Connect with us

Published

on

After becoming the new prime minister last week, Rishi Sunak made the controversial decision to appoint Suella Braverman as his home secretary – just six days after she had quit the role for breaking the ministerial code.

A week on, and questions are still being asked about why the PM brought her back after the breach, as well as whether her own performance in the job had contributed to dire conditions in a migration centre in Kent.

Here is what we know:

Why did she quit in the first place?

Ms Braverman was appointed by Liz Truss in September to take over the Home Office after securing some significant backing in the summer’s leadership contest.

But her tenure as home secretary came to end after she broke with security protocols by forwarding an official document to her personal email, and then sent it onto a fellow MP, copying in a parliamentary staffer by accident.

The document was a draft written statement on migration that was deemed highly sensitive as it related to immigration rules, which could have major implications for market-sensitive growth forecasts.

Much of the draft had been briefed to MPs but it was a serious breach of the ministerial code on two accounts – for sharing a statement ahead of time and sending it from a personal account.

Former barrister and ex-attorney general Ms Braverman agreed to quit – then published a scathing resignation letter to Ms Truss, in which she hinted the then PM should go as well over mistakes made during her premiership.

Image:
Suella Braverman’s resignation letter to Liz truss was scathing of her government

“Pretending we haven’t made mistakes, carrying on as if everyone can’t see that we have made them, and hoping that things will magically come right is not serious politics,” she wrote.

“I have made a mistake; I accept responsibility; I resign.”

She also used her letter to raise concerns about the government, saying it had “broken key pledges” and she had “serious concerns” about the government’s commitment to honouring manifesto commitments, especially on immigration.

Re-appointment criticism

Ms Braverman’s re-appointment by Mr Sunak less than a week later was criticised by opposition MPs and a former sleaze watchdog.

The new prime minister hired her after promising to lead the Conservative Party with “integrity, professionalism and accountability”.

But Labour accused him of doing a “grubby deal” instead to ensure the right wing of his party – where Ms Braverman is a key figure – would support him to take over Number 10, “trading security for support”.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper has written to cabinet secretary Simon Case, who determined a security breach had happened, demanding a full investigation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Michael Gove defended Suella Braverman, saying she is a ‘first-rate, front-rank politician’ who ‘acknowledged a mistake had been made’.

And Alistair Graham, former chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said there were questions over whether her appointment was appropriate, especially because the breach was not examined by an ethics adviser.

“Normally the prime minister would have consulted a ministerial adviser for advice,” he said.

“A breach of the ministerial code is seen as a serious matter and would make any minister an inappropriate appointment to one of the four most senior positions in government.”

However, Mr Sunak has stood by the appointment and Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove insisted to Sky News that Ms Braverman was a “first-rate, front-rank politician” who deserved to be back in cabinet.

On Monday, Ms Braverman sent a lengthy letter to the Home Affairs Select Committee to address issues related to her resignation, in which she set out in detail the timetable of what happened.

In it, she revealed that a Home Office review into her communications showed she had sent official documents from her government email to her private one on six occasions in the six weeks she was in the role.

“The review confirmed that all of these occasions occurred in circumstances when I was conducting Home Office meetings virtually or related to public lines to take in interviews,” she wrote.

She also said that before her reappointment she “gave the prime minister assurances” she would not use her personal email for official business and “reaffirmed my understanding of and adherence to the ministerial code”.

Manston chaos

While the row rages on about whether she should have been brought back, another argument is brewing over the treatment of people being housed at the Manston migration centre in Kent.

Last week, a Home Affairs Select Committee heard conditions at Manston were “wretched”, with overcrowding, outbreaks of diseases and people being held for weeks longer than the 24 hours intended.

The home secretary’s judgement has now been called into question after a report in The Times claimed she blocked the transfer of asylum seekers to new hotels and ignored legal advice that the government was illegally detaining people at the centre.

Local Tory MP Sir Roger Gale said the situation at Manston was a “breach of humane conditions”, with the facility holding 4,000 people when it is only designed to hold 1,000.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Conservative MP for North Thanet Sir Roger Gale has told Sky News that the situation in the Manston migrant centre is a ‘breach of humane conditions’.

He said the circumstances “were a problem made in the Home Office”, saying within five weeks the system had been “broken – and it’s got to be mended fast”.

Sir Roger did not point the finger directly at Ms Braverman, saying “whoever is responsible, either the previous home secretary or this one, has to be held to account”.

But sources close to her predecessor, Priti Patel, told Sky News she signed off transfers from holding centres to hotels throughout the summer as she had a statutory duty to do so.

Labour’s Ms Cooper also claimed there had been “a failure to make decisions” within the government, causing the problems, and that Ms Braverman needed to make a statement.

Rwanda and reducing immigration

The home secretary’s return to government has also raised questions about Mr Sunak’s immigration plans and whether he made a deal with her to get her support.

She wants to keep net migration to “tens of thousands” and is keen on reducing overall migration, as stipulated in the 2019 Tory manifesto.

However, Mr Sunak is under pressure from business to ease migration rules to help fill job vacancies and boost growth.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Home Sec to make Rwanda plan ‘work’

One of Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s main strategies to restore market confidence is to loosen some of those immigration rules so forecasts will have the government hitting growth targets.

But both Mrs Braverman and Mr Sunak are supporters of the Rwanda policy to deport Channel migrants to the east African country.

Mr Sunak said he would do “whatever it takes” to ensure the scheme worked while Mrs Braverman said it is her “dream” and “obsession” to see the first flight take off for Rwanda.

How do we sole the immigration dilemma?

Thousands crossing the Channel

Pressure is also piling on the Home Office to act over the record of number of people who continue to cross the channel, with 1,000 arriving on Sunday.

The department is already grappling with a 100,000 backlog in processing asylum applications, with 96% of those from last year still outstanding.

On Sunday, refugee charities wrote to the home secretary demanding the government create more safe routes to the UK as a solution to stopping the dangerous small boat crossings.

Continue Reading

UK

Nearly 500 arrested in London as pro-Palestine protest goes ahead despite pleas

Published

on

By

Nearly 500 arrested in London as pro-Palestine protest goes ahead despite pleas

Nearly 500 people have been arrested over protests supporting the proscribed group Palestine Action, as demonstrators defied calls to reconsider in the wake of the Manchester synagogue terror attack.

Two days after the attack in Crumpsall, crowds of people gathered in central London on Saturday to call on the government to reverse the ban on the proscribed group.

Organisers of the protest, Defend Our Juries, said 1,000 people attended the event to “oppose genocide and the Palestine Action ban”.

The Metropolitan Police said 492 people had been arrested, with the youngest being 18 and the eldest 89. The force said 297 remain in custody and the rest have been bailed.

Before the demonstration even began, six people were arrested for unfurling banners which read “I oppose genocide” and “I support Palestine Action” on Westminster Bridge.

The bulk of the arrests were made in Trafalgar Square, where protesters held placards showing their support for Palestine Action, which was added to the UK’s list of proscribed terrorist groups in July.

The Met said a different group of protesters also gathered in Whitehall before trying to make their way to Trafalgar Square.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Met Police call on pro-Palestine protesters

Many of those arrested throughout the day were older individuals. Pictures showed people with walking sticks or in wheelchairs being supported by police, while others were physically carried to a processing pen after failing to cooperate with officers.

One protester, 62-year-old Mike Higgins, who is blind and uses a wheelchair, told the PA news agency: “We are going to win this battle, by the way, there’s no doubt about that. The problem for me is that I want to win it now to try and bring an end to the suffering in Palestine.”

Police remove a protester taking part in a demonstration in support of Palestine Action in Trafalgar Square. Pic: PA
Image:
Police remove a protester taking part in a demonstration in support of Palestine Action in Trafalgar Square. Pic: PA

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

The Metropolitan Police had urged the Defend Our Juries group to postpone the event in light of the synagogue attack.

Chief of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Mark Rowley, said he was worried resources would be stretched and the ability of the force to protect communities would be compromised as a result of the protest.

Protesters unfurl a banner on Westminster Bridge. Pic: PA
Image:
Protesters unfurl a banner on Westminster Bridge. Pic: PA

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

In a statement on X on Saturday morning, Sir Keir Starmer also said anyone thinking of protesting should “recognise and respect the grief of British Jews”, while Jewish figures called the action “phenomenally tone deaf”.

In a letter to Ade Adelekan, the deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Defend Our Juries said the protest would continue as planned as “the protection of our democracy and the prevention of countless deaths are critical issues”.

Read more:
Tributes to ‘kind and heroic’ victims of Manchester attack
What we know about Manchester attacker

The controversial decision drew criticism from policing minister Sarah Jones, who said many of those attending the event “want to be arrested, that is their aim”.

She said: “We believe in people’s rights to protest. This protest here in London is a different order of event because people are supporting a proscribed organisation and the police have to step in, in that case.”

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

A similar event held by the group, Greater Manchester Friends of Palestine, took place earlier on Saturday in Manchester. Instead of marching in support of Palestine Action, the event was to “honour the names of Palestinian children brutally killed by Israel in Gaza”.

A crowd of around 100 pro-Palestinian supporters gathered outside the city’s Cathedral to listen to speakers before moving en masse to St Peter’s Square.

A similar event was held in Greater Manchester. Pic: Reuters
Image:
A similar event was held in Greater Manchester. Pic: Reuters

A counter-protester in Manchester. Pic: Reuters
Image:
A counter-protester in Manchester. Pic: Reuters

People were heard chanting “Free Palestine!” while a small group of counter-protesters marched in front shouting “release the hostages”.

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) did not say if any arrests were made.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Synagogue attack: Burnham and Badenoch in Manchester

Away from the protests, GMP said four of the six people arrested in connection to the synagogue terror attack will remain in custody for up to another five days.

The force said the custody extension applies to two men, aged 30 and 32, and two women, aged 61 and 46.

An 18-year-old woman and a 43-year-old man have been released and will face no further action.

GMP said all six people had been arrested on suspicion of commission, preparation and instigation of acts of terrorism.

Continue Reading

UK

Police given extra time to question four arrested over Manchester synagogue terror attack

Published

on

By

Police given extra time to question four arrested over Manchester synagogue terror attack

Police have been granted extra time to question four people who were arrested in connection with the terrorist attack on a synagogue in Manchester.

Three men remain in hospital after the car and knife attack at the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue on Thursday.

Jihad al Shamie, 35, who was on bail for an alleged rape, was shot by police as he launched the attack on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.

Adrian Daulby, 53, is believed to have been shot dead by police while trying to stop al Shamie from entering the synagogue.

He died alongside Melvin Cravitz, 66, a worshipper who helped prevent the attacker from entering the place of worship.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Counter Terrorism Policing North West (CTPNW) is leading the police operation and has been granted warrants allowing them to detain four people who were arrested on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts for a further five days.

The warrants relate to two men, aged 30 and 32, and two women, aged 46 and 61.

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said the investigation was “continuing at pace” with “significant resources” mobilised in order to “establish the full picture into what has happened”.

The force said three men remain in hospital with serious injuries, including a security guard with car-impact injuries and a Community Security Trust (CST) worker with stab wounds.

On Friday, the police watchdog, which is investigating the incident, said it was examining the use of lethal force by GMP firearms officers, including “whether police may have caused or contributed to the death” of Mr Daulby.

Read more:
Tributes to ‘kind and heroic’ victims of Manchester attack
What we know about Manchester attacker

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Arrests at pro-Palestine protest

Nearly 500 arrested as pro-Palestine protest goes ahead despite pleas

It comes as 492 people were arrested over protests supporting the proscribed group Palestine Action in Trafalgar Square on Saturday.

The demonstration went ahead despite Sir Keir Starmer, other politicians and police bosses calling on organisers to reconsider.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews called for those who attended the demonstration arrested under the Terrorism Act to also be investigated for stirring up racial hatred.

The board is set to hold an event in the same location on Sunday afternoon to reflect on the two-year anniversary of the 7 October Hamas attack.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Met Police call on pro-Palestine protesters

On Friday, the head of counter-terrorism policing, Laurence Taylor, said a “suspicious device” attached to al Shamie’s torso was fake and police believed he “may have been influenced by extreme Islamist ideology”.

He added: “Based on some fast-time assessments conducted on our systems, this individual does not appear to be known to counter-terrorism policing, however, he does have a non-CT (counter-terror) related criminal history.

“This includes a recent arrest for rape, which resulted in him being bailed.”

Continue Reading

UK

Prince William ‘cares deeply about tradition’ but Earthshot Prize shows he’s not afraid to modernise

Published

on

By

 Prince William 'cares deeply about tradition' but Earthshot Prize shows he's not afraid to modernise

A close adviser to Prince William has told Sky News William “does care deeply about tradition” but his Earthshot Prize shows he’s not afraid to modernise to make sure his work “makes sense” for the generation he will serve.

Marking a month to go until the fifth Earthshot Prize awards takes place in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, Jason Knauf, the new chief executive, says it shows “the sort of leader that Prince William wants to be, both now and in the future” but also the huge impact his influence can have on issues like the climate crisis.

Mr Knauf has become a close confidante of the Prince, having worked with him for ten years, and being there right at the beginning of the Earthshot journey, “when this thing was percolating, and he really pushed us to make it something special”.

But after discussions this week about the “change” William wants to make when he’s monarch, Mr Knauf told us the Prince doesn’t want to just shake things up for the sake of it.

“He does care deeply about tradition, about his family’s legacy of service, and I think Earthshot is a really good example of how you’re going to see that maintained in the future, but done in a way that makes sense for the time”, he said, adding: “That’s what his grandmother did.

“That’s what his father’s been doing. Updating the tradition for the generation that they serve”.

Prince William joined actor Cate Blanchett during a visit to Earthshot Prize finalist Colorifix. Pic: Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace
Image:
Prince William joined actor Cate Blanchett during a visit to Earthshot Prize finalist Colorifix. Pic: Andrew Parsons / Kensington Palace

Explaining how in the early days they looked closely at other examples of past royal prizes or initiatives, such as the Duke of Edinburgh Award, for inspiration, Mr Knauf said: “You know, we didn’t just create this thing in a vacuum. It was about what kind of difference could his leadership make?

More on Earthshot Prize

“And one of the things about the royal family for generations, has been recognising the work of others.

“You know, whether that’s through the honours system, recognising people in arts and community service or whatever it might be, all this is doing is taking something that’s really traditional and putting a modern twist on it”.

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

Last week, a TV programme was released in which Prince William admitted, during an interview with Hollywood star Eugene Levy, that “change is on my agenda” when he becomes King.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Prince William hinted at ‘change’ in an interview with Canadian TV presenter Euguene Levy

This weekend, the finalists for the fifth Earthshot awards are announced, with four weeks to go until the ceremony takes place in Rio.

The prize recognises innovators coming up with solutions to the world’s most pressing environmental problems.

Among this year’s finalists in the running for the five £1m prizes are Matter, a British company whose simple washing machine filters remove the greatest cause of microplastics in our ocean; the world’s first fully ‘upcycled skyscraper’ in Australia, a Chinese company working on mobile phone waste, and the country of Barbados for its environmental focus.

Read more from Sky News:
Radioactive issues could still derail momentum for Gaza peace
Details emerge of synagogue attacker’s life

For the first time, the awards will take place in the same country, in the same week as the UN climate change conference COP30.

Prince William is the founder and president of The Earthshot Prize. Pic AP
Image:
Prince William is the founder and president of The Earthshot Prize. Pic AP

Addressing whether the positive message of Earthshot will be overshadowed by the inevitable split opinions on tackling the climate crisis that will come out of the conference in Belem, Mr Knauf said: “The news around political disagreement and all of that stuff will be out there, but that’s one of the reasons we created the prize, directly to challenge that pessimism and negativity, to say we need to get on with this work.

“Showing world leaders that big things are happening in their regions and in their countries and in their backyards should remind them that, actually, this isn’t something that’s theoretical.

“The actual solutions that we need really, really do exist”.

Prince William will travel to Brazil on 3 November for engagements in Rio, highlighting environmental issues, as well as attending the awards on 5 November at the iconic Museum of Tomorrow.

In a video posted on his social media, the Prince explains how he continues to do this for his children, saying: “The Earthshot Prize was founded because this decade matters.

“2030 is a threshold by which future generations will judge us; it is the point at which our actions, or lack of them, will have shaped forever the trajectory of our planet.”

Continue Reading

Trending