Seven hours is a long time in US politics.

At 10am, Donald Trump accused Russia of posing a threat to America’s national security.

By 5pm, Mr Trump said there was a “good prospect” of him meeting Vladimir Putin “soon”.

There had, he claimed, been “great progress” in talks between his special envoy Steve Witkoff and the Russian president.

It’s difficult to gauge the chances of a meeting between the two leaders without knowing what “great progress” means.

Is Russia “inclined” towards agreeing a ceasefire, as Ukraine’s president now claims?

Is Mr Putin prepared to meet with his Ukrainian foe, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, too?

The very fact that we’re asking those questions suggests something shifted on a day when there was no expectation of a breakthrough.

Read more from Sky News:
Woman told she may lose leg after liquid Brazilian butt lift
Zoo kills 12 healthy baboons to ease overcrowding

Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Mr Trump repeatedly vowed to end the war within 24 hours of becoming president.

On day 198 of his presidency, he might, just might, be one step closer to achieving that.

There was always a heavy hint of charade in the company of “Arthur Knight”.

It was hard to square the man presenting as a bumbling aristocrat in Glasgow’s west end with one of America’s most wanted. And yet, there were always clues.

Like his knowledge of Kay Burley. On the day I first arranged to interview him, he told me that TV was a mystery to him and that he never watched it.

Then he said he hoped he wouldn’t be nailed to the wall by Kay – our then Sky News colleague and presenter.

How did he know Kay if he knew nothing about television, I wondered.

He also asked how we would “chyron” him, an American term for an on-screen title that I was unfamiliar with (and I’m in the business).

There was also the matter of the plasma TV screen on his front room wall – he knew TV, alright.

Such was the international interest in the story of “Arthur Knight” – real name Nicholas Rossi – there was no escaping the attention of TV and everyone else.

His was a tale lifted from the pages of a fictional thriller – a fugitive pursued halfway across the world and discovered only when he had the misfortune to catch COVID and leave his tattoos exposed on a hospital ward.

Medical staff at Glasgow’s Queen Elizabeth University Hospital did the eyes-on execution of an international manhunt.

As careful as he was, Rossi left a digital footprint that US authorities followed to a flat in Glasgow.

When we first arrived, he had been arrested but was out on bail.

It was dark inside his flat, and there wasn’t much floor space.

Read more from Sky News:
Putin: ‘I’m not against meeting Zelenskyy’ – Watch
Oasis gig beats Taylor Swift for most ‘ground-shaking’ concert

It made movement difficult for Rossi because he was in a wheelchair.

When physical movement demanded finesse, like in lifting him into a car, his wife Miranda manoeuvred him Sumo-wrestler style.

Quite the spectacle.

We sat down for a number of interviews with Rossi and his wife, Miranda. Always, he addressed my questions with the busy eyes of concentrated deceit.

Once, he insisted on sitting with his back to a bookcase. It featured the tome Machiavelli, prominently in shot.

It made me wonder how much of him was enjoying this.

He was a performer, certainly, and I suppose he’d been thrust centre stage.

He claimed to be an Irish orphan, but he never did get the accent right.

It was like a comedy fake when he wrapped an Irish lilt around gravelly tones.

He would suddenly start to sound Irish when you reminded him that he was, eh, Irish.

Not that he had the paperwork to prove it.

There was no birth certificate, no ID for his parents, no idea of exactly where in Ireland he’d been born.

He was the boy from nowhere because he knew he had to be – give any journalist a place to go looking for confirmation and therein lies a trail to ruin.

So “Arthur” kept it vague – his freedom depended on it.

When he did commit to detail, he ran into difficulty.

He told me he’d been raised in homes run by the Christian Brothers in Ireland, and I asked him which ones, specifically.

His reply was: “St. Mary’s and Sacred Heart.”

A quick check with the Christian Brothers revealed they have no facility named Sacred Heart in Ireland, and anything called St Mary’s wasn’t residential.

Of course, it was never going to last for him.

The extradition court in Edinburgh had fingerprint and photographic evidence, and there was a tattoo match, too.

Next week sees the start of his latest trial.

Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

He is accused of raping a woman to whom he had been engaged.

The allegations offer a duplication for Rossi’s crime modus operandi – isolating women, refusing to leave their company, and engaging in sexual assault.

“Evil,” is how he was described by Brian Coogan to me. Brian is a former state representative in Rhode Island who, at one stage, was on the verge of adopting the young Rossi.

He was warned off by the adoption judge, who refused to let it happen, having seen the file on the young man.

Violence in childhood duly extended into adulthood, and Rossi was convicted in 2008 after sexually assaulting Mary Grebinski on a college campus in Ohio.

A DNA sample from that attack is what linked Rossi to rape in Utah, and it’s what caused the long arm of the law to reach as far as Scotland.

The footnote to the story concerns Miranda, Rossi’s wife, whom he married in Bristol in 2020.

Rossi faked his death in 2020, and his “widow”, a woman by the name of Louise, ran around telling people he’d passed away.

Father Bernard Healey, of Our Lady of Mercy Parish Church in Rhode Island, took a call from an English woman – sounding like “Hyacinth Bouquet”.

She said Rossi had died and asked if he would hold a memorial mass.

The priest agreed, but when the invitations started going out on social media, he took a call from the police telling him to cancel the arrangements, as Rossi wasn’t dead – he’d faked it and was in hiding.

The voice that rang round reporting news of Nicholas’ demise was familiar to anyone who has heard his wife Miranda. The two voices sound identical, indeed.

How much was Miranda involved in the deceit? It remains an open question in a story about to enter a new chapter – this time, set in an Utah courtroom.

More details from the trial of an Australian woman convicted of murdering her parents-in-law and an aunt after serving them poisonous mushrooms for lunch have been revealed – including why her husband rejected an invitation.

Mother-of-two Erin Patterson, 50, was convicted of the 2023 murders of her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, and Gail Patterson’s sister, Heather Wilkinson, 66, along with the attempted murder of Reverend Ian Wilkinson, Heather’s husband.

She served guests beef wellington knowing it contained deadly death cap mushrooms, also known as Amanita phalloides.

After a nine-week trial in Morwell, Victoria, the jury concluded unanimously that she poisoned the guests on purpose and rejected her defence that the deaths were a “terrible accident”.

Aspects of the case, which concluded last month, were the subject of a gag order, as the judge didn’t want them to influence the jury.

But those details have now been made public.

Here’s what you need to know about the trial and the new information.

Patterson’s husband rejected the invite ‘out of fear’

Patterson invited the four victims for lunch at her home in Leongatha, a small town in Melbourne, on 29 July 2023.

Her estranged husband, Simon Patterson, with whom she shares two children, was also invited but didn’t attend.

In court, the jury was not told why Mr Patterson rejected the invite, but it has now been revealed that he told a pre-trial hearing that he did so “out of fear”.

“I thought there’d be a risk that she’d poison me if I attended,” he told the court months before the trial.

He said he believed Patterson, from whom he had been estranged since 2015, had tried to poison him with her cooking three times in the past, and had therefore stopped eating food she prepared.

He said the previous alleged poisonings had occurred on family camping trips after he had eaten dishes including penne bolognese pasta, chicken korma curry and a vegetable curry wrap.

Mr Patterson claimed he became seriously ill after the meals, but no poisonings were ever found.

He said he didn’t believe anyone else would be at risk from her cooking.

On Friday the court ruled in favour of lawyers representing media who sought to overturn the gag order on this information, meaning it could be shared for the first time.

Patterson told guests she was prepping ‘special meal’

During the trial, text messages read out revealed Patterson found her husband’s decision not to come “really disappointing” as she had spent time and money preparing the “special meal”.

Mr Patterson told the court he had listed them as financially separated on a tax return, which triggered a series of child support payments that meant he would no longer pay their two children’s private school fees directly.

Speaking through tears, Mr Patterson said: “I was sure she was very upset about that.”

Reverend Wilkinson said he and his wife were surprised by the invitation, telling the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC): “There was no reason given for the lunch, and I remember talking to Heather wondering why the sudden invitation.”

But he said the pair were “very happy to be invited”.

Patterson’s daughter, according to ABC, told the court that her mother organised a trip to the cinema for her and her brother in advance of the lunch.

Sole survivor gives details about the lunch

Reverend Wilkinson told the court that Heather and Gail offered to help plate up the food, but Patterson rejected the offer.

Each plate had a serving of mashed potatoes, green beans and an individual beef wellington.

Patterson said the mushrooms were a mixture of button mushrooms from a supermarket and dried mushrooms bought at an Asian grocery store several months before, which were in a hand-labelled packet.

Reverend Wilkinson said the four guests were given large grey dinner plates, while Patterson ate from a smaller, tan-coloured plate.

He said he remembered his wife pointing this out after they became ill.

The reverend said he and his wife ate their full servings, while Don ate his own and half of his wife’s.

Reverend Wilkinson said that after the meal, Patterson told them she had been diagnosed with cancer, suggesting the lunch was put together so that she could ask them the best way to tell her children about the illness.

The prosecution said she did this to justify the children’s absence.

The defence does not dispute that Patterson lied about having cancer.

When asked why she lied about her health, Patterson told the court it was partly to elicit sympathy from her husband’s relatives, as she felt they were growing apart.

“I didn’t want their care of me to stop, so I kept it going. I shouldn’t have done it,” she said, adding: “I did lie to them.”

Defendant wanted to serve ‘something special’

While on the stand at the beginning of June, Patterson said she might have accidentally included foraged mushrooms in the fatal lunch.

She said she brought expensive ingredients and researched ideas to find “something special” to serve. She said she deviated from her chosen recipe to improve the “bland” flavour.

However, she denied that a series of photos showing mushrooms placed on weighing scales in her kitchen was evidence she had been measuring a “fatal dose” to serve to her lunch guests.

Prosecutor Nanette Rogers asked: “I suggest that you were weighing these death cap mushrooms so that you could calculate the weight required for the administration of a fatal dose for one person. Agree or disagree?”

“Disagree,” Patterson replied.

The mother of two said she began foraging for mushrooms around the towns of Korumburra and Leongatha during the COVID lockdowns in 2020 and would use a food dehydrator to dry and preserve them.

Prosecutors earlier claimed the defendant denied ever owning a food dehydrator, but police traced one owned by her to a nearby dump. It was later found to contain death cap mushrooms.

Two mobile phones she owned were also reset to factory status three times.

Patterson told the court she disposed of the dehydrator before a visit from child protection, who were investigating her living arrangements. She said the phones were wiped because she panicked during the police investigation.

“I was scared of the conversation that might flow about the meal and the dehydrator,” she said.

“I was scared they would blame me for it, for making everyone sick. I was scared that they would remove the children.”

Patterson talks through tears

Lawyer Mr Mandy also questioned Patterson about a series of expletive-laden messages she sent to friends about the Patterson family.

“I wish I’d never said it. I feel ashamed for saying it and I wish that the family didn’t have to hear that I said that,” Patterson told the court about the messages.

Talking through tears, she added: “I was really frustrated with Simon, but it wasn’t Don and Gail’s fault.”

The court previously heard that the relationship between Patterson and her estranged husband deteriorated shortly before the murders due to a disagreement over child support.

Patterson’s children ‘ate leftovers after guests went to hospital’

All four victims fell ill and were experiencing severe vomiting and diarrhoea by midnight on the day of the lunch.

Police previously said the symptoms of all four of those who became ill were consistent with poisoning from death cap mushrooms, which are responsible for 90% of all toxic mushroom-related fatalities.

Patterson said she also became unwell hours after eating the meal, but claimed she wasn’t as ill as her guests because she had vomited due to an eating disorder.

Her daughter, according to the ABC, told the court she remembers Patterson telling her she had diarrhoea that night.

Patterson claimed she and her children ate leftovers from the beef wellington on the same day. Her daughter told the court she remembered this, and that her mum didn’t eat much because she was still feeling unwell.

The mum said she scraped the mushrooms off the plates in advance because she knew her children didn’t like them.

Patterson went to hospital two days after the lunch, where she initially discharged herself against medical advice, the court was told.

A nurse at the hospital where she was treated told the court she “didn’t look unwell like Ian and Heather”, who were at the same hospital.

Read more:
Murder of woman exposes date-to-rob crime syndicate
Inside the recovered sunken Bayesian superyacht

Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Gail and Heather died on Friday 4 August 2023, while Don died a day later.

Reverend Wilkinson spent seven weeks in hospital but survived.

Days after the deaths, police opened a homicide investigation and confirmed Patterson was a suspect. She was charged on 2 November 2023 and convicted in July 2025.

What happens now?

Patterson is facing a potential life sentence for each of the murders and 25 years for attempted murder.

A two-day sentencing hearing is set for 25 August, and once passed, Patterson will have 28 days to lodge an appeal against the sentence, the convictions, or both.

Her lawyers have said she will be appealing against the convictions, and argued against the gag-ordered information being released in case it influenced potential jurors in the event of a retrial.