Connect with us

Published

on

Over the space of just a few hours and within just 50 miles of each other, I’ve seen two entirely different visions for America this weekend.

In the unseasonably warm afternoon sun in Pittsburgh, a crowd had gathered to listen to their hero Barack Obama.

The Democratic Party is in trouble, perhaps big trouble, in Tuesday’s midterm elections. They stand to lose both the Senate and the House of Representatives in Washington DC and maybe see Republican governors win power in several states.

The implications for the Democrats’ domestic policies on the economy, healthcare, abortion rights, immigration and the climate would be profound. American foreign policy would shift more inward too.

And so the orator Obama, with a sparkle that President Joe Biden lacks, was out to gee up a lacklustre Democratic Party base.

His focus was the now-familiar warnings of the threat to democracy which Democrats say is posed by the election-denying Trumpian Republicans.

Dangerous divisions

More on Barack Obama

He warned about divisions which fuel a “dangerous climate”, citing the hammer attack on the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

As it is so often in American election cycles, Pennsylvania is key for both parties.

It could tip the balance in a pivotal midterm US Senate race between Democrat John Fetterman and Republican Mehmet Oz.

“This habit we have of demonising political opponents, of saying crazy stuff. It creates a dangerous climate,” Mr Obama said.

“You’ve got politicians who work not to bring people together but to stir up division and to make us angry and afraid of one another just for their own advantage, so they can take power.”

In the crowd, there was a clear recognition of the importance of this midterm take on the country’s direction.

“This midterm is the most important midterm I think that we’ve ever had during my life for sure,” voter Alex told me.

Another said: “It feels good to hear a sane speech. Measured and balanced and says the right things and the things that people need to hear and that this country needs to hear is refreshing.”

Leeanna McKibben said: “I think it’s critical that we exercise our right to vote and that we eliminate the incivility that’s happening. We can have two-party politics, but it’s got to happen with respect and civility. And that’s not what’s happening right now.”

The key state of Pennsylvania

While Nevada and Georgia are both key senate races too, much of the focus is on Pennsylvania because of its history of swinging from the left to the right.

In the 2016 presidential election it swung to Donald Trump, delivering him the White House. Four years later it edged back to Mr Biden and the Democrats.

No wonder so much campaign money has ploughed into the campaigns here, and no wonder all the big hitters are criss-crossing the state.

A key problem for the Democrats is Mr Biden. His approval rating is just 40% according to the most recent polling. It’s another reason Mr Obama is out – a reminder that there is more to the Democrats than Mr Biden.

Trump’s red wave?

Fifty miles down the road at an airport, another former president was out too – Mr Trump, a man who hasn’t stopped campaigning since he lost the election two years ago.

“The election was rigged and stolen and we’re not going to let it happen again,” he told a huge crowd of his most faithful.

There is no evidence at all for his claim of election fraud. Audits, recounts and court cases across America have confirmed Mr Biden as the winner in 2020, yet Mr Trump has managed to sow doubt into the fabric of society.

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

The false claim remains his core message for a 2024 presidential campaign everyone expects him to announce any day.

“I love Trump!” supporter Lory Randall told me. “Best president ever.”

“Trump’s my guy because he’s honest, he doesn’t sugar coat anything, he doesn’t put up with anything and he puts America first,” Aaron Hoffman said.

Another said: “I’m here to see Donald Trump because I believe he should be our president and Joe Biden is destroying America.”

The vibe, the energy, the branding – it’s all here for the man who seems to command near-total control of today’s Republican Party.

For all that the Democratic Party and a minority of anti-Trump Republicans have done to try to discredit him, to expose him as a liar and a crook, to try to make sure he’s history, it really doesn’t feel like he is the past at all.

He hopes that this week’s midterm elections will provide a “red wave” confirming that his appeal stretches beyond this core and that election-denying candidates across the country, who he has endorsed, will win.

Remember – if they win, many of them will be responsible for judging the validity of the 2024 presidential election.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How do midterm elections work?

The lone heckler

As Mr Trump spoke a lone voice piped up from the crowd.

“He’s a liar,” she screamed.

Her heckling, and the reaction from around her, was a neat glimpse of the deep angry divisions, up close.

“Lock her up! Lock her up!” the crowd shouted, borrowing a chant they used for Mr Trump’s 2016 rival Hilary Clinton.

“Go home. Go to your rally and brag about your Obama and brag about the inflation,” a man shouted into her face.

With some considerable force and with her arms locked into a hold behind her, she was then carted out by police.

Beyond the perimeter they released her and we chatted briefly.

“We know full well that the election was not stolen. It was fair, it was safe, it was secure…” she said before the police returned and resumed their eviction.

She never did tell us her name, but she spoke for many millions in the other America.

It’s hard to see how these two starkly different visions for these supposedly United States can be reconciled.

Continue Reading

US

US hails ‘tremendous progress’ on Ukraine peace plan – but says negotiators ‘need more time’

Published

on

By

US hails 'tremendous progress' on Ukraine peace plan - but says negotiators 'need more time'

The US secretary of state has hailed a “tremendous amount of progress” on peace talks after the US and Ukraine delegations met in Geneva – but said that negotiators would “need more time”.

Marco Rubio said the meetings in Switzerland on Sunday have been “the most productive and meaningful” of the peace process so far.

He said the US was making “some changes” to the peace plan, seemingly based on Ukrainian suggestions, “in the hopes of further narrowing the differences and getting closer to something that both Ukraine and obviously the United States are very comfortable with”.

Mr Rubio struck an optimistic tone talking to the media after discussions but was light on the details, saying there was still work to be done.

US secretary of state Marco Rubio in Geneva after peace talks with Ukraine. Pic: Reuters
Image:
US secretary of state Marco Rubio in Geneva after peace talks with Ukraine. Pic: Reuters

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Analysis: Rubio strikes an optimistic tone – but is light on detail

“I don’t want to declare victory or finality here. There’s still some work to be done, but we are much further ahead today at this time than we were when we began this morning and where we were a week ago for certain,” Mr Rubio said.

He also stressed: “We just need more time than what we have today. I honestly believe we’ll get there.”

Sky News’ defence analyst Michael Clarke said on the initial US-Russian 28-point peace plan that it was Donald Trump against the world, with maybe only Moscow on his side.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is Trump’s plan a ‘capitulation document’?

Mr Rubio praised the Ukrainian attitude towards the talks and said Mr Trump was “quite pleased” after he previously said in a social media post that Ukraine’s leaders had expressed “ZERO GRATITUDE” for US efforts.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his nightly address on Sunday that there are signs that “President Trump’s team hears us”.

In a news release on Sunday evening, the White House said the day “marked a significant step forward”.

“Ukrainian representatives stated that, based on the revisions and clarifications presented today, they believe the current draft reflects their national interests and provides credible and enforceable mechanisms to safeguard Ukraine’s security in both the near and long term,” it claimed.

Despite diplomatic progress in Geneva the finish line remains a long way off


John Sparks

John Sparks

International correspondent

@sparkomat

We’ve witnessed a day of determined and decidedly frantic diplomacy in this well-heeled city.

Camera crews were perched on street corners and long convoys of black vehicles swept down Geneva’s throughfares as the Ukrainians worked hard to keep the Americans on side.

Secretary of state Marco Rubio did not want to go into details at a press “gaggle” held at the US Mission this evening, but he seemed to think they had made more progress in the last 96 hours than the previous 10 months combined.

The Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy also seemed satisfied enough, posting on Telegram that there were “signals President Trump’s team is hearing us” after a day of “numerous meetings and negotiations”.

That said, we are a long way from the finish line here – something Rubio acknowledged when he said that any proposal agreed here would have to be handed over to the Russians.

At that point, negotiations to stop the war would surely get tougher.

President Putin has shown little or no inclination to stop the conflict thus far.

This, then, is the most important reason the Ukrainians seem determined to keep the Americans on side.

European leaders have presented a counter proposal to the widely criticised US-Russian peace plan, with suggestions including a cap on Ukraine’s peacetime army and readmitting Moscow into the G8.

This will only take place if the plan is agreed to by the US, Russia and Ukraine, and the G7 signs off on the move. Russia was expelled after annexing Crimea in 2014.

The counter proposal also includes US guarantees to Ukraine that mirror NATO’s Article 5 – the idea that “an armed attack against one NATO member shall be considered an attack against them all”.

Read more:
Who actually wrote US-Russian peace plan for Ukraine?
In full: Europe’s 28-point counter proposal to US-Russia plan

The initial peace plan was worked up by the White House and Kremlin without Ukraine’s involvement, and it acquiesces to many of Russia’s previous demands.

It covers a range of issues – from territorial concessions to reconstruction programmes, the future Ukrainian relationship with NATO and the EU, and educational reforms in both Ukraine and Russia.

US and Ukrainian officials are set to meet again today to continue work on the proposal.

It has also been reported that President Zelenskyy could travel to the US as early as this week to discuss the most sensitive aspects of the plan with President Trump.

Continue Reading

US

Who actually wrote US-Russian peace plan for Ukraine?

Published

on

By

Who actually wrote US-Russian peace plan for Ukraine?

Questions are being raised about the Russia-Ukraine peace plan, after US politicians suggested the proposal’s 28 points did not originate from Donald Trump’s administration but were put forward by Moscow.

Senators, critical of the US president’s approach to Ukraine, said they spoke with the US secretary of state Marco Rubio, who told them the plan is a “wish list” from the Russians and not a proposal offering Washington’s positions.

Ukraine war latest: Washington denies backing ‘Moscow wish list’

The US state department has called that account “blatantly false”, with Mr Rubio saying that the senators were mistaken and that Washington was responsible for the proposals.

The 28-point plan has surprised many for being so favourable to Moscow.

Explained: Trump’s peace plan in full

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How Ukraine peace plan came about

Republican senator Mike Rounds is among those who have claimed the plan was not drafted by Washington.

“This administration was not responsible for this release in its current form,” he said at a security conference in Canada. “They want to utilise it as a starting point.”

Mr Rounds added: “It looked more like it was written in Russian to begin with.”

Independent senator Angus King said Mr Rubio told them the plan “was not the administration’s plan” but a “essentially the wish list of the Russians”.

The senators said they spoke to Mr Rubio after he contacted them while on his way to Geneva for talks on the plan.

According to the Reuters news agency, some US officials also said the plan contains material that the US secretary of state has previously rejected and neither he, nor anyone in the state department, was aware of the plan before it was announced.

These latest claims have added to growing confusion over who was involved in drawing up the 28 points.

European leader asks: ‘Who authored the plan?’

Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has raised concerns about its origins. On Sunday, he wrote on X: “It would be good to know for sure who is the author of the plan and where was it created.”

In a post on X, Mr Rubio insisted that “the peace proposal was authored by the US… but it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine”.

A former adviser to Vladimir Putin had denied that Russia was behind the peace plan. Sergei Markov told Sky News “it is American” and the points were a “very good basis for diplomatic negotiation”.

Mr Markov insisted there were “some positive moods in Russia about it” but also accused Europe and Ukraine of wanting to continue the war, despite Russia unilaterally launching and pursuing a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Former Putin advisor challenged over 28-point peace plan

Read more from Sky News:
Peace plan scrutinised at G20
Ukraine issued with ‘surrender ultimatum’
Ukraine and Europe cannot reject plan

American special envoy Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner met Kirill Dmitriev in Miami at the end of October to work on the proposals, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

Mr Dmitriev, who is a close ally of the Russian president, was blacklisted by the US government in 2022 following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Kirill Dmitriev and special envoy Steve Witkoff in St Petersburg in April 2025. Pic: Kremlin Pool Photo/AP
Image:
Kirill Dmitriev and special envoy Steve Witkoff in St Petersburg in April 2025. Pic: Kremlin Pool Photo/AP

Trump rows back on demands

The US president initially demanded that Ukraine accept the peace plan by Thursday. But he has since rowed back from that position, instead saying the proposal was not his final offer.

The plan currently on the table calls for major concessions by Kyiv, including ceding territory to Russia, pledging not to join NATO and abandoning certain weaponry.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has not rejected the proposals outright, but said he would not betray Ukraine’s interests. Meanwhile, Mr Putin has described the plan as the basis of a resolution to the conflict.

Separately, Senator Roger Wicker, the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has been equally dismissive of the proposals.

“This so-called ‘peace plan’ has real problems, and I am highly sceptical it will achieve peace,” he said.

Continue Reading

US

‘Slender Man’ stabbing attacker Morgan Geyser in custody after cutting off monitoring bracelet

Published

on

By

'Slender Man' stabbing attacker Morgan Geyser in custody after cutting off monitoring bracelet

Morgan Geyser, who stabbed a classmate to please the internet horror character Slender Man, has been detained after cutting off her monitoring bracelet and leaving a group home.

The Madison Police Department said on Sunday night she had been taken into custody in the state of Illinois.

Now an adult, she was sentenced to 40 years in a psychiatric hospital after carrying out the nearly fatal attack in 2014.

Police in Madison, Wisconsin, had said earlier on Sunday that she was at large and her whereabouts were unknown.

“If you see Geyser, please call 911,” the force said.

She was last seen around 8pm local time on Saturday with an adult acquaintance.

Geyser had been moved to a group home this year after being granted conditional release from the Winnebago Mental Health Institute.

Her lawyer Tony Cotton said he did not know what had happened and urged Geyser to turn herself in.

“It’s in her best interest for her to turn herself in immediately and not continue with this course of action,” he said in an Instagram video post.

“We don’t know any of the facts about what happened or who might have assisted her.”

Mugshots of Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier from the time of the attack
Image:
Mugshots of Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier from the time of the attack

Geyser and her friend, Anissa Weier, were 12 years old when they lured a classmate to a suburban Milwaukee park after a sleepover, authorities said.

Geyser stabbed their victim more than a dozen times as Weier egged her on. The victim barely survived the ordeal.

The girls told investigators they had carried out the attack in order to please Slender Man, an online horror character.

They said they wanted to earn the right to be Slender Man’s servants and they feared he’d harm their families if they didn’t follow through.

Read more from Sky News:
Four shot at Christmas tree lighting ceremony
Grammy-winning rapper jailed for 14 years

A depiction of the Slender Man fictional character
Image:
A depiction of the Slender Man fictional character

Created in 2009, Slender Man is depicted as a mysterious figure with long limbs that is photo-edited into everyday pictures.

He grew into a popular bogeyman and has appeared in games, online stories and a 2018 film.

Geyser pleaded guilty to attempted first-degree intentional homicide in a deal with prosecutors to avoid prison.

Weier pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree intentional homicide. She was also sent to the psychiatric centre and was granted release in 2021.

Continue Reading

Trending