
Electrek’s vehicle of the year is the svelte $25K Chevy Bolt
More Videos
Published
3 years agoon
By
admin
The lowest-priced EV in the US is somehow also one of the best. Now in its sixth year, the Bolt EV is also seasoned, having worked through a battery fiasco/recall and significant lapses by GM’s decision-makers while receiving modest but significant updates.
With a clean bill of health, the Bolt is now an huge outlier in bang-for-buck. But the 2023 Bolt is also quick, fun to drive, useful, and often more so than cars twice its price. In fact, I think we should be looking to the diminutive Bolt as the future of transportation.
2022 EV landscape
2022 was an interesting year for EVs. The leader in the space, Tesla, still commands over 60% of the market share in the US and many developed countries. But as traditional automakers ramp up their EV output, that dominance will recede. The Austin-based company hasn’t really done too much in the way of upgrading its cars this year, however. Instead it focused on production, opening new plants in Austin and Berlin and ramping up its Shanghai plant while achieving record breaking quarters, one after another.
There were a ton of new vehicles we loved, however, including E-GMP platform vehicles from the greater Hyundai including the quick charging and beautifully equipped IONIQ 5, Kia EV6 and the Genesis GV60. The IONIQ 6 is coming along as are future vehicles (Ev9, etc) on this platform. If this award was for platforms, the E-GMP would probably take it.
There’s also the hot-selling Ford Mustang Mach-E and F-150, the beautiful Cadillac Lyriq, VW’s improved ID.4 that is now made in Chattanooga with Plug and Charge and V2G coming. But there’s one thing that sticks out about all of these EV CUVs: The sticker price starts at around $50,000.
On the more mundane side, Hyundai/Kia offer the Kona/Niro for around $40,000 and the aging 40kW CHAdeMO-equipped Nissan LEAF comes in at $29,000, but to get over 200 miles of range, you have to add close to $10,000.
The chip shortage, supply chain issues and just overall supply and demand issues for EVs let almost every EV maker jack up their prices in 2022. Some as much as $20,000 or more.
Then there’s the mighty Chevy Bolt EV which actually saw a $6000 decrease in price this year to an outlier price starting at $25,600. That price is changing the game and allowing more people get a full, non-compliance EV. The longer EUV is only $1600 more and offers some of the best Autonomy options on the road. But low price is only part of the equation. (We’re not the only ones seeing this)
Recent Electrek Vehicles of the Year winners:
My history with the Bolt and background
I leased a 2017 Chevy Bolt EV from 2017 to 2020. During the pandemic, I decided not to buy out my lease partially because I wasn’t driving but also GMC raw dogged me on buyout price, offering more than a new Bolt. Turns out the joke’s on them because soon after I surrendered my beloved Bolt, the vehicles started catching on fire.
I’ve also reviewed just about every other EV out there, including everything from Minis to Mercedes and everything in-between. I’ve also owned every Tesla outside of the Roadster (and Semi, I guess) and currently own a Model Y and 3.
I often compare all of these cars to my previous and future Bolts in my head and often they come up short.
After the Bolt price drop and my mom’s Prius started faltering, I decided to buy my mom a Bolt EV. I liked that car so much, I again bought myself one. It was delivered yesterday, and it is now my daily driver. I expect to sell my 2018 Tesla Model 3 RWD long range for more than the $28,000 I paid for my Bolt EV. My family will still use the Model Y for long trips, and we’ll reassess if and when our Rivian R1S ever arrives (likely the Bolt will eventually go to the teenager).
Bolt EV vs. Bolt EUV
The EV and EUV are incredibly similar, starting with the exact same battery pack, charging system, motor, and electronics. But, the EUV is 6.3 inches longer, translating to three more inches of rear legroom and a few inches each in the rear compartment and front. The rear legroom in the EV vs. EUV goes from “passable” to “oddly more than enough.” The EUV, having been introduced last year, also has some additional options including the sunroof and SuperCruise, which works incredibly well. As a 6-footer, I have no problem sitting in the back of either vehicle unless there is a fifth person in the middle of the rear seat. Then, you are counting down the seconds until the trip ends.
The biggest difference in the two models is the profile appearance with the EUV representing the extremely popular CUV trend and the Bolt looking more like a tall “hot hatch,” or as Chevy used to call it a, “Micro-Crossover.”
Strangely, however, the shorter Bolt EV has more cargo space than the EUV. Is there some sort of wormhole in there? I’m told the shape of the rear end of the EV more than makes up for those extra length inches in the EUV. I don’t see it, but I’ll trust Chevy. My take is the EV is remarkably roomy inside for its footprint.
Bolt EUV cargo volume
- 16.3 cubic feet behind the second row
- 56.9 cubic feet with the second row folded down
Bolt EV cargo volume
- 16.6 cubic feet behind the second row
- 57.0 cubic feet with the second row folded down

The EV, because of its smaller size and weight, gets slightly more range (247 to 259 miles), and therefore adds slightly more efficiency and charge miles/minute. 60-0 braking is also slightly shorter for the Bolt EV. Maybe most importantly the EV hits 0-60 in 6.4 seconds which feels a lot faster than the .3 seconds slower EUV. Something to consider with EVs vs. ICE cars: You can absolutely gun it at every green light and not be ostracized like you would in a down/gear shifting, loud, jerky internal combustion engine vehicle.
So the EV is faster, smaller, more efficient, better at braking, and yet has more cargo space than the EUV?
We’re awarding both cars our car of the year, but if I had to drill it down to the EV vs. the EUV, I’d go with the smaller EV.
Bonus charging offered by Chevy
On top of the Bolt’s low price, Chevy also offers up to $1000 through Qmerit for Level 2 charger home installation, or $500 in EVGO credit. As I discussed in my post about getting my mom a Bolt, my Qmerit experience was awful; but after a ton of complaining, I did get a Nema 14-50 outlet.
Chevy also offers a free charging cable with the Bolt EV and EUV, though upgrading the EV to level 2 is a $295 option. With Volkswagen and Tesla removing the free charging cables from their cars, Chevy’s offer here is fantastic and gets drivers off on the right foot.

Time to think holistically – not just about EV vs. ICE
After driving a HummerEV and Ford F-150 Lightning, I started to wonder if we’re better off electrifying these behemoths of the road or just getting rid of them altogether. In a time where battery supply is the bottleneck to electrification, the HummerEV is carrying 4 EVs or 10 PHEVs worth of batteries on its 9000lb. body. It also takes three efficient cars worth of electricity to go the same mile in a huge truck. That’s not to even bring up the dangers of being way up in the air and driving these huge heavy trucks at highway speeds. Not only is bicycle and pedestrian visibility limited, but they absolutely destroy anything they crash into including school busses. Sure, some small percentage of pickup drivers actually do work in them, but we somehow got by with Ford Maverick-sized trucks 20 years ago, and we should probably strive to go back to that.
Comparatively, the Bolt is refreshingly small, meaning parking is easy and there’s a ton of extra space in your garage. Yet, with its height and low floor entry points, it is super easy to get into not just for aged and accessibility folks. The low side windows and sloping hood make it easy to see kids and bikers in front of and around the car. The Bolt got a 5-star-safety-rating from NHTSA, and though it might not fare well against a Hummer, it will keep occupants as safe as possible.
It also has tons of room and even more when you fold the seats down (see above).
Wireless CarPlay and Android Auto is a gamechanger
As a Tesla driver, I’m always pleasantly surprised when I get into a CarPlay or Android Auto-based vehicle. I just don’t see anyone beating Apple and Google in the UX space, and it has become quite standard in the car space. Responding to texts is way easier, and the voice recognition is an order of magnitude better. Apps that I want are there and updated in a timely manner.
I was taken aback recently when I reviewed the Genesis GV60. This luxury car with all of the bells and whistles still required you to plug in your phone to use CarPlay. This review might have pushed me over the edge. CarPlay is great, but wouldn’t it be cool if my phone could just be in my pocket?
And that’s the experience with the Bolt. You get in the car turn it on and go. It connects to the phone in your pocket (or you can put it on the wireless charging pad or even plug into the USBA/USBC plugs like a caveman). You’ve got your favorite apps, music and are ready to go. It Just Works™.

Downsides to the Bolt
Every vehicles has some downsides, but I’d argue that the Bolt has relatively few. Let me try to explain these away…
54kW DC fast charging limit. This one is particularly painful because it was called out six years ago. GM decided, again and again, not to upgrade it citing cost and complexity concerns. Even just getting it over 100kW would have been a big psychological boost, and the thing can re-gen at 70kW, so it is pretty obviously capable of updating.
That said, most folks don’t go over 260 miles on all but a few days of the year, and if so, there are a ton of CCS charging options now. Even better, with Plug and Charge/Autocharge+ from EVGO it is super easy – you just plug in to charge (after a quick setup). One thing to consider is that with the Bolt’s efficiency, it charges much faster on a miles-per-minute basis. For instance, it will get just as many miles as a Ford F-150 Lightning charging at over 100kW.
I’ve easily road tripped in a Bolt before and realistically, that means I have to stay an extra 15-30 minutes per charging session and heck, people have driven their Bolts from Ohio to Alaska. At peak charging rate of 54kW, you’ll get 100 miles of range in a half hour of charging. Relax!
The overriding point is that if you don’t do a lot of road tripping and have a home charger where you’ll wake up every morning with 260 miles of range, the DC charging speed limit isn’t a dealbreaker.
FWD vs. AWD Putting front wheel drive into an EV isn’t as straight forward a decision as an ICE vehicle with the weight of the motor over the front wheels. EVs have equal weight between the tires and will see diminishing returns.
With the Bolt’s instant torque and low resistance wheels, I chirp out a lot more than I mean to, especially on rainy or icy roads and on gravel. This can be mitigated somewhat by changing out for worse range, grippier tires. I was told once by a Bolt engineer that they were fixing that but they never did.
The flip side is that the front wheel drive allows for a lot more regeneration of power than a RWD would. The Bolt offers some of the best and most complete one wheel driving available, especially with the always-on regen button and steering wheel paddle to add up to 70kW of braking.
I still would have loved to see an AWD option on the Bolt even if it was just putting a light sub-100hp motor on the back wheels for snow and a little more pickup. Chevy is offering this kind of small motor option to get the Equinox to AWD.
Chevy is perhaps seeing the light here offering the upcoming Ultium Blazer SS in not only FWD and AWD options but, in a first, offering RWD version as well. It can do this because adding motors to EVs is an order of magnitude easier than ICE vehicles. Just not easy enough to add to the Bolt apparently.
Size and shape. I happen to love the look of the Bolt EV but I think I’m in the minority, certainly of Electrek writers. Most people see the EUV as the better looking variant, but I just see it as another CUV in a sea of CUVs on American roads. I, for one, appreciate the uniqueness of the Bolt EV’s form factor. It’s a HOT HATCH! I wonder if GM could have made something look more like the Mini or GTi.
The interior quality is what I would call middle of the road. Seats are comfy and an upgrade from earlier Bolts, but nothing about this car says luxury; it is designed well, but not over the top. Chevy inexplicably changed the shifter in the Bolt to push/pull buttons which I’m still getting used to.
Both Bolts are quite narrow, and the driver ends up being pretty close to the passenger – sharing that small armrest can sometimes feel like a movie theater or a flight. And that back row middle seat? Small people only.
Bolt Fires. A problem was identified with LG’s manufacturing process in Bolt Batteries in 2020 that very rarely caused fires in previous years battery packs. A sting of Bolt fires and GMs refusal to comment got a ton of negative publicity. The cause of the fires was discovered and fixed. Then GM, mostly funded by LG laboriously replaced all previous battery packs. The packs manufactured now are fixed and should function properly. GM did the right thing here.
Dealers. I’ve had to deal with two Chevy dealers in the last two months getting Bolts for myself and my mom. The experience with hers was typical of my past experience, which means, not great. They tried to trick her into a maintenance package after we’d already paid for the car and didn’t handle the Qmerit mess very well either.
Mine here in New York wasn’t bad (Mt. Kisco Chevy). Mike D. was pretty realistic once I told him my expectations and that I knew exactly what I wanted. Bravo to him. He was well prepared and paperwork took about 15 minutes. As a former Bolt owner himself, he just let me go with a handshake. The one downside was I got a hard sale from a lying OnStar salesman on the phone who then abruptly hung up after I didn’t bite. Sheesh.

Vehicle to grid/load/etc.
It is 2023, and all EVs should build in a simple pure Sine Wave inverter that would allow the car to provide AC power to a campsite, worksite, or to the home during an electrical outage. The Ford F-150 highlighted this untapped demand with 10kW of output, and the E-GMP platform cars recently added a smaller 2kW capability.
Unfortunately, the Chevy Bolt has nothing of the sort (we saw some plugs in the upcoming Chevy Equinox and Silverado), but thankfully it is really easy to access the 12V subsystem that is fed by a 1.6kW DC-DC converter from the main 400V battery. That means it is easy to plug in an inverter and take over a kilowatt of power out of the Bolt…. for days.
DIY Solution. I’ve simply alligator-clipped a 1kW continuous/2kW peak inverter onto my Bolt’s 12V lead acid battery to run a refrigerator and internet connectivity in the past. However, I recommend formalizing this setup with something like the purpose-built and fused $180 EV Extend, which actually makes it a lot easier to hook up your inverter and get power out of your Bolt. Assuming a small house/cottage idles below 1kW and doesn’t go over 2kW, the Bolt can keep your house/cottage/campsite powered for over two days. If nothing else, it will keep your fridge and some lights and internet going for upwards of a week.
In the future, all EVs will have a 240V generator port connected to the main battery by a big 10kW inverter. For now, only the Ford F-150 Lightning has this. Tesla is strangely behind here considering they have Powerwalls, solar- and home-switching expertise. Let’s get there!
As we look into 2023
I think big themes of 2023 are going to be Tesla vs. the rest of the market. The Model Y is approaching a 1M cars-per-year run rate which would make it a favorite for 2023 vehicle of the year. That’s an order of magnitude more than the Bolt will sell next year and possibly all of GM, who seem fixated on beating Tesla’s numbers.
But also GM is launching 3 new EVs: Silverado in Spring, Blazer EV in Summer, and Equinox in Fall, so that lineup will be interesting.
There’s a ton more stuff coming as well. I’ve got my eyes on the Kia EV9 3rd row SUV, wondering if they’ll deliver before Rivian’s R1S gets off the ground.
But for now, let’s give the Chevy Bolt its glory. The economy is in some sort of recession/economic downturn and at $25,600, the Chevy Bolt is allowing a much broader swath of the population to get into an EV – and easily get into a great one at that.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
You may like
Environment
Lucid’s (LCID) midsize EV platform is coming next year, bringing three $50,000 ‘top hats’
Published
3 hours agoon
June 26, 2025By
admin

As Lucid (LCID) ramps up production of its first electric SUV, the Gravity, the EV maker has several new lower-priced models in the works. Lucid confirmed its midsize platform is coming next year, which will spawn at least three new EVs priced at around $50,000.
Lucid has three new midsize EVs coming soon
In early 2023, Lucid’s former CEO, Peter Rawlinson, told investors on an earnings call that the company’s advanced battery, powertrain, and other EV technologies are “pushing the envelope on what’s possible.”
Rawlinson promised the innovations would “drive down the costs for EVs,” paving the path for more affordable models.
In an interview with ABC News later that year, Rawlinson explained that Lucid’s in-house tech will be “the key to unlocking greater efficiency” and ultimately lower prices.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
During the interview, Rawlinson said that Lucid was aiming for a starting price around $50,000, adding that’s “Right in the heart of Tesla Model 3, Model Y territory.”
Fast forward a few years, and Lucid is now preparing to launch its Tesla-rivalling midsize EVs. According to the company’s interim CEO, Marc Winterhoff, Lucid will bring its midsize platform to market in late 2026, with production ramping up the following year.

Speaking on the Automotive News Daily Drive podcast, Winterhoff confirmed it’s aiming for starting prices around $50,000.
Lucid has “three top hats” in the works, two of which will launch relatively close to each other. The third will follow shortly after.

Last year, Lucid told Electrek that the company planned to launch three new EVs on the midsize platform: an electric crossover, sedan, and a third vehicle that has yet to be revealed.

We got a sneak peek of the upcoming midsize crossover SUV after Lucid teased it in a blurry photo last September.
Earlier this month, Lucid opened its new Phoenix Hub in Nikola’s former headquarters. The new hub will be home to the first midsize prototypes.
For now, Lucid is focused on ramping up Gravity output. Winterhoff said on the podcast that feedback for the electric SUV has been “phenomenal” so far. He added, “In all of my 25 years of working in the automotive industry, I’ve never seen that positive feedback.”
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Xiaomi YU7 first drive: a $35,000 Ferrari-looking electric SUV with over 400 miles of real range
Published
4 hours agoon
June 26, 2025By
admin

I had the chance to test drive the Xiaomi YU7 ahead of its launch today in China, and I came out of the entire experience both impressed and frustrated.
Let me try to explain why, and also why Western automakers are scared of these new Chinese EVs.
When I was a kid, I remember asking my dad why good-looking vehicles, like exotic supercars, cost so much more than regular cars. In my childish innocence, while I could understand that more performance and higher quality materials cost more, I couldn’t wrap my head around why automakers couldn’t make average performing cars with regular materials but with more aggressive and cooler designs.
My dad tried his best to explain the concept of scarcity and the limitations of different form factors in achieving higher sales volumes, but we ultimately agreed that automakers could technically produce more affordable vehicles with better, more aggressive designs.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Of course, concepts like manufactured scarcity are complex to understand as a child, but the thought did stick with me that a company could mass-produce great exotic-looking cars for more reasonable prices.
That’s basically what Xiaomi is doing now.
One of Xiaomi’s taglines is “make innovative technology accessible to everyone.” That sounds like corporate talk, but I have to admit that it is living up to it with its electric vehicles. I’m not as familiar with its electronics, but I am hearing it’s a similar situation.
The company is facing criticism for the SU7’s resemblance to the Porsche Taycan, and now the YU7’s similarity to the Ferrari Purosangue is undeniable. However, you can’t tell me there’s no market for an all-electric Purosangue with actually higher performance, better tech, more utility, and for a tenth of the price?


That’s basically what the Xiaomi YU7 is and more.
Ultimately, every great car design is heavily inspired by other vehicles. Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun has been spotted driving the Purosangue, Ferrari’s latest $400,000 performance SUV, and it sounds like he thought: “Wouldn’t be nice if this were all-electric, with Xiaomi tech, and more affordable so hundreds of thousands of people could experience it?”
It turns out that, yes, it would be nice.
Xiaomi YU7 electric SUV Specs
Xiaomi is calling it an “SUV” due to the true meaning of the word: “sport utility vehicle,” but it doesn’t look like your average SUV.
When you lift the air suspension to the max (3″ of travel), it does look like more like one, but most of the time, it looks like a sporty wagon, which I love.
Xiaomi hasn’t been shy about going after the Tesla Model Y with the YU7, which is not a bad target considering it’s the best-selling vehicle in the world. The goal is drawing a lot of comparisons, so here are the dimensions compared with Tesla’s SUV:
Model | Wheelbase | Length | Width* | Height | Kerb Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiaomi YU7 | 3,000 mm (118.1 in) | 4,999 mm (196.8 in) | 1,996 mm (78.6 in) | 1,600 mm (63.0 in) | 2,140 – 2,460 kg (4,718 – 5,423 lb) |
Tesla Model Y (2025) | 2,891 mm (113.8 in) | 4,751 mm (187 in) | 1,920 mm (75.6 in) | 1,624 mm (63.9 in) | 1,884 – 1,998 kg (4,154 – 4,404 lb) |
As you can see, it is about a foot longer than the Model Y, 3 inches wider, and a little shorter.
It’s also quite a bit heavier, but that’s because it’s equipped with a significantly larger battery pack.
Tesla doesn’t officially disclose the capacity of its battery pack, but in the latest Model Y, they are estimated to be about 62 kWh for the base version and ~80 kWh for the long range version.
As for the YU7, it features a 96 kWh battery pack with LFP cells from BYD in both the standard and Pro versions.
The YU7 Max, the version I tested, is equipped with a 101 kWh battery pack with NMC battery cells from CATL.
The result is that the base YU7 achieves 835 km of range on a single charge, while the Max version achieves 760 km. The base version is equipped with a single RWD motor, making it the most efficient and therefore, the longest range.
Here are all the ranges of the different variants compared to Tesla’s own CLTC range in China:
Variant | CLTC Range (km / mi) |
---|---|
Xiaomi YU7 (RWD) | 835 km / 519 mi |
Xiaomi YU7 Pro (AWD) | 770 km / 478 mi |
Xiaomi YU7 Max (AWD) | 760 km / 472 mi |
Tesla Model Y RWD | 593 km / 369 mi |
Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD | 719 km / 447 mi |
The CLTC standard is based on the average driving cycle in China, which is more city driving-based than most other markets, and the range would be slightly lower on the WLTP or EPA cycles.
It is a heavy vehicle, but Xiaomi countered that with significant energy capacity. In my experience with the performance electric SUV, you could easily get 500 km of highway driving on a single charge with the Max as long as you don’t go too much over the speed limit.
I looked at the energy stats of the YU7 Max that Xiaomi let me test, and it had consumed 1,113 kWh over 4,868 km:

However, the vehicle had been used as a press car, with people, including myself, driving it quite aggressively up and down mountain roads, mostly in “sport mode,” for the last week.
Even then, it still achieved an efficiency 4.3 km per kWh. I could see the efficiency improve by double digits if driven more normally, with a higher mix of comfort or eco modes, and with the smaller wheels.
But if I only get a few hours with a vehicle, I’m likely to spend most of my time in sports mode.
If you run out of range, charging can be extremely fast with the YU7. Xiaomi claims a 5.2C peak charging capacity, which on the highest capacity chargers will result in charging from 10 to 80% state-of-charge in 21 minutes for the variants with LFP cells (Standard and Pro) and only 12 minutes for the Max, which is powered by NMC cells.
As for the YU7’s power capacity, here are the different motor variants:
Variant | Motor Configuration | Power Output (kW) | Torque (Nm) | 0–100 km/h (s) | Top Speed (km/h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
YU7 (RWD) | Single rear-motor | 235 kW | 528 Nm | 5.88 | 240 |
YU7 Pro (AWD) | Dual motors (front + rear) | 365 kW total | 690 Nm | 4.27 | 240 |
YU7 Max (AWD) | Dual motors (220 kW front + 288 kW rear) | 508 kW total | 866 Nm | 3.23 | 253 |
Again, I can only discuss the Max version, which was the one available to us during the press test drives ahead of the launch.
Here’s my video that goes into details about the Xiaomi YU7:
Xiaomi YU7 Driving Impression
A little further down, I’ll talk about all the technology, connectivity, and user interface in the YU7. As Xiaomi is known for its consumer electronics, I had high expectations in that regard, and I was confident that they would impress me.
The vehicle aspect is where I had more doubts, but I kept an open mind. After all, Xiaomi didn’t even have a vehicle division 5 years ago, and now they have the best-selling premium sedan in the world’s largest auto market.
As I write this, I haven’t had the chance to test the SU7, but I’m trying to get some time in the vehicle before leaving China. Talking to other journalists who have driven it, I’m told that it is a fun and impressive vehicle to drive, but that Xiaomi has also managed to make significant improvements and refinements with the YU7 in a short period of time.

The YU7 is heavy, but with the Max’s more than 500 kW powertrain, the weight disappears instantly when you need to go. The vehicle feels solid and planted to the road, thanks to its low center of gravity, especially at the lowest suspension setting.
Speaking of the suspension, it features a double wishbone in the front and a 5-link independent setup in the back, paired with standard air suspension, which adds 3 inches of adjustable height. For this price point, it’s hard to beat.
We mostly drove the car up and down mountain roads about 3 hours outside of Beijing. I couldn’t reach anywhere near the car’s 253 km/h (157 mph) top speed, but I was able to experience some cornering and handling, and the suspension’s active dampening was useful.
A documentary crew has been following me on my travels in China, and they attempted to film me in a Land Rover Evoque equipped with a crane camera. However, the SUV kept overheating before reaching the top of the 4-km hill climb, whereas the YU7 managed to complete the climb repeatedly all afternoon without issue.
The battery cooling system would be a bit loud, but you would only hear it from the outside, as the cabin isolation is incredible in this car. Xiaomi used double-paned glass everywhere, complemented by active noise canceling. It is exceptionally quiet, which is a big part of a luxury car experience in my book.
Another thing that I’ve found extremely impressive with the YU7 is the level of customization. Even something as simple as regenerative braking can be customized. You have a low, normal, and custom mode. In the custom mode, you can choose to have regen braking anywhere between 0 and 100%. At 100%, it is pretty much one pedal driving.
You can also customize your own driving mode with a ton of different options, including your power distribution from front to back, making the dual motor Max variant a RWD vehicle if you want:

I suggest watching my video about the YU7 for more details on customizing the driving modes.
The head-up display is also highly customizable. It’s not a typical HUD like augmented reality projecting onto the windshield – something the Xiaomi SU7 is equipped with.
The YU7 is instead equipped with a meter-long display that appears to be mounted deep into the dash. It’s an interesting feature that’s genuinely well-implemented. You can set it up to have your instrument cluster information on the driver side, and the position of the display, which almost appears to be floating between the dash and the windshield, is right at the bottom of your field of vision when driving.

The advantage is that everyone inside the car can actually see, unlike an augmented reality heads-up display. With the level customization, it can be useful to all passengers – although primarily the front passenger.
The high level of customization, both at the software level and at the accessory level, makes me feel like YU7 owners could really tune the vehicle to their liking over time, and your experience would get a lot better over the first few months as you learn more about the car.
At the accessory level, Xiaomi even offers a seamless add-on that snaps at the bottom of the main display to add analog buttons for climate control and a media volume dial.
The seats are perforated, ventilated, and extremely comfortable. Both front seats have massaging functions as standard, and they can lie back into zero-gravity position. Yes, even the driver’s seat.

The level of comfort is pretty impressive for a vehicle in that price range.
There’s also a lot of room in the back seats, which are also reclining, albeit not as much as the front seats, but they still go back to 135 degrees:

From the back seat, you can also access an optional mini fridge that fits under the center console. There are also optional mounting systems for tablets to fit behind each of the front seats.
Since Xiaomi has many smart home devices, YU7 owners can also purchase magnetic customizable buttons that can snap onto the center console or the B pillars and they can link into the Xiaomi app to initiate functions inside your car or your home if you have smart devices.
Honestly, there are too many tech and connectivity features in this car to list them out, but I do go through a lot of them in my video review.
The last piece of tech I’ll discuss is the ADAS system, which it is Xiaomi HAD. Xiaomi has packed the YU7 with an impressive ADAS hardware suite that includes one roof-mounted LiDAR with a 200-metre (660 ft) range, one 4D mmWave radar, 11 cameras, and 12 ultrasonic sensors, and uses an Nvidia DRIVE AGX Thor-U chip capable of 700 TOPS.
Xiaomi is not talking about achieving unsupervised self-driving capabilities with this yet, but it is future-proofing with the extensive hardware suite and this is currently only sold in China, which currently doesn’t allow level 3 and up automated systems in consumer vehicles.
We were able to test the current level 2 capacity, which includes automated lane changes on the highway, traffic-aware cruise control, and lane keeping, to a level similar to what I’ve experienced with Tesla Autopilot.

They even have a feature in beta that lets you see what the lidar sensor sees around the road in real-time.
The ADAS system also provides all the active safety features that you expect from a modern vehicle.
While it’s too early for the YU7 to have a safety rating, the SU7 had the highest overall score for any vehicle tested with the 2024 standards in the C-NCAP safety testing results.
For the YU7, Xiaomi developed its own ultra-strong steel alloy to reinforce several parts of the vehicle:


We won’t know until there’s indepent crash testing, but Xiaomi appears to be confident that the YU7 will perform well in those.
Xiaomi YU7 Pricing and availability
I drove the YU7 almost a week ago now, but we had an embargo until the launch event today, and Xiaomi didn’t want to elaborate on the price until CEO Lei Jun took the stage.
However, we had a fairly good idea based on the SU7 pricing and Xiaomi’s apparent attempt to target Tesla’s Model Y in the Chinese market.
Here’s the Xiaomi YU7 pricing per variant:
- YU7 Standard: 253,500 RMB (equivalent to $35,300 USD)
- YU7 Pro: 279,900 RMB (equivalent to $39,000 USD)
- YU7 Max: 329,900 RMB (equivalent to $46,000 USD)

As for availability, deliveries are starting now. I visited the factory yesterday and I saw hundreds of them coming out of it.
For now, the vehicle is only available in China, but Xiaomi is aiming to expand globally starting in 2027.
Electrek’s Take
As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, this was a frustrating test drive because I came out so impressed with this vehicle that I was frustrated knowing there’s no chance I or my friends in Canada and the US could buy it anytime soon due to ridiculous protectionist measures.
Honestly, I would trade my Model 3 performance in a heartbeat for a YU7, but that’s unlikely to happen anytime soon. I’m so impressed, I’m looking into ways to import it in Canada myself.
The form factor is incredible and works beautifully with the design. It packs 100 kWh of energy capacity, which is unprecedented for a vehicle in that price range.
Then, you have an incredibly fast-charging capability, and the vehicle is loaded with tech and connectivity features, all backed by an exceptionally smooth user interface. It’s a hard deal to pass on.
Finally, you add that it is packaged in a fit and finish that is on par, if not better than, what we have come to expect from premium automakers from the West.
Considering how quickly Xiaomi was able to ramp up production of the SU7 to over 30,000 units per month, and despite this, it still has a wait time of over 30 weeks for delivery, even though it is only sold in China, I wouldn’t be surprised if the YU7 becomes as popular, if not more so.
I think it will put a lot of pressure on other premium midsize SUVs in China, especially the Tesla Model Y.
The Xiaomi YU7 embodies why Western automakers are so concerned about Chinese EVs and have lobbied for tariffs on them. They can’t compete with this. At least, not now.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Bosch just made its e-bike motors more powerful (among other upgrades)
Published
5 hours agoon
June 26, 2025By
admin

Bosch eBike Systems, which is Europe’s leading e‑bike drive supplier and powers more than 100 major bike brands, just dropped an impressive suite of upgrades across its Smart System lineup. The stars of the show are enhanced versions of the mid-drive motors in the Cargo Line, Performance Line Speed, Performance Line, and the beefed-up Performance Line SX, all designed to deliver smoother, quieter, and more customizable support.
The highlights? More power, less weight
The Cargo Line of drive systems, intended to provide extra oomph for heavy cargo bikes, now packs up to 100 Nm of torque and 750W of peak power, an upgrade from the previous 85 Nm of torque and 600W peak power rating. It’s also lighter and quieter thanks to gearbox refinements and improved sensors.
Riders can fine-tune their torque or power levels directly in the eBike Flow app, choosing more boost, while accepting trade-offs in battery life and component wear.


The Performance Line Speed motor group, designed for S-pedelecs (Europe’s version of a Class 3 e-bike in the US) that are legal up to 45 km/h or 28 mph) also jumps to 100 Nm of torque and 750W of peak power, offering up to 400% rider-assist power. Again, Bosch gives riders full control through app-configurable settings.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The base Performance Line motors, found in typical city or trekking e‑bikes, retain their improved package but stay at their existing 75 Nm of torque and 600W of peak power, though now come in a lighter 2.8 kg (6.2 lb) unit, which is 400 g (0.9 lb) less than before, making casual riding more natural on a lighter e-bike.
The Performance Line SX motors, often found on gravel or lightweight urban bikes, receive a free OTA firmware boost later this year. Max torque remains at 60 Nm, but peak power jumps to 600W and 400% assist.
Bosch also introduced a larger capacity PowerTube 540 battery with 540 Wh of capacity, all while maintaining the same form factor and weight. The company combined it with seamless “Touch & Go” sharing, a new digital Battery Lock that bricks the battery to make it useless to thieves, and enhanced app integrations, creating a system that now covers city commuting, cargo hauling, and adventurous e-travel, all with more peace of mind.


Electrek’s Take
I think it’s fair to say that Bosch isn’t just pushing motors – they’re building a full ecosystem that they use to differentiate themselves even further from other drive makers in the market. The Smart System ties together drive units, batteries, displays, the eBike Flow app, and dealer service networks. By shifting key custom features (power output, speed limits, battery lock) to software sliders, Bosch is also now making it easier for brands to offer unique experiences for their e-bikes without big or costly hardware changes, which only makes them even more relevant.
While I don’t think Bosch’s latest drive upgrades reinvent e‑biking, they significantly polish it. More power, more precision, more customization – all while keeping weight low and ride smooth – is pretty much exactly what customers have been asking for. With various riding scenarios such as urban commuters hauling kids, cargo riders climbing hills, and weekend urban warriors, these subtly smarter motors bring real, practical value.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Sports2 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike