Connect with us

Published

on

Here at Electrek we cover all sorts of electric vehicles, from cars and trucks to planes and trains. But one type of electric vehicle outsells all others combined many times over: the humble electric bicycle.

And yet, for some reason, electric bicycles have been plagued by a running misconception that switching to an e-bike means a slow decline into sedentary demise. In reality, that couldn’t be further from the truth. The simple fact is that switching to an e-bike is one of the best things you can do to get more exercise. Don’t believe me? See why, below.

What is an electric bicycle?

First, let’s set the stage with some quick definitions. Electric bicycles are nearly the same as pedal bicycles, except for the inclusion of an assist motor and a battery pack. They use the same pedals, wheels, seats, tires, handlebars, etc. An e-bike is just a pedal bike with a helper motor.

There are multiple types of e-bikes, with the main two groups being pedal assist (where you have to pedal to engage the assist motor) and throttle-enabled (where you usually have the choice of using pedal assist like the first style or alternatively using a hand throttle that doesn’t require pedaling).

Both types are capable of offering great exercise, since both include pedal assist functions where you only get motor assistance when you’re also pedaling. But keep in mind that if you’re exclusively using the throttle on the e-bike instead of pedaling, you’re not getting much more exercise than you would on a horse. The good news is that as long as you’re using pedal assist, switching to an electric bike means you’ll be getting more exercise and living a healthier lifestyle.

“But switching from what?” you may be thinking. Oh! Now you’re asking the right question!

niu bqi-c3 electric bike

It’s not e-bikes versus pedal bikes

For some godforsaken reason, the e-bike argument is often reframed as electric bikes versus pedal bikes. It’s not uncommon to see comments on e-bikes articles to the effect of “Just what a country with 40% obesity epidemic needs. Less exercise.”

But that’s the wrong way of looking at it, and the numbers prove it.

When someone “switches to” an electric bike as a form of transportation, they are almost always switching out of a car. Sometimes it’s a bus or a train. But it’s almost never switching from a pedal bike to an e-bike.

And do you know why? It’s because almost no one rides a pedal bike.

If you’re a pedal cyclist then you’re surely scoffing right now. I’ll give you a minute. But then climb down from your high saddle, come back to me and look at the numbers. Surveys vary, but nationwide studies from 2019 found that around 0.6% of the US commuters used a pedal bike. That’s not nothing. It’s around 760,000 people, actually. But out of 130 million commuters in the US, that’s almost nothing.

To be fair, bicycle commuting numbers grew after the COVID-19 pandemic amid a renewed interest in cycling, but we’ve still barely broken into integers here in the US. (Side note: Europeans, your numbers are much higher. That’s awesome. Keep doing you.)

But the fact remains that somewhere between 75-90% of all commutes in the US occur by car (numbers vary widely depending on the city and whether ride-hailing/taxis/car-sharing are included).

So if someone is switching to an electric bicycle, they’re almost guaranteed to be switching away from a larger vehicle like a car, truck, bus, or train.

And when that’s the case, which it almost always is, they’re essentially guaranteed to be getting more exercise.

Electric bikes are great for exercise

Study after study after study has reported the health benefits of e-bikes for exercising. Boosted cardiovascular health. Better fitness test results. Improved mental health. Lower BMI from weight loss. The health benefits of e-bikes are long documented. They probably make you better in bed too. I have no study to cite for this but think about it: a healthier body and mind surely aren’t going to hurt in the bedroom.

Most Americans find it hard to fit 30 minutes of moderate exercise into the day. And that’s fair – we all live busy lives. But a quick 15-minute e-bike commute to work gets you that 30 minutes per day without forcing you to set aside a specific block of daily exercise time. And many people cite e-bike exercise via commuting as a convenient level of exertion that gets your heart pumping without being so strenuous that you arrive at work sweating and in need of a shower.

In fact, I’ve heard the same story over and over again from new e-bike converts: They bought an e-bike to get to work but found it to be so enjoyable that it turned into a recreational activity too. Their e-bike is a daily commuter vehicle and a weekend pleasure ride.

Can you get most of these benefits from riding a pedal bicycle? Of course! And if you can make it happen on a pedal bike, that’s great! If you can walk to work, that’s great too! But you know what? You probably won’t. It’s nothing against you, personally. It’s just a numbers game. Due to the exertion required (and that resulting “sweaty at work” situation from pedal bikes), there are just so few out there that the odds of you being one of them is miniscule.

If you ARE a pedal bike commuter or a walk-to-work person, that’s awesome and I applaud you. But you’re in a teeny, tiny minority. To be honest, I don’t even know how you found this article. You’re practically an endangered species at this point. Screw the pandas. We need bumper stickers that say “Save the cyclists!”

So sure, I’m not saying pedal bikes aren’t great for exercise too. But again, that’s not the argument here. That’s reframing the whole idea incorrectly. Pedal bikes are great for the 1% of folks who ride them to work. For the rest of Americans, e-bikes could be the fun, fast, and efficient form of exercise that gets you out of the glass box and into the world, experiencing your city around you while improving your health.

With more cities improving their cycling infrastructure (one of the top reasons commuters often cite for not cycling to work), it’s becoming easier than ever to leave the car in the garage and hop on an e-bike. To be fair, the US has a long way to go in building safe, protected bike lanes. But progress, however slow, is headed in the right direction. Many advocacy groups and individual bike/e-bike commuters alike are making their voices heard, with more cities listening and installing better bike lanes.

That’s important progress, but it shouldn’t stop those who already can bike from considering making the switch today.

The “I live on the side of a 50 mph highway and can’t bike to work” crowd get a pass, but please understand you are also the minority. For the rest of you that live in a city, consider how biking, e-biking, walking, skipping, kick-scootering, or any other form of active personal transportation could improve your commute, your health, and your life.

And for those of you that are dead set on never leaving the comfort of your SUV, just understand that cyclists help you too. The next time you see one zip by you while sitting in your captain’s chair, realize that you’re waiting in a little bit less traffic because of them. You’re welcome.

new york bike lane

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

An energy star inside U.S. homes is under attack from Trump, with the cost to homeowners uncertain

Published

on

By

An energy star inside U.S. homes is under attack from Trump, with the cost to homeowners uncertain

Donald Trump, as both a citizen and president, has railed against modern dishwashers, washing machines, light bulbs, showerheads and toilets, claiming that onerous government regulations render them less effective and more expensive.

Since returning to the White House in January, he’s turned his ire into an edict.

On April 9, Trump issued an executive order directing certain federal agencies “to incorporate a sunset provision” into a laundry list of regulations governing energy production, including those covering appliances. A month later, he issued a memorandum, entitled “Rescission of Useless Water Pressure Standards.”

Following that, on May 12, the Department of Energy announced that it was preparing to eliminate or modify 47 federal regulations “that are driving up costs and lowering quality of life for the American people.”

Many of the rules are covered in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), a decades-old law that mandates energy-efficiency and water-conservation standards for home appliances and plumbing fixtures.

Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Agency said it is planning to eliminate the Energy Star program, a popular voluntary initiative that manufacturers employ to rank their appliances based on energy conservation and cost savings, displayed on familiar blue labeling at retail as comparison-shopping guides.

Trump’s actions have been met with a mix of resistance from consumer protection groups and appliance manufacturers, as well as support from deregulation hawks and decriers of the nanny state. And while the administration continues to review the current standards and solicit comments before considering any official changes, legal challenges to the efforts are being weighed.

A new era of ‘buyer beware’ in electric bills

Originally passed in 1975, EPCA ensures that the entire array of products covered by the law all meet a basic level of energy- and water-efficiency performance, reflected in different price points. A prime example are the ubiquitous yellow Energy Guide stickers affixed to appliances that indicate their annual energy usage and cost. “Consumers who are shopping primarily, if not exclusively, on price also get reasonable efficiency performance [information],” said Andrew deLaski, executive director of the Appliance Standards Awareness Project, a coalition of environmental and consumer groups, utilities and state governments, based at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a nonprofit research organization.

Without that level of regulated consumer protection, deLaski said, “It’s buyer beware.”

Consumers would face the risk of less-efficient appliances entering an unregulated marketplace, he said, “and you’re not going to know it until you get the [higher] electric bill.”

Separate from EPCA, the Energy Star labeling program was established by the EPA in 1992 as a public-private partnership. Managed and jointly funded by the DOE, it sets energy-efficiency standards that manufacturers can choose to display on appliances, building products, electronics, lighting fixtures, HVAC equipment and other products as a way for consumers and businesses to make informed purchase decisions.

The EPA estimates that 90% of households recognize the Energy Star label and that over its 33 years, the program has saved five trillion kilowatt-hours of electricity, reduced greenhouse gas emissions by four billion metric tons and saved $500 billion in utility costs. The program’s 2024 operating budget was $35.7 million. To date, every dollar spent has resulted in nearly $350 in energy cost savings.

Americans support energy-efficient appliance efforts

Consumer Reports conducted a national survey in March which found that 87% of respondents support energy-efficient home appliance standards. Nearly a third said that saving money on energy bills would motivate them to buy a more efficient large home appliance.

Last month, in response to plans to shutter Energy Star, the organization issued a statement urging the EPA to preserve the program. “The loss would hit especially hard at a time when people are dealing with unpredictable energy bills and trying to cut expenses,” said Shanika Whitehurst, associate director for Consumer Reports’ product sustainability, research and testing team.

The nonprofit Alliance to Save Energy, a bipartisan coalition of consumer, environment, business and government groups, suggests that EPCA and Energy Star actually promote the White House’s goals of lowering families’ energy bills and making the nation energy dominant. “If you start to dismantle the energy-efficiency programs, American households are going to pay for that,” said Jason Reott, ASE’s senior manager of policy. “Energy dominance begins at home, by eliminating energy waste.”

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, which represents more than 150 manufacturers, has historically supported efficiency regulations, but pushed back against the Biden administration’s updates of EPCA standards for gas stoves, refrigerators, dishwashers and other appliances. The law requires the DOE to review standards at least once every six years, a process that has often led to rule changes.

“We have always been able to produce products at higher efficiency levels,” said Jill Notini, vice president of communications and marketing for AHAM, “but there’s a tipping point where you have to stop and say, you have to have the technology that allows those standard levels.”

“We very much appreciate the intent behind [President Trump’s] goals of deregulatory actions,” Notini said. “Our industry needs it after looking at our products and how far they have come in terms of energy efficiency and water use,” alluding to the eight rounds of EPCA reviews, updates and revisions over the years.

Already at or near peak efficiency, industry says

Today’s appliances are at or near their peak efficiency, a result of federal standards and manufacturers’ investment in technology and innovation, Notini said. “So there needs to be a recognition that we can’t stay on this path and continue to ratchet up standards and expect high-performing products,” she added.

AHAM favors revising EPCA standards, she said, based on technological advances rather than the every-six-year requirement. What the association does not endorse, however, is Trump’s request for the DOE to waive federal preemption of states’ regulations regarding the water efficiency of showerheads, faucets and toilets.

“It’s concerning to us that we may not have federal preemption, which creates that certainty that the industry is looking for,” Notini said, noting that several states have established their own efficiency standards on some EPCA-covered products. Federal preemption “truly is what has made energy efficiency such a success.”

AHAM member LG Electronics USA has mixed views on efforts to roll back EPCA, according to senior vice president John I. Taylor. “Generally deregulation is good for business, but there are some specific things in EPCA that are beneficial to American consumers and the American economy,” he said. “Our company has been a leader in driving energy efficiency, so regardless of how the regulations end up, we’ll continue to keep our foot on that accelerator.”

In March, nearly three dozen industry groups and appliance companies, including the Chamber of Commerce, Bosch, Carrier and the Air-Conditioning, Heating, & Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) sent a letter to EPA administrator Lee Zeldin, urging him not to end Energy Star. In April, the U.S. Green Building Council, along with more than 1,000 signatories — among them LG, Miele and Samsung Electronics America — wrote to Zeldin to express concerns about proposed cuts at the EPA, including Energy Star.

Energy Star very popular with consumers, according to retail sector

While major appliance retailers, such as Lowe’s, Home Depot and Best Buy, have not publicly commented on any of these pending regulatory changes, the National Retail Federation, one of several consumer products, manufacturing, real estate and retail organizations that sent a letter on June 6 to a bipartisan group of Congressional leaders, asking them to “strongly support continuation of the non-regulatory and non-partisan Energy Star program within the federal government.”

“Consumers have said overwhelmingly that they support voluntary environmental standard-setting programs like Energy Star,” said Scot Case, vice president of corporate social responsibility and sustainability and executive director for the NRF’s Center for Retail Sustainability. And that’s why retailers the trade group represents “want to make sure they’re able to share the benefits of those programs with the consumer,” he said.

Trump’s tribulations with energy-efficiency and water-conservation standards echo those of libertarians and free-marketers who maintain that regulations often represent government overreach and restrict personal choice. For instance, the libertarian Cato Institute has called Energy Star “a very coarse piece of energy information that may crowd out efforts” to develop more accurate ways to measure energy-operating costs.

“I’m a big proponent of energy efficiency, but I don’t think we need the federal government overriding the choices and preferences that consumers may have when purchasing an appliance,” said Nick Loris, vice president of public policy for C3 Solutions, a conservative energy think tank. He said rolling back EPCA standards is “a step forward in reducing government intervention into decisions that should be best left for producers and consumers.”

Where legal challenges are headed

As with a mounting number of actions taken by the Trump administration this year — from tariffs to immigration — tinkering with EPCA is expected to be challenged in federal courts. The law includes a so-called anti-backsliding provision, which prevents rolling back standards that have already been finalized. A 2004 case deLaski referred to, NRDC v. Abraham, upheld the provision. “Once a DOE standard has been updated and published in the Federal Register, you can’t go backward,” he said of the precedent.

The administration may seek legal authority to enact these deregulation orders by citing the “good cause” exception in the Administrative Procedures Act as a way to avoid the APA’s public notice-and-comment processes. Yet legal experts, environmental groups and state attorneys general have warned that skipping APA procedures — especially for weakening energy- and water-use standards covered by EPCA — would likely be deemed “arbitrary and capricious” and illegal.

Ultimately, considering the success and popularity of EPCA and Energy Star — with consumers, manufacturers and retailers — as well as the legal underpinnings, it’s entirely possible that both will remain intact, if perhaps with a few tweaks. “In one form or another,” Taylor said, “we expect both will.”

“We know consumers want the information, and the interesting thing about consumers is, they are also voters,” Case said.

Continue Reading

Environment

CASE expands compact equipment lineup with new CX25EV electric excavator

Published

on

By

CASE expands compact equipment lineup with new CX25EV electric excavator

CASE CE is expanding its mini excavator lineup with the launch of four models this week, including an all-new electric model designed to delivers emissions-free performance that rivals any of its comparably-sized diesel counterparts — including its CASE-branded siblings!

CASE calls the CX25EV a “highly versatile machine,” highlighting the excavator’s hydraulic flow settings and three auxiliary circuits that can be paired with a quick coupler and a variety of attachments. The mini excavator is also equipped with electrohydraulic controls that are fully customizable to the operator’s taste for speed, ramp-up speed and smoothness, while its short-radius design makes it easy to move around in tight, indoor spaces during trenching and precision demolition jobs.

The belief is that the new machine will enable construction crews to take on more challenging jobs that face unique noise, emission, or vibration requirements, the CX25EV electric mini excavator, originally announced last spring as part of a broader electric equipment launch, the new machine is now in production, on sale, and on its way to customers. Customers, it’s hoped, who will be able to keep operators happier and healthier without the loud diesel engines of the past.

And that is hugely important for the industry.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Use your indoor voices


CASE Bolsters Mini Excavator Lineup to Give Crews More Versatility on Tight Jobsites
Bringing it indoors, without emissions; via CASE.

“Labor shortages, close-quarter environments, more stringent jobsite requirements — the challenges crews are up against today are more varied than ever,” says Terry Dolan, head of CNH Construction Brands, North America. “Helping crews meet the demands of the modern worksite is what drives our practical approach to innovation, and it’s why we’ve focused heavily on enhancing our robust lineup of mini excavators to offer the most efficient solutions. These new models deliver big on power, but they’re also easier to transport, move around the jobsite, operate, maintain and own, compared to larger machines.”

The CASE CX25EV ships with a 32.3 kWh li-ion battery that can be DC fast charged from 20-80% in under an hour, or from 0-100% in less than two hours. CASE says the new electric mini excavator offers operators 4,950 lbs. of traction force as well, and has provided a complete and comprehensive set of specs that I’ve included, below.

CASE CX25EV specs


SOURCE | IMAGES: CASE.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

E-quipment highlight: Manitou telehandler gets electric retrofit

Published

on

By

E-quipment highlight: Manitou telehandler gets electric retrofit

No matter how badly a fleet may want to electrify, harsh economic realities and the greater up-front costs typically associated with battery electric remain high hurdles to overcome — but a new retrofit option from French equipment manufacturer Manitou could help lower those barriers.

The retrofit solution showcased in the MT 1440 telehandler shown here was co-developed by Manitou Group and the electric engineers at Kinell for equipment rental group Kilotou as a cost-effective, energy-efficient way to decarbonize their customers’ construction and logistics operations. Crucially, this isn’t just a solution for late-model offerings — this MT 1440 telehandler is already seven years old!

“At a time when electric is set to become the norm and gradually replace fossil fuels, we see retrofitting as an alternative to mass replacement,” explains François Renault, Kiloutou director of equipment and sustainable development. “It is perfectly aligned with a comprehensive fleet upgrade program, without the need to buy everything back.”

Kinell’s modular retrofit replaces the 2018-spec diesel engine with a high-capacity battery sending power to a 55 kW (approx. 75 hp) electric motor. And, while battery specs aren’t shared, Kilotou says they expect a single charge to last a fully day in, “over 80% of daily usage cycles.”

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Manitou MT 1440 electric


Electric retrofit of the Manitou MT 1440
Retrofit electric telehandler; via Manitou.

Though it’s just a prototype for now, Manitou believes a retrofit solution like the one shown here could significantly reduce a job site’s carbon emissions — with all the safety and performance criteria equivalent to the internal combustion version. Once they get there, Manitou plans to offer the electrification kit, which would enable its customers to electrify without having to buy all new equipment assets.

“The goal (is to) provide an efficient solution for urban worksites, where reducing noise and emissions is critical, by converting diesel-powered telehandlers into electric models,” reads the official copy at Kinell. “The challenge was to develop a technically robust, economically viable, and scalable solution for converting diesel-powered telehandlers.”

Equipment World reports that the Kinell retrofits will be carried out on a number of equipment assets in the Kiloutou rental — each at least five years old. The repowered units will eventually be available for rent at Kiloutou’s branches in France, with retrofit packages eventually being rolled out to the larger market as the kinks are worked out.

SOURCE | IMAGES: Kinell.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending