I kind of feel like I took part in something bad, and I need to counter it with something good that I do, by speaking out, because I am very troubled about what I took and still am taking part of, as a soldier and citizen in this country,” he said
“I think the war is… a very bad thing that is happening to us, and to the Palestinians, and I think it needs to be over,” he said.
He added: “I think in Israeli community, it’s very hard to criticise itself and its army. A lot of people don’t understand what they are agreeing to. They think the war needs to happen, and we need to bring the hostages back, but they don’t understand the consequences.
“I think a lot of people, if they knew exactly what’s happening, it wouldn’t go down very well for them, and they wouldn’t agree with it. I hope that by speaking of it, it can change how things are being done.”

The soldier is a reservist in the Israel Defence Force’s 252nd Division
We put the allegations of arbitrary killings in the Netzarim corridor to the Israeli military.
In a statement, the IDF said it “operates in strict accordance with its rules of engagement and international law, taking feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm”.
“The IDF operates against military targets and objectives, and does not target civilians or civilian objects,” the statement continued.
The Israeli military added that “reports and complaints regarding the violation of international law by the IDF are transferred to the relevant authorities responsible for examining exceptional incidents that occurred during the war”.
On the specific allegations raised by the soldier interviewed, the IDF said it could not address them directly because “the necessary details were not provided to address the case mentioned in the query. Should additional information be received, it will be thoroughly examined.”
Read more:
What is the possible Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal?
Two security workers injured at Gaza aid site, group says
The man acting as backchannel for Hamas in US negotiations
The statement also mentioned the steps the military says it takes to minimise civilian casualties, including issuing evacuation warnings and advising people to temporarily leave areas of intense fighting.
“The areas designated for evacuation in the Gaza Strip are updated as needed. The IDF continuously informs the civilian population of any changes,” it said.
World
Australian mother guilty of murdering three people with poisonous mushrooms
Published
9 hours agoon
July 7, 2025By
admin
An Australian mother has been found guilty of murdering her estranged husband’s parents and an aunt by serving them a beef wellington laced with poisonous mushrooms.
Erin Patterson, 50, invited her former parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, and Gail Patterson’s sister, Heather Wilkinson, 66, to the fatal lunch on 29 July 2023.
The mother-of-two, from the state of Victoria in southern Australia, has also been convicted of the attempted murder of Mrs Wilkinson’s husband Reverend Ian Wilkinson.
All four fell ill after eating a meal of beef wellington, mashed potatoes and green beans at Patterson’s home in the town of Leongatha, the court was told.
Prosecutors said Patterson knowingly laced the beef pastry dish with deadly death cap mushrooms, also known as Amanita phalloides, at her home.
The guests ate their meals off four large grey dinner plates, while Patterson ate from a smaller, tan-coloured plate, the court heard.
Mrs Wilkinson and Mrs Patterson died on Friday 4 August 2023, while Mr Patterson died a day later.
More on Australia
Related Topics:
Reverend Wilkinson spent seven weeks in hospital but survived.

Ian and Heather Wilkinson Pic: The Salvation Army Australia – Museum

Ian Wilkinson arrives at court during the trial. Pic: Reuters
Her estranged husband Simon Patterson, with whom she has two children, was also invited to the lunch and initially accepted but later declined, the trial heard.
The jury was told that prosecutors had dropped three charges that Patterson had attempted to murder her husband, who she has been separated from since 2015.
Reverend Wilkinson said that immediately after the meal, Patterson fabricated a cancer diagnosis, suggesting the lunch was put together so that she could ask them the best way to tell her children about the illness.
Read more:
Patterson denies measuring ‘fatal dose’
Patterson weeps in court

Death cap mushrooms. File pic: iStock
The prosecution said she did this to justify the children’s absence.
The defence did not dispute that Patterson lied about having cancer.
The trial attracted intense interest in Australia – with podcasters, journalists and documentary-makers descending on the town of Morwell, around two hours east of Melbourne, where the court hearings took place.
A sentencing date is yet to be scheduled.
What makes death cap mushrooms so lethal?
The death cap is one of the most toxic mushrooms on the planet and is involved in the majority of fatal mushroom poisonings worldwide.
The species contains three main groups of toxins: amatoxins, phallotoxins, and virotoxins.
From these, amatoxins are primarily responsible for the toxic effects in humans.
The alpha-amanitin amatoxin has been found to cause protein deficit and ultimately cell death, although other mechanisms are thought to be involved.
The liver is the main organ that fails due to the poison, but other organs are also affected, most notably the kidneys.
The effects usually begin after a short latent period and can include gastrointestinal disorders followed by jaundice, seizures, coma, and eventually, death.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
World
Israel attacks Houthi targets at three ports and power plant in Yemen
Published
13 hours agoon
July 7, 2025By
admin
Israel says its military has attacked Houthi targets at three ports and a power plant in Yemen.
Defence minister Israel Katz confirmed the strikes, saying they were carried out due to repeated attacks by the Iranian-backed rebel group on Israel.
Mr Katz said the Israeli military attacked the Galaxy Leader ship which he claimed was hijacked by the Houthis and was being used for “terrorist activities in the Red Sea”.

A bridge crane damaged by Israeli airstrikes last year in the Yemeni port of Hodeidah. Pic: Reuters
It came after the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued an evacuation warning for people at Hodeidah, Ras Issa, and Salif ports – as well as the Ras al Khatib power station, which it said is controlled by Houthi rebels.
The IDF said it would carry out airstrikes on those areas due to “military activities being carried out there”.
Afterwards, Mr Katz confirmed the strikes at the ports and power plant.
Earlier in the day, a ship was reportedly set on fire after being attacked in the Red Sea.
A private security company said the assault, off the southwest coast of Yemen, resembled that of the Houthi militant group.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:00
From May: Israel strikes Yemen’s main airport
It was the first such incident reported in the vital shipping corridor since mid-April.
The vessel, identified as the Liberian-flagged, Greek-owned bulk carrier Magic Seas, had taken on water after being hit by sea drones, maritime security sources said. The crew later abandoned the ship.
The Houthi rebels have been launching missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group’s leadership called an effort to end Israel’s offensive against Hamas in Gaza.
Between November 2023 and January 2025, the Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones, sinking two of them and killing four sailors.
The Houthis paused attacks in a self-imposed ceasefire until the US launched an assault against the rebels in mid-March.
That ended weeks later and the Houthis have not attacked a vessel, though they have continued occasional missile attacks targeting Israel.
Read more:
What is the possible Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal?
‘We’ll never yield’: Millions of Iranians unite in mourning

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
A renewed Houthi campaign against shipping could again draw in US and Western forces to the area.
The ship attack comes at a sensitive moment in the Middle East.
A possible ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war hangs in the balance and Iran is weighing up whether to restart negotiations over its nuclear programme.
It follows American airstrikes last month, which targeted its most-sensitive atomic sites amid an Israeli war against the Islamic Republic that ended after 12 days.
How did the Houthis come to control much of Yemen?
A civil war erupted in Yemen in late 2014 when the Houthis seized Sanaa.
Worried by the growing influence of Shia Iran along its border, Saudi Arabia led a Western-backed coalition in March 2015, which intervened in support of the Saudi-backed government.
The Houthis established control over much of the north and other large population centres, while the internationally recognised government based itself in the port city of Aden.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Sports2 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike