Today we’re kicking off a new spotlight on another very popular segment in the EV space – stocks. Over the past couple years, we’ve seen EV automakers financial bolstered or inhibited by IPOs, SPAC Mergers, or updates to their EV plans. Below, you can see how some of the companies building EVs compare side by side on Wall Street and how far they have come – or fallen – in the past year.
Table of contents
Comparing three different groups of EV stocks
Below you will find three separate tables, each unique in its own way, but each part of one cohesive set of data – how companies that are building some degree of EVs are doing stock-wise over the last month, how each compares to its competitors, and how each company’s numbers compare to its status a year ago.
The first chart is a global stock comparison, including legacy and EV automakers around the globe. We have included their highest stock price in their primary market, regardless if it’s in the United States or not. For instance, companies like Volkswagen Group and BMW are primarily sold on the XETRA German Electronic Exchange, Volvo Cars is on the market in Sweden, etc.
The second chart includes EV stocks sold in the US market. You may see some of the same automakers, but they may have different tickers, as they pertain to one of the United States’ several local exchanges.
Last but not least, we couldn’t provide EV stock numbers without delivering a table dedicated specifically to EV automakers, right? The third table consists of automakers that manufacturer EVs only – no legacy automakers that are starting to dabble in electrification here. In this table, you’ll see some startups that have gone public in recent years and how they’ve fared so far. Spoiler alert – not great.
Keep in mind, not one granule of this post is financial advice. It is simply stock data relevant at the time of this posting, compiled into one place for you to peruse, compare, and draw your own conclusions. With that, let’s start with the top ten EV stocks around the globe in October.
* – Compared to 9/30/22 IPO / ** – Compared to 11/8/21 IPO
It should come as no surprise that American automaker Tesla is number one in EV stock. Despite a pretty big fall compared to October 2021, the EV company is still nearly double the value of its second place competitor Toyota, which it dethroned as the world’s most valuable automaker years ago.
We feel a bit generous including Toyota in this list of EV stocks, because it’s just starting to dip a pinky toe into the BEV pool with its bZ4X, which will see boosted production following a massive recall pertaining to the EV’s wheels literally falling off. A steady outlook for BEV production could be a reason for Toyota being in the green compared to a month ago. Still, it remains down overall YOY.
Following its IPO split from parent Volkswagen Group on September 30, Porsche showed the biggest gains in October by a lot, jumping nearly $18 in value. We will keep eyes on this going forward to better gauge its early valuation and see how it pans out over time.
Moving our sights to US-specific markets, Tesla is again your top dog (get used to it). Toyota again grabs silver, but Build Your Dreams (BYD) is holding in third place for October, despite a near $11 loss in valuation compared to a month ago. Still, it has bested American automaker GM.
What may be most impressive about BYD’s success in the US market so far is that the company does not sell passenger EVs in the country – only commercial vehicles like buses and heavy-duty trucks. Household names round out the rest of the US list and include two nascent EV automakers in Rivian and Lucid Group. More on them below.
If you’re here reading on Electrek, you may agree that this last list is the most exciting and probably most volatile head to toe. These 13 companies make up a lot of the EV stock being sold around the world. More importantly, they showcase just how drastic valuations can be between established scaled automakers and EV startups.
Tesla is once again the group leader (surprise surprise), followed by BYD, who continues to expand its footprint outside of China and into new markets, particularly in Europe right now.
The next two on the list are names you’d expect – Rivian and Lucid. Both are relatively young in the stock world but show minimal drops this month despite growing pains in scaling their respective EV production lines. YOY comparisons have not been kind to either young automaker, especially Rivian, which is down nearly $100 per share following its massive IPO in November of 2021.
Other Chinese EV automakers with US stock market presence join BYD on the list, including NIO and XPeng. Like BYD, neither sell passengers EVs in the country yet. Companies 10 through 13 are the current bottom feeders – EV startups that have yet to deliver an EV, and their valuation shows it.
Each of these companies has its own unique potential in a booming market, but each has faced its own setbacks in reaching scaled production. Whether their hurdles have been financial, infrastructural, or even controversial, these startups continue to fight on.
Of all of the companies on these EV stock lists, these may be most exciting to watch succeed and grow their valuation – if they can. Time will tell.
That’s all for now, check back with Electrek next month for the November report, so we can once again compare how these EV company stack up. Not only against one another, but also against themselves.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The HD arm of Hyundai has just released the first official images of the new, battery-electric HX19e mini excavator – the first ever production electric excavator from the global South Korean manufacturer.
The HX19e will be the first all-electric asset to enter series production at Hyundai Construction Equipment, with manufacturing set to begin this April.
The new HX19e will be offered with either a 32 kWh or 40 kWh li-ion battery pack – which, according to Hyundai, is nearly double the capacity offered by its nearest competitor (pretty sure that’s not correct –Ed.). The 40kWh battery allows for up to 6 hours and 40 minutes of continuous operation between charges, with a break time top-up on delivering full shift usability.
Those batteries send power to a 13 kW (17.5 hp) electric motor that drives an open-center hydraulic system. Hyundai claims the system delivers job site performance that is at least equal to, if not better than, that of its diesel-powered HX19A mini excavator.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
To that end, the Hyundai XH19e offers the same 16 kN bucket breakout force and a slightly higher 9.4 kN (just over 2100 lb-ft) dipper arm breakout force. The maximum digging depth is 7.6 feet, and the maximum digging reach is 12.9 feet. Hyundai will offer the new electric excavator with just four selectable options:
enclosed cab vs. open canopy
32 or 40 kWh battery capacity
All HX19es will ship with a high standard specification that includes safety valves on the main boom, dipper arm, and dozer blade hydraulic cylinders, as well as two-way auxiliary hydraulic piping allows the machine to be used with a range of commercially available implements. The hydraulics needed to operate a quick coupler, LED booms lights, rotating beacons, an MP3 radio with USB connectivity, and an operator’s seat with mechanical suspension are also standard.
HX19e electric mini excavator; via Hyundai Construction Equipment.
The ability to operate indoors, underground, or in environments like zoos and hospitals were keeping noise levels down is of critical importance to the success of an operation makes electric equipment assets like these coming from Hyundai a must-have for fleet operators and construction crews that hope to remain competitive in the face of ever-increasing noise regulations. The fact that these are cleaner, safer, and cheaper to operate is just icing on that cake.
With the Trump Administration fully in power and Federal electric vehicle incentives apparently on the chopping block, many fleet buyers are second-guessing the push to electrify their fleets. To help ease their minds, Harbinger is launching the IRA Risk-Free Guarantee, promising to cover the cost of anticipated IRA credits if the rebate goes away.
In the case of a Harbinger S524 Class 5 chassis with a 140 kWh battery capacity with an MSRP of $103,200, the company will offer an IRA Risk-Free Guarantee credit of $12,900 at the time of purchase, bringing initial cost down to $90,300. This matches the typical selling price of an equivalent Freightliner MT-45 diesel medium-duty chassis.
“We created (the IRA Risk-Free Guarantee) program to eliminate the financial uncertainty for customers who are interested in EV adoption, but are concerned about the future of the IRA tax credit,” said John Harris, Co-founder and CEO of Harbinger. “For electric vehicles to go mainstream, they must be cost-competitive with diesel vehicles. While the IRA tax credit helps bridge that gap, we remain committed to price parity with diesel, even if the credit disappears. Our vertically integrated approach enables us to keep costs low, shields us from tariff volatility, and ensures long-term price stability for our customers.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Harbinger recently revealed a book of business consisting of 4,690 binding orders. Those orders are valued at approximately $500 million, and fueled a $100 million Series B raise.
Electrek’s Take
Harbinger truck charging; via Harbinger.
One of the most frequent criticisms of electric vehicle incentives is that they encourage manufacturers and dealers to artificially inflate the price of their vehicles. In their heads, I imagine the scenario goes something like this:
you looked at a used Nissan LEAF on a dealer’s lot priced at $14,995
a new bill passes and the state issues a $2500 used EV rebate
you decide to go back to the dealer and buy the car
once you arrive, you find that the price is now $16,995
While it’s commendable that Harbinger is taking action and sacrificing some of its profits to keep the business growing and the overall cause of fleet electrification moving forward, one has to wonder how they can “suddenly” afford to offer these massive discounts in lieu of government incentives – and how many other EV brands could probably afford to do the same.
Whoever is left at Nikola after the fledgling truck-maker filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last month is probably having a worse week than you – the company issued a recall with the NHTSA for 95 of its hydrogen fuel cell-powered semi trucks.
That complaint seems to have led to the posthumous recall of 95 (out of about 200) Nikola-built electric semi trucks.
The latest HFCEV recall is on top of the 2023 battery recall that impacted nearly all of Nikola’s deployed BEV fleet. Clean Trucking is citing a January 31, 2025 report from the NHTSA revealing that, as of the end of 2024, Nikola had yet to complete repairs for 98 of its affected BEVs. The ultimate fate of those vehicles remains unclear.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Electrek’s Take
Image via Coyote Container.
I’ve received a few messages complaining that I “haven’t covered” the Nikola bankruptcy – which is bananas, since I reported that it was coming five weeks before it happened and there was no “new” information presented in the interim (he said, defensively).
Still, it’s worth looking back on Nikola’s headlong dive into the empty swimming pool of hydrogen, and remind ourselves that even its most enthusiastic early adopters were suffering.
“The truck costs five to ten times that of a standard Class 8 drayage [truck],” explained William Hall, Managing Member and Founder of Coyote Container. “On top of that, you pay five to ten times the Federal Excise Tax (FET) and local sales tax, [which comes to] roughly 22%. If you add the 10% reserve not covered by any voucher program, you are at 32%. Thirty-two percent of $500,000 is $160,000 for the trucker to somehow pay [out of pocket].”
After several failures that left his Nikola trucks stranded on the side of the road, the first such incident happening with just 900 miles on the truck’s odometer, a NHTSA complaint was filed. It’s not clear if it was Hall’s complaint, but the complaint seems to address his concerns, below.