Scotland needs to see “proper respect” from Rishi Sunak if he wants to reset the relationship that frayed under his predecessors, says Nicola Sturgeon.
The first minister met the new prime minister for the first time since he took power on Thursday at the British-Irish Council, and described their meeting as “cordial and constructive”.
But she warned that under Boris Johnson and Liz Truss, relations between Westminster and all the devolved administrations had “deteriorated”, and it will take more than warm words to fix the bonds.
Ms Sturgeon and Mr Johnson‘s interactions were known to be frosty, especially over the SNP’s demands for a fresh independence referendum.
Ms Truss branded the first minister an “attention seeker” and did not make the customary phone call to her after taking the keys to Number 10.
Ms Sturgeon returned fire by saying Ms Truss would be “utterly catastrophic” for the economy.
More on Nicola Sturgeon
Related Topics:
The first minister told reporters she had “deep and profound political disagreements” with Mr Sunak, but that she had worked with David Cameron, Theresa May and “perhaps to a lesser extent” Mr Johnson.
“The test, I think, of any professional, grown-up political relationship between different governments is whether you are prepared and able to put… disagreements aside and find areas to work on, and even where you disagree, to be able nevertheless to have frank conversations and disagree seriously,” she said.
Advertisement
“There has been a deterioration in the relationship between the UK government and, I think, all of the devolved administrations, there has been a lack of respect on the part of the UK government, riding roughshod over the powers and responsibilities of devolved parliaments.”
The FM added: “Now, I welcome Rishi Sunak’s words about wanting to reset the relationship and do things differently, I really welcome that, but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.
“We need to see from the UK government proper respect and, if that is the case, then I do believe, not withstanding our disagreements, we will be able to build a good relationship.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:37
Nicola Sturgeon is ‘an attention seeker’
NHS ‘close to breaking point’
Ms Sturgeon also said she told the PM of her “profound concerns” about the NHS ahead of next week’s autumn statement, saying the service was “close to breaking point across the UK”.
“It is my government’s responsibility to manage the NHS in Scotland,” she said, “but our ability to invest in it depends on the decisions taken by the UK government.
“We in Scotland are at the limits of what we can do, so we need to see from the UK government’s decisions an injection of investment into the NHS to allow it to recover from COVID and get back onto a sustainable path.”
The FM said that her Westminster counterpart did not reveal what was in the upcoming fiscal statement, but he “certainly made the right noises”, adding: “I am hopeful that in a very difficult economic and fiscal context, we will see decisions coming from the UK government that help not hinder the recovery of our National Health Service.”
The UK is on a “slippery slope towards death on demand”, according to the justice secretary ahead of a historic Commons vote on assisted dying.
In a letter to her constituents, Shabana Mahmood said she was “profoundly concerned” about the legislation.
“Sadly, recent scandals – such as Hillsborough, infected blood and the Post Office Horizon – have reminded us that the state and those acting on its behalf are not always benign,” she wrote.
“I have always held the view that, for this reason, the state should serve a clear role. It should protect and preserve life, not take it away.
“The state should never offer death as a service.”
On 29 November, MPs will be asked to consider whether to legalise assisted dying, through Kim Leadbeater’s Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
14:46
Minister ‘leans’ to assisted dying bill
Details of the legislation were published last week, including confirmation the medicine that will end a patient’s life will need to be self-administered and people must be terminally ill and expected to die within six months.
Ms Mahmood, however, said “predictions about life expectancy are often inaccurate”.
Advertisement
“Doctors can only predict a date of death, with any real certainty, in the final days of life,” she said. “The judgment as to who can and cannot be considered for assisted suicide will therefore be subjective and imprecise.”
Under the Labour MP’s proposals, two independent doctors must confirm a patient is eligible for assisted dying and a High Court judge must give their approval.
The bill will also include punishments of up to 14 years in prison for those who break the law, including coercing someone into ending their own life.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
However, Ms Mahmood said she was concerned the legislation could “pressure” some into ending their lives.
“It cannot be overstated what a profound shift in our culture assisted suicide will herald,” she wrote.
“In my view, the greatest risk of all is the pressure the elderly, vulnerable, sick or disabled may place upon themselves.”
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who put forward the bill, said some of the points Ms Mahmood raised have been answered “in the the thorough drafting and presentation of the bill”.
“The strict eligibility criteria make it very clear that we are only talking about people who are already dying,” she said.
“That is why the bill is called the ‘Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill’; its scope cannot be changed and clearly does not include any other group of people.
“The bill would give dying people the autonomy, dignity and choice to shorten their death if they wish.”
In response to concerns Ms Mahmood raised about patients being coerced into choosing assisted death, Ms Leadbeater said she has consulted widely with doctors and judges.
“Those I have spoken to tell me that they are well equipped to ask the right questions to detect coercion and to ascertain a person’s genuine wishes. It is an integral part of their work,” she said.
In an increasingly fractious debate around the topic, multiple Labour MPs have voiced their concerns.
In a letter to ministers on 3 October, the Cabinet Secretary Simon Case confirmed “the Prime Minister has decided to set aside collective responsibility on the merits of this bill” and that the government would “therefore remain neutral on the passage of the Bill and on the matter of assisted dying”.
“Immediate action” is being taken after blueprints of jail layouts were shared online.
The maps detailing the layouts of prisons in England and Wales were leaked on the dark web over the past fortnight, according to The Times.
The detailed information is said to include the locations of cameras and sensors, prompting fears they could be used to smuggle drugs or weapons into prisons or help inmates plan escapes.
Security officials are now working to identify the source of the leak and who might benefit from the details.
The Ministry of Justice did not disclose which prisons were involved in the breach.
A government spokesperson said in a statement: “We are not going to comment on the specific detail of security matters of this kind, but we are aware of a breach of data to the prison estate and, like with all potential breaches, have taken immediate action to ensure prisons remain secure.”
The leak comes amid a chronic prison overcrowding crisis, which has led to early release schemes and the re-categorising of the security risks of some offenders to ease capacity pressures.
The UK will “set out a path” to lift defence spending to 2.5% of national income in the spring, the prime minister has said, finally offering a timeframe for an announcement on the long-awaited hike after mounting criticism.
Sir Keir Starmer gave the date during a phone call with Mark Rutte, the secretary general of NATO, in the wake of threats by Moscow to target UK and US military facilities following a decision by London and Washington to let Ukraine fire their missiles inside Russia.
There was no clarity though on when the 2.5% level will be achieved. The UK says it currently spends around 2.3% of GDP on defence.
A spokeswoman for Downing Street said that the two men “began by discussing the situation in Ukraine and reiterated the importance of putting the country in the strongest possible position going into the winter”.
They also talked about the deployment of thousands of North Korean soldiers to fight alongside Russia.
“The prime minister underscored the need for all NATO countries to step up in support of our collective defence and updated on the government’s progress on the strategic defence review,” the spokeswoman said.
“His government would set out the path to 2.5% in the spring.”
The defence review will also be published in the spring.
While a date for an announcement on 2.5% will be welcomed by the Ministry of Defence, analysts have long warned that such an increase is still well below the amount that is needed to rebuild the armed forces after decades of decline to meet growing global threats from Russia, an increasingly assertive China, North Korea and Iran.
They say the UK needs to be aiming to hit at least 3% – probably higher.
With Donald Trump returning to the White House, there will be significantly more pressure on the UK and other European NATO allies to accelerate increases in defence spending.