
Are the Kraken a legitimate playoff contender? What execs, analysts and the players themselves say
More Videos
Published
2 years agoon
By
adminThere’s always that one surprise NHL team. The success story we don’t see coming.
They’ve gone from missing the playoffs — usually by a sizable margin — to beginning the following season so well that it forces an inevitable question: Are they for real?
This season’s Cinderella turn has belonged to the Seattle Kraken.
Let’s face it: The Kraken’s inaugural 2021-22 season was marred by constant defeat. Seattle never crested past .500 after playing their second game, endured at least six separate streaks with four or more losses and fielded criticism about their expansion draft strategy.
Well, the Kraken are back to issue a rebuttal.
Seattle went into this season’s holiday break sitting third in the Pacific Division with a 18-10-4 record and a .625 points percentage. Around Christmas last season, Seattle was 27th in the league at 10-16-3. Clearly, times have changed. But why? And by how much?
To answer those burning inquiries and others — including how sustainable Seattle’s success is and whether it will lead to a playoff berth — we went straight to the source.
Here’s what Seattle’s players are saying, how executives and analysts view the club and what the Kraken’s underlying numbers can reveal about their impressive sophomore start.
What the players say
It didn’t take long for the Kraken to have an aha! moment.
They had just won five straight games — including three on the road — in late October and early November. All four teams Seattle played had all reached the postseason in 2021-22.
It was a stretch that showed Kraken winger Jordan Eberle how Seattle had transformed.
“I think it’s a process of finding a way of winning games with the team you have,” Eberle said. “I thought last year we had games where we had that game, we were playing that game, winning that game. It was too inconsistent. I don’t know if it was a lack of depth or whatever it may be, but we weren’t consistently doing that.”
Understanding why the Kraken’s players have faith — or even why the team still has skeptics — requires looking back on how Seattle arrived at this stage. The Kraken had to write a new narrative, one in which they were capable of more than just promising glimpses and crushing defeats.
Last season, Seattle struggled for consistent scoring. Seven players accounted for 55% of their goals. That lack of sustained offensive production was compounded further by what Kraken coach Dave Hakstol described in April as a disconnect between their defensive principles and goaltending. Seattle was allowing the fourth-fewest shots and the eighth-fewest high-danger goals per game, while also giving up the eighth-most high-danger goals and ninth-most goals per game.
So, Seattle flipped the script and became one of the league’s more prolific offensive teams, ranking sixth in goals per game (3.53).
That came about through a by-committee approach that really began last season, when the Kraken signed Matty Beniers — the No. 2 pick of the 2021 draft — to an entry-level contract. Beniers joined Seattle following his sophomore season at the University of Michigan and scored nine points in 10 games. It would be a good omen for his — and the Kraken’s — coming year.
Seattle also signed winger Andre Burakovsky and defenseman Justin Schultz in free agency and traded for winger Oliver Bjorkstrand. Burakovsky paces the Kraken with 28 points, while Beniers is third with 25. Bjorkstrand has 16 points in 32 games; Schultz has 17 points in 30 games.
“Right from the beginning, I saw the personnel they had and the different signings they made in the offseason,” Bjorkstrand said. “They had additions like Matty Beniers and so on, and I got excited. I thought it looked like a group that had a lot of potential, and I was excited about being part of this team.”
The Kraken have also seen players such as Will Borgen, Morgan Geekie and Daniel Sprong take on greater roles. Borgen has already scored more points than he did last season and is five games shy of matching what he did last year. Geekie has 13 points in 26 games and is on pace to give the Kraken a bottom-six forward with a 30-point season. Meanwhile, Sprong has 19 points in 25 games and is two points shy of setting a career high.
Add it all up, and Seattle had 16 players with 10-plus points before Christmas. That was more than the league-leading Boston Bruins (13) or Vegas Golden Knights (12).
“That’s been huge having those guys,” Kraken defenseman Carson Soucy said. “It’s also comfortable for them. Last year … there were not always roster spots available. Now, those guys are getting comfortable and you are seeing guys earning their spot and getting used to playing has been huge for them. Good on those guys for being ready night in and night out and having consistency.”
Getting comfortable in Hakstol’s structure is another pillar of Seattle’s success. Eberle said every system and every team has their nuances. It just takes time for players to familiarize themselves with what their coaches want.
