A man who spent more than 38 years in prison for a murder he did not commit has been freed after DNA evidence pointed to another – now dead – suspect.
Maurice Hastings, now 69, was convicted of the 1983 murder of Roberta Wydermyer, who was killed by a single gunshot to the head. Her body was found in the boot of her vehicle.
Mr Hastings was originally tried for special circumstance murder with the district attorney’s office seeking the death penalty but the jury at the time was unable to come to a verdict.
He was tried again and was convicted of murder, robbery and sexual assault, with a jury sentencing him in 1988 to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
He was also convicted of two attempted murders, of Ms Wydermyer’s husband and his friend, according to NBC4, despite no physical evidence ever linking Mr Hastings to the original crime in Inglewood, Los Angeles.
Before his release from a prison in California, Mr Hastings maintained his innocence for almost four decades.
“What has happened to Mr Hastings is a terrible injustice,” district attorney George Gascón said in a statement.
More on California
Related Topics:
“The justice system is not perfect, and when we learn of new evidence which causes us to lose confidence in a conviction, it is our obligation to act swiftly.”
Mr Hastings looked emotional as his conviction was overturned by the court.
Advertisement
Semen found in victim’s mouth was not his
At the time of the victim’s autopsy, the coroner conducted a sexual assault examination and semen was found in the victim’s mouth.
Mr Hastings sought DNA testing in 2000 but the district attorney’s office denied the request.
He then submitted a claim of innocence to the district attorney’s Conviction Integrity Unit last year and DNA testing last June found that the semen was not his.
Instead, it matched with a person convicted of the armed kidnapping of a female victim who was placed in the boot of a vehicle and the kidnap, rape and forcing of a sex act on a young woman.
That suspect, whose name was not released, was sentenced to 56 years in prison for those crimes and is now dead.
The district attorney’s office said it was working with police to further investigate the involvement of the deceased person in the case.
“I prayed for many years that this day would come,” the Los Angeles Innocence Project reported Mr Hastings as saying after his conviction was overturned.
Donald Trump has said he will sue the BBC for between $1bn and $5bn over the editing of his speech on Panorama.
The US president confirmed he would be taking legal action against the broadcaster while on Air Force One overnight on Saturday.
“We’ll sue them. We’ll sue them for anywhere between a billion (£792m) and five billion dollars (£3.79bn), probably sometime next week,” he told reporters.
“We have to do it, they’ve even admitted that they cheated. Not that they couldn’t have not done that. They cheated. They changed the words coming out of my mouth.”
Mr Trump then told reporters he would discuss the matter with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer over the weekend, and claimed “the people of the UK are very angry about what happened… because it shows the BBC is fake news”.
Separately, Mr Trump told GB News: “I’m not looking to get into lawsuits, but I think I have an obligation to do it.
“This was so egregious. If you don’t do it, you don’t stop it from happening again with other people.”
More on Bbc
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
11:02
BBC crisis: How did it happen?
The Daily Telegraph reported earlier this month that an internal memo raised concerns about the BBC’s editing of a speech made by Mr Trump on 6 January 2021, just before a mob rioted at the US Capitol building, on the news programme.
The concerns regard clips spliced together from sections of the president’s speech to make it appear he told supporters he was going to walk to the US Capitol with them to “fight like hell” in the documentary Trump: A Second Chance?, which was broadcast by the BBC the week before last year’s US election.
Following a backlash, both BBC director-general Tim Davie and BBC News chief executive Deborah Turness resigned from their roles.
‘No basis for defamation claim’
On Thursday, the broadcaster officially apologised to the president and added that it was an “error of judgement” and the programme will “not be broadcast again in this form on any BBC platforms”.
A spokesperson said that “the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited,” but they also added that “we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim”.
Earlier this week, Mr Trump’s lawyers threatened to sue the BBC for $1bn unless it apologised, retracted the clip, and compensated him.
Image: The US president said he would sue the broadcaster for between $1bn and $5bn. File pic: PA
Legal challenges
But legal experts have said that Mr Trump would face challenges taking the case to court in the UK or the US.
The deadline to bring the case to UK courts, where defamation damages rarely exceed £100,000 ($132,000), has already expired because the documentary aired in October 2024, which is more than one year.
Also because the documentary was not shown in the US, it would be hard to show that Americans thought less of the president because of a programme they could not watch.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:05
Sky’s Katie Spencer on what BBC bosses told staff on call over Trump row
Newsnight allegations
The BBC has said it was looking into fresh allegations, published in The Telegraph, that its Newsnight show also selectively edited footage of the same speech in a report broadcast in June 2022.
A BBC spokesperson said: “The BBC holds itself to the highest editorial standards. This matter has been brought to our attention and we are now looking into it.”
Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has said she is ready to mend relations with Donald Trump after a high-profile row between the pair.
The former MAGA ally had said the US president was “coming after me hard” to prevent her efforts to release more files about Jeffrey Epstein.
But writing on X on Sunday, she said forgiveness was a “major part” of her Christian faith.
“I’m here to show how it’s possible to settle our differences and move forward as Americans,” she wrote. “That’s why I’m always willing to go on shows with different viewpoints.
“I truly believe in forgiveness and I am open to moving forward with the President.”
She said she’d received warnings about her safety and that “a hotbed of threats” were “being fuelled and egged on by the most powerful man in the world”.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:54
‘MAGA meltdown going on because of Epstein’
“As a woman, I take threats from men seriously,” Ms Greene added.
“I now have a small understanding of the fear and pressure the women, who are victims of Jeffrey Epstein and his cabal, must feel.”
The congresswoman said Mr Trump’s “aggression against me” – considering she was a staunch supporter of his policies – was “completely shocking to everyone”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
The fight began when a petition to vote on the full release of the Epstein files received enough signatures – including Ms Greene’s – to bring it to a vote in the House of Representatives.
Mr Trump rescinded his support for Ms Greene, dubbed her a “RINO” (Republican In Name Only), and suggested he could support a challenge against her.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:05
March 2025: Greene clashes with Sky correspondent
Ms Greene claimed text messages she sent to the president about the Epstein files had “sent him over the edge”.
She wrote on social media: “Of course he’s coming after me hard to make an example to scare all the other Republicans before next week’s vote to release the Epstein files.”
High-profile figures, including Mr Trump, have been referenced in some of the documents.
The White House has said the “selectively leaked emails” were an attempt to “create a fake narrative to smear President Trump”, who has consistently denied any involvement or knowledge about Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.
Mr Trump has called the Epstein files a “hoax” created by the Democrats to “deflect” from the US government shutdown.
They say power is measured by the battles you choose to fight. This week Donald Trump chose two.
One was an international clash with the BBC, the other, a messy family drama in his own backyard.
His lawyers had threatened to sue the BBC for manipulating a speech he gave on 6 January 2021, by editing two different parts together to imply he incited violence.
The corporation apologised but when it refused to meet his $1bn demand for compensation, he upped it to “between $1bn and $5bn”.
Donald Trump has won out-of-court settlements from two US networks, but legal analysts are sceptical about his chances of a courtroom victory.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
11:02
BBC crisis: How did it happen?
In the UK, the deadline for defamation claims has passed, and in Florida, he will have to prove enough people saw it to cause him reputational harm.
More from US
The BBC is protected by the First Amendment of the US constitution, and it is notoriously difficult to demonstrate malicious intent against a public figure.
But for Trump, this may be less about winning a case and more about the optics – reinforcing his claims of “fake news”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
16:23
Will new Epstein emails hurt Trump?
On the other front is Marjorie Taylor Greene, once the most loyal of allies, even touted as a potential running mate.
He publicly withdrew his endorsement of her on Truth Social, branding her “wacky Marjorie” and “a ranting lunatic”.