Connect with us

Published

on

Thousands of shoppers are expected to be heading to their local high streets and retail parks or scouring the websites of their favourite shops as Black Friday gets under way.

But consumer group Which? has warned that there are a few deals that should be avoided, highlighting a pair of child car seats, a TV, a dishwasher, a laptop, and fridges and freezers.

Which? said it had tested the items and concluded that they “could be a waste of money for shoppers – at a time when many can ill afford it during the current cost of living crisis”.

Products it said had raised red flags were:

Graco Logico L car seat

This was being sold on Amazon at a discounted price of £40 from its pre-sale price of £50.

Which? said the seat meets legal safety requirements under R44 regulations, but due to poor side-impact protection, it was not recommended.

Which? said the car seat is only legally required to pass front impact testing, but its own test includes side impact.

Amazon said the car seat is not currently available as a Black Friday deal. When Sky News looked on the website, it was listed as “out of stock”.

Maxi Cosi Beryl car seat

This also performed poorly in Which?’s side crash test, although it met legal safety requirements under R44 regulations.

Which? said: “The product’s sizing is not quite right, meaning children weighing 25kg are slightly oversized for the seat, leaving them exposed.”

A retailer which did have the car seat on sale said it had since been removed, although it is offered by a number of other outlets.

Hisense 50A7100FTUK television

Described by Which? as “absolutely abysmal”, with criticism of its poor motion control, dark contrast and a palette that skews too red, this TV is being sold by Argos for £249, down from £349.

A spokesperson said: “The Hisense 50A7100FTUK from Argos is not a Black Friday deal, it is a clearance item. It is not on the Black Friday deals 2022 section of the website, and we are not pushing it as a Black Friday deal.

“We regularly review our ranges and overall the Hisense range has received positive feedback from our customers.”

Hoover HBFUP 130 NKE freezer

Sold by Currys for £289, down from the original price of £369, but Which? said its tests found the appliance had an inconsistent temperature and is slow to freeze food, estimating it would cost households almost £50 extra a year to operate under the current energy price guarantee.

Sky News has sought a response from Currys.

Read more:
Tips to stay safe and avoid scams on Black Friday
‘Just one in seven’ Black Friday deals are real discounts

Amica FDR2213C Retro fridge-freezer

Criticised by Which? as energy inefficient and slow to refrigerate food, this product is reduced to £399 from £479 at AO.

AO also has a dishwasher – Hisense HV651D60UK – on sale for £379, down from £399. Which? said its filters were likely to need cleaning every third wash cycle, and that it was loud.

An AO spokesperson said: “The fridge-freezer named by Which? has been rated 4.8 stars out of 5 by over 400 of our customers, while the dishwasher also scores highly at 4.4 stars out of 5 with over 150 reviews.

“Which? is, of course, entitled to its own opinion, but our customer reviews from real families using these products speak for themselves.”

Fusion5 T90B+ Pro laptop

Singled out by Which? for “terrible performance and short-lived guaranteed security support”. It is on sale for £160 at Amazon, down from £200. Amazon did not supply a separate comment on this.

Natalie Hitchins, Which? head of home products and services, said: “Our research has found so-called Black Friday bargains that could end up being a big let-down and money down the drain for people who buy them.

“The cost of living crisis makes it even more important that people can make their money go further with savvy purchases in the sales. Only buy products if you really need them, and do your research, so you don’t end up with a certified dud.”

Continue Reading

UK

Andrew Malkinson criticises apology from Criminal Cases Review Commission after he was wrongly jailed for 17 years

Published

on

By

Andrew Malkinson criticises apology from Criminal Cases Review Commission after he was wrongly jailed for 17 years

A man wrongly jailed for 17 years for a rape he did not commit has said it is “too little too late” after receiving an apology from the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Andrew Malkinson was jailed in 2003 but eventually released in December 2020.

His charges were quashed last year after new DNA evidence potentially linked another man to the crime.

The CCRC has now offered Mr Malkinson an unreserved apology after the completion of a report from an independent review by Chris Henley KC into the handling of the case.

But reacting to the apology, Mr Malkinson said the time for CCRC chairman Helen Pitcher OBE to apologise was when he was exonerated last summer.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Malkinson: Wrongly imprisoned for rape

“The CCRC’s delay in apologising to me added significantly to the mental turmoil I am experiencing as I continue to fight for accountability for what was done to me,” Mr Malkinson said.

“The CCRC’s failings caused me a world of pain. Even the police apologised straight away. It feels like Helen Pitcher is only apologising now because the CCRC has been found out, and the last escape hatch has now closed on them.”

He said his lawyer had written to Ms Pitcher last September requesting an apology, to which she refused.

He added: “It is hard for me to see the sincerity in an apology after all this time – when you are truly sorry for what you have done, you respond immediately and instinctively, it wells up in you.”

Earlier on Thursday, Ms Pitcher released a statement saying: “Mr Henley’s report makes sobering reading, and it is clear from his findings that the commission failed Andrew Malkinson. For this, I am deeply sorry. I have written to Mr Malkinson to offer him my sincere regret and an unreserved apology on behalf of the commission.

Addressing beliefs that she was unwilling to apologise, Ms Pitcher added: “For me, offering a genuine apology required a clear understanding of the circumstances in which the commission failed Mr Malkinson. We now have that.

Andrew Malkinson, who served 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, reads a statement outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London, after being cleared by the Court of Appeal. Picture date: Wednesday July 26, 2023.
Image:
Mr Malkinson protested his innocence for years. Pic: PA

“Nobody can ever begin to imagine the devastating impact that Mr Malkinson’s wrongful conviction has had on his life, and I can only apologise for the additional harm caused to him by our handling of his case.”

Mr Malkinson had applied for his case to be reviewed by the CCRC in 2009, but at the conclusion of its review in 2012 the commission refused to order further forensic testing or refer the case for appeal, amid concerns over costs.

A second application was rejected in 2020.

Read more:
Investigation launched into Andrew Malkinson case
Police and CPS ‘knew another man’s DNA was on victim’s clothes’

Critical DNA evidence had been available since 2007, but no match was found on the police database at the time.

Since Mr Malkinson had his conviction quashed, dozens of rape and murder convictions from before 2016 are set to undergo fresh DNA testing to identify potential miscarriages of justice.

The CCRC said it has re-examined nearly 5,500 cases that it previously rejected in the light of improvement in DNA analysis techniques.

Its initial trawl last summer found around a quarter of the cases are those where the identity of the offender is challenged.

Focusing on those, it says there are potentially several dozen cases where DNA samples could be retested using the DNA 17 technique, first introduced in 2014.

Continue Reading

UK

Nicola Sturgeon’s husband Peter Murrell charged in connection with embezzlement of funds from SNP

Published

on

By

Nicola Sturgeon's husband Peter Murrell charged in connection with embezzlement of funds from SNP

Nicola Sturgeon’s husband Peter Murrell has been charged by police after he was arrested amid an investigation into the SNP’s funding and finances.

Police said he has been charged in connection with the embezzlement of funds from the party.

The former SNP chief executive, 59, was questioned by detectives after being taken into Police Scotland custody on Thursday at 9.13am.

He remained in police custody until he was charged just after 6.30pm.

Murrell has since been released from custody.

A report will be sent to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service in due course.

 Peter Murrell, the former Chief Executive of the Scottish National Party
Image:
Murrell is the former chief executive of the SNP. Pic: PA

The police investigation into the party’s funding and finances has been ongoing for years.

It has been dubbed Operation Branchform.

Murrell became chief executive of the SNP in 2001, he stepped down from the role in 2023 having held it for more than 20 years.

He has been married to Ms Sturgeon – who resigned as first minister last February – since 2010.

Continue Reading

UK

Dozens arrested and thousands contacted after scammer site taken offline

Published

on

By

Dozens arrested and thousands contacted after scammer site taken offline

Dozens of people around the world have been arrested after police disrupted a UK-founded website scamming victims on an industrial scale.

LabHost, a site set up in 2021, tricked as many as 70,000 UK victims, obtaining 480,000 card numbers and 64,000 PINs worldwide, the Metropolitan Police said.

It was created by a criminal network and enabled more than 2,000 users to set up phishing websites designed to steal personal information such as email addresses, passwords and bank details.

Criminal subscribers could log on and choose from existing sites or request bespoke pages replicating those of trusted brands such as banks, healthcare agencies and postal services.

Person arrested in connection with the investigation. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Person arrested in connection with the investigation. Pic: Met Police

The website even provided a tutorial to cater for wannabe fraudsters with limited IT knowledge, with a robotic voice saying at the end: “Stay safe and good spamming”.

Those subscribing to worldwide membership – meaning they could target victims all around the world – paid between £200 and £300 a month.

Since it began, the site has received just under £1m in payments from criminal users.

More from UK

But just after it was seized and disrupted, its 800 customers got a message telling them that police knew who they were and what they were doing.

Thirty-seven people were arrested around the world, including some at Manchester and Luton airports, as well as in Essex and London.

Detectives have also contacted up to 25,000 UK-based victims to tell them their data has been compromised.

Read more:
Notorious cyber crime gang Lockbit disrupted by NCA, FBI and international coalition
FBI disrupts hacking network ‘linked to Russian intelligence’
Parents of US gun violence victims use AI to recreate their voices
Chinese hackers preparing to ‘wreak havoc’ on US, warns FBI chief

Items seized by the Metropolitan Police. Pic: Met Police
Image:
Items seized by the Metropolitan Police. Pic: Met Police

Police began investigating LabHost in June 2022 after they were tipped off by the Cyber Defence Alliance – a group of British-based banks and law enforcement agencies which share intelligence.

Dame Lynne Owens, deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service, said: “Online fraudsters think they can act with impunity. They believe they can hide behind digital identities and platforms such as LabHost and have absolute confidence these sites are impenetrable by policing.

“But this operation and others over the last year show how law enforcement worldwide can, and will, come together with one another and private sector partners to dismantle international fraud networks at source.”

Adrian Searle, director of the National Economic Crime Centre in the NCA, said: “This operation again demonstrates that UK law enforcement has the capability and intent to identify, disrupt and completely compromise criminal services that are targeting the UK on an industrial scale.”

Continue Reading

Trending