An extra £118m, at least, will be spent this year on temporary accommodation, such as hotels and B&Bs, by councils, a Sky News investigation has found.
If trends continue, local authorities in England will spend nearly a quarter more (24%) this financial year than pre-COVID-19.
Outside London, expenditure is on track to increase by 55%.
The number of families living in temporary accommodation (TA), as a proportion of the population, has alsorisen by 8%.
Around £309m was spent by councils on TA in the six months to September, and they are expected to spend well over £618m this financial year.
That’s compared with £500m in the year to March 2020.
The true figure will be much higher because out of more than 300 local authorities contacted, through freedom of information requests, only 180 responded with comparable data.
More on Homelessness
Related Topics:
The biggest increases in TA spending since before the pandemic have been in Yorkshire and the Humber and the South West.
The biggest rises have been in St Helens, Rossendale, Torridge, Sunderland and Wigan.
Advertisement
Torridge district council, in Devon, one of the worst affected, has a forecast for TA expenditure of £1.1m this year, an increase of more than 2,000%.
Devon is a case study in itself, bearing the brunt of external housing market pressures.
There are 70% fewer properties available to rent there than in 2018 and the cost of rented accommodation has also risen by 42%.
It is also believed that in Torridge, a “tourist hotspot”, a “significant number” of properties are being let as holiday homes.
Torridge district councillor Rachel Clarke, lead for homelessness and housing need, told of “unprecedented pressures” with “modest reimbursement” from the government.
“The council is facing significant challenges in finding affordable rented accommodation for residents in temporary accommodation, and hence their stays in TA are longer,” Ms Clarke said.
“The cost pressures associated with temporary accommodation is by far the biggest cost pressure this council faces.”
Image: Sally O’Malley and her son Ollie were evicted from their privately rented home
More children in temporary accommodation
The latest government figures also show that the number of families with children living in TA in England, outside London, has risen by more than 20%.
Sally O’Malley and her son Ollie, 12, are one of those statistics.
They lived in a hotel, followed by a B&B, after she was made homeless through a “no fault” section 21 eviction.
She was told, like many are, that she would not be eligible for help from the authorities until the day she became homeless.
Ms O’Malley, 49, who is from Leeds, was evicted from her privately rented house and describes the ordeal as “traumatising” and “hell”:
“I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy… horrible. We got to the stage where I really wanted to give in,” she said.
“Then I’d beat myself up cos how could I think that with Ollie? I had no fight left. I didn’t want to do one more phone call, one more email. I totally lost myself, I was drowning.”
She is now in rented accommodation paid for through her housing allowance but, as it doesn’t cover the cost of rent, is topped up by the local council.
She is one of thousands going through a cycle of eviction, homelessness, temporary accommodation and then back into an expensive private rental sector.
The councils that responded to information requests have spent £1.98bn on temporary accommodation in the past three and a half years.
Image: Sean Gillespie, a landlord in Hull, says a ‘massive housing crisis’ is on the way
Rising rental costs and falling supply
The reasons behind the rise in costs is partly down to more homelessness in some areas, but also due to the rising cost of accommodation itself.
The supply of privately rented accommodation is dropping, which is partly pushing up prices.
Some councils are also struggling to find places to put people up in, which means they are having to resort to more expensive shorter-term lets.
Sean Gillespie has a portfolio of properties to rent in Hull and blames government legislation for a lack of stock as it forces landlords to sell up.
He claims the most damaging piece of legislation has been “section 24”, which came fully into force last year and means landlords are no longer able to offset financial costs against tax.
“Can you imagine a business, any business, where you can’t offset your costs? How is that possible? It’s now possible to make a loss as a landlord and still pay tax – it’s bonkers,” he said.
“We are not taxed on our profits, we’re taxed at our turnover. Where is the spare money?… We [landlords] don’t want a new Rolex, we just don’t want to sell someone’s house.
“Because that doesn’t help anyone. I really don’t know where people are going to live. There’s going to be a housing crisis. It’s in the post, a massive crisis, it’s catastrophic.”
Alex Diner, senior researcher of housing policy at the New Economics Foundation, describes temporary accommodation as a “national scandal”.
“We are throwing far more money at the symptom of the problem and far less on addressing the root cause of it,” he said.
“It’s economically illiterate and dysfunctional that we’re allowing ever-increasing amounts of money to pay for that, rather than dealing with the problem at source and building social and affordable housing that the country so desperately needs.”
Lack of social housing the key problem
At the heart of all this is one uniting factor: a distinct lack of social housing.
Think of the housing market as a vicious circle of inequality, with two things happening at the bottom.
One: unaffordable housing has driven more and more people on low incomes into the private rented sector.
Two: social housing stock has been sold off and not replaced and therefore benefit recipients have also been forced increasingly to privately rent.
The fact is the private rental sector has become a substitute for social housing.
In the middle of it, two converging groups of people have begun to compete for the same place to live.
Government figures show 25.7% of households in the private rental sector are in receipt of housing benefit.
If we built more affordable homes, and specifically more social housing, it would slowly take the heat out of the private rented sector and ultimately market sales.
Private rental has become a precarious and increasingly unaffordable sector and is one of the main reasons why taxpayers are spending billions on temporary accommodation.
From an economic perspective it may appear nonsensical, certainly in terms of “levelling up”.
Ultimately, an overreliance on the private rented sector, as more landlords sell up, will only serve to deepen social and housing inequality.
A government spokesperson said: “Temporary accommodation is a last resort, but a vital lifeline for those at risk of sleeping rough.
“We are giving councils £316 million this year to prevent homelessness and help ensure families are not left without a roof over their heads.
“We know people are concerned about rising costs, which is why we have announced the energy price guarantee, to support household with their energy bills over the winter, and a further £37 billion of support for those struggling with the cost of living.”
Plans have been announced for a new “landmark tower” in London with double the floor space of Britain’s tallest building, The Shard.
JPMorgan Chase unveiled details of the proposed office block after banks escaped having their taxes raised in the budget earlier this week.
The US multinational bank said the new building in Canary Wharf, in the east of the capital, would have a floor space of three million square feet. The Shard, in London Bridge, covers 1.3 million square feet.
However, the final design of the tower, including its height, is still being finalised.
A spokesperson for the firm told Sky News that they hoped to have clarity “soon” on how tall the building would be and the number of storeys. But it is expected to be one of the biggest office blocks in Europe.
JPMorgan Chase boss Jamie Dimon reportedly signed off on the plans late last week.
It came after Sir Keir Starmer’s business envoy Varun Chandra flew out to New York to personally “offer assurances about the government’s business-friendly policies,” the Financial Times reported on Friday.
Image: The Shard is the tallest building in western Europe. Pic: Reuters
The company also warned in a press release that its plans were “subject to a continuing positive business environment in the UK”, as well as planning permission from local authorities.
JPMorgan Chase said the project could contribute up to £9.9bn to the UK economy over six years, including by generating 7,800 jobs, many of them in the construction industry.
The tower would house up to 12,000 people and serve as JPMorgan Chase’s main UK headquarters and its most significant presence in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
The firm, which employs 23,000 people in the UK, said the tower would be “one of the largest and most sophisticated in Europe”.
The building is being designed by British architects Foster and Partners, known for landmarks projects including the new Wembley Stadium and London’s Millennium Bridge.
Mr Dimonsaid: “London has been a trading and financial hub for more than a thousand years, and maintaining it as a vibrant place for finance and business is critical to the health of the UK economy.
“This building will represent our lasting commitment to the city, the UK, our clients and our people.”
Mr Dimon added: “The UK government’s priority of economic growth has been a critical factor in helping us make this decision.”
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she was “thrilled” about the announcement, while Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan said it represented a “huge vote of confidence in the capital’s future”.
An influential City group is urging investors to oppose plans that would guarantee a multimillion pound share bonanza to executives at Anglo American as it finalises a $33bn merger with Canada’s Teck Resources.
Sky News understands that the Investment Association’s IVIS voting advisory service has issued next month’s vote on amendments to Anglo’s long-term incentive awards with a ‘red-top’ alert – its strongest possible warning against the resolution.
The development comes days after rival miner BHP approached Anglo for a second time about a potential takeover, before abruptly withdrawing.
Anglo, the mining group which owns De Beers, wants to amend its share awards to guarantee that they would pay out at least 62.5% of their value if the merger completes.
Institutional Shareholder Services, which has recommended that shareholders vote in favour of the merger itself, has also recommended opposition to the bonus scheme amendments.
“The amending of awards to reflect M&A factors not envisioned when the awards were first granted is not considered inappropriate in the UK market per se,” ISS said in a report to clients.
“However, in this case, the amending of in-flight LTIP awards in order to ensure a minimum payout linked to the completion of the merger transaction is.
“Indeed, the linking of variable incentives to the completion of transactions is not considered good practice, which is itself recognised by the company.”
Sticking to Labour’s manifesto pledge and freezing income tax thresholds rather than raising income tax has hurt low- and middle-income earners, an influential thinktank has said.
Millions of these workers “would have been better off with their tax rates rising than their thresholds being frozen”, according to the Resolution Foundation’s chief executive, Ruth Curtice.
“Ironically, sticking to her manifesto tax pledge has cost millions of low-to-middle earners”, she said.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her budget speech that the point at which people start paying higher rates of tax has been held. It means earners are set to be dragged into higher tax bands as they get pay rises.
The chancellor felt unable to raise income tax as the Labour Party pledged not to raise taxes on working people in its election manifesto.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:47
Budget: What does the public think?
But many are saying that pledge was broken regardless, as the tax burden has increased by £26bn in this budget.
When asked by Sky News whether Ms Reeves would accept she broke the manifesto pledge, she said:
More on Budget 2025
Related Topics:
“I do recognise that yesterday I have asked working people to contribute a bit more by freezing those thresholds for a further three years from 2028.”
“I do recognise that that will mean that working people pay a bit more, but I’ve kept that contribution to an absolute minimum”.
Welcome news
The Resolution Foundation thinktank, which aims to raise living standards, welcomed measures designed to support people with the cost of living, such as the removal of the two-child benefit cap, which limited the number of children families could claim benefits for.
The announced reduction in energy bills through the removal of as yet unspecified levies was similarly welcomed.
The chancellor said bills would become £150 cheaper a year, but the foundation said typical energy bills will fall by around £130 annually for the next three years, “though support then fades away”.
More to come
This budget won’t be the last of it, Ms Curtice said, as economic growth forecasts have been downgraded by independent forecasters the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and growth is a “hurdle that remains to be cleared”.
“Until that challenge is taken on, we can expect plenty more bracing budgets,” she added.
It comes despite Ms Reeves saying as far back as last year, there would be no more tax increases.
Ultimately, though, the foundation said, “The great drumbeat of doom that preceded the chancellor’s big day turned out to be over the top: the forecasts came in better than many had feared.”