Connect with us

Published

on

People aged 16 will be able to apply to change their gender in Scotland, while the time required for someone to live in their acquired gender is to be slashed to three months after a controversial bill was passed.

After two long days of debate in the Scottish Parliament, the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill has been passed by 86 votes to 39.

The bill means:

• The minimum age at which someone can apply for a gender recognition certificate (GRC) will be lowered to 16 from 18.

• There will no longer be a need for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria in order to receive a GRC.

• The time required for an applicant to live in their acquired gender will be cut from two years to three months with a three-month reflection period (six months for 16 and 17-year-olds).

However, the bill might still face hold ups, with the UK government already suggesting it could block it gaining Royal Assent.

Read more:
‘Toxic row’ over gender bill exposes division in Scottish parliament –
analysis

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

After two long days of debate in the Scottish Parliament, the controversial Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill has passed.

The bill has proved to be one of the most controversial in Holyrood since devolution but it passed following support from many in the SNP, Greens, Labour and Liberal Democrats.

Protesters took part in demonstrations both for and against the bill outside Holyrood on Wednesday as MSPs went through the final amendments.

And as Alison Johnstone, Holyrood’s presiding officer, announced the result, there were shouts of “shame on you” from the public gallery.

Opponents have raised concerns over its impact on the safety of women and girls, arguing the bill should not have been passed as it fails to protect women’s rights and single-sex spaces.

The UN’s special rapporteur on violence against women and girls said the reforms could allow violent males to “abuse” the system.

But the Scottish government has insisted the legislation will not impact the UK’s Equality Act, which allows trans people to be excluded from single-sex spaces such as changing rooms and shelters.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

SNP on Scotland’s gender reforms

The bill also proved controversial as it means the laws in Scotland will now be different to the rest of the UK.

More than 60 of the 153 amendments were voted on in the first sitting on Tuesday, with the rest the day after.

There were protests from the public gallery when an amendment that would make it harder for sex offenders to apply for a GRC was voted down.

The Scottish Conservatives appeared to be attempting to make the proceedings last as long as possible, tabling four amendments, a motion and a number of points of order before the debate had started – meaning the sitting on Tuesday finished at 12.15am.

The next sitting, which began on Wednesday, ran even later eventually concluding at 1.15am on Thursday morning.

Supporters of the For Women Scotland and the Scottish Feminist Network take part in a demonstration outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh, ahead of the vote on the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill. Picture date: Wednesday December 21, 2022.
Image:
Supporters of the For Women Scotland and the Scottish Feminist Network in a protest ahead of the vote

While First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been a strong supporter of the bill, not all in the SNP have toed the line, with seven MSPs from the ruling party voting against it and two others abstaining at stage one.

Minister Ash Regan was forced to quit over her objection.

MSPs backed a change on Tuesday which means anyone subject to a sexual harm prevention order or sexual offences prevention order will not be allowed to obtain a GRC.

An amendment to ensure applications are paused if an applicant is charged with a sexual offence until their case is disposed of divided members evenly, with the deputy presiding officer voting against it so it was not added to the bill.

The SNP deputy leader in Westminster, Mhairi Black, welcomed the passing of the bill on Twitter, posting the word “finally” along with a trans flag emoji.

Trans rights activist Dylan Hamilton told Sky News: “It [the bill] makes it easier for banking and easier to apply for a passport. I socially transitioned when I was 13, it was pretty obvious for me, I knew I wanted to transition.

“A GRC is sort of an administrative thing, it doesn’t affect your right to spaces, it’s not kind of a ‘pass to be trans’. Transwomen, transmen have been using the toilets of their choice for years, I know I have.”

However, the passage of the bill does not completely clear its path to the statute book.

The Scottish Secretary, Alister Jack, is now able to legally challenge the law if he believes it impacts on the UK, while private groups are also able to take legal action if they wish to do so.

In a statement after the final vote, Mr Jack said the UK government would consider taking it to the Supreme Court.

“We share the concerns that many people have regarding certain aspects of this bill, and in particular the safety issues for women and children,” he said.

“We will look closely at that, and also the ramifications for the 2010 Equality Act and other UK wide legislation, in the coming weeks – up to and including a Section 35 order stopping the bill going for Royal Assent if necessary.”

UK equalities minister Kemi Badenoch has also raised concerns about the impact of the bill on the rest of the country.

Continue Reading

UK

Prince Harry visits war victims in Ukraine

Published

on

By

Prince Harry visits war victims in Ukraine

Prince Harry has visited war victims in Ukraine as part of his work with wounded veterans, a spokesperson has said.

The Duke of Sussex was in central London this week for a Court of Appeal hearing over his security arrangements in the UK.

The visit on Thursday to Lviv in western Ukraine, which has frequently been targeted with Russian missiles, was not announced until after he was out of the country.

Prince Harry visits Superhumans Center in Lviv. Pic: Superhumans Center
Image:
Prince Harry visits Superhumans Center in Lviv. Pic: Superhumans Center

Harry, who served 10 years in the British Army, visited the Superhumans Center, an orthopaedic clinic in Lviv that treats and rehabilitates wounded military personnel and civilians.

The prince, 40, was accompanied by a contingent from his Invictus Games Foundation, including four veterans who have been through similar rehabilitation experiences.

Prince Harry visits Superhumans Center in Lviv, Pic: Superhumans Center
Image:
Harry at the rehabilitation centre in Lviv on Thursday. Pic: Superhumans Center

A spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex said Harry had been invited by the centre’s CEO, Olga Rudneva, a year ago, and at the Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025, which took place in February.

Harry travelled to the centre, which offers prosthetics, reconstructive surgery and psychological help free of charge, to see first-hand the support they provide at an active time of war.

More on Prince Harry

Prince Harry visits Superhumans Center in Lviv, Pic: Superhumans Center
Image:
Prince Harry made an unannounced visit to Ukraine. Pic: Superhumans Center

The duke, who served two tours in Afghanistan, met patients and medical professionals while touring the centre, the spokesperson said.

During his trip to Ukraine, he also met members of the Ukrainian Invictus community, as well as Ukraine’s minister of veterans affairs, Natalia Kalmykova.

Read more from Sky News:
Helicopter crashes into Hudson River near Manhattan
‘Capitulation Day’? How Trump changed his mind on tariffs

The Duke of Sussex arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Pic: PA
Image:
The Duke of Sussex was in London earlier this week.
Pic: PA

Helping wounded soldiers has been one of Harry’s most prominent causes, as he founded the Invictus Games in 2014 to offer wounded veterans the challenge of competing in sports events similar to the Paralympics.

Harry is the second member of the royal family to visit Ukraine since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its smaller neighbour in February 2022.

His aunt, Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh, made an unannounced visit to Ukraine’s capital of Kyiv last year.

Continue Reading

UK

Starmer says government will fund further local grooming gangs inquiries if ‘needed’

Published

on

By

Starmer says government will fund further local grooming gangs inquiries if 'needed'

The government will fund any further local inquiries into the grooming gangs scandal that are deemed necessary, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

However, the prime minister said it is his “strong belief” that the focus must be on implementing recommendations from the Alexis Jay national review before more investigations go ahead.

Politics latest: ‘Our position hasn’t changed’ on tariffs, says minister

It follows a row over whether Labour is still committed to the five local inquiries it promised in January, after safeguarding minister Jess Phillips failed to provide an update on them in a statement to parliament hours before it closed for recess on Tuesday.

Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer joins police officers on patrol in Cambridgeshire. Pic: PA

Instead, Ms Phillips told MPs that local authorities will be able to access a £5m fund to support locally-led work on grooming gangs.

On Thursday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper insisted the “victim-centred, locally-led inquiries” will still go ahead, while a Home Office source told Sky News more could take place in addition to the five.

Speaking to Sky News’ Rob Powell later on Thursday, Sir Keir confirmed that there could be more inquiries than those five but said the government must also “get on and implement the recommendations we’ve already got”.

More on Yvette Cooper

The prime minister said: “Of course, if there’s further local inquiries that are needed then we will put some funding behind that, and they should happen.

“But I don’t think that simply saying we need more inquiries when we haven’t even acted on the ones that we’ve had is necessarily the only way forward.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Yvette Cooper speaks to Sky News

Ms Phillips’s earlier comments led to accusations that the government was diluting the importance of the local inquiries by giving councils choice over how to use the funds.

Sky News understands she was due to host a briefing with MPs this afternoon at 5pm – the second she had held in 24 hours – in an attempt to calm concern amongst her colleagues.

Review recommendations ‘sat on a shelf’

Sir Keir insisted he is not watering down his commitment for the five local enquiries, but said the Jay recommendations were “sitting on a shelf under the last government” and he is “equally committed” to them.

He added: “At the most important level, if there is evidence of grooming that is coming to light now, we need a criminal investigation. I want the police investigation because I want perpetrators in the dock and I want justice delivered.”

In October 2022, Professor Alexis Jay finished a seven-year national inquiry into the many ways children in England and Wales had been sexually abused, including grooming gangs.

Girls as young as 11 were groomed and raped across a number of towns and cities in England over a decade ago.

Prof Jay made 20 recommendations which haven’t been implemented yet, with Sir Keir saying on Thursday he will bring 17 of them forward.

However, the Tories and Reform UK want the government to fund a new national inquiry specifically into grooming gangs, demands for which first started last year after interventions by tech billionaire Elon Musk on his social media platform X.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk wears a 'Trump Was Right About Everything!' hat while attending a cabinet meeting at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 24, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Image:
Elon Musk has been critical of Labour’s response to grooming gangs and has called for a national inquiry. Pic: Reuters

‘Fuelling confusion’

Reform leader Nigel Farage said the statement made by Ms Phillips “was one of the most cowardly things I have ever seen” as he repeated calls for a fresh inquiry.

Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, also told Sky News that ministers were “fuelling confusion” and that the “mess.. could have been avoided if the government backed a full national inquiry – not this piecemeal alternative”.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the government needed to look at “state failings” and she would try and force a fresh vote on holding another national inquiry, which MPs voted down in January.

‘Political mess’

As well as facing criticism from the Opposition, there are signs of a backlash within Labour over how the issue has been handled.

Labour MPs angry with government decision grooming gangs


Photo of Mhari Aurora

Mhari Aurora

Political correspondent

@MhariAurora

With about an hour until the House of Commons rose for Easter recess, the government announced it was taking a more “flexible” approach to the local grooming gang inquiries.

Safeguarding minister Jess Philips argued this was based on experience from certain affected areas, and that the government is funding new police investigations to re-open historic cases.

Speaking on Times Radio, former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission Sir Trevor Phillips called the move “utterly shameful” and claimed it was a political decision.

One Labour MP told Sky News: “Some people are very angry. I despair. I don’t disagree with many of our decisions but we just play to Reform – someone somewhere needs sacking.”

The government has insisted party political misinformation was fanning the flames of frustration in Labour.

The government also said it was not watering down the inquiries and was actually increasing the action being taken.

But while many Labour MPs have one eye on Reform in the rearview mirror, any accusations of being soft on grooming gangs only provides political ammunition to their adversaries.

One Labour MP told Sky News the issue had turned into a “political mess” and that they were being called “grooming sympathisers”.

On the update from Ms Phillips on Tuesday, they said it might have been the “right thing to do” but that it was “horrible politically”.

“We are all getting so much abuse. It’s just political naivety in the extreme.”

Read more:
Grooming gangs: What we know from the data
Fewer criminals set to be jailed amid overcrowding

‘We will leave no stone unturned’

Ms Phillips later defended her decision, saying there was “far too much party political misinformation about the action that is being taken when everyone should be trying to support victims and survivors”.

“We are funding new police investigations to re-open historical cases, providing national support for locally led inquiries and action, and Louise Casey… is currently reviewing the nature, scale and ethnicity of grooming gangs offending across the country,” she said.

“We will not hesitate to go further, unlike the previous government, who showed no interest in this issue over 14 years and did nothing to progress the recommendations from the seven-year national inquiry when they had the chance.

“We will leave no stone unturned in pursuit of justice for victims and will be unrelenting in our crackdown on sick predators and perpetrators who prey on vulnerable children.”

Continue Reading

UK

Government should be ‘ashamed’ over grooming gangs inquiries confusion, says victim’s father

Published

on

By

Government should be 'ashamed' over grooming gangs inquiries confusion, says victim's father

The father of a grooming gang victim has told Sky News the government should be “ashamed” of itself over the confusion surrounding inquiries – accusing it of “messing around with survivors’ lives”.

Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips this week sparked fresh uncertainty over whether regional inquiries into grooming gangs – promised by the government in January – would go ahead.

Following two days of confusion, the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, insisted on Thursday that five local inquiries will take place – and hinted more could follow.

But her comments have done little to reassure Marlon West, whose daughter Scarlett was a victim of sexual exploitation in Manchester.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM challenged on grooming gang inquiry timeline

Ms Phillips’s statement in parliament on Tuesday – which sparked criticism after it failed to mention the reviews – left survivors “so disappointed”, he said.

The uncertainty “makes you dizzy because you get hope and think ‘I’m getting somewhere now’ then they do a U-turn as they’ve done twice this week”, Mr West continued.

“I think they should be ashamed of themselves,” he said. “The government now are messing around with survivors’ lives and campaigners like me.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Govt denies ‘watering down’ grooming gang inquiries

Throughout her ordeal, Scarlett has “been let down by the local authority, by social workers, by the police force,” he said. “With the government, she’s just been let down again. That’s what’s cruel.”

Mr West added he is “really disappointed” in the government’s decision to push forward with the five regional inquiries instead of a statutory, national one.

Marlon West
Image:
Mr West’s daughter Scarlett was a victim of sexual exploitation

He pointed out that police officers and professionals can refuse to give evidence at regional inquiries, whereas national ones can compel them to do so.

“With a statutory inquiry, it’d be more like a [legal] setting,” Mr West said. “Professionals will not be allowed to refuse interviews. They have to attend.

“It needs to [be in a] legal arena where they are compelled to give evidence.”

A family photo of Scarlett
Image:
Scarlett West

His comments came as the prime minister said the government is focussing on implementing the “hundreds” of recommendations from previous inquiries into grooming gangs.

Sir Keir Starmer said: “My strong belief is we’ve got to implement those recommendations.

“At the moment, and under the last government, they just stacked up and sat on a shelf. So they need to be implemented.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gangs: What happened?

Read more:
A timeline of the scandal
What we know from grooming gangs data

Both the prime minister and the home secretary have rejected claims the government’s pledge to hold “victim-centred, locally-led inquiries” is being “watered down”.

Asked by Sky News presenter Anna Jones if that was the case, Ms Cooper replied: “No, completely the opposite.

“What we’re doing is increasing the action we’re taking on this vile crime.”

Sir Keir separately said: “We put the money behind it. We’re not watering it down. We’re committed to that.

“But, I’m equally committed to implementing the recommendations that we’ve got.”

Continue Reading

Trending