The Kraken needed a full-team buy-in to what Hakstol preached, which Soucy claims is now the case. Soucy said the Kraken’s defensive structure has evolved into a system that requires “a lot of skating” and for its centers to always be involved within the defensive zone. And it also takes all five skaters being fully committed.
The results were there through Christmas as Seattle had allowed the third fewest shots per 60 in 5-on-5 play, the ninth-fewest goals per 60 in 5-on-5 and ranked 13th in high-danger goals allowed per 60 in 5-on-5.
“You can tell [when the system works]. You can tell from how tired you are if it is working or not,” Soucy said. “Some games, you are breezing through with forwards closing down plays and checking. I can tell if it is an easier game because my legs do not feel like they are burning.”
1:16
Oliver Bjorkstrand finds the net and 10 seconds later Daniel Sprong scores as the Kraken pad their lead to 3-1.
The Kraken’s maturation also played a part in easing Martin Jones into finding early success. The Kraken signed Jones after Chris Driedger — coming off a rocky NHL season — tore an ACL at the IIHF Men’s World Championships in June. That left Seattle with only Philipp Grubauer and Joey Daccord under contract, and the intention was for Jones to work in tandem with Grubauer moving ahead.
Then Grubauer was injured after playing just five games this season. That left Jones to play in 18 of the Kraken’s first 22 games. He gave them stability, and Jones has already surpassed his win total from last season. Grubauer has recently recovered as well, which has lessened Jones’ workload and given the Kraken a veteran tandem. Driedger could return at some point after January.
That’s why the Kraken’s five-game winning streak against teams that made the playoffs last year was so monumental. Eberle said the team learned it could win in different ways. He said they “stole” the second game but played the way they wanted in the rest of those games.
Winning those games helped establish the Kraken’s confidence in believing they can make the playoffs. Eberle said the mindset earlier in the season was that having a good effort was important. And while that matters, the Kraken also know they must play with more edge and confidence with the realization that the days of being satisfied with good efforts are “behind us.”
But with that confidence comes companionable caution.
“We gotta play 60 minutes most nights to get the win,” Bjorkstrand said. “I don’t think we are a team that can relax on the ice and sneak away with the win. We need to work hard for our wins. Where it can slip out of hand is if we get satisfied and start thinking you are better than what you are. We need to keep it going with the wins we get. You don’t want to go down a bad path.”
What the stats say
Seattle is a long way from where it finished last season.
The Kraken had, through 32 games, a 12.55 goals above expected that ranked third in the NHL (compared to 19th a year ago), an expected goals per 60 of 3.1 (19th) and expected goals-against per 60 of 3.04 (15th). Seattle also ranked second in shooting percentage (11.9%), compared to 27th a season ago (9.0%).
A constant has been the Kraken’s stinginess on defense, reflected in their allowing the fourth-fewest shots in the league (28.1 per game).
“What I see is a capable defensive team that doesn’t give up a lot,” one analytics source said. “They don’t get overwhelmed. They’re not under siege all the time. For the most part, they can play a good defensive game every night. You just need your goaltender to stop [those] stoppable pucks.”
That’s where Seattle has stumbled. The Kraken are 18th in goals-against average (3.21), pointing to one of the larger team issues analysts and analytics experts agree should be addressed: goaltending.
Jones has carried the load in net for Seattle and been just good enough through late December, with a 14-5-3 record, .888 save percentage and 2.99 goals-against average. But will that effort level suffice in the long term?
According to MoneyPuck.com, Jones was the league’s 58th-ranked goaltender (out of 80 total) through those 23 appearances, and he ranked 22nd — out of 25 — in goals saved above expected (-2.3) among goalies with a minimum 20 starts.
Meanwhile, Grubauer has seen only limited action to date, earning a 3-6-1 record with .889 SV% and 3.28 GAA.
“I don’t want to say [goaltending] has held them back, but it’s not performed,” former NHL goalie and current league analyst Marty Biron said. “When you look at Martin Jones, his win-loss record is fantastic, but not his [underlying numbers]. There, you’re not top-20; you’re not even top-30. There’s still improvements to be made in the net, and I think that, to me, [shows] that year after year, Seattle is going to have to build certain parts of their team up. Goaltending and defense may have to be something they look at moving forward.”
An analytics source was more blunt about what they’re seeing from the Kraken thus far.
“I’d be worried about how much pressure is on Seattle’s offense to carry the day,” the source said. “You’re already starting to see that, unless they’re getting three, four, five goals a night, Seattle’s losing games. Or not winning as many tight games or one-goal games. That’s a problem when the second half of the season picks up, teams are settled in and making trades and getting better, and Seattle could wind up in the dust if their most successful formula requires four-plus goals a game. You’re not going to sustain that and you’re certainly not going to get away with it in the playoffs.”
That won’t inevitably be the case for Seattle, though. Every team endures ebbs and flows. Stats are constantly in motion. Right now, only one figure truly matters.
“You can’t complain when you’re winning games,” Biron said. “Even though I think they would like better numbers [overall]. I don’t think goaltending is as good as they want it to be. And you don’t want it to be an issue in the second half of the season to try and keep winning despite putting up not-so-great numbers like that.”
What they’re saying around the league
It’s not that Seattle wasn’t expected to improve upon a lackluster rookie season.
It’s the degree to which they’ve done it so far that’s been most surprising.
“I don’t think anyone could predict the bounce-back that Seattle’s showed this year,” NHL analyst and former player Anthony Stewart said. “I don’t think anyone probably had them in a playoff spot, let alone challenging for the [Pacific] Division, right? Everyone was talking about L.A. and Vancouver being good and possibly San Jose making a push, and here comes Seattle sort of out of nowhere. So it’s very, very surprising. And I think they’ve taken the league by storm.”
Stewart wonders how much of that shock could be attributed to the classic East Coast vs. West Coast bias, wherein Seattle’s accomplished opening would grab more attention playing out in another time zone.
“I don’t think a lot of people are talking about them,” he said. “You sort of mention it in passing, like, ‘Oh, yeah, Seattle is doing pretty good.’ And that’s it. I don’t know if it’s a lack of respect, because they’re playing some good hockey. It’s good to see; it’s a great story this year.”
And these have only been the Kraken’s first chapters. For one executive who spoke with ESPN, there’s a reason to buy what Seattle’s selling.
“They’re not smoke and mirrors,” they said.
What stood out most was the Kraken’s continuity and how players acquired in the offseason such as Burakovsky, Bjorkstrand, Daniel Sprong and Schultz, along with veterans already on the team, gave them balance. That allowed younger players such as Beniers to be around experienced skaters who can “show him and help him.”
“The biggest thing for me is that they have depth,” Biron said. “They were able to put their team together and give themselves more impactful players. And when I say impactful, it doesn’t have to be Connor McDavid impactful. But there’s more players on the team that can change the way a game is being played, so they don’t have to rely on just a handful of guys. That to me has been the biggest change for Seattle.”
And Beniers? The 20-year-old is drawing high praise across the board for a standout freshman season that has put him at the front of this year’s Calder Trophy race.
“When I look at their team, I think, ‘What would it look like without Matty Beniers?’ TSN analyst and former NHL GM Craig Button said. “For me, that’s the guy. Matty doesn’t just rely on offense to contribute. I think Matty Benier has really been significant; I think he’s delivered in a big way.”
Seattle’s new players have seemed to bolster the team’s entire confidence level. One executive pointed out how the Kraken could outplay opponents last season but then be undone by “a bad goal.” It made that executive wonder how much Seattle’s morale was impacted game to game.
But now? He sees the Kraken as “a team that is always on you” because of their suffocating style — one he compared to the Carolina Hurricanes.
That led to praise for Kraken general manager Ron Francis and his front office staff for their offseason moves, including ones that haven’t been widely discussed.
“I have not seen Vince Dunn have very many poor games this year,” the executive said. “He’s a guy people might have forgotten about last year. This year, he is taking a step and becoming a top-four this season, maybe top-two. … Last year, it’s hard to quantify how poor goaltending played into their poor standings.”
0:44
Vince Dunn nets goal vs. Ducks
Seattle has managed to avoid that fate early this season — at least when it comes to their position in the league — but there’s a consensus that the Kraken will eventually be held back by netminding if Francis sticks with the status quo.
“The goaltending is still not very good,” Button said. “Last year, they didn’t have the offensive weapons [they have now]. So when I look at it, they’ve got a lot more offense, they’ve got a lot more capability that allows you to overcome some below-average league goaltending. But you have a team that you don’t want to slip, right? So what’s the bigger problem: not finding a goaltender or paying a price to find a goaltender so your team doesn’t slip? So if you don’t want to slip, then there’s a price to be paid. I think they’ve got to find the solution, I really do. Because I don’t see the solution [in net] coming from within.”
The executive who talked about the goalies insisted the Kraken just need “adequate” goaltending to reach the postseason, though.
“If they [get the goaltending] and injuries don’t hurt them, I don’t see how they are not a playoff team,” the executive said. “I think they will be a tough out in the playoffs.”
The executive concerned about the Kraken handling a playoff push said that has more to do with teams that have not made the playoffs with their current rosters.
“When the games are starting to get more defensive and more clamped down, what direction do they go?” the executive asked. “Do they try to open up the offense or match that stinginess on the defensive side? That comes with experience.”
Getting to the playoffs means navigating what has already been a hectic Western Conference landscape. The Golden Knights, Kraken and Winnipeg Jets all missed the playoffs last season and are currently jockeying for spots, while last year’s conference finalists — the Colorado Avalanche and Edmonton Oilers — were both in the final wild-card spot around Christmas.
Stewart is optimistic Seattle can use the right attitude to work its way into that postseason mix.
“They’re well on their way to [getting that berth],” he said. “They just have to stay the course, right? They just can’t really read the headlines. You’ve got to just continue to put in the work and almost have that underdog mentality, just continue to go to work. I know with the coaching staff that they have, they’re focusing on taking it day by day. If they continue to do that, I think they’ll be just fine in securing their first playoff berth.”
One exec said the Kraken’s strong start does give them a little bit of wiggle room in the event they go through a rough stretch. But at the same time, losing cannot become habitual, as a crowded field of candidates will be desperate down the stretch to secure their spot.
“Everyone has to look around and think, ‘We could win our division, but we could also be ninth with a bad week or two,'” the executive said. “Even the top teams like Vegas, Winnipeg, Dallas, all of them. We’re all looking ahead to think we can win the division and be a playoff team but know with one or two bad weeks, some injuries and a bad goaltending stretch, that we could be in the muck.”
What about just bad goaltending in general? Concerns about that area repeatedly resurface as the most likely obstacle to Seattle potentially seeing its breakout season sour. It would make for a bitter end to this promising tale.
“[The Kraken won’t make playoffs] if they don’t get a better goaltender,” Button said. “And I’m making the distinction — not better goaltending; a better goaltender. And it’s not from within.”
You may like
Sports
Texas coach Steve Sarkisian: Arch Manning has ‘grandpa’s gene’
Published
5 hours agoon
April 18, 2025By
admin
AUSTIN, Texas — Steve Sarkisian enters his fifth season as head coach at Texas with the program facing big expectations after reaching the semifinals of the College Football Playoff in consecutive years.
The Arch Manning era has officially arrived in Austin, as he’ll be the Longhorns’ full-time starting quarterback this fall. Manning is humble enough that he has won over the locker room and self-assured enough that he’ll occasionally wink at Sarkisian after a good play in practice.
“Almost like, ‘Did you like that?'” Sarkisian chuckled about the winks.
With Texas headed into its second season in the SEC, there is a stout roster, strong returning cores on both sides of the ball and the reality of playoff expectations hovering again. There’s also a defense that’s experienced and explosive enough that Sarkisian says, “I don’t think Arch is ever going to have to go into a game thinking we have to outscore ’em.”
We’ll know right away with the Longhorns traveling to Ohio State for the marquee game of Week 1. Here is Sark on Manning, the state of the program and why Texas has established itself as a top 10 program again.
Question: Arch Manning’s moment is finally here. He’s waited patiently for it. He’s the focal point of both the offense and the locker room now. How’s he embraced the new reality?
Sarkisian: I think there’s something that’s unique about Arch. You can watch him throw and you see when you get up on him in person, man, he’s a bigger guy than maybe people think. When you watch him throw, the arm talent and the deep ball is there. Then you watch him move and you’re like, wait, this guy’s a better athlete than I thought. Definitely got grandpa’s gene. It’s not the uncles, he got grandpa’s gene. There’s an infectious leadership that he has, that I don’t want to say is unintentional because he intentionally leads. You can feel that. But the unintentional leadership ability he has, players gravitate to him, they want to be around him.
They like him for who he is, not for the name on the back of his jersey. And I think that’s something that he provides. He’s a fiery guy. He enjoys playing the game. Even in practice he’ll make a throw, and he’ll look over at me and wink at me almost like, ‘Did you like that?’ And so we have really good rapport, but I understand now because of my rapport with him, why the players have really good rapport with him. He just has a natural ability to engage with people.
Q: What’s that rapport like?
Sarkisian: Sometimes it’s verbal, sometimes it’s nonverbal. But I think that’s part of the responsibility as a quarterback that when you look at a quarterback and why is it this position in sports that is so coveted? It’s because your job is really to instill belief in the locker room, your job is to instill belief in an organization or a team or in a staff, and then ultimately your job is to instill belief in a fan base. And I think that he does that very naturally. It’s not something that is manufactured or fabricated. It’s very natural for him to go along with all those other things, the skill set, the ability to do those things. And so, I’m excited for him. I just want to make sure that we’re really strong around him, that he doesn’t feel the weight of the world to have to go perform. I want us to play really well around him to enhance what he’s able to do.
Q: Will there be some grace for growth? Some people already are pegging him the first-team All-SEC quarterback. He’s spent his whole life as a Manning, so he’s prepared, I guess, but do you think he’s prepared for the first interception in Columbus? Or the moment when on-field adversity hits? Do you think he’s ready for the level of both praise and criticism that will come?
Sarkisian: I think one, the exposure he got last season was helpful. He got two career starts. He started as our quarterback in the first SEC game in the history of the school. And those were not all perfect. Granted, there were some great moments. He threw nine touchdowns and almost a thousand yards. There was a couple of bad picks in there, too. And in the end, I think he understands he is not riding the emotional roller coaster of the opinions of others and staying [with a] level of consistency in his approach, in his play, in his ability to pick people up. Easier said than done when you’re not in the real fire of it all. But we are fortunate that he got exposed to some of that, and he threw a couple bad picks, and it was OK.
Q: He missed a few blitz pickups, right?
Sarkisian: Yeah, and he gets hit in the back and things like that. Like he’s learning. And yeah, there’s probably going to be some grace needed. Unfortunately, it’s probably not going to be grace granted outside of our building. Inside of our building, sure, there will be, but outside of the building, the pundits are going to be the pundits, the fans are going to be the fans, the opposing fans are going to be the fans. But inside our building, I think the support that he’s going to get is going to be one that he’ll definitely appreciate.
Q: One impactful change this spring has been Duane Akina being back on the field. He was here from 2001 to 2013 and coached an elite assembly line of defensive backs. What’s it been like having him back?
Sarkisian: Having Coach Akina back has been awesome. It’s been great in the building and the timing felt right. When we lost Blake Gideon [to Georgia Tech], we still had Terry Joseph on staff [and a] connection between he and Pete Kwiatkowski was a perfect fit. I had heard about [Akina] as a coach on the field, but I had never really seen it. And he’s a very kind of even-keel guy in and around the building. But when you watch him coach, the energy that he provides at practice is infectious. It’s what you always wanted in all of your coaches. And so the fact that here’s this guy, the oldest coach in our staff and he’s running to the ball, he’s demanding excellence out of every player, I think has just been infectious. Not only amongst the staff, but I think the respect that the players have, knowing the history and track record that he’s had of great players … here when it was DBU to what he was able to do at Stanford. He’s been an awesome addition.
Q: Identity-wise on defense, will this team be built around the defensive backs?
Sarkisian: I would argue it might be the best position group we have on our team right now from sheer talent. Now we have some experience there with Michael Taaffe coming back, Derek Williams getting healthy, Jelani McDonald‘s experience, Jaylon Guilbeau‘s experience, Malik Muhammad‘s experience. But below those guys, I think our ability to recruit that position the last two years is really evident. The guys look the part, they all are impactful players on special teams and so [Akina has] inherited a really good room of talented players, competitive players that are going to help us down the road.
Q: Texas went through a nearly two-decade drought for first-round offensive linemen. Now there’s a flurry of them coming out and seemingly emerging. How do you feel about the offensive line and skill around Arch?
Sarkisian: We feel good, obviously, on the offensive line. There’s a couple new faces, but again, we got exposure to a couple of those new faces early on. And so the experience of [senior guard] DJ Campbell and [senior interior lineman] Cole Hutson are big. The experience that [sophomore left tackle] Trevor Goosby got, Trevor was blocking real guys in the last month of the season, which was good for him. The emergence of some new faces is going to be good. These guys were all high-level recruits, and now it’s time, and that’s OK.
Q: There has to be some optimism at tailback, right?
Sarkisian: I think that the backfield will be better, in some degree. We got two guys coming off of injuries in CJ Baxter and Christian Clark, and we really think highly of both of them. We have a 1,000-yard rusher coming back, Tre Wisner, and we have a true freshman kid who’s going to be a sophomore in Jerrick Gibson, who played some really significant meaningful snaps in some big games. And so I feel really good about the running back room.
Q: They’ll be some familiar faces at receiver, too, right?
Sarkisian: I think having DeAndre Moore and Ryan Wingo back is going to be big. And then we got some guys that, it’s time to step up and it’s their moment. I would say the one room that we probably have our biggest question mark in is in the tight end room. So the offense is there.
Q: What’s the vibe on the defensive side?
Sarkisian: I think more importantly is who we are on defense and the growth of who we have been as a defensive team from Year 1 through Year 4. Going into Year 5, we have real playmakers on the defensive side of the ball, whether it’s Anthony Hill, Colin Simmons, Trey Moore, and we touched on Michael Taaffe, we touched on Derek Williams and Liona Lefau and Ethan Burke. We have some real players on the defensive side of the ball, to where I don’t think Arch is ever going to have to go into a game thinking we have to outscore ’em. We need to play good football, and as a team we can win a lot of games. It’s not going to feel like the weight of the world where if we don’t score 40, we’re in trouble. We’re going to be in plenty of high-level games where 24, 28 points is going to be good enough to win. Now do we want to score 35, 42, 49? Of course. But I don’t think we’re always going to have to. It’s managing some of those games the right way to make sure that our defense can play to their ability.
Q: Let me wrap with a macro question. How do you feel going into Year 5? At age 51, you’ve said you were ready for this job as a head coach, having endured some adversity in your career. Can you reflect on the collision of the consistency you’ve had the last few seasons with your preparedness and maybe where you see it’s going at this moment?
Sarkisian: You never know why you’re really here. Why are you hired? There’s been great coaches before. All guys who have been really successful at other places. Why weren’t they as successful here? And then: Why are you here now? And I jokingly say, this administration thinks they hired you for a reason, and what the issues were, but in reality, a lot of times they don’t know because they’re not looking behind the curtain. They don’t know. And as we’ve gone through this journey going into Year 5, we’ve really tried to look forward and be forward thinking rather than look backwards and say what’s wrong? What was wrong? What’s going to be right?
And along the way, there’s been all these changes in college football that have happened, right? Literally, we got hired in the middle of COVID. So we were dealing with COVID. We were dealing with the new facility getting built. We didn’t have a team room, we didn’t have a locker room, I didn’t have an office. Then here comes, they say the transfer portal, but nobody really knew what that was and so we didn’t really know how to tap into it. Then here comes conference realignment, and we’re in the midst of moving from the Big 12 to the SEC. Then here comes College Football Playoff expansion, and we’re going from four teams to 12. Then here comes NIL, and what does NIL look like? And here comes collectives and how do you manage collectives and what that looks like. And now here comes revenue share. And now here comes a potential different expansion to the College Football Playoff.
We’re forever evolving. And so the one thing that we’ve tried to do, like I said, is be forward thinking. And not playing catch up, but in essence, think about where are we headed and how do we continually adapt and do what’s best for our players and do what’s best for our team and try to minimize the noise outside the building and focus on what we’re doing here with the players we recruit, with the staff that we hire, with the expansion of the recruiting department and the scouting department with the evolution of understanding how do you manage NIL money to now? How do you manage a cap space and what does that look like, and be ahead of it all, which I think that’s something we’ve done a pretty good job of. We were one of the very first, when NIL got presented, we were one of the very first of utilizing that. … And then how do we still recruit the high schools and believe in high school recruiting to build our culture and to start that process.
Q: That makes sense here, right?
Sarkisian: And I look back at my time with Pete Carroll [at USC] and how important that was in that seven-, eight-year run of the development of players and the old players teaching the younger players. And then I looked at what Nick [Saban] did and how that [Alabama] roster turned itself over, but yet how did he hire really good coaches year after year? Because the cycle of success is you’re going to lose people.
And so we try to tap into history to look to the future. And so far, so good. And we haven’t been perfect, and I don’t pretend us to be perfect, but I do think we’ve done things, a lot of things really well that have allowed us to stay at the forefront of college football. And again, when I got here, I didn’t want to be a one-hit wonder. I didn’t want to live in the portal — one year we’re good and the next year we’re not. We wanted to build something that could sustain and that in my opinion is high school recruiting. We surely have tapped into the free agent market through the transfer portal to fill needs. And I think we’ve had a really good balance there. And ultimately, sure, I want to win a national championship. There’s no question about it. But the fact that we went from 5-7 to 8-5 to … in the semifinals two years in a row, I think lends itself to the consistency of our program and the foundation of our program. Now granted, we want to get into that [title] game, and we want to win that game, but I think we’ve built something here that’s going to be long lasting, that’s going to be sustainable.
And I’ve been telling everybody, my goal is to retire here and I’m 51 today, and I hope I can coach a long, long time. But the only way to do that is to have continued success because here the standard is a standard. You either compete and win championships or you don’t. There’s not a lot of gray area. And so to do that, you got to have the right amount of energy, you got to have the right people around you and allow them to do their jobs. You got to recruit the right people so that you don’t take those massive drops. You might have a blip on the radar, but yet we sustain it in a way that we’re proud of. And I think we’re doing that. But like I said, there’s always more work to do.
Sports
Red Sox activate 3B Bregman, reassign Fulmer
Published
5 hours agoon
April 18, 2025By
admin
-
Field Level Media
Apr 18, 2025, 03:53 PM ET
The Boston Red Sox activated third baseman Alex Bregman off the paternity list Friday, while right-hander Michael Fulmer was designated for assignment.
In other moves, the Red Sox recalled right-hander Hunter Dobbins, while infielder/outfielder Nick Sogard was optioned.
Bregman, 31, last played Tuesday when he went 5-for-5 with a pair of home runs and four RBIs in Boston’s 7-4 victory over the Tampa Bay Rays. In his first 19 games with the club since signing as a free agent in the offseason, he was batting .321 with four home runs and 16 RBIs.
He and his wife, Reagan, welcomed their second son this week.
Fulmer, 32, made his Red Sox debut Monday and gave up three runs in 2⅔ innings. A former starter for the Detroit Tigers, he is 37-50 with a 3.96 ERA in 263 appearances (90 starts) over eight career seasons.
He won the 2016 American League Rookie of the Year with the Tigers.
Dobbins, 25, made his major league debut for the Red Sox on April 6 and pitched five innings and gave up two runs. He got the win in an 18-7 victory over the St. Louis Cardinals. Sogard, 27, played in 31 games as a rookie last season and batted .273 with four doubles and eight RBIs.

-
ESPN News Services
Apr 17, 2025, 09:31 PM ET
NEW YORK — Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred met this week at the White House with President Donald Trump.
“President Trump is a longtime fan of baseball,” MLB said in a statement Thursday. “As he has done in the past, Commissioner Manfred was pleased to visit the White House again to discuss issues pertaining to baseball with the president.”
The meeting took place Wednesday and was first reported by The Washington Post.
Manfred’s visit to the White House came after Trump said in February that he would pardon baseball great Pete Rose and criticized MLB for barring the all-time hits leader from the sport’s Hall of Fame for gambling.
An investigation for MLB by lawyer John M. Dowd found Rose placed numerous bets on the Cincinnati Reds to win from 1985 to ’87 while playing for and managing the team. Following the investigation, Rose agreed to go on baseball’s permanent ineligible list. People on the list are not eligible for election to baseball’s Hall of Fame.
Jeffrey Lenkov, a Southern California lawyer who represented Rose prior to his death at age 83, filed a petition on Jan. 8 to reinstate Rose’s eligibility. Manfred in 2015 rejected a previous petition for reinstatement by Rose.
“Over the next few weeks I will be signing a complete pardon of Pete Rose, who shouldn’t have been gambling on baseball, but only bet on his team winning,” Trump posted on Truth Social in February. “He never betted against himself, or the other team. He had the most hits, by far, in baseball history, and won more games than anyone in sports history.”
Trump did not say what the pardon would cover. Rose served five months in prison after pleading guilty to tax evasion charges in 1990.
A 17-time All-Star, Rose is the career leader with 4,256 hits. He also holds the major league record for games played (3,562) and plate appearances (15,890). He was the 1973 National League MVP and played on three World Series winners.
The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.
Trending
-
Sports2 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway