Connect with us

Published

on

After becoming the new prime minister last week, Rishi Sunak made the controversial decision to appoint Suella Braverman as his home secretary – just six days after she had quit the role for breaking the ministerial code.

A week on, and questions are still being asked about why the PM brought her back after the breach, as well as whether her own performance in the job had contributed to dire conditions in a migration centre in Kent.

Here is what we know:

Why did she quit in the first place?

Ms Braverman was appointed by Liz Truss in September to take over the Home Office after securing some significant backing in the summer’s leadership contest.

But her tenure as home secretary came to end after she broke with security protocols by forwarding an official document to her personal email, and then sent it onto a fellow MP, copying in a parliamentary staffer by accident.

The document was a draft written statement on migration that was deemed highly sensitive as it related to immigration rules, which could have major implications for market-sensitive growth forecasts.

Much of the draft had been briefed to MPs but it was a serious breach of the ministerial code on two accounts – for sharing a statement ahead of time and sending it from a personal account.

Former barrister and ex-attorney general Ms Braverman agreed to quit – then published a scathing resignation letter to Ms Truss, in which she hinted the then PM should go as well over mistakes made during her premiership.

Image:
Suella Braverman’s resignation letter to Liz truss was scathing of her government

“Pretending we haven’t made mistakes, carrying on as if everyone can’t see that we have made them, and hoping that things will magically come right is not serious politics,” she wrote.

“I have made a mistake; I accept responsibility; I resign.”

She also used her letter to raise concerns about the government, saying it had “broken key pledges” and she had “serious concerns” about the government’s commitment to honouring manifesto commitments, especially on immigration.

Re-appointment criticism

Ms Braverman’s re-appointment by Mr Sunak less than a week later was criticised by opposition MPs and a former sleaze watchdog.

The new prime minister hired her after promising to lead the Conservative Party with “integrity, professionalism and accountability”.

But Labour accused him of doing a “grubby deal” instead to ensure the right wing of his party – where Ms Braverman is a key figure – would support him to take over Number 10, “trading security for support”.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper has written to cabinet secretary Simon Case, who determined a security breach had happened, demanding a full investigation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Michael Gove defended Suella Braverman, saying she is a ‘first-rate, front-rank politician’ who ‘acknowledged a mistake had been made’.

And Alistair Graham, former chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said there were questions over whether her appointment was appropriate, especially because the breach was not examined by an ethics adviser.

“Normally the prime minister would have consulted a ministerial adviser for advice,” he said.

“A breach of the ministerial code is seen as a serious matter and would make any minister an inappropriate appointment to one of the four most senior positions in government.”

However, Mr Sunak has stood by the appointment and Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove insisted to Sky News that Ms Braverman was a “first-rate, front-rank politician” who deserved to be back in cabinet.

On Monday, Ms Braverman sent a lengthy letter to the Home Affairs Select Committee to address issues related to her resignation, in which she set out in detail the timetable of what happened.

In it, she revealed that a Home Office review into her communications showed she had sent official documents from her government email to her private one on six occasions in the six weeks she was in the role.

“The review confirmed that all of these occasions occurred in circumstances when I was conducting Home Office meetings virtually or related to public lines to take in interviews,” she wrote.

She also said that before her reappointment she “gave the prime minister assurances” she would not use her personal email for official business and “reaffirmed my understanding of and adherence to the ministerial code”.

Manston chaos

While the row rages on about whether she should have been brought back, another argument is brewing over the treatment of people being housed at the Manston migration centre in Kent.

Last week, a Home Affairs Select Committee heard conditions at Manston were “wretched”, with overcrowding, outbreaks of diseases and people being held for weeks longer than the 24 hours intended.

The home secretary’s judgement has now been called into question after a report in The Times claimed she blocked the transfer of asylum seekers to new hotels and ignored legal advice that the government was illegally detaining people at the centre.

Local Tory MP Sir Roger Gale said the situation at Manston was a “breach of humane conditions”, with the facility holding 4,000 people when it is only designed to hold 1,000.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Conservative MP for North Thanet Sir Roger Gale has told Sky News that the situation in the Manston migrant centre is a ‘breach of humane conditions’.

He said the circumstances “were a problem made in the Home Office”, saying within five weeks the system had been “broken – and it’s got to be mended fast”.

Sir Roger did not point the finger directly at Ms Braverman, saying “whoever is responsible, either the previous home secretary or this one, has to be held to account”.

But sources close to her predecessor, Priti Patel, told Sky News she signed off transfers from holding centres to hotels throughout the summer as she had a statutory duty to do so.

Labour’s Ms Cooper also claimed there had been “a failure to make decisions” within the government, causing the problems, and that Ms Braverman needed to make a statement.

Rwanda and reducing immigration

The home secretary’s return to government has also raised questions about Mr Sunak’s immigration plans and whether he made a deal with her to get her support.

She wants to keep net migration to “tens of thousands” and is keen on reducing overall migration, as stipulated in the 2019 Tory manifesto.

However, Mr Sunak is under pressure from business to ease migration rules to help fill job vacancies and boost growth.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Home Sec to make Rwanda plan ‘work’

One of Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s main strategies to restore market confidence is to loosen some of those immigration rules so forecasts will have the government hitting growth targets.

But both Mrs Braverman and Mr Sunak are supporters of the Rwanda policy to deport Channel migrants to the east African country.

Mr Sunak said he would do “whatever it takes” to ensure the scheme worked while Mrs Braverman said it is her “dream” and “obsession” to see the first flight take off for Rwanda.

How do we sole the immigration dilemma?

Thousands crossing the Channel

Pressure is also piling on the Home Office to act over the record of number of people who continue to cross the channel, with 1,000 arriving on Sunday.

The department is already grappling with a 100,000 backlog in processing asylum applications, with 96% of those from last year still outstanding.

On Sunday, refugee charities wrote to the home secretary demanding the government create more safe routes to the UK as a solution to stopping the dangerous small boat crossings.

Continue Reading

UK

Parents of boy whose outbursts left them fearing for their lives say Adolescence ‘touched a nerve’

Published

on

By

Parents of boy whose outbursts left them fearing for their lives say Adolescence 'touched a nerve'

A teenager suddenly becomes violent, his anger towards women fuelled by online influencers, while his parents struggle to process what their son is capable of.

Does this sound familiar?

It’s the story of the hit drama Adolescence – but for Jess and Rob, it’s their life.

Their 14-year-old son Harry’s violence has escalated so rapidly he’s had to be taken into care. We’ve changed all their names to protect their identities.

Until the age of 12, Harry’s parents say he was a “wonderful” son. But they saw a change in his personality, which they believe was sparked by an incident when he was hit by a girl. Soon, he developed an online interest in masculine power and control.

Becky Johnson Adolescence  feature
Image:
Harry’s personality changed after he was assaulted (this image shows an actor in a Sky News reconstruction)

“Harry became obsessed with being strong, and I think he developed a difficulty around certain female people because of the assault,” Jess says.

“He had to be in charge… in every setting,” Rob adds.

Then one night, he punched his mother, Jess. His parents called the police in the hope it would shock him out of doing it again. But, as time went on, the violence escalated.

“We probably must have called the police over 100 times,” Rob says.

One attack was so serious, Jess ended up in hospital. The violence spilled outside the home too as Harry assaulted neighbours and friends.

Then he threatened to stab a teacher.

“Every time we think it can’t get any worse, something else happens and it does get worse,” Rob says. “Unfortunately, him getting hold of a knife is quite likely to happen.”

They say Adolescence, which stars Stephen Graham, Ashley Walters and Owen Cooper, touched a nerve.

Becky Johnson Adolescence  feature
Image:
Jess and Rob say they called the police 100 times (this image shows actors in a Sky News reconstruction)

“My worst fear is that he’s going to end up killing one of us,” says Jess. “If not us, then somebody else…”

It’s a shocking thought for any parent to have. As well as contacting police, the family have tried many times to get help from social services and the NHS for Harry’s deteriorating mental health.

“We’ve been told that we’re using too many resources and accessing too many services,” Rob says. “We tried for 18 months to get him more intensive therapeutic help. At every turn it was ‘no, no, no’.”

Read more:
Starmer backs campaign to show Adolescence in schools
Inside the online gangs where boys compete to be cruel

They have found help with an organisation called PEGS that supports parents who are victims of their own children’s violence.

Becky Johnson Adolescence  feature
Image:
PEGS founder Michelle John says many families struggle to have their concerns taken seriously

Last year it was contacted by over 3,500 families, a 70% increase on 2023. Founder Michelle John says many families struggle to have their concerns taken seriously.

“What we’re hearing time and time again is that referrals are not being picked up because thresholds aren’t being met and perhaps the parent or caregiver isn’t a risk to the child,” she says. “Families are falling through gaps.”

In some parts of the country, local organisations are attempting to fill those gaps. Bright Star Boxing Academy in Shropshire has children referred by schools, social workers and even the police.

Joe Lockley, who runs the academy, says the problem is services that deal with youth violence are “inundated”.

“The biggest cause of the violent behaviour is mental health,” he says. “They lack that sense of belonging and control, and it’s quite easy to gain that from the wrong crowd and getting involved in violence.

“Social media is having a huge impact, especially around that young person’s identity.”

Becky Johnson Adolescence  feature
Image:
Ethan at the Bright Star Boxing Academy

Ethan, 18, agrees. He joined the academy aged 14. By then he had already been arrested several times for getting into fights.

He believes bullying sparked anxiety and depression. “Someone could look at me, I’d be angry,” he says.

“Social media – that’s definitely a massive part. You’ve got so many people that are living this material life. They’ve got loads of money.

“My main thing was seeing people with amazing bodies – I felt I couldn’t reach that point and it made me self-conscious, which would add on to the anger which then turned to hatred towards other people.”

Becky Johnson Adolescence  feature
Image:
Ethan says boxing has helped him turn his life around

Without the support of the boxing academy, he believes, he wouldn’t have been able to turn his life around.

“I would either be in prison or I would have done something a lot worse to myself,” he says.

“It’s just this massive mess in your head where you’ve got a million thoughts at once – you don’t know what to think or how to even speak sometimes,” he adds.

“All we need is someone that’s got the time for us… and the understanding that it’s a war in our heads.”

A government spokesperson told Sky News: “We have seen too many preventable tragedies caused by the failings of mental health services, and it’s unacceptable that young people have not been getting the care and treatment they need to keep them, their families and the wider public safe.

“We are working to ensure children and their families get that help. We are investing over £50m to fund specialist support in schools, launching a Young Futures hub in every community, and providing access to a specialist mental health professional in every school in England.”

Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK

Continue Reading

UK

Plastic surgeon Peter Brooks found guilty of attempting to murder colleague

Published

on

By

Plastic surgeon Peter Brooks found guilty of attempting to murder colleague

A plastic surgeon has been found guilty of the attempted murder of a fellow doctor who he stabbed after a failed attempt to set his house on fire.

Peter Brooks had cycled to the home of Graeme Perks in Halam, near Southwell, Nottinghamshire, while wearing camouflage gear and armed with a crowbar, petrol, matches and a knife in the early hours of 14 January 2021.

The 61-year-old then doused the ground floor of the property with petrol before stabbing fellow plastic surgeon Mr Perks because he wanted him “out of the way”, his trial at Loughborough Courthouse heard.

The victim’s wife and children were sleeping at the time of the attack, the jury was told.

Mr Perks, a consultant plastic surgeon, had provided evidence in disciplinary proceedings against Brooks, who faced potentially losing his job with Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, the jury was told.

Brooks was “voluntarily absent” from his month-long trial because he was on hunger strike and said he would “rather be dead than incarcerated”, it can now be reported.

He also sacked his lawyers before the trial and was unrepresented in the case.

More from UK

Graeme Perks is fighting for his life in hospital. Pic: BAPRAS
Image:
Graeme Perks is fighting for his life in hospital. Pic: BAPRAS

When opening the prosecution’s case, Tracy Ayling KC had told the jury it was “clear that the defendant hated Graeme Perks” and wanted him “out of the way”.

Mr Perks, who was 65 at the time, had retired the month before the attack and suffered “extremely life-threatening” injuries to his liver, intestines and pancreas, and was given a 95% chance of death, the court was told.

He had woken up on the night of the attack when Brooks smashed through his conservatory, the jury heard.

The camouflage suit worn by Peter Brooks during the attack. Pic Nottinghamshire Police
Image:
The camouflage suit worn by Peter Brooks during the attack. Pic Nottinghamshire Police

Mr Perks then went downstairs where his feet “felt a bit damp” from the petrol, which Brooks had also thrown against the wall next to the stairs, before he felt a “blow to his body”, the court was told.

Brooks was later found asleep on a garden bench later that morning when he was taken to hospital for injuries to his hand, and was arrested.

His blood was found on a door at the scene of the attack.

Brooks has been convicted of two counts of attempted murder, attempted arson with intent to endanger life, and possession of a knife in a public place.

Jurors deliberated for more than 12 hours before finding Brooks guilty of all the charges against him.

Retired surgeon Graeme Perks leaving Loughborough Magistrates' Court.
Pic: PA
Image:
Graeme Perks leaves court in Loughborough after giving evidence.
Pic: PA

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Two-phase public inquiry into Southport murders formally launched

Published

on

By

Two-phase public inquiry into Southport murders formally launched

A two-phase statutory public inquiry into the Southport murders has been formally launched.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the first phase would look at the circumstances around Axel Rudakubana’s attack on a Taylor Swift-themed dance class last summer.

It will focus on issues around policing, the criminal justice system and the multiple agencies involved with the attacker who killed three girls – seven-year-old Elsie Stancombe, six-year-old Bebe King and Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine.

It follows the revelation Rudakubana had been referred to the government’s Prevent scheme on three occasions, with the cases being closed each time.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

Trending