People living in areas of Birmingham and Liverpool are most likely to struggle with access to affordable food, according to new research.
Low income and a lack of large supermarkets and online shopping are making it more difficult for Britons to shop around and find healthy and affordable food to eat, according to data from Which?
The consumer watchdog, alongside the University of Leeds, has identified the places around the UK where households are most likely to be in need of extra support to put food on the table.
The Priority Places for Food Index has ranked local areas by the likelihood of people needing extra support.
Constituencies in Birmingham and Liverpool feature heavily at the top of the index. Just three of the top 20 worst affected regions are in Wales, with the remaining 17 in England – predominantly in the North East.
Birmingham Hodge Hill is considered the worst – with 100% of its local areas in need of extra support.
Which? found the area has poor online delivery access, high levels of fuel poverty and people in the area having a low income or no car access.
More on Cost Of Living
Related Topics:
When Which? visited a food bank in the local area, volunteer David Fletcher said: “Where this food bank is, there’s no supermarket within two miles.”
Knowsley in Merseyside is the second highest ranking constituency for needing support according to the analysis, with low income, fuel poverty and an exceptionally high need for family food support in 96% of its local areas.
Advertisement
It also has relatively low levels of nearby supermarkets with half the number of large or very large supermarkets compared to the national average, indicating affordable food may be harder to find locally.
One local resident said “often cheaper products are unavailable with only more expensive options left” at their local supermarket.
The top five worst affected areas in England were: Birmingham Hodge Hill, Knowsley, Houghton and Sunderland South, Birmingham Northfield and Birmingham and Perry Barr.
Liz Truss’s constituency makes top 20
A number of the worst-affected constituencies have high-profile MPs on both sides of the divide attached to them.
South West Norfolk, the constituency of former prime minister Liz Truss, ranks 20th in England and 24th overall. In the constituency – which has a limited supermarket and non-supermarket retail provision – 70% of local areas are priority places.
Dehenna Davison, a minister for levelling up, is also the MP for Bishop Auckland, which ranks 11th in England and 12th overall.
Bridget Phillipson, Labour’s shadow minister for education, represents Houghton and Sunderland South, which sits third on the list.
Of the top 20 regions across the UK, four are represented by Conservative MPs, with the rest Labour-held seats.
Image: The top 30 worst affected areas – all of which are in England (16) and Wales (4)
Areas at risk in Welsh Valleys
Overall, seven in 10 UK parliamentary constituencies have at least one area in need of urgent help accessing affordable food – but there are 16 constituencies across England and Wales for which at least three-quarters of the constituency are at risk.
In Wales, Which? found the highest concentration of areas at high risk during the food crisis were in the Valleys where proximity to a large supermarket or access to online deliveries may be very poor.
Wales has a higher proportion of rural places where accessing affordable food is an issue than England and Scotland.
The five worst-affected areas in Wales were Rhondda, Blaenau Gwent, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney, Cynon Valley and Neath.
In Scotland, the places in highest need of support were in the Central Belt, according but there is also a notable concentration in and around Dundee where there is relatively poor access to online food deliveries and people are more likely to be suffering from fuel poverty and on a low income.
The top five worst-affected regions in Scotland were North Ayrshire and Arran, West Dunbartonshire, Kilmarnock and Loudoun, Glasgow North East and Glenrothes.
Northern Ireland has the most even geographical spread of areas in need of support accessing affordable food. However, there is a noticeably greater concentration in parts of southwest Belfast and in and around Derry/Londonderry.
The five worst-affected areas in Northern Ireland were East Londonderry, Foyle, West Tyrone, North Antrim, Belfast West.
Calls for supermarkets to do more
The consumer group is calling on supermarkets to do more to support people through the crisis, by making sure food prices are easy to understand, with straightforward price reductions, and that budget lines consist of healthy choices.
Previous Which? research found most people have been forced to change their shopping habits, with millions skipping meals and turning to foodbanks to feed themselves.
Sue Davies, head of food policy at Which?, said: “Our new research tells us where around the UK support is most urgently needed.
“The supermarkets have the ability to take action and make a real difference to communities all around the UK. That’s why we’re calling on them to ensure everyone has easy access to budget food ranges that enable healthy choices, can easily compare the price of products to get the best value and that promotions are targeted at supporting people most in need.”
Michelle Morris, associate professor of nutrition and lifestyle analytics at the University of Leeds, said: “With so many people in the UK already suffering from food insecurity and the cost of living crisis making that much worse, we need to do all that we can to support those most in need to access affordable, healthy and sustainable foods.”
WORRIED ABOUT THE COST OF LIVING? SHARE YOUR STORY WITH SKY NEWS
You can share your story, pictures or video with us using our app, private messaging or email.
The economy is stagnating and job losses are mounting. Now is the time to cut interest rates again.
That was the view of the Bank of England’s nine-member rate setting committee on Thursday.
Well, at least five of them.
The other four presented us with a different view: Inflation is above target and climbing – this is no time to cut interest rates.
Who is right? All of them and none of them.
Central bankers have been backed into a corner by the current economic climate and navigating a path out is challenging.
The difficulty in charting that route was on display as the Bank struggled to decide on the best course of monetary policy.
The committee had to take it to a re-vote for the first time in the Bank’s history.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:40
Bank of England is ‘a bit muddled’
On one side, central bankers – including Andrew Bailey – were swayed by the data on the economy. Growth is “subdued”, they said, and job losses are mounting.
This should weigh on wage increases, which are already moderating, and in turn inflation.
One member, Alan Taylor, was so worried about the economy he initially suggested a larger half a percentage point cut.
On the other side, their colleagues were alarmed by inflation.
In a blow to the chancellor, the September figure is used to uprate a number of benefits and pensions. The Bank lifted it from a previous forecast of 3.75%.
In explaining the increase, the Bank blamed higher utility bills and food prices.
Food price inflation could hit 5.5% this year, an increase driven by poor harvests, some expensive packaging regulations as well as higher employment costs arising from the Autumn Budget.
Image: Rachel Reeves on Thursday. Pic: PA
When pressed by Sky News on the main contributor to that increase – poor harvests or government policy – the governor said: “It’s about 50-50.”
The Bank doesn’t like to get political but nothing about this is flattering for the chancellor.
The Bank said food retailers, including supermarkets, were passing on higher national insurance and living wage costs – the ones announced in the Autumn Budget – to customers.
Economists at the Bank pointed out that food retailers employ a large proportion of low wage workers and are more vulnerable to the lowering of the national insurance threshold because they have a larger proportion of part-time workers.
Of all the types of inflation, food price inflation is among the most dangerous.
Households spend 11% of their disposable income, meaning higher food price inflation can play an outsized role in our perception of how high overall inflation in the economy is.
When that happens, workers are more likely to push for pay rises, a dangerous loop that can lead to higher inflation.
So while the chancellor is publicly celebrating the Bank’s fifth interest rate cut in a year, behind the scenes she will have very little to cheer.
Remnants of Tropical Storm Dexter will bring an increase in temperatures over the weekend, with highs of 34C possible next week.
A heatwave could be registered in parts of the South early next week and could spread more widely if temperatures hold.
Temperatures of 28C (82F) are possible in the South on Sunday, reaching 30C (86F) across parts of England on Monday before getting closer to 34C (93F) on Tuesday.
Image: Pic: Joe Giddens/PA
Warm and muggy nights are to be expected, especially in the South.
Conditions will be more unsettled in the North, with strong winds and rain at times.
Image: People punting along the River Cam in Cambridge last month. Pic: PA
In its forecast the Met Office said Friday will be a brighter day for many, with sunny spells across southern and central areas and highs of 25-26C expected. Northern Scotland will be breezy with showery outbreaks of rain.
Saturday will also see sunny spells for much of England and Wales, but there will be some rain in northern areas, paritcularly northern Scotland.
Image: People enjoying the hot weather on Sunny Sands beach in Folkestone last month. Pic: PA
A weather front moving in from the west will bring rain to Northern Ireland, parts of Scotland and possibly northern England by Sunday evening, while central and southern areas are expected to remain dry with sunny spells.
Temperatures will begin to rise in the South from Sunday evening, as the remnants of Tropical Storm Dexter “draws warm air up from the southwest across the UK”, the Met Office said.
Temperatures are expected to exceed 30C across parts of central, southern and eastern England on Monday and Tuesday, the forecaster added.
“We’re confident that temperatures will increase markedly by the start of next week, reaching the low 30s Celsius in parts of England on Monday and perhaps the mid 30s in a few places on Tuesday,” said Met Office deputy chief meteorologist Steven Keates.
“However, the length of this warm spell is still uncertain, and it is possible that high temperatures could persist further into next week, particularly in the south.”
“Ex-Dexter sets the wheels in motion for an uptick in temperatures, but the weather patterns then maintaining any hot weather are rather more uncertain”.
The war of words over Sentebale is continuing, with the charity calling on the Charity Commission to provide clarity that its recent report did not specifically investigate claims of racism and misogyny against Prince Harry.
Sources close to the Duke of Sussex claim they are “rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more”, describing their latest move as not “just provocative, it’s pitiful”.
A source at Sentebale has told Sky News: “We have written to The Charity Commission stating that the onus is on the commission to restate for the record that individual allegations of bullying have not been investigated or addressed in the commission’s report.”
It comes after the Charity Commission report stated that “based on the evidence provided and reviewed by the commission, it found no evidence of: widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity”.
However, the commission added that it “acknowledged the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally”.
But sources at Sentebale believe the reporting around this statement – that Prince Harry has been cleared of bullying – has been inaccurate, as the charity watchdog did not specifically look at allegations made by the chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka, including during an exclusive interview on Sky News.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:42
From March 2025: Charity chair’s bullying claims on Sky News
A source close to Prince Harry and the former board of trustees has hit back, and said: “It’s remarkable, just yesterday Ms Chanduaka was applauding the Charity Commission’s findings, yet today, after a flurry of unflattering headlines, she’s back on the warpath.
“Issuing yet another media statement only reinforces the commission’s criticism about using the press to air internal disputes.
“Rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more, which the commission found no evidence of and dressing them up as veiled threats isn’t just provocative, it’s pitiful.
“If Ms Chanduaka has genuine concerns, she should spell them out plainly or, better yet, redirect her energy toward something truly worthwhile, like raising money for the children Sentebale exists to support.”
It’s understood Prince Harry and his supporters have also been left unsatisfied by the scope of the report, including their concerns about money spent on consultants that was authorised by Dr Chandauka.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Responding to Sky News, the Charity Commission said: “We have issued the charity with an action plan which sets out steps the current trustees need to take to improve governance weaknesses and rectify findings of mismanagement.
“We now urge all involved to put their differences behind them and allow the charity to focus on its work and beneficiaries”.
Their report, released on Wednesday, was highly critical of all parties for allowing their disagreement to play out so publicly and allowing it to severely impact the charity’s reputation